Fedakarlıkta algılanan zarar ölçeği ve fedakarlık doyum ölçeği'nin Türkçe'ye adaptasyonu

Turkish adaptation of perceived sacrifice harmfulness scale and satisfaction with sacrifice scale

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity and the reliability of two scales used to examine how individuals perceive their sacrificing behaviors and the extent to which they experience satisfaction through sacrificing. After completing translation and back-translation studies, scales were administered to 108 (66 females, 42 males) and 105 (65 females, 40 males) volunteered married individuals. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a one-factor structure for both of the scales. Findings regarding convergent and divergent validity of the scales revealed significant relationships with marital commitment and satisfaction measures and indicated significant gender differences. Internal consistency coefficients were found as acceptable and similar to the original scale values. These results pointed out that the Turkish adaptation of the scales have acceptable psychometric characteristics.

___

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos 18.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Small Waters.
  • Beşikçi, E. (2008). The predictors of relationship commitment: Perceived parenting styles, parental approval, and psychological reactance. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Bilgin, M. (2001). Üniversite öğrencilerinin fonksiyonel olmayan tutumlarının bazı değişkenler açısından irdelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(8), 40-48.
  • Büyükşahin, A. (2007). Yakın ilişkilere bağlanım: Bilişsel ve davranışsal olarak ilişkiyi sürdürme mekanizmaları. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 10(19), 55-75.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229-238.
  • Ersoy, E. (2009). Cinsiyet kültürü içerisinde kadın ve erkek kimliği (Malatya örneği). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 209-230.
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Locke, H. J. & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
  • Rusbult, C. E., Bissonette, V. I., Arriaga, X. B. & Cox., C. L. (1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. In, T. N. Braudbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dyfunction (pp. 74- 113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M. & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
  • Stanley, S. M. & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. JournalMarriage and the Family, 54, 595-608.
  • Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., Sadberry, S. L., Clements, M. L. & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sacrifice as a predictor of marital outcomes. Family Process, 45, 289-303.
  • Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Ally and Bacon. Tezer, E. (1996). Evlilik ilişkisinden sağlanan doyum: Evlilik Yaşamı Ölçeği. Psikolojik DanışmaRehberlik Dergisi, 2(7), 1-7.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Ullman, J. B. (2007). Structural equation modeling.Tabachnick & L. Fidell (Eds), Using multivariate statistics (5th ed., pp. 676-780). Boston: Ally and Bacon.
  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S. & Cox, C. L. (1997).
  • Willingness to sacrifi ce in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 , 1373-1395.
  • Whitton, S. W., Stanley, S. M. & Markman, H. J. (2007). If I help my partner, will it hurt me? Perceptionssacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 64-92.