Bölge Orijinli İçme Sütü Profilleri İçin Tüketicilerin Ödeme İstekliliği ve Piyasa Payları: Iğdır İli Örneği

üzerinde etkili olan faktörler ve onların düzeylerine göre içme sütü profillerini dizayn etmek ve daha sonra piyasa payı ve ödeme istekliliklerini (WTP) belirlemektir. Araştırmanın verileri, Iğdır ilinde içme sütü tüketen 160 hane halkından elde edilmiştir. Bölge orijinli içme sütü profillerini dizayn etmek ve onların piyasa paylarını (MS) ve tüketicilerin ödeme istekliliklerini (WTP) belirlemek için Conjoint Analiz kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları; tüketicilerin toplam faydalarını maksimum kılan ilk üç içme sütü profillerinin (7, 6 ve 1 numaralı kartlar) piyasa payları, sırasıyla %34, %12 ve %10 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Diğer taraftan, içme sütünün bölge orijinleri ve fiyat seviyeleri altında tüketicilerin WTP, en düşük fiyat seviyesinde Marmara/Ege Bölgesi için %26, Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi için %16 ve Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi için %12 olarak analiz edilmiştir. Tüketicilerin toplam faydalarını maksimum kılan içme sütü profilleri dizayn edilerek, ürünlerin piyasa payı ve yayılım oranları artırılabilir ve aynı zamanda tüketicilerin WTP’ne cevap veren ürün profilleri de onların satın alma kararları üzerinde anlamlı bir memnuniyet sağlayabilir.

Consumers’ Willingness to Pay and Market Shares for Drinking Milk Profiles with the Region of Origin: Case of Iğdır Province

The aim of the study was to design the drinking milk profiles according to the factors and their levels effecting on the consumers’ purchase decisions towards drinking milk with the region of origin at the retailer level, and then to determine the market shares (MS) and the consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP). Research data were obtained from 160 households consuming drinking milk in Iğdır province. Conjoint Analysis were used to design drinking milk profiles with the region of origin, and to determine their market shares (MS) and consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP). The result of the study highlighted that the marketing shares of the first three drinking milk profiles maximizing the consumers’ total utilities were calculated as %34, %12 and %10 (card number 7, 6 and 1), respectively. On the other hand, the consumers’ willingness to pay under the origins and price levels of drinking milk were analyzed as %26 for Aegean/Marmara Region, %16 for Northeast Anatolia Region and %12 for Eastern Black Sea Region at the lowest price levels. By having designed drinking milk profiles maximizing the consumers’ total utilities, the marketing share and penetration rates of the products could increase, and the product profiles responded to the consumers’ willingness to pay could also satisfy considerably on their purchase decisions.

PDF

___

Adanacıoğlu H, Albayram Z. 2012. A conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for traditional cheeses in Turkey: A case study on Tulum Cheese. Korean J. Food Sci. An., 32 (4): 458-466.
Anonim 2014. Coğrafi işaretlerde dünyanın neresindeyiz. Erişim Adresi: http://apelasyon.com [Erişim: 15.03.2018]
Anonim 2015. Coğrafi işaretli ürünler için stratejiler. Erişim Adresi: http://www.gidahatti.com [Erişim: 15.03.2018]
Allen S, Goddard E. 2012. Consumer preferences for milk and yogurt attributes: How health beliefs and attitudes affect choices. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association’s 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, Seattle, Washington.
Almli VL, Ovrum A, Hersleth M, Almoy T, Naes T. 2015. Investigating individual preferences in rating and ranking conjoint experiments: A case study on semi-hard cheese. Food Qual. & Pref., 39: 28-39.
Aprile MC, Caputo V, Nayga RM. 2016. Consumers’ preferences and attitudes toward local food products. J. Food Prod. Marketing, 22 (1): 19-42.
Aprile MC, Gallina G. 2008. Quality perception using signals on food label: An analysis on Italian consumers. 18th Annual IAMA Symposium, June 17, 2008, Monterey, USA.
ASUD 2019. Süt ve süt ürünleri tüketimi. Erişim Adresi: http://www.asuder.org.tr. [Erişim: 04.02.2019].
Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F. 2005. Fairy consumption is inversely associated with the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Tehranian adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 82 (3): 523-30.
Bellows AC, Alcavaz G, Hallman WK. 2010. Gender and food, a study of attitudes in the USA towards organic, local, U.S. grown and GM-free foods. Appetite 55: 540-550.
Black RE, Williams SM, Jones IE, Goulding A. 2002. Children who avoid drinking cow milk have low dietary calcium intakes and poor bone health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 76: 675-80.
Bonany J, Buehler A, Carbo J, Codarin S, Donati F. 2013. Consumer eating quality acceptance of new apple varieties in different European countries. Food Quality and Preference, 30 (2013): 250-259.
Cacciolatti LA, Garcia CC, Kalantzakis M. 2015. Traditional food products: the effect of consumers’ characteristics, product knowledge, and perceived value on actual purchase. J. Inter. Food and Agribus. Marketing, 27: 155-176.
Cernea C. 2011. Protected geographical origins. A study of Danish consumers’ willingness to pay for domestic protected geographical indication cheese products, (MS Thesis). Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Chamorro A, Rubio S, Miranda FJ. 2014. The region of origin (ROO) effect on purchasing preferences: The case of a multiregional designation of origin. British Food Journal, 117 (2): 820-839.
Denver S, Jensen JD. 2014. Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Quality and Preference, 31 (2014): 129-134.
FAOSTAT 2019. Download and visualize data of livestock processed and primary product production. Erişim Adresi: http://www.fao.org/faostat. [Erişim: 04.02.2019].
Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A. 2011. Are quality labels a real market advantage? A conjoint application on PDO olive oil. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness, 12: 1-22.
Götze F, Mann S, Ferjani A, Kohler A, Heckelei T. 2016. Explaining market shares of organic food: evidence from Swiss household data. British Food J., 118 (4): 931-945.
Graaf S, Vanhonacker F, Loo EJV, Bijttebier J, Lauwers L, Tuyttens FAM, Verbeke W. 2016. Market opportunities for animal-friendly milk in different consumer segments. Sustainability 1302 (8): 1-17.
Gracia TMA. 2016. Consumers’ willingness to pay for light, organic and PDO cheese. British Food J., 118 (3): 560-571.
Green PE, Krieger AM. 1991. Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 55 (4): 20-31.
Groot E, Albusi LM. 2015. A bottom-up model to describe consumers’ preferences towards late season peaches. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13 (4): 1-13.
Grubor A, Djokic N. 2016. Organic food consumer profile in the Republic of Serbia. British Food J., 118 (1): 164-182.
Grunert KG, Aachmann K. 2016. Consumer reactions to the use of EU quality labels on food products. Food Control, 59 (1): 178-187.
Hassan D, Monier-Dilhan S, Orozco V. 2011. Measuring consumers’ attachment to geographical indication. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organisation, 9 (1): 35-50.
Huth PJ, di-Renzo DB, Miller GD, 2006. Major scientific advances with dairy foods in nutrition and health. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 1207–1221.
Kan M, Gülçubuk B, Küçükçongar M. 2012. Coğrafi işaretlerin kırsal turizmde kullanılma olanakları. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekon. Arş. Derg., 6(2): 52-64.
Li EX, Drake MA. 2015. Sensory perception, nutritional role, and challenges of flavored milk for children and adults. J. Food Sci., 80 (4): 665-670.
Liang R. 2015. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the moderating effects of organic food prices. British Food J., 118 (1): 183-199.
Lim K, Hu W, Maynard LJ, Goddard E. 2014. A taste for safer beef? How much does consumers’ perceived risk influence willingness to pay for country‐of‐origin labeled beef. Agribusiness, 30 (1): 17-30.
Miller GD. 2000. Benefits of dairy product consumption on blood pressure in humans: A summary of the biomedical literature. J. Amer. Coll. Nut., 19 (2): 147-164.
Mobley AR, Jakob DJ, Maulding M. 2014. Attitudes, beliefs, and barriers related to milk consumption in older, low-income women. J. Nut. Educ. Behav., 46 (6): 554-559.
Munoz CX, Johnson EC, McKenzie AL, Guelinck I., Graverholt G, Casa DJ, Armstrong LE. 2014. Habitual total water intake and dimensions of mood in healthy young women. Appetite, 92 (1): 81-86.
Murphy MM, Douglass JS, Johnson RK, Spence LA. 2004. A conjoint analysis of Irish consumer preferences for farmhouse cheese. British Food Journal, 106 (4): 288-300.
Murphy MM, Cowan C, Meehan H, O'Reilly S. 2008. Drinking flavored or plain milk is positively associated with nutrient intake and is not associated with adverse effects on weight status in US children and adolescents. J. Amer. Diet. Ass., 108: 631–639.
Murphy M, Cowan C, Meehan H, 2015. A conjoint analysis of Irish consumer preferences for farmhouse cheese. British Food J., 106 (4): 288-300.
Pelsmaeker S, Schouteten J, Lagast S, Dewettinck K, Gellynck X. 2017. Is taste the key driver for consumer preference? A conjoint analysis study. Food Qual. & Pref. 62: 323-331.
Pinto VRA, Melo LF, Balbino DF, Novaes JF, Negrete MC, Sousa TD. 2016. The evaluation of consumer behavior influence on the buying process of dairy products in Minas Gervais State, Brazil. J. Food and Nut. Res., 4(1): 51-59.
Sichtmann C, Wilken R, Diamantopoulos A. 2011. Estimating willingness-to-pay with conjoint analysis: Can consumer characteristics explain variations in accuracy? British J. Manage., 22: 628-645.
SPSS Conjoint 20.0 2015. SPSS Base 15 User’s Guide, pp. 161- 184. Chicago, IL.
Şeker İ, Şeker P, Şahin M, Özen VS, Akdeniz A, Erkmen O, Kışlalıoğlu İ, Sargın G, Doğu GB. 2012. Elazığ İli merkez ilçede tüketicilerin süt tüketim alışkanlıkları ve bu alışkanlıkları etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, 26(3): 131-143.
Tsakiridou E, Mattas K, Mpletsa Z. 2009. Consumers’ food choices for specific quality food products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 15: 200-212.
Tekelioğlu Y. 2016. Yöresel ürünler, coğrafi işaretler ve Türkiye uygulamaları. Gastro Dergisi, 59: 118-122.
Topcu Y. 2019. Tüketicilerin bölge orijinli organik içme sütü tercih profilleri ve piyasa payları: TRA1 Bölgesi örneği. MAS International Conference, 849-859, May 2-5, 2019, Erzurum.
Topcu Y, Sarı MM. 2019. Bölge orijinli konvansiyonel içme sütü tüketim memnuniyeti ve ödeme istekliliği: TRA1 Bölgesi örneği. ICAFOP 3. International Conference, 1298-1310, April 16-18, 2019, Trabzon.
Topcu Y. 2015. Turkish consumer decisions affecting ice cream consumption. Italian Journal of Food Science, 27 (1): 1-11.
TPE 2018. Coğrafi işaretli ürünler. Türk Patent Enstitüsü. Erişim Adresi: http://www.pte.com.tr. [Erişim: 15.03.2018]
Tsourgiannis T, Karasavvoglou A, Florou G. 2011. Consumers’ attitudes towards GM free products in European Region. The case of the prefecture of Drama-Kavala-Xanthi in Greece. Appetite 57: 448-458.
Uzundumlu AS, Topcu Y. 2016. Determining Turkish consumers’ consumption satisfaction with Erzurum Civil cheese. British Food Journal, 118 (4): 896-914.
Vaskozen T. 2003. Dietary minerals and modification of cardiovascular risk factors. J. Nut. Biochem., 14: 492–506.
Vecciho R, Annunziata A. 2011. The roll of PDO/PGI labelling in Italian consumers’ food choices. Agricultural Economic Review, 12 (2): 80-98.
WDS 2017. World Dairy Summit: per capita drinking milk consumption and population. Erişim Adresi: http://www.idfwds2017.com. [Erişim: 15.09.2017].
Yan Y, Ames CW. 2014. Willingness to pay for safer dairy products in China: Evidence from Shanghai customers’ purchasing decision of bright dairy’s baby cheese, (MS Thesis). Nanjing Agricultural University, Athens, Georgia.