Effects of gradual soil drought stress on the growth, biomass partitioning, and chlorophyll fluorescence of Prunus mongolica seedlings

The present studyaimed to determine the effects of gradual drought stress on Prunus mongolica seedlings. The growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of the seedlings were investigated under drought and control conditions. The short-term (21 day) decline in soil water content from 30.46% to 15.55% did not significantly influence the growth of P. mongolica seedlings but increased the height, basal diameter, crown, leaf number, stem mass, leaf mass, and root mass of the seedlings. The growth of the drought group reached the maximum, but remained lower than that of the control group, within 21 days. Compared with the control group, the drought group showed 1.46%, 9.65%, 9.44%, 5.19%, 29.09%, 19.20%, and 0.03% lower height, basal diameter, crown, leaf number, stem mass, leaf mass, and root mass, respectively. With the gradual manifestation of soil drought through the decline in soil water content from 15.55% to 11.38% from 21 days to 42 days, growth of the drought group became significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The minimal fluorescence decreased and then increased, whereas the nonphotochemical quenching initially increased and then decreased. Thus, P. mongolica can protect the PSII reaction center from damage at the early stage of drought stress. The maximal fluorescence,the maximum quantum yield of PSII, and the photochemical quenching slightly decreased during the initial period of drought stress. These results suggest that drought can slightly influence the openness of PSII reaction centers. This influence was further proven by the decreased quantum yield of PSII. This study provided insights into the adaptive mechanism of P. mongolica seedlings under drought and may serve as a theoretical basis to protect the P. mongolica population. Comparing these responses is crucial for elucidating the drought-tolerance mechanisms in P. mongolica cultivars.

Effects of gradual soil drought stress on the growth, biomass partitioning, and chlorophyll fluorescence of Prunus mongolica seedlings

The present studyaimed to determine the effects of gradual drought stress on Prunus mongolica seedlings. The growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of the seedlings were investigated under drought and control conditions. The short-term (21 day) decline in soil water content from 30.46% to 15.55% did not significantly influence the growth of P. mongolica seedlings but increased the height, basal diameter, crown, leaf number, stem mass, leaf mass, and root mass of the seedlings. The growth of the drought group reached the maximum, but remained lower than that of the control group, within 21 days. Compared with the control group, the drought group showed 1.46%, 9.65%, 9.44%, 5.19%, 29.09%, 19.20%, and 0.03% lower height, basal diameter, crown, leaf number, stem mass, leaf mass, and root mass, respectively. With the gradual manifestation of soil drought through the decline in soil water content from 15.55% to 11.38% from 21 days to 42 days, growth of the drought group became significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The minimal fluorescence decreased and then increased, whereas the nonphotochemical quenching initially increased and then decreased. Thus, P. mongolica can protect the PSII reaction center from damage at the early stage of drought stress. The maximal fluorescence,the maximum quantum yield of PSII, and the photochemical quenching slightly decreased during the initial period of drought stress. These results suggest that drought can slightly influence the openness of PSII reaction centers. This influence was further proven by the decreased quantum yield of PSII. This study provided insights into the adaptive mechanism of P. mongolica seedlings under drought and may serve as a theoretical basis to protect the P. mongolica population. Comparing these responses is crucial for elucidating the drought-tolerance mechanisms in P. mongolica cultivars.

___

  • Anyia AO, Herzog H (2004). Water-use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under midseason drought. Eur J Agron 20: 327–339.
  • Arora A, Sairam RK, Srivastava GC (2002). Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems in plants. Current Sci 82: 1227–1238.
  • Barbara EK, Nora LE, Edith S (2014). Compartment specific response of antioxidants to drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci 227: 133–144.
  • Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E (2003). A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurements of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51: 335–380.
  • Dias PC, Araujo WL, Moraes GA, Barros RS, DaMatta FM (2007). Morphological and physiological responses of two coffee progenies to soil water availability. J Plant Pysiol 164: 1639–
  • Franca MG, Pham TT, Pimentel C, Rossiello ROP, Fodil YZ, Laffray D (2000). Differences in growth and water relation among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induces water stress. Environ Experi Bot 43: 227–337.
  • Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L (2004). Response of seedlings of two Eucalyptus and three deciduous tree species from Ethiopia to severe water stress. Forest Eco Manag 201: 119–129.
  • Gratani L, Varone L (2004). Leaf key traits of Erica arborea L., Erica multiflora L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. co-occurring in the Mediterranean maquis. Flora 199: 58–69.
  • Hong Yu, Zou LL, Zhu QF (2010). Community structure characteristics of endangered plant Prunus mongolica. Chinese J Eco 29: 1907–1911.
  • Kage H, Kochler M, Stützel H (2004). Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress conditions: measurement and simulation. Eur J Agron 20: 379–394.
  • Kavas M, Baloğlu MC, Akça O, Köse FS, Gökçay D (2013). Effect of drought stress on oxidative damage and antioxidant enzyme activity in melon seedlings. Turk J Biol 37: 491–498.
  • Li FL, Bao WK, Wu N, You C (2008). Growth, biomass partitioning, and water-use efficiency of a leguminous shrub (Bauhinia faberi var. microphylla) in response to various water availabilities. New Forest 36: 53–65.
  • Li FL, Bao WK, Wu N (2009). Effects of water stress on growth, dry matter allocation and water-use efficiency of a leguminous species, Sophora davidii. Agroforest Syst 77: 193–201.
  • Li GL, Wu HX, Sun YQ, Zhang XY (2013). Response of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to drought stress in sugar beet seedlings. Russ J Plant Physl 60: 337–342.
  • Liu D, Wu LT, Muhammad NS, Liu HB, Deng XQ, Xu L, Zhang F, Zhou WJ (2013). 5-Aminolevulinic acid enhances photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant system in oilseed rape under drought stress. Acta  Physiol Plant 35: 2747–2759.
  • Ma J, Ni X, Shi HY, Liu WZ (2010). Flowering biology of Amygdalus mongolica. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 30: 1134–1141.
  • Ma SM, Nie YB, Geng QL, Wang RX (2014). Impact of climate change on suitable distribution range and spatial pattern in Amygdalus mongolica. Chinese J Plant Eco 38: 262–269.
  • Masinde PW, Stützel H, Agong SG, Fricke A (2006). Plant growth, water relations and transpiration of two species of African nightshade (Solanum villosum Mill. ssp. miniatum (Bernh. ex Willd.) Edmonds and S. sarrachoides Sendtn.) under water- limited conditions. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 110: 7–15.
  • Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51: 659–668.
  • Ogbonnaya CI, Nwalozie MC, Roy-Macauley H, Annerose DJM (1998). Growth and water relations of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under water deficit on a sandy soil. Ind Crop Prod 8: 65–76.
  • Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Jorquera MJ (2009). Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs. Plant Eco 204: 261–270.
  • Rampino P, Pataleo S, Gerardi C, Mita G, Perrotta C (2006). Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Environ 29: 2143–2152.
  • Royo A, Gil L, Pardos JA (2001). Effect of water stress conditioning on morphology, physiology and field performance of Pinus halepensis Mill seedlings. New Forest 21: 127–140.
  • Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi M, Cervilla LM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Rosales MA, Romero L, Ruiz JM (2010). Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci 178: 30–40.
  • Saruhan GN, Sağlam A, Demiralay M, Kadıoğlu A (2012). Apoplastic and symplastic solute concentrations contribute to osmotic adjustment in bean genotypes during drought stress. Turk J Biol 36: 151–160.
  • Siqinbateer, Xiu M (2007). Hydrological characteristic of the desert plant Prunus mongolica on the Mongolian plateau of China. J Plant Eco 31: 484–489.
  • Van Kooten O, Snel JFH (1990). The use of chlorophyll nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25: 147–150.
  • Wang WL, Wan YJ, Liu B, Wang GX, Tang XY, Chen X, Liang B, Zhuang W (2013). Influence of soil gradual drought stress on Acorus calamus growth and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics. Acta Ecologica Sinica 33: 3933–3940.
  • Wu GL, Duan RY, Wang ZG, Zhang ZX, Wu LF (2010). Effects of drought stress and rehydration on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Acta Ecologica Sinica 30: 3941–3946.
  • Yin CY, Wang X, Duan BL, Luo J, Li C (2005). Early growth, dry matter allocation and water use efficiency of two sympatric Populus species as affected by water stress. Environ Exp Bot 53: 315–322.
  • Zhang J, Wang J, Li HY, Zhang HR, Wang YC (2012). Genetic diversity of different eco-geographical populations in endangered plant Prunus mongolica by ISSR Markers. Acta Ecological Sinica 32: 4443–4452.
  • Zhang YJ, Xie ZK, Wang YJ, Su PX, An LP, Gao H (2011). Effect of water stress on leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and growth of Oriental lily. Russ J Plant Physl 58: 844–850.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Designing a bacterial biosensor for detection of mercury in water solutions

AMIR ROOINTAN, NOOSHIN SHABAB, JAMSHID KARIMI, ALIREZA RAHMANI, MOHAMMAD YOUSEF ALIKHANI, MASSOUD SAIDIJAM

Optimization of multiplex RT-PCR for M1, M23, and M23X splice variants of AQP4 and β-actin transcripts in Dalton's lymphoma mouse tissues

Rajaneesh Kumar GUPTA, Sukala PRASAD

The biochemical and histoanatomical response of some woody species to anthropic impact in Suceava County, Romania

ELENA CIORNEA, IRINA BOZ, ELENA IONEL, SABINA IOANA COJOCARU, GABRIELA DUMITRU

Genetic integrity assessment of cryopreserved tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes

ANA COSTE, DANA SUTEU, IOAN BACILA, CONSTANTIN DELIU, SERGIU VALIMAREANU, ADELA HALMAGYI

Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal properties of silver and copper nanoparticles

AZAM JAFARI, LATIFEH POURAKBAR, KHALIL FARHADI, Lida MOHAMMAD GHOLIZAD, YOBERT GOOSTA

Use of in vitro propagation of `Obla?inska? sour cherry in rootstock breeding

DUSICA DORIC, VLADISLAV OGNJANOV, GORAN BARAC, MIRJANA LJUBOJEVIC, ANKICA PRANJIC, KRUNOSLAV DUGALIC, SEZAİ ERCİŞLİ

Y chromosome genetic diversity and breed relationships in native Polish cattle assessed by microsatellite markers

BEATA PRUSAK, WIOLETTA SAWICKA-ZUGAJ, AGNIESZKA KORWIN-KOSSAKOWSKA, TOMASZ GRZYBOWSKI

Ghrelin effects on midgut tissue antioxidative defense and glutathione S-transferase activity in Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera)

VESNA PERIC MATARUGA, MILENA VLAHOVIC, MARIJA MRDAKOVIC, DRAGANA MATIC, ANJA GAVRILOVIC, ALEKSANDRA MRKONJA, LARISA ILIJIN

Antioxidant activity of heme oxygenase 1 in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.(Indian mustard) under salt stress

KHUSHBU VERMA, SHUBHAM DIXIT, GYAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT, AFROZ ALAM

Storage temperature of boar semen and its relationship to changes in sperm plasma membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and oxidoreductive capability

DARIUSZ GACZARZEWICZ, JAN UDALA, MALGORZATA PIASECKA, BARBARA BLASZCZYK, TOMASZ STANKIEWICZ