___

• Adams, J., ve Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(1), 83-105.
• Athawale, R. (2004). Cultural, gender and socio-economic differences in time perspective among adolescents.
• Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, University of the Free State. Basım, H. N., Çetin, F., ve Tabak, A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik özelliklerinin kişilerarası çatışma çözme yaklaşımlarıyla ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20-34.
• Boniwell, I. ve Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. Linley A.P. ve Joseph, S., (Ed.), Positive psychology in practice (1. baskı) içinde (165-178). New Jersey: John WileyveSons Inc.
• Botwin, M., Buss, D. ve Shackelford, T. (1997). Five factor in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 108-136.
• Boyacioglu, I. ve Sümer, N. (2011). Bağlanma boyutları, otobiyografik bellek ve geçmişi kabul etme. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(67), 105-122.
• Buyuksahin, A. ve Hovardaoğlu, S. (2007). Yatırım modelinin bazı ilişkisel değişkenler yönünden incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 22(59), 69-86.
• Buyuksahin, A. ve Taluy, N. (2008). İlişki istikrarı ölçeği'nin gözden geçirme çalışması. Yayınlanmamış araştırma raporu.
• Chavarria, J., Allan, N. P., Moltisanti, A. ve Taylor, J. (2015). The effects of present hedonistic time perspective and past negative time perspective on substance use consequences. Drug and alcohol dependence, 152, 39-46.
• Claxton, A., O'Rourke, N., Smith, J. Z. ve DeLongis, A. (2012). Personality traits and marital satisfaction within enduring relationships: An intra-couple discrepancy approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 375-396.
• Çırakoğlu, O. C. (2006). Role of locus of control and critical thinking in handling dissatisfactions in romantic relationships of university students (Kontrol odağının ve eleştirel düşünmenin üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerindeki doyumsuzlukları ele alış biçimleri üzerindeki rolü). Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Çırakoğlu, O. C. ve Tezer, E. (2010). Kontrol odağı ve eleş- tirel düşünmenin üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişki doyumsuzluklarına verdikleri tepkiler üzerindeki yordayıcı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 13(26), 29-41.
• D'Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V. ve Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo's stanford time perspective inventory (ZTPI)-short form: An Italian study. Time & Society, 12(2), 333-347.
• Dağ, İ. (1991). Rotter'in İç-Dış Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği'nin (RİDKOÖ) üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26), 10-16.
• Daugherty, J. R. ve Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 202-207.
• Decuyper, M., De Bolle, M. ve De Fruyt, F. (2012). Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 19(1), 128-145.
• Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C. ve Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47-61.
• Epel, E. S., Bandura, A. ve Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(3), 575-596.
• Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, or avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6-15.
• Harasymchuk, C. (2001). Responses to dissatisfaction in friendships and romantic relationships: An interpersonal script analysis. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
• Hendrick, C. ve Hendrick, S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 784-794.
• Hill, D. (1998). Individual differences in responses to dissatisfaction in relationships. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
• Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Harvard University Press; New Ed edition.
• Hojjat, M. (2000). Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(4-5), 598-617.
• Holman, E. A. ve Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). The social language of time: The time perspective-social network connection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 136-147.
• Hornik, J. ve Zakay, D. (1996). Psychological time: The case of time and consumer behavior. Time & Society, 5, 385-397.
• Horstmanshof, L. ve Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 703-718.
• Johnston, L. D. (2004). The relationship between attachment style and responses to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Qeen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Kanada.
• Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G. ve Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149-164.
• Kilpatrick, S. D., Bissonnette, V. L. ve Rusbult, C. E. (2002). Empathic accuracy and accommodative behavior among newly married couples. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 369-393.
• Kislali Erginbilgic, A. (hazırlık aşamasında). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory scores in Turkish university students.
• Le, B. ve Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 37-57.
• Ludwig, K. B. (1999). Responses to dissatisfaction: An integrative analysis of change attempts and relationship quality. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Auburn University.
• Mello, Z. R. ve Worrell, F. C. (2006). The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(3),271-289.
• Milfont, T. L., Andrade, P. R., Pessoa, V. S. ve Belo, R. P. (2008). Testing Zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Brazilian sample. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 49-58.
• Najarpourian, S., Fatehizadeh, M., Etemadi, O., Ghasemi, V., Abedi, M. R. ve Bahrami, F. (2012). Personality types and marital satisfaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(5), 372-384.
• Navarick, D. J. ve Bellone, J. A. (2010). Time of semester as a factor in participants' obedience to instructions to perform an aversive task. The Psychological Record, 60(1), 101-114
• Öner, B. (2000). Relationship satisfaction and dating experience: Factors affecting future time orientation in relationships with the opposite sex. The Journal of psychology, 134(5), 527-536.
• Öner, B. (2001). Factors predicting future time oriantation for romantic relationships with the opposite sex. The Journal of Psychology: Interdiciplinary and Applied, 135(4), 430-438.
• Öner, B. (2004). Future time orientation in romantic relationships and the minding theory of relating. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 32(8), 797-804.
• Petkloska, J. ve Earl, J. K. (2009). Understanding the influence of demographic and psychological variables on retirement planning. Psychology and Aging, 24(1), 245
• Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. ve Postmes, T. (2010). Time perspective and attitude-behaviour consistency in future-oriented behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 69-89.
• Roberts, M. L. (2004). Personality and work situational predictors of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An interactionist perspective. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, The University of Tennessee, Tennessee, USA.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172-186.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101-117.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1991). Commentary on Johnson's commitment to personal relationships: what's interesting, and what's new? W. H. Jones ve D. W. Perlman, (Ed.), Advances in personal relationships içinde (151-169). London: Kingsley.
• Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J. ve Morrow, G. D. (1986a). Impact of couple patterns of problem solving on distress and nondistress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 744-753.
• Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J. ve Morrow, G. D. (1986b). Predicting satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic involvements: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(1), 81-89.
• Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M. ve Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-391.
• Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M. ve Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1230-1242.
• Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M. ve Iwaniszek, J. (1986). The impact of gender and sex-role orientation on responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships. Sex Roles, 15(1- 2), 1-20.
• Rusbult, C. ve Zembrodt, I. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(3), 274-293.
• Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2003). How do romantic relationship satisfaction, gender stereotypes, and gender relate to future time orientation in romantic relationships? The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137(3), 294-303.
• Shiota, M. ve Levenson, R. (2007). Birds of a feather don't always fly farthest: Similarity in big five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 666-675.
• Shores, K. ve Scott, D. (2007). The relationship of individual time perspective and recreation experience preferences. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 28-59.
• Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W. ve Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 121-139.
• Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., ve ark. (2014). A global look at time: A 24-country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1-12.
• Tümkaya, S. (2000). İlkokul öğretmenlerindeki denetim odağı ve tükenmişlikle ilişkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(8), 61-68.
• Watson, D., Hobbard, B. ve Wiese, D. (2000). Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Personality and Mate Preferences: Five Factors in Mate Selection and Marital Satisfaction, 68(3), 413-449.
• Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M. ve Yaeger, A. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress-coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 118.
• Zimbardo, P. (2002). Time to take our time. Psychology Today, 35, 62.
• Zimbardo, P. G. ve Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271- 1288.
• Zimbardo, P. G. ve Boyd, J. N. (2009). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.
• Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, A. K. ve Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personal Individual Differences, 23(6), 1007-1023.