Productivity and Egg Quality of Two Commercial Layer Hybrids Kept in Free-Range System

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance and egg quality parameters of two layer hybrids (Lohmann Brown and Atak-S) which were reared in free-range system. The experiment was carried out with a total of 300 laying hens. From 18 to 50 weeks of age Lohmann Brown (LB) and Atak-S (AS) were housed in two groups of 150 hens in a poultry house with a stocking density of 7 hens/m2. The 2 trial groups were formed from 10 repetitions each consisting of 15 hens. At the 20, 30, 40 and 50 weeks of ages, the production performance and egg quality parameters were evaluated. Mean daily feed intake and feed efficiency through the trial were 111.2 g vs 124.3 g, and 2.46 vs 2.58 respectively for LB and AS hybrids (P

___

Abrahamsson P, Tauson R. 1997. Effects of group size on performance, health and birds’ use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A— Animal Sciences, 47(4): 254-260

Anderson KE, Tharrington JB, Curtis PA, Jones FT. 2004. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of single comb white leghorn chickens and relationship of egg shape to shell strength. International Journal of Poultry Science 3: 17-19.

Anonymous. 1999. Council Directive 1999/74/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens.

Basmacıoğlu H, Ergül M. 2005. Research on the Factors Affecting Cholesterol Content and Some Other Characteristics of Eggs in Laying Hens The effects of genotype and rearing system. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29(1): 157-164.

Batkowska J, Brodacki A, Knaga S. 2014. Quality of laying hen eggs during storage depending on egg weight and type of cage system (conventional vs. furnished cages). Annals of Animal Science, 14(3): 707-719.

Bozkurt Z. 2009. Kafes ve Alternatif Sistemlerde Yumurtacı Tavukların Refahı. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, 2 (1): 59-67.

Chowdhury SD. 1990. Shell membrane protein system in relation to lathyrogen toxicity and copper deficiency. World's Poultry Science Journal, 46(2): 153-169.

Denli M, Bukun B, Tutkun M. 2016. Comparative performance and egg quality of laying hens in enriched cages and free-range systems. Scientific Papers Series D Animal Science, 59: 29-32.

Dikmen BY, İpek İ, Şahan Ü, Sözcü A, Baycan SC. 2017. Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 41: 77-84

Hester PY. 2005. Impact of science and management on the welfare of egg laying strains of hens. Poultry science, 84 (5): 687-96.

Hocking PM, Bain M, Channing CE, Fleming R, Wilson S. 2003. Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. British Poultry Science, 44(3): 365-373.

Goger H, Demirtas SE, Yurtogullari S. 2016. A selection study for improving eggshell colour in two parent lines of laying hens and their hybrids. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(3): 390-395.

Küçükyılmaz K, Bozkurt M, Herken EN, Çınar M, Çatlı AU, Bintaş E, Çöven F. 2012. Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 25(4): 559.

Leyendecker M, Hamann H, Hartung J, Kamphues J, Ring C, Gluender G, Ahlers C, Sander I, Neumann U, Distl O. 2001. Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and housing systems for performance traits, egg quality and bone breaking strength - 2 nd communication: Egg quality traits. Züchtungskunde, 73: 308-323.

Lymbery P. 1999. European Parliament demands ban on battery cages. Agscene,133, 5.

Mallet S, Guesdon V, Ahmed AMH, Nys Y. 2006. Comparison of eggshell hygiene in two housing systems: Standard and furnished cages. British poultry science, 47(1): 30-35.

Moorthy M, Sundaresan K, Viswanathan K. 2000. Effect of feed and system of management on egg quality parameters of commercial white leghorn layers. Indian Veterinary Journal 77:233-236.

National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Nutrient requirements of laying hens. Ninth Revised Edition.

Rodenburg TB, Tuyttens FAM, Sonck B. 2005. Welfare, Health, and Hygiene of Laying Hens Housed in Furnished Cages and in Alternative Housing Systems. Journal of Applied Anımal Welfare Science. 8(3): 211–226.

Silversides FG, Shaver DM, Song Y. 2006. Pure line laying chickens at the Agassiz Research Centre. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, 40: 79-85.

Singh R, Cheng KM, Silversides FG. 2009. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Science, 88(2): 256-264.

Şekeroğlu A, Sarı̇ca M, Demı̇r E, Ulutas Z, Tı̇lkı̇ M, Saatcı̇ M, Omed H. 2010. Effects of different housing systems on some performance traits and egg qualities of laying hens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(12): 1739-1744.

Taylor AA, Hurnik JF. 1996. The long-term productivity of hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poultry science, 75(1): 47-51.

Tumova E, Skrivan M, Mandak K. 1993. Technological value of eggs of Hisex brown and D-29. Sbornik Vysoke Skoly Zemedelske v Praze. Fakulta Agronomicka. RB Zivocisna Vyroba (Czech Republic).

Türker İ, Alkan S, Akçay S. 2017. Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Commercial Brown Layer Hens in Terms of Yield Characteristics in Free-Range Raising System. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(7): 814-821.

Van Den Brand H, Parmentier HK, Kemp B. 2004. Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. British poultry science, 45(6): 745-752.

Vits A, Weitzenburger D, Hamann H, Distl O. 2005. Influence of different small-group-systems on production traits, egg quality and bone breaking strength of laying hens. 1st communication: Production traits and egg quality. Zuchtungskunde, 77(4): 303-323.

Zita L, Tůmová E, Štolc L. 2009. Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78(1): 85-91.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Phenological, Pomological and Technological Characteristics of Seedless White Mulberry in Mulberry Genetic Resources of Turkey

Erdoğan ÇÖÇEN, HASAN PINAR, AYDIN UZUN, MEHMET YAMAN, Ahmet ASLAN, Oktay Turgay ALTUN

An Investigate on Importance of the Major Components of Herb Essential Oils on Challenging with Fish Diseases

AZİME KÜÇÜKGÜL

Brassinosteroid Uygulamalarının Munstead Lavander Çeşidinde Bitki Gelişimi ile Sekonder Metabolit Üretimi Üzerine Etkileri

ÖZLEM ARAS AŞCI, Hikmet DEVECİ, Alican ERDEĞER, Kübra Nur ÖZDEMİR, Tunhan DEMİRCİ, NİLGÜN GÖKTÜRK BAYDAR

Türkiye’de Yetiştirilen Bazı Sığır Irklarında GHR Geni Bakımından Genetik Çeşitlilik

ÖZDEN ÇOBANOĞLU

Farklı Enerji Kaynaklarında Geliştirilen Bazı Bacillus Suşları Tarafından Üretilen Sekonder Metabolitlerin Antimikrobiyal Etkisi

FERİT CAN YAZDIÇ, Altuğ KARAMAN, FADİME YAZDIÇ

Extension of the Postharvest Life of Nectarine Using Modified Atmosphere Packaging and Potassium Permanganate Treatment

ERDİNÇ BAL

Comparison of Mutton Charollais Lambs and Their Cross Lambs Born from Indigenous Fat Tailed and F1 Prolific Breed Ewes

MÜZEYYEN KUTLUCA KORKMAZ, EBRU EMSEN GİMENEZ DİAZ

The Way of Yield Increasing and Cost Reducing in Agriculture: Smart Irrigation and Fertigation

MUHAMMET KARAŞAHİN, ÖZGÜR DÜNDAR, AHMET SAMANCI

Oğlaklarda Organik Bakır ve Çinko İz Minerallerinin Canlı Ağırlık ile Bu Minerallerin Birikim ve Atılma Düzeyleri Üzerine Etkisi

VADULLAH EREN

Kinetic and Mathematical Modeling of Drying of Asparagus officinalis in Different Drying Methods

İLHAMİ OKUR, CEM BALTACIOĞLU