Beç Tavuklarında (Numida meleagris) Yumurta Şekil İndeksinin Yumurta Kalitesine Etkileri

Bu çalışmada, Beç tavuklarında (Numida meleagris) yumurta şekil indeksinin yumurta kalite özellikleri üzerine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için, yumurtalar şekil indeksi bakımından ve >=78 olmak üzere üç gruba ayrılmıştır. Yumurta kalite özelliklerinin (yumurta ağırlığı, kabuk kalınlığı, kabuk yüzey alanı, birim yüzey kabuk ağırlığı, kabuk oranı, ak indeksi, ak oranı, sarı indeksi, sarı oranı, sarı/ak oranı, haugh birimi ve yumurta hacmi) belirlenmesi için toplam 100 adet yumurta incelenmiştir. Araştırmada, kabuk kalınlığı, birim yüzey kabuk ağırlığı, kabuk oranı, ak indeksi, ak oranı, sarı indeksi, sarı oranı, sarı/ak oranı ve haugh birimi özellikleri yumurta şekil indeksi tarafından etkilenmemiştir. Buna karşın yumurta şekil indeksi, yumurta ağırlığı, kabuk yüzey alanı ve yumurta hacmini önemli derecede etkilemiştir. Aynı zamanda, yumurta şekil indeksi ile yumurta kalite özellikleri arasında önemli ilişki bulunmuştur. Yumurta şekil indeksi yumurta kalite özelliklerini etkileyen önemli bir faktör olarak belirlenmiştir.

The Effects of Egg Shape Index on Egg Quality Traits of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris)

The aim of this study was to investigated the effects of the egg shape index on egg quality characteristics in Guinea fowl. For this, the eggs were classified in terms of egg shape index, as <= 75, < 76 -77 > and >= 78. A total of 100 Guinea fowl eggs were evaluated to determine the egg quality traits ( egg weight, eggshell thickness, eggshell surface area, eggshell weight per unit surface area, eggshell ratio, albumen index, albumen ratio, yolk index, yolk ratio, yolk/albumen ratio, haugh unit and egg volume). In this study, eggshell thickness, eggshell weight per unit surface area, eggshell ratio, albumen index, albumen ratio, yolk index, yolk ratio, yolk/albumen ratio and haugh unit were not significantly affected by egg shape index groups. Whereas egg weight, eggshell surface area and egg volume were significantly affected by egg shape index groups. At the same time, there were found significant relationship between the egg shape index and egg quality traits. Egg shape index was found to be an important factor affecting the egg quality characteristics.

___

  • Abanikannda OTF, Olutogun O, Leigh AO, Ajayi LA. 2007. Statistical modeling of egg weight and egg dimensions in commerical layers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6: 59-63.
  • Adjetery ANA. 2006. Comparative growth performance of growing indigeneous Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) from the upper east, upper west and northern regions of Ghana. BSc. Thesis. University for Development Studies, Department of Animal Science, Tamale, Ghana.
  • Ahmadi, F, Rahimi F. 2011. Factors affecting quality and quantity of egg production in laying hens: a review. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12 (3):372-384.
  • Aktan S. 2004. Determining some exterior and interior quality traits of quail eggs and phenotypic correlations by digital image analysis. Hayvansal Üretim, 45(1): 7-13.
  • Alkan S, Karabağ K, Galiç A, Karsli T, Balcioğlu MS. 2010. Effects of selection for body weight and egg production on egg quality traits in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) of different lines and relationships between these traits. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2): 239-244.
  • Alkan S, Karsli T, Galiç A, Karabağ K. 2013. Determination of phenotypic correlations between internal and external quality traits of Guinea fowl eggs. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(5): 861-867.
  • Alkan S, Durmuş İ. 2015. Alternatif kanatlı yetiştiriciliği: Beç Tavuğu Yetiştiriciliği. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(10):806-810.
  • Alipanah M, Deljo J, Rokouie M, Mohammadnia R. 2013.Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in khazak layers. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 2: 175-180.
  • Altuntaş E, Şekeroğlu A. 2008. Effect of egg shape index on mechanical properties of chicken eggs. Journal of Food Engineering, 85: 606-612.
  • Bernacki Z, Heller K. 2003. Ocena jakosci jaj perlic szarych wroznych okresearch niesnosci. Pr Kom Nauk Roln Biol, 51:27-32.
  • Dudusolo IO. 2010. Comparative evaluation of internal and external qualities of eggs from quail and guinea fowl. International Research Journal of Plant Science, 1:112-115.
  • Duman M, Şekeroğlu A, Yıldırım A, Eleroğlu H, Camcı O. 2016. Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. DOI:10.1399/eps.2016.117. Poultry Science,
  • Emamgholi BH, Zerchdaron S, Hassani S, Abbasi MA, Khan Ahmadi AR. 2010. Heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in Iranian native fowl. British Poultry Science, 51:740-744.
  • Fajemilehin SOK, Odubola OO, Fagbuaro SS, Akinyemi MO. 2009. Phenotypic correlations between some external and internal egg quality traits in the Nigerian helmeted guinea fowl, Numida meleagris galeata pallas. App. Trop. Agric. 14:102-108.
  • Günlü A, Kırıkçı K, Çetin O, Garip M. 2003. Some external and internal quality characteristics of partridge (A. graeca) eggs. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 1 (3-4): 197-199.
  • Kul S, Şeker I. 2004. Phenotypic correlations between some external and internal egg quality traits in the Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). International Journal of Poultry Science, 3(6): 400-405.
  • Kuzniacka KN, Bernecki Z, Adamski M.2004. Jakos i wylegowosc jaj perlic szarych (Numida meleagris) utrzymywanych eksrensywnie. Zesz Nauk AT-R Bydg Zootech, 34:115-123.
  • Nagarajan S, Narahari D, Jayaprasad IA, Thyagarajan D.1991.Influence of stocking density and layer age on production traits and egg quality in Japanese quails. British Poultry Science, 32:243-248.
  • Nahashon SN, Adefope NA, Amenyenu A, Wright D. 2007a. Effect of concentration of dietary crude protein and metabolizable energy on laying performance of Pearl Gray Guinea fowl hens. Poultry Science, 86:1793-1799.
  • Nahashon SN, Adefope NA, Amenyenu A, Wright D. 2007b Effect of varying metabolizable energy and crude protein concentrations in diets of Pearl Gray Guinea fowl pullets. 2. Egg production performance. Poultry Science, 86:973-982.
  • Narushin VG. 2005. Egg geometry calculation using the measurements of length and breadth. Poultry Science, 84 (3): 482-484.
  • Nowaczewski S, Witkiewicz K, Fratczak M, Kontecka H, Rutkowski A, Krystianiak S, Rosinski A.2008. Egg guality from domestic and French Guinea fowl. Nauka Przyroda Technologie, 2 (2): 1-9.
  • Nwagu BI. 1997. Factors affecting fertility and hatchability of Guinea fowl eggs in Nigeria. World Poultry Science Journal, 53: 279-285.
  • Obike OM, Oke UK, Azu KE. 2011. Comparison of egg production performance and egg quality traits of Pearl and Black strains of Guinea fowl in a humid rain-forest zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10:547- 551.
  • Obike OM, Azu KE. 2012. Phenotypic correlations among body weight, external and internal egg quality traits of Pearl and Black strains of Guinea fowl in a humid tropical environment. Journal of Animal Science Advance, 2:857- 864.
  • Oke UK, Herbert U, Nwachukwu EN. 2004. Association between body weight and some egg production traits in the Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata pallas). Livestock Research Rural Development, 16:9.
  • Olawumi SO, Ogunlade JT. 2008. Phenotypic correlation between some external and internal egg quality traits in the exotic ISA Brown layer breeders. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 2(1):30-35.
  • Onunkwo DN, Okara IC. 2015. Phenotypic correlation between external and internal egg quality traits in three varieties of helmeted Guinea fowl from 28 to 46 weeks of age. International Journal of Livestock Research, 5:60-70.
  • Özçelik M. 2002. The phenotypic correlations among some external and internal quality characteristics in Japanese quail eggs. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 49: 67-72.
  • Rozycka B, Wezyk S. 1985. Cechy jakosciowe jaj wylegowych kur rasy leghorn in new Hampshire. Rocz Nauk Zootech, 12: 143-160.
  • Robinson R. 2000. Regulatory impact analysis. Canadian food inspection agency. Ontario. Canada, pp 3.
  • Saina H. 2001. Livestock production in the semi-arid smallholder farming area of Chirisa in Midlands Province of Zimbabwe. B.Sc. Honours. Dissertation. University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Sarıca M, Önder H, Yamak US. 2012.Determining the most effective variables for egg quality traits of five hen genotypes. Int J Agric Biol. 14:235-240.
  • Singh B, Jilani MH, Singh B. 2009. Genetic parameters of egg quality traits in Guinea fowl. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 44:389-391.
  • Song KT, Choi SH, Oh HR. 2000. A comporison of egg quality of pheasant, chukar, quail and Guinea fowl. Asian- Australian Journal of Animal Science, 13 (7): 986-990.
  • Shi SR, Wang KH, Dou TC, Yang HM. 2009. Egg weight affects some quality traits of chicken eggs. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7(2): 432-434
  • Smith AJ.1990. The tropical agriculturist: Poultry. Mcmillan, London and Basingstoke. 218 p.
  • Şekeroğlu A, Kayaalp GT, Sarıca M. 2000. The regression and correlation analysis on egg parameters in Denizli poultry. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, Çukurova University, 15: 69-74.
  • Teye GA, Gyawu P. 2002. A guide to Guinea fowl production in Ghana. Department of Animal Science. University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana. 14 pp.
  • Tebesi T, Madibela OR, Moreki JC. 2012. Effect of storage time on internal and external characteristics of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) eggs. Journal of Animal Science Advance, 2 (6): 534-542.
  • Türkoğlu M, Sarıca M. 2014. Tavukçuluk Bilimi. Yetiştirme, Besleme, Hastalıklar. Bey-Ofset Matbaacılık, Ankara, 671 sayfa.
  • Tyler C. 1961. Shell strenght. Its measurement and its relationship to other factors. British Poultry Science, 2: 3- 19.
  • Yamak US, Boz MA, Sarıca M. 2015. Changes in guinea fowl fertility and hatching traits over a 4-month laying season with long-term egg storage conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 49 (4) 2015 : 532-536.
  • Yang HM, Yang Z, Wang W, Wang ZY, Sun HN, Ju XJ, Qi XM. 2014. Effects of different housing systems on visceral organs, performance and egg quality of laying hens. European Poultry Science, 78: 1-9. proportions, immune
  • Yannakopoulos AL, Tserveni-Gousi AS. 1986. Quality characteristics of quail eggs. British Poultry Science, 27: 171-176.
  • Yılmaz A, Tepeli C, Çağlayan T. 2011. External and internal egg quality characteristics in Japanese quails of different plumage color lines. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9(2): 375-379.
  • Zhang LC, Ning ZH, Xu GY, Hou ZC, Yang Z. 2005. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in Brown-Egg Dwarf Layers. Poultry Science, 84: 1209-1213.