Mandalarda Mastitis Olgusu

Mastitis manda yetiştiriciliğinde ekonomik kayıplara neden olan önemli bir hastalıktır. Hastalığın şiddeti, süresi ve birincil nedenine göre mastitis, genel olarak klinik ve subklinik olmak üzere ikiye ayrılmaktadır. Subklinik mastitis, sürüdeki diğer hayvanlardan bulaşması nedeni ile önemli bir sürü problemidir. Ancak, klinik mastitis ise memede deformasyonlar ve süt veriminin azalması ile şekillenen klinik bir olgudur. Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactia ve Streptococcus dysgalactia klinik, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus agalactia ve Streptococcus dysgalactia ise subklinik mastitis olaylarında en yaygın olarak izole edilen mikroorganizmalardır. Mandalarda bu mikroorganizmaların neden olduğu mastitis olguları sonucu, sütün yapısında anormallik gözlenmekte ve sütün miktarında meydana getirdiği düşüşle üreticileri ekonomik kayba uğramaktadır. Bu nedenle mastitis üzerine etkili faktörlerin tespit edilmesi ve gerekli önlemlerin alınması büyük önem taşmaktadır. Bu derlemede, mandalarda mastitis olgusu ve etkileri üzerinde durulmuştur.

The Mastitis Case in Water Buffalo

Mastitis is an important disease which causes economic losses in the water buffalo breeding. According to severity, duration and primary, mastitis is generally classified as clinical and subclinical. Because of contamination from other animals in the herd, subclinical mastitis is a important dairy herd problem. However, clinical mastitis is a clinical case created by deformation of udder gland and decreasing milk yield. Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactia and Streptococcus dysgalactia are in clinical mastitis, but Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus agalactia and Streptococcus dysgalactia are the most common isolated microorganisms in subclinical mastitis. Due to mastitis caused by these microorganisms in Water Buffalo, abnormality in the structure of milk are observed, and it causes economic losses to farmers from reduced production. Therefore, the detection of effective factors on mastitis and taking of the necessary precautions are very important. In this review, mastitis case in water Buffalo and its effects were discussed.

___

  • Abd-Elrahman AH. 2013. Mastitis in housed dairy buffaloes: incidence, etiology, clinical finding, antimicrobial sensitivity and different medical treatment against E.coli mastitis. Life Science Journal, 10:532-538.
  • Anand V, Dogra N, Singh S, Kumar SN, Jena MK. 2012. Establishment and Characterization of a Buffalo (Buba/us buba/is) Mammary Epithelial Cell Line. PLoS ONE 7(7): e40469. doi:10.1371/journal. Pone.0040469.
  • Andrews AH, Blowely RW, Royd H, Eddy RG. 1992. Bovine medicine: Disease and husbandry of cattle. Blackwell Publishing Co., 289-300.
  • Anonim. 2000. Türk Gıda Kodeksi, çiğ süt ve ısıl işlem görmüş içme sütleri tebliği (Tebliğ no 2000/6). Resmi Gazete, 14.2.2000, Sayı 23964.
  • Anonim. 2013. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Hayvancılık İstatistikleri (TUİK). http://www.tuik.gov.tr. Erişim Trihi: 02.12.2013/PreHaberBultenleri.doid=1979PreistatistikTablo .doistab_id=140, 141 ve 487. Erişim tarihi: 05.12.2010.
  • Anonim. 2014. National Mastitis Council. Human health risks associated with high somatic cell count milk: symposium summary. [Accessed September 4, 2006]. http://nmconline.org/docs/scchealthrisks.pdf
  • Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJGM, Beiboer ML, Benedictus G, Brand A. 1998. Management Practies Associated with Low, Medium and High Somatic Cell Counts in Bulle Mille. J. Dairy. Sci., 81: 1917-1927.
  • Bartlett PC, Miller GY, Lance SE, Hancock DD, Heider LE. 1992. Managerial Risk Factors of Intramammary Infection with Streptococcus agalactiae in Dairy Herds in Ohio. Am. J. Vet. Res., 53: 1715- 1721.
  • Barth K. 2001. Evaluation of somatic cell count under automatic milking conditions. Physiological and Technical Aspects of Machine Milking. ICAR Technical Series No:7, p. 165-169, 26-27 June, Nitra, Slovak republic.
  • Berry EA. 1998. Mastitis Incidence in Straw Yards. Vet. Rec., 142,517-518. Bradley, A.J.,2002. Bovine Mastitis :An Evolging Disease. The Veterinary Journal,164:116-128. Bradley AJ. 2002. Bovine mastitis, an evolving disease. The Veterinary Journal,163:1-13.
  • Costa EO, Garino F, Watanabe JR, Ribeiro ET, Vezon P, Baruselli PS, Paske A. 1997. Study of mastitis among ten dairy buffaloes herds (Bubalus bubalis) in the Vale do Ribeira (Ribeira River Valley) Sao Paulo. Brazil. Proc. S'h World Buffalo Congress, Caserta, Italy. 635-638.
  • Damé MCF, Lima CTS, de1, Marcondes CR, Ribeiro MER, Garnero ADV. 2010. Preliminary study on buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) milk production in Southern Brazil. Proceedings 9th World Buffalo Congress. Buenos Aires, April,582-584.
  • De K, Mukherjee J, Prasad S, Dang AK. 2010. Effect of Different Physiological Stages and Managemental Practices on Milk Somatic Cell Counts of Murrah Buffaloes, Proceedings 9th World Buffalo Congress, Buenos Aires, April 2010.
  • Dhakal IP, Kapur MP, Anshu S, 1992. Signifcance of differential somatic cell counts in milk for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in buffaloes using foremilk and strippings milk. Indian Journal of Animal Health, 31: 39-42.
  • Dhakall P, Thapa BB, 2002. Economic impact of clinical mastitis in the buffaloes in Nepal. Buffalo Journal, 2: 225- 234.
  • Dhillon KS, Singh J. 2012. Pathobiology, etiology and novel mastitis therapy in buffalo, http://en.engonnix.com/MAdairy-cattle/health/articles/mastitis-in buffalot2141/165- p0.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 19.09.2013.
  • Du Preez JH, Giesecke WH. 1994. Mastitis. In: Coetzer J.A.W., Thomson G.R. Infectious Diseases of Livestock. Oxford University Press Edit. 2: 1564-1595.
  • El-Khodery SA, Osman SA. 2008. Acute coliform mastitis in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis):clinical findings and treatment outcomes. Trop Anim Health Prod. Feb;40: 93-9.
  • Enevoldsen C, Gruhn YT, Thysen I. 1995. Dairy cows characteristics related to staphylococcus aureus ısolation from quarter samples. J. Dairy Res., 62: 69-81.
  • Fagiolo A, Lai O. 2007. Mastitis in buffalo. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 200-206.
  • Faull WB, Hughes JW, Clarkson MJ, Walton GS. 1984. Mastitis Notes for the Dairy Practitioner. 2. Ed., Liverpool Universty Press, Liverpool.
  • Funk DA, Freeman AE, Berger PJ. 1982. Environmental and physiological factors affecting mastitis at drying off postcalving. Journal of Dairy Science, 65: 1258-1268.
  • Galiero G, Palladino M, Lai O, Goffredi CG. 1996. Buffaloes mastitis: bacteria identification and susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs. Bubalus Bubalis. II: 61-66.
  • Galiero G, Morena C. 2000. The meaning of the Somatic Cell Count in buffalo milk. Bubalus bubalis. IV: 26-27.
  • Galiero G. 2002. The control of environmental mastitis. Bubalus bubalis I: 26-28.
  • Göncü S, Özkütük K. 2002. Adana entansif süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde yetiştirilen saf ve melez siyah alaca inek sütlerinde somatik hücre sayısına etki eden faktörler ve mastitis ile ilişkisi. Hayvansal Üretim, 43: 44-53.
  • Guidry AJ. 1985. Mastitis and the Immun System of the Mammary hall, Great Britain, First Edition, ISBN-0 7514 0354 7, 165.
  • Halasa T. 2009. Bio-economic modeling of bovine intramammary infections. PhD Thesis, Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (with summary in English and Dutch)
  • Hamann J. 2002a. Relation between somatic cell count and milk composition. IDF Bulletin 372: 56-59.
  • Hamann J. 2002b. Milk quality and udder health in relation to modern milking. In: Recent developments and perpective in bovine medicine. Proceedings of the XXll World Buiatrics Congress, Hannover, 334-345.
  • Hamann J, Lind O, Bansal BK. 2010. Determination of on-farm direct cell count and biochemical composition of milk in buffaloes, Proceedings 9th World Buffalo Congress. Buenos Aires, April, 552-553.
  • Harding F, 1995. Milk quality. Blackie Academic and Professionals, an imprint of Chapman and Hall, Glasgow, UK, 157-158.
  • Harmon RJ. 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci., 77: 2103-2112. Haynes N.B. 2001. Keeping Livestock Healty. Storey Publishing, LLC-USA. 2: 190-206.
  • Hokmabad V, Reza MF, Mogaddam M, Sadegh M, Mirzaii H. 2011, Bacterial pathogens of intramammary infections in Azeri buffaloes of Iran and their antibiogram, African Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 2516-2521.
  • Hussain R, Tariq Javed MT, Khan A, Mahmood F, Kausar R. 2012. Mastitis and Associated Histo-pathological Consequences in the Context of Udder Morphology, International Journal of Agriculture Biology ISSN Print: 1560-8530;ISSN Online: 1814-9596 12-449/ZI P/2012/14- 6-947-952.
  • Jarett JA. 1984. Mechanical Milking and Its Relationship to Mastitis.349-360.Ed. J. J. Jarett In: " The Veterinary Clinics of North America".First Ed., W. B. Saunders Com., Philadelphia.
  • Jasper DE, McDonald JS, Mochrie RD. 1982. Bovine mastitis research: Needs, Funding and source of suppor. In proceeding of the National Mastitis Council 21 st Annual Meeting, Louisvilla, KY.PP 184-193.
  • Jones GM, Bailey TL, Roberson JR. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus mastitis: Cause, Detection, and Control .VirginiaMaryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech Publication Number404-229.
  • Jones TO. 1986. A Review of Teat Factors in Bovine E.coli Mastitis. Vet. Rec., 118: 507-509.
  • Kavitha, K.L., Rajesh, K., Suresh, K., Satheesh, K., Syama Sundar, N., 2009. Buffalo mastitis - risk factors. Buffalo Bull., 28: 134-137.
  • Keefe GP. 1997. Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis: A Review. Can. Vet J., 38, July, 429-437.
  • Kumar R, Sharma A. 2002. Prevalence, etiology and antibiogram of mastitis in cows and buffaloes in Hissar, Haryana. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 72: 361-363.
  • Matos JJS, White DG, Harmon RJ, Langlois BE. 1991. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from sites other than the lactating mammary gland. J.Dairy Sci., 74:1544-1549.
  • Matthews KR, Harmon RJ, Langlois BE. 1992. Prevalence of Staphlococcus Species During the Periparturient Period in Primiparaous and Multiparaous Cows. J.Dairy Sci.,75: 1835-1839. McDonald JS. 1984. Streptococcal ve Staphylococcal Mastitis. 269-286. Ed. J. J. Jarett In: "The Veterinary Clinics of North America". First Ed.,W. B. Saunders Com., Philadelphia.
  • Miltenburg JD, De Lange D, Crauwels PPA, Bongers JH, Tielen MJM, Schukken YH, Elbers ARW. 1996. Incidens of clinical mastitis in a random sample of Dairy herds in southern Netherlands. Vet. Rec. 139: 204-207.
  • Moroni P, Sgoifo Rossi C, Pisoni G, Bronzo V, Castiglioni B, Boettcher PJ. 2006. Relationship between somatic cell count and intramammary infection in buffaloes, Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 998-1003.
  • Mustafa YS, Awan FN, Zaman T, Chaudhry SR, Zoyfro V. 2011. Prevalence and anhbactenal suscephbihty ın mashhs ın buffalo and cow ın and around the distinct Lahore-Pakistan, Pak.J. Pharm. 24: 29-33.
  • Natzke RP. 1981. Elements of mastitis control. J.Dairy Sci., 64, 6: 1431-1442.
  • Nickerson SC, Owens WE, Boddie RL. 1995. Mastitis in dairy heifers: Initial studies on prevalence and control. J.Dairy Sci., 78: 1607-1618.
  • Oliver SP, Sordillo LM. 1988. Udder health in the periparturient period. J.Dairy Sci., 71: 2584-2606.
  • Oliver SP, Mitchell BA. 1984. Prevalence of mastitis pathogens in herds participating in a mastitis control program. J. Dairy Sci., 67: 2436-2440.
  • O'Neil P, Drechsler PA, Pankey JW. 1990. Prevalence of mastitis in Primiparous cows. American Dairy Sci., Association 851 Annual Meeting. 73, Atlanta, USA.
  • Osman KM, El-Enbaawy MI, Ezzeldeen, NA, Hussein HMG. 2009. Mastitis in dairy buffalo and cattle in Egypt due to Clostridium perfringens: prevalence, incidence, risk factors and costs, Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 28: 975-986.
  • Oz HH, Farnsworth RJ, Larson VL. 1985. Environmental mastitis. Vet. Bull., 55: 829-839.
  • Özenç E, Vural, MR, Şeker E, Uçar M. 2008. An evaluation of subclinical mastitis during lactation in anatolian buffaloes. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 32: 359-368.
  • Pankey JW, Drechsler PA, Wild EE. 1991. Mastitis prevalence in primigravid heifers at parturation. J.Dairy Science, 74: 1550-1552.
  • Philpot WN, Nickerson SC. 1991. Mastitis: Counter Attack. First Ed., Babson Bros. Co., lllinois.
  • Radostits OM, Gay CC, Blood DC, Hinchcliff KW. 2000. Mastitis.In:Veterinary Medicine, 9th ed., W.B.Saunders Company Ltd., London, pp.603-687.
  • Randolph H, Erwin RE, Richter RL. 1971. Influence of mastitis on properties of milk vıı-distribution of milk proteins. J. Dairy Sci., 57:15-18.
  • Rişvanlı A, Kalkan C. 2002. Sütçü ineklerde yaş ve ırkın subklinik mastitisli memelerin sütlerindeki somatik hücre sayıları ile mikrobiyolojik izolasyon oranlarına etkisi. YYÜ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 13: 84-87.
  • Saxena RK, Dutta GN, Borah P, Buragohain J. 1993. Incidence and etiology of bovine Subclinical mastitis. Indian Vet. J.,70: 1079-1080.
  • Schroeder JW. 1997. Mastitis control programs: Bovine mastitis and milking management. North Dakota State University Extension Service, AS, 1129.
  • Schukken YH, Erb HN, Sears PM Smith RD. 1988. Ecologic Study of the Risk Factors for Environmental mastitis in cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 49: 766-769.
  • Schukken YH, Grommers FJ, Van de Geer D, Brand A. 1989.Incidence of Clinical Mastitis on Farms with Low Somatic Cell Counts in Milk. Vet. Rec., 125: 60-63.
  • Schukken YH, Grommers FJ, Van de Geer D, Erb HN, Brand A. 1990. Risk factors for clinical mastitis in herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 1. data and risk factors for all cases. J. Dairy Sci., 73: 3463-3471.
  • Sharif A, Ahmad T, Bilal MQ, Yousaf A, Muhammed G. 2007. Effect of severity of sub-clinical mastitis on somatic cell count and lactose contents of buffalo milk. Pakistan Vet. J., 27: 142-144.
  • Sharif A, Ahmad T, Umer M, Bilal MQ, Muhammad G, Sharif MA. 2009a. Quarter Based Determination of Milk Lactose Contents and Milk Somatic Cell Count from Dairy Buffaloes under Field Conditions in Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. Suppl. Ser., No.9, pp. 313-321.
  • Sharıf A, Muhammad G., 2009b. Mastitis control in dairy animals, Pakistan Vet. J., 2009, 29(3): 145-148.
  • Sharif A, Muhammad G. 2009b. Mastitis control in dairy animals, Pakistan Vet. J., 29: 145-148.
  • Sharma A, Dhingra P, Pander BL, Kumar R. 2006. Bovine subclinical mastitis: prevalence and treatment with homeopathic medicine. Intl. J. Cow Sci., 2: 40-44.
  • Sharma N, Singh NK, Bhadwal MS. 2011. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 429-438.
  • Sharma H, Maiti SK, Kaley KM. 2004. Studies on the incidence of sub clinical mastitis in buffaloes of Rajnandgaon district of Chhattisgarh state. Vet. Practitioner. 5: 123-124.
  • Sharma H, Maiti SK, Sharma KK. 2007. Prevalence, etiology and antibiogram of microorganisms associated with subclinical mastitis in buffaloes in durg, Chhattisgarh state (India). Int. J. Dairy Sci., 2: 145-151.
  • Silva TD, Silva KFST. 1994. Total and differantial cell counts in buffalo milk Buffalo J., 2: 133-137.
  • Singh RS, Bansal BK. 2004. Variation in selected components of milk among different milk fractions andit's relevance to diagnosis of mastitis in buffaloes. Buffalo Journal, 3: 213-224.
  • Singh M, Ludri RS. 2001. Somatic cell count in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) during different stages of lactation, parity and season. J. Anim. Sci., 14:189-192.
  • Singh RS, Kumar R, Yadav BR. 2011. Distrubution of Pathogenic factors in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from intra mammary infection in cattle and Buffaloes, Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 410-416.
  • Smith KL, Hogan JS. 1993. Environmental Mastitis.Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 9: 489-98.
  • Stetça G, Vasile C, Anamaria POP. 2010. Researches on the Somatic Cells in Buffalo Cow Milk and Their Significance. Bulletin UASVM Agriculture, 67: 425-428.
  • Sudhan NA, Sharma N. 2010. Mastitis An Important Production Disease of Dairy Animals, F.V.Sc. A.H.,R.S. Pura, Jammu- 181102, SMVS' DAIRY YEAR BOOK 2010.
  • Suojala L. 2010. Bovine mastitis caused by Escherichia coliclinical, bacteriological and therapeutic aspects, Department of production Animal medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universty of Helsinki, Finland.
  • Şahin A, Yıldırım A, Ulutaş Z. 2012. Tokat ili halk elinde yetiştirilen mandaların çiğ süt kompozisyonu ve somatik hücre sayısı. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniv. Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu, Proje No:2011/13.
  • Şahin A, Ulutaş Z. 2014. Anadolu mandalarının değişik metotlara göre tahmin edilen süt verimleri üzerine bazı çevresel faktörlerin etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 20: 79-85.
  • Tan X, Huang Y, Hu S. 2009. Persistence of gentamicin residues in milk after the intramammary treatment of lactating cows for mastitis, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B., 2009 10: 280-284 .
  • Timms LL, Schultz LH. 1987. Dynamics and Significance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Intramarnmary Infections. J. Dairy Sci., 70: 2648-2657.
  • Todhunter DA, Smith KL, Hogan JS. 1995. Environmental Streptococca l Intramammary Infections of the Bovine Mammary Gland. J. Dairy Sci., 78: 2366-2374.
  • Todhunter DA, Smith KL, Hogan JS, Schoenberger PS. 1991. Gram negative Bacterial Infections of Mammary Gland. Am. J.Vet. Res., 52: 184-188.
  • Tripaldi C, Palocci G, Miarelli M, Catta M, Orlandini S, Amatiste S, Bernardini RDi. 2010a. Effects of mastitis on buffalo milk quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 23: 1319-1324.
  • Tripaldi C, Palocci G, Miarelli M, Catta M, Orlandini S, Amatiste S, Bernardini RD, Catillo G. 2010b. Effects of mastitis on buffalo milk quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 23: 1319-1324
  • Ullah S, Ahmad T, Bilal MQ, Rehman Z, Muhammad G, Rehman SU. 2005. The effect of severity of mastitis on protein and fat contents of buffalo milk. Pakistan Vet. J., 25:1-4.
  • Urech E, Puhan Z, Schallibaum M. 1999. Changes in milk protein fraction as affected by subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci., 82: 2402-2411.
  • Varij N, Anuradha B, Balhara A, Jerome A, Phulia SK, Dheer S. 2013. Mastitis in Buffalo: Risk Factors. http://www.buffalopedia.cirb.res.in/index.php?optioncom_c ontent&view=a rt icle&id=328%3Amasti tis-in-buffalo-riskfactors-&Iternid=256&1a ng=en.Erişim tarihi: 06/06/2013.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)