___

• Ahmet, W. & Bruinsma, M. (2006). A structural model of self-concept, autonomous motivation and academic performance in cross-cultural perspective. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(4), 551-576.
• Akyıldız, H. & Taşdelen, A. (1998, Eylül). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ereksel ve araçsal değer tercihleri. VII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, 9-11 Eylül, Konya.
• Bacanlı, H. (2000). Üniversite öğrencilerinin değer tercihleri. Eğitim Yönetimi, 20, 597-610.
• Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1998). Carl Rogers’ helping system: Journey and substance. London: Sage.
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative index in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,107, 238-246.
• Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y. & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well- being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-110.
• Cihangir-Çankaya, Z. & Bacanlı, H. (2003, Temmuz). İhtiyaç Doyum Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. VII. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 9-11 Temmuz, Malatya.
• Cohen. J. C. & Cohen, P. C. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1985). Gençlerde benlik saygısı ile ilgili bir araştırma. XXI. Ulusal Psikiyatri ve Nöroloji Bilimleri Kongresi, Mersin.
• Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Adölasanlarda benlik saygısı Hacettepe Üniversitesi Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE, US: University of Nebraska Press.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘ what’’ and ‘‘why ’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
• Diener, E., Emmons R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
• Fromm, E. (1965). Escape from freedom. New York: Avon.
• Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve Negatif Duygu Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46), 19–26.
• Goldman, B. M. & Kernis, M. H. (2002). The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5(6), 18–20.
• Gül, A. (2010). Benlik düzenleme odakları, otantiklik ve ilişkisel/özerk benlik ketlenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
• Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164-172.
• Hambleton, R. K. & de Jong J. (2003). Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests. Language Testing, 20, 127-134.
• Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 382–394). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Harter, S., Marold, D. B., Whitesell, N. R. & Cobbs, G. (1996). A model of the effects of perceived parent and peer support on adolescent false self-behavior. Child Development, 67, 360 –374.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Horney, K. (1951). Neurosis and human growth. London: Routledge.
• Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
• Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 421-453.
• Ilardi, B.C., Leone, D., Kasser, R. & Ryan, R.M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a Factory setting.
• Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805. Iyengar, S. S. & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.
• İlhan, T. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin benlik uyum modeli: Yaşam amaçları, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ve öznel iyi oluş.Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• İmamoğlu, E. O., Günaydın, G. & Selçuk, E. (2011). Özgün benliğin yordayıcıları olarak kendileşme ve ilişkililik: Cinsiyetin ve kültürel yönelimlerin ötesinde. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(67), 27-48.
• İmamoğlu, E. O. & Karakitapoğu-Aygün, Z. (1999). 1970’lerden 1990’lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(44), 1-17.
• Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, Scientific Software International, Chicago.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1998). Kültürel psikoloji: Kültür bağlamında insan ve aile. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.
• Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychology Inquiry, 14, 1–26.
• Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması.Yayımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Lopez, F. G. & Rice, K. G. (2006). Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 362–371.
• Lynch, M. F. & Ryan, R. M. (2004). On being yourself: Consistency versus authenticity of self-concept in cultural and interpersonal contexts. Proceedings of the Third International Biennial SELF Research Conference, Australia: SELF Research Centre, University of Western Sydney. Şu adresten alınmıştır: http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0009/374481/SELF_Research_Conference_2004.pdf
• Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
• Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S. & Heiman, R. J. (1996). Culture and “basic” psychological principles. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857-913). New York: Guilford Press.
• Neff, K. D. & Harter, S. (2002). The role of power and authenticity in relationship styles emphasizing autonomy, connectedness, or mutuality among adult couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 835-857.
• Neff, K. D. & Suizzo, M. A. (2006). Culture, power, authenticity and psychological well-being within romantic relationships: A comparison of European American and Mexican Americans. Cognitive Development 21, 441–457.
• Oishi, S. & Diener, E. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1674-1682.
• Robinson, O.C., Lopez, F. R. & Ramos, K. (2012, April). Should you bother being yourself at work?
• Relationships between social context, authenticity and wellbeing. presented at British Psychological Society Annual Conference.
• Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self- image. Princeton University Press: New Jersey
• Rudy, D., Sheldon, K. M., Awong, T. & Tan, H. H. (2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of ResearchPersonality, 41, 983-1007.
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
• Ryan, R. M., LaGuardia, J. G. & Rawsthome, L. J. (2005). Self-Complexity and the authenticity of self-Aspects: Effects on well-being and resilience to stressful events. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(3), 431-448.
• Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J. & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380 –1393.
• Şimşek, O. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinos Yayınları.
• Theran, S. A. (2011). Authenticity in relationships and depressive symptoms: A gender analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 423-428. Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International JournalPsychology, 24(6), 685-701.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measurespositive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
• Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., F. & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136.
• Wood, A., Linley, P., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M. & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55,385–399.
• Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.