Farm-Specific Risk Analysis in Dairy Farming: A Case Study from Turkey

The purposes of this study were to determine the socio-economic characteristics of dairy farmers in Antalya, in Turkey, calculate the gross income, variable costs and gross margin of dairy farms, determine the probability distributions of consequences for alternative decisions to enable dairy farmers as decision makers to make a good and wellinformed choice, to determine cross effects of milk prices variations on the productive strategy of dairy farms. The data were gathered via face to face interviews in Korkuteli, Dosemealtı, Elmalı, Manavgat and Serik counties of Antalya province in Turkey. The survey study was conducted with 80 farmers, who were member of Dairy Cow Breaders Union, in the 2011 production period. In this study, on the basis of previous experience, dairy farmers assigned minimum, maximum and most likely values of milk price and yield over the next period of 5 years. Then, triangular and cumulative distributions were defined by using these values. Moreover, Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulation model was developed to obtain distribution of expected gross margin per cow. The model and triangular and cumulative distributions were built in Excel with @Risk add-in software. The relationship of mean risk aversion coefficient, calculated by using negative exponential function, with both average gross margin and gross margin standard deviation values determined for each farm was examined. The results show that the relation between average gross margin and mean risk aversion coefficient was negative and significant at 5% level. But, although the relation between gross margin standard deviation and mean risk aversion coefficient was found to be negative, it was not significant at 5% level.

___

Acs S, Berentsen P, Huirne R. B. M, Van Asseldonk M. 2009. Effect of yield and price risk on conversion from conventional to organic farming. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 53: 393-411.

Akcaoz H. 2001. Risk in agricultural production, risk analysis and risk attitudes: applications for Cukurova Region. Department of Agricultural Economics Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences University of Cukurova. PhD Thesis, Adana, Turkey.

Akcaoz HV, Ozkan B. 2005. Determining risk sources and strategies among farmers of constrasting risk awareness: A case study for Cukurova Region of Turkey. Jornal of Arid Environment. 62: 661-675.

Anonymous 2009. Records of Antalya Directorate of Provincial Food Agriculture and Livestock, Turkey.

Budak BD. 2009. An Assessment of the competitiveness of the dairy food chain in Turkey, WP2: Studies, D'.1 Study 1: coordinator: Siemen van Berkum (LEI), February.

Ceyhan V, Bozoğlu M, Cinemre HA. 2003. Measuring yield and price risks for dairy farms and designing risk management strategies: The case of Tonya, Turkey. Die Bodenkultur 54(4): 209-214.

Dillon JL, Hardaker JB. 1993. Farm management research for small farmer development, 2nd ed., FAO. 302 pp.

Flaten O, Lien G. 2005. Stochastic utility- efficient programming of organic dairy farms. XIth Congress of the EAAE, August 24-27, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR, Lien G. 2004. Coping with Risk in Agriculture, 2nd ed. CAB International, Wallingford.

Herbst BK, Anderson DP, Outlaw JL, Richardson JW. 2011. The effectiveness of dairy risk management at managing income, revenue and magrin risk. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, February 5-8, Corpus Christi, Texas.

Holloway CA. 1979. Decision making under uncertainty: Models and choices. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffts, New Jersey.

Hranaiova J, Stefanou SE. 2002. Scale, productivity growth and risk response under uncertainty. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 2: 73-91.

Kaan D. 2005. Defining risk and a framework for moving towards resilience in agriculture. Risk and resilience in Agriculture. Available at: http://agecon.uwyo.edu.

Kizilay H, Akcaoz H. 2008. Risk analysis of farmers that are member and non-member dairy cow-breeders union in Antalya Province. Anodolu J. Aegean Agric. Res. Inst. 18(1): 949-958.

Marshall GR, Jones RE, Wall LM. 1997. Tactical oppurtinities, risk attitude and charge of farming strategy: an application of the distribution method. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 41(4): 499-519.

Meuwissen MPM, Van Asseldonk MAPM, Huirne RBM. 2003. Alternative risk financing instruments for swine epidemics. Agricultural Systems. 75: 305-322.

Palisade 1995. @Risk--Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-in for Microsoft Excel or Lotus 1 2-3. Palisade Corporation, Newfield, USA.

Pennings JME, Wansink B, Meulenberg MTG. 2002. A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: the case of the mad cow disease. International Journal of research in Marketing. 19: 91-100.

Ogurtsov VA. 2008. Catastrophic risks in farm-level decision making. PhD Thesis Wageningen University, Netherlands.

TSI 2004. 2001 General Agricultural Census, Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr

TSI 2007. Statistical Yearbook of Turkey, Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr

TSI 2008a. Agricultural Statistics 1987-2006, Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr

TSI 2008b. Livestock Statistics, Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr

TSI 2009. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr

TSI, 2014. Turkey's Statistical Yearbook, 2013. Publication Number: 4175, Ankara.

Uysal O. 2005. A Research on the attitudes of farmers towards risk: Case of Aegean Region farmers. Ege University Journal of Faculty of Agriculture. 42(3): 147-158.

Vose D. 2001. Risk analysis: a quantitative guide, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Yamane T. 1967. Elemantary sampling theory. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, USA.

Zhang L, McErlean S, Patton M. 2010. Impact of risk within the Northern Ireland dairy sector. The Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Edinburgh, March, 29-31, 2010.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Etlik Piliçlerde Altlık Üzerine Dane Buğday Serpilmesinin Performans, Karkas Özellikleri, Dışkı pH ve Viskozitesi Üzerine Etkileri

FİGEN KIRKPINAR, ZÜMRÜT AÇIKGÖZ, ÖZER HAKAN BAYRAKTAR, Özge ALTAN

Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stock as Affected by Agricultural Wastes in a Typic Haplusult of Owerri, Southe-Astern Nigeria

Stanley Uchenna ONWUDİKE, Bethel Ugochukwu UZOHO, Bernadine Ngozi NDUKWU, Innocent Uzoma OPARA, Ojinere Clitton ANYAMELE

Factors Affecting Dairy Farmers' Application of Agricultural Innovations: A Case Study from Muğla Province

Tayfun ÇUKUR

Conformity of Fruit Nectar Samples to Libyan Specification Standards

Ahmeda Algari ALZAGTAT, Rema Yousef ELEDODY

Patatesin Kısa Süreli Kuraklık Uygulamasına Fizyolojik Tepkileri

İLKNUR TINDAŞ ÇAYLI, UFUK DEMİREL

Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake Capacity of Rice under Different Sulphur Levels

A. K. M. Sajjadul ISLAM, Shohel RANA, Mazibur RAHMAN, Jainul Abedin MİAN, Mezanur RAHMAN, Asif RAHMAN, Nazmun NAHER

Türkiye'de Eti Yenilebilen Kurbağaların (Ranidae) Biyolojisi, Ekonomisi, Avcılığı ve İhracatına Yönelik Yasal Mevzuatı

HÜLYA ŞEREFLİŞAN, Ahmet ALKAYA

Sebze Püresi ile Üretilen Yoğurtların Tekstürel ve Duyusal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

TÜLAY ÖZCAN, Eda YILDIZ

Larvicidal Activity of Essential Oils from the Leaves and Fruits of Nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt) Against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

Anne CAROLİNA, Received MARCH

Farklı Organik Gübrelerin Tohumluk Patates (Solanum tuberosum L.) Çeşitlerinde Verim ve Kalite Üzerine Etkileri

HASAN ELEROĞLU, KÜRŞAT KORKMAZ