Effect of Storage Time on Some Mechanical Properties and Bruise Susceptibility of Pears and Apples

This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of storage time on some mechanical properties and bruise susceptibility of Williams and Ankara varieties of pear and Starkspur Golden Delicious and Starking varieties of apple. The research was performed in 2 stages. Firstly, compression tests were conducted to determine the mechanical properties of fruits. Secondly, an impact test was used to determine the bruise susceptibility of test materials. Impact tests were performed using a pendulum with 50 cm arm length. The tests were carried out at 5 storage times (harvest day, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th month) and 3 drop heights for the impact tests (10, 15 and 20 cm). During the compression tests, a curve-ended cylindrical probe with 8 mm diameter was used to compress the fruit at 7 mm min-1 load velocity. Results of the compression tests indicate that the bioyield point force, modulus of elasticity and deformation energy of the pear and apple varieties decreased with increasing storage time. Modulus of elasticity decreased from 1.68 to 0.51 MPa for Williams, from 1.34 to 0.8 MPa for Ankara, from 1.45 to 0.88 MPa for Starkspur Golden Delicious and from 1.51 to 1.1 MPa for Starking with increasing storage time. The impact test results show that the bruise susceptibility values of Ankara and Starking are higher than those of the other varieties when a comparison is made between 2 varieties. The bruise susceptibilities of Williams and both apple varieties tended to decrease with increasing storage time, whereas that of Ankara increased. According to the analyses of variance results, variety and storage time are significant for the bioyield point force, modulus of elasticity, bruising volume, absorbed energy and bruise susceptibility. Furthermore, drop height significantly affected the bruise susceptibility of Ankara, while there was no significant effect on bruise susceptibility for Williams or the 2 apple varieties.

Effect of Storage Time on Some Mechanical Properties and Bruise Susceptibility of Pears and Apples

This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of storage time on some mechanical properties and bruise susceptibility of Williams and Ankara varieties of pear and Starkspur Golden Delicious and Starking varieties of apple. The research was performed in 2 stages. Firstly, compression tests were conducted to determine the mechanical properties of fruits. Secondly, an impact test was used to determine the bruise susceptibility of test materials. Impact tests were performed using a pendulum with 50 cm arm length. The tests were carried out at 5 storage times (harvest day, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th month) and 3 drop heights for the impact tests (10, 15 and 20 cm). During the compression tests, a curve-ended cylindrical probe with 8 mm diameter was used to compress the fruit at 7 mm min-1 load velocity. Results of the compression tests indicate that the bioyield point force, modulus of elasticity and deformation energy of the pear and apple varieties decreased with increasing storage time. Modulus of elasticity decreased from 1.68 to 0.51 MPa for Williams, from 1.34 to 0.8 MPa for Ankara, from 1.45 to 0.88 MPa for Starkspur Golden Delicious and from 1.51 to 1.1 MPa for Starking with increasing storage time. The impact test results show that the bruise susceptibility values of Ankara and Starking are higher than those of the other varieties when a comparison is made between 2 varieties. The bruise susceptibilities of Williams and both apple varieties tended to decrease with increasing storage time, whereas that of Ankara increased. According to the analyses of variance results, variety and storage time are significant for the bioyield point force, modulus of elasticity, bruising volume, absorbed energy and bruise susceptibility. Furthermore, drop height significantly affected the bruise susceptibility of Ankara, while there was no significant effect on bruise susceptibility for Williams or the 2 apple varieties.

___

  • Abbott, J.A. and R. Lu. 1996. Anisotropic mechanical properties of apples. Transactions of the ASAE, 39: 1451-1459.
  • Agricultural Engineers Yearbook. 1994. Compression test of food materials of convex shape., ASAE Standard: ASAE S368.2, p. 472-475, St. Joseph, Michigan.
  • Aydın, C. 1989. Amasya Elma Çeflidinin Tarım Tekniği Yönünden Önemli Fiziko-Mekanik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, p. 66.
  • Aydın, C. and K. Çarman. 1998. Elmalar arasında çarpıflma enerjisine bağlı olarak zedelenmenin saptanması. Tarımsal Mekanizasyon 18. Ulusal Kongresi, Tekirdağ, pp. 773-778.
  • Chen, P., M. Ruiz, F. Lu and A.A. Kader. 1987. Study of impact and compression damage on Asian pears. Transaction of the ASAE 30: 1193-1197.
  • Diener, R.G., K.C. Elliott, P.E. Nesselroad, M. Ingle, R.E. Adams and S.H. Blizzard. 1979. Bruise energy of peaches and apples. Transactions of the ASAE, 287-290.
  • Garcia, J.L., M. Ruiz-Altisent and P. Barreiro. 1995. Factors influencing mechanical properties and bruise susceptibility of apples and pears. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 61: 11-17.
  • Hyde, J.E. and M. Ingle. 1968. Size of apple bruises as affected by cultivar, maturity and time in storage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 92: 733-738.
  • Klein, J.D. 1987. Relationship of harvest date, storage conditions, and fruit characteristics to bruise susceptibility of apple. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 112(1): 113-118.
  • Mohsenin, N.M. 1980. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
  • Öğüt, H. and C. Aydın. 1992. Konya ekolojik flartlarında yetifltirilen bazı elma çeflitlerinin Poisson oranı ve elastikiyet modüllerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2: 39- 53, Konya.
  • Özbek, S. 1978. Özel Meyvecilik (Kıflın Yaprağını Döken Meyve Türleri). Çukurova Üniversitesi Yayın No: 128, Ders Kitabı No: 11, Adana.
  • Parke, D. 1963. The resistance of potatoes to mechanical damage caused by impact loading. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 8: 173-177.
  • Pasini, L., L. Ragni, A.D. Rombola, A. Berardinelli, A. Guarnieri and B. Marangoni. 2004. Influence of the fertilization system on the mechanical damage of apples. Biosystems Engineering, 88: 441- 452.
  • Schoorl, D. and J.E. Holt. 1978. The effects of storage time and temperature on the bruising of Jonathan, Delicious and Granny Smith apples. J. Texture Studies, 8: 409-416.
  • Schoorl, D. and J.E. Holt. 1980. Bruise resistance measurements in apples. J. Texture Studies, 11: 389-394.
  • Tarımsal Yapı (Üretim, Fiyat, Değer). 2000. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Baflbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Topping, A.J. and M.T. Luton. 1986. Cultivar differences in the bruising of English apples. Journal of Horticultural Science, 61: 9-13.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Köyiflleri Bakanlığı Elma Çeflit Katalogu. 1991. Ankara.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Köyiflleri Bakanlığı Armut Çeflit Katalogu. 1993. Ankara.
  • Vursavufl, K. and F. Özgüven. 1999. Determination of the some mechanical properties and susceptibility to bruising damage of apples. 7th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy, Adana, Turkey, pp. 570-575.
  • Vursavufl, K. and F. Özgüven. 2000. Çarpma durumunda elmanın fiziko- geometrik özelliklerinin mekanik zedelenme üzerindeki etkisinin arafltırılması. Tarımsal Mekanizasyon 19. Ulusal Kongresi, Erzurum, pp. 489-494.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK