Comparative Genotoxic Potential of Mercury and Cadmium in Soybean

Genotoxic effects of two heavy metals viz. mercury (Hg) and cadmium (Cd) on somatic and gametic cells of soybean were investigated. Seeds were treated with different doses of these heavy metals. Treatments with Hg and Cd not only reduced the frequency of dividing cells but a wide spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities were also recorded. Pollen fertility was found to be significantly correlated with meiotic irregularities found in the metal treatment sets. It was found that both of these heavy metals are capable of inducing chromosomal aberrations, but Hg is much more genotoxic than Cd, since it induces greater abnormalities.

Comparative Genotoxic Potential of Mercury and Cadmium in Soybean

Genotoxic effects of two heavy metals viz. mercury (Hg) and cadmium (Cd) on somatic and gametic cells of soybean were investigated. Seeds were treated with different doses of these heavy metals. Treatments with Hg and Cd not only reduced the frequency of dividing cells but a wide spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities were also recorded. Pollen fertility was found to be significantly correlated with meiotic irregularities found in the metal treatment sets. It was found that both of these heavy metals are capable of inducing chromosomal aberrations, but Hg is much more genotoxic than Cd, since it induces greater abnormalities.

___

  • Matsumoto ST, Marin-Morales MA. Mutagenic potential evaluation of the water of a river that receives tannery effluent using the Allium cepa test system. Cytologia 69: 399-408, 2004.
  • George NM. Evaluation on mutagenic effects of the three heavy metals on Vicia faba plants. Cytologia 65: 75-82, 2000.
  • Kovacs M, Podani J. Bioindication: A short review on the use of plants as indicators of heavy metals. Acta Biologica Hungarica 37: 19-29, 1986.
  • Harden RM. The learning environment and the curriculum. Med Teach 23: 335-336, 2001.
  • Steffensen D. Effect of various cation imbalances on the frequency of X-ray induced chromosomal aberrations in Tradescantia. Genetica 42: 239-252, 1956.
  • Al Achkar W, Sabatier L, Dutrillaux B. How are sticky chromosomes formed? Annu. Genet 32: 10-15, 1989.
  • Eriksson G. Temperature response of pollen mother cells in Larix and its importance for pollen formation. Stud Forest Suec 63: 1- 132, 1968.
  • Badr A, Ibrahim AG. Effect of herbicide Glean on mitosis, chromosomes and nucleic acids in Allium cepa and Vicia faba root meristems. Cytologia 52: 293-302, 1987.
  • Caetano-Pereira CM, Pagliarini MS, Brasil EM et al. Influence of aluminium in causing chromosome stickiness in maize microsporocytes. Maydica 40: 325-330, 1995.
  • Klasterska I, Natrajan AT. Stickiness in Rosa meiosis induced by hybridization. Caryologia 28: 81-88, 1975.
  • Rao PN, Kanganadhaam P, Nirmala A. Behaviour of sticky desynaptic mutant in pearl millet. Genetica 81: 221-227, 1990.
  • Zanella CC, Bodanes-Zanettini MH, Moraes-Fernandes MIB et al. Differential effect of soil acidity and lime treatment on the chromosomes of two wheat cultivars. Rev Bras Gen 14: 1021- 1032, 1991.
  • Evans HJ. Chromosome aberrations induced by ionizing radiations. Int Rev Cytol 13: 221-232, 1962.
  • Jayabalan N, Rao GR. Gamma radiation induced cytological abnormalities in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Var. Pusa Ruby. Cytologia 52: 1-4, 1987.
  • Gaulden ME. Hypothesis: Some mutagens directly alter specific chromosomal proteins (DNA topoisomerase II and peripheral proteins) to produce chromosome stickiness, which causes chromosome aberrations. Mutagenesis 2: 357-365, 1987.
  • Rao NB, Laxmi V. Gamma ray induced meiotic abnormalities in Capsicum annuum L. Caryologia 33: 509-518, 1980.
  • Amer SM, Farah OR. Cytological effects of pesticides. X. Meiotic effects of “Phosvel”. Cytologia 45: 241-245, 1980.
  • Singh SD, Singh Y, Singh RB et al. Meiotic irregularities induced by insecticide treatments in barley (Hordeum Vulgare). J Cytol Genet 13: 125-128, 1978.
  • Gottschalk W, Kaul MLH. Asynapsis and desynapsis in flowering plants. Asynapsis. Nucleus 23: 1-15, 1980a.
  • Gottschalk W, Kaul MLH. Asynapsis and desynapsis in flowering plants. Desynapsis. Nucleus 23: 97-120, 1980b.
  • Koduru PKR, Rao MK. Cytogenetics of synaptic mutants in higher plants. Theor Appl Genet 59: 197-214, 1981.
  • umar G, Singh V. Comparative analysis of meiotic abnormalities induced by gamma rays and EMS in barley. J Ind Bot Soc 82: 19- 22, 2003. Stebbins GL. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press; 1950. Koduru PRK, Rao MK. Cytogenetics of synaptic mutants in higher plants. Theor Appl Genet 59: 197-214, 1981.
  • Khazanehdari KA, Jones GH. The causes and consequences of meiotic irregularity in the leek (Allium ampeloprasum spp. Porrum) implications for fertility, quality and uniformity. Euphytica 93: 313-319, 1997.
  • Singh RJ, Hymowitz T. Identification of four primary trisomics of soybean by pachytene chromosome analysis. J Hered 82: 75-77, 1991.