___

• Aberson, C. L., Healy, M. ve Romero, V. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 157–173.
• Altun, N. (2013). Modern Türkiye’de kimlik: Kürt kimliğinden Kürt sorununa. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(2), 45–67.
• Berger, J. ve Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 593–607.
• Breakwell, G. (1996). Identity processes and social change. G. M. Breakwellve E. Lyons (Ed.), Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Changes içinde (13–30). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
• Brewer, M. B. (1993). The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behavior. M. Hogg ve Abrams (Ed.), Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives içinde (1–16). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
• Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or out-group hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.
• Brewer, M. B. (2001). In-group identification and intergroup conflict: When does in-group love become out-group hate? R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim ve D. Wilder (Ed.), Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Resolution içinde (17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 726–38.
• Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its Social Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. Cairns, E. Kenworthy, J. Campbell A. ve Hewstone M. (2006). The role of in-group identification, religious group membership and intergroup conflict in moderating in-group and out-group affect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(4), 701–716.
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Paladino, M. P. ve Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, the refore, I exist: In-group identification, in group entitativity, and in group bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135–143.
• Cinnirella, M. (1996). A social identity perspective on European integration. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons (Ed.), Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change içinde (253–274).
• Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Çoymak, A., Gheorghiu, M., Niens U. ve Lyons, E. (2015). Vatandaşlığın psikolojisi ve politik güven. Siyaset Psikolojisi içinde (257–280). Ankara: Nobel.
• Deffenbacher, D. M., Park, B., Judd, C. M. ve Correll, J. (2009). Category boundaries can be accentuated without increasing intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12(2), 175–193.
• Dixon, F. C. ve Ergin, M. (2010). Explaining anti-Kurdish beliefs in Turkey: Group competition, identity, and globalization. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1329–1348.
• Dunbar, E., Jose L., Saiz, J. L., Stela, K. ve Saez, R. (2000). Personality and social group value determinants of out-group bias: A cross-national comparison of Gough’s Pr/To Scale. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31, 267–275.
• Effro, D. A. ve Knowles, E. D. (2015). Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 234–253.
• Erdoğan, M. M. (2014). Türkiye’deki Suriyeliler: Toplumsal kabul ve uyum araştırması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Göç ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Merkezi, Ankara.
• Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Semenya, A. H. ve Jackson, L. M. (2005). Attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: The role of national and international identities. D. Abrams, J. M. Marques ve M. A. Hogg (Ed.), The Social Psychology Of Inclusion and Exclusion içinde (317–337). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
• Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M. ve Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724.
• Finell, E. ve Liebkind, K. (2010). National symbols and distinctiveness: Rhetorical strategies in creating distinct national identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 321–341.
• Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Ablasser, C., Beyer, M., Kuban, J., Manger, A. M. ve Schultz, M. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19–32.
• Gaertner, L. ve Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived in-group entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 963–980.
• Golec de Zavala, A. (2011). Collective narcissism and intergroup hostility: The dark side of ‘in-group love’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 309–320.
• Golec de Zavala, A., Eidelson, A., Cichocka, R. ve Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096.
• Ha, S. E. ve Jang, S. J. (2015). Immigration, threat perception, and national identity: Evidence from South Korea. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44(1), 53–62.
• Hayes (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Hortaçsu, N. ve Cem-Ersoy, N. (2005). Values, identities, and social constructions of the European Union among Turkish university youth. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 107–121.
• İnaç, H. (2004). Identity problems of Turkey during the European Union integration process. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 6(2), 33–62.
• Jetten, J., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality: Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 635–657.
• Jetten, J. ve Hutchison, P. (2011). When groups have a lot to lose: Historical continuity enhances resistance to a merger. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 335–343.
• Jetten, J. ve Wohl, M. J. A. (2012). The past as a determinant of the present: Historical continuity, collective angst, and opposition to immigration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 442–450.
• Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J. ve Zanna, M. P. (2005). Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 693–702.
• Kancı, T. (2009). The reconfigurations in the discourse of nationalism and national identity: Turkey at the turn of the twenty-first century. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 9(3), 359–376.
• Li, Q. ve Brewer, M. B. (2004). What does it mean to be American? Patriotism, nationalism, and American identity after 9/11. Political Psychology, 25(5), 727– 739.
• Livingstone, A. ve Haslam, S. A. (2008). The importance of social identity content in a setting of chronic social conflict: Understanding inter-group relations in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 1–21.
• Luhtanen, R. ve Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318.
• Lyons, E. (1996). Coping with social change: Processes of social memory in the reconstruction of identities. G. M. Breakwellve E. Lyons (Ed.), Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change içinde (31–40). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Oytun, O. ve Gündoğar, S. S. (2015). Suriyeli Sığınmacıların Türkiye’ye Etkileri Raporu. Orsam-Tesev Rapor No: 195, Ankara.
• Pickett, C. L. ve Brewer, M. B. (2001). Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 341–348.
• Preacher, K. J. ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
• Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W. ve Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Inter-group threat and out-group attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.
• Roccas, S., Klar, Y. ve Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based quilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711.
• Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. P. Katz ve D. Taylor (Ed.), Eliminating Racism: Profiles In Controversy içinde (53–84). New York: Plenum Press.
• Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
• Stephan, W. G., Ybarra O. ve Bachman G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221–2237.
• Smeekes, A. ve Verkuyten, M. (2013). Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 984–994.
• Smeekes, A. ve Verkuyten, M. (2014). When national culture is disrupted: Cultural continuity and resistance to Muslim immigrants. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 45–66.
• Smith, A. D. (2001). Nationalism: Theory, ideology, history. Cambridge: Polity. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter group conflict. W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations içinde (33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• Taşdemir, N. (2011).The relationships between motivations of intergroup differentiation as a function odifferent dimensions of social identity. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 125–137.
• Taşdemir, N. ve Öner-Özkan B. (2016a). Definitions of Turkish in-group boundaries: National participation and essentialism as predictors of inter-group attitudes in Turkey. Nations & Nationalism, 22(1), 143–164.
• Taşdemir, N. ve Öner-Özkan B. (2016b). Türk kimliği içerikleri: Sosyal psikolojik bir yaklaşım. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19(38), 35–49.
• Tunç, A. Ş. (2015). Mülteci davranışı ve toplumsal etkileri: Türkiye’deki Suriyelilere ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Tesam Akademi Dergisi, 2(2), 29–63.
• Ünal, S. (2014). Türkiye’nin beklenmedik konukları: “Öteki” bağlamında yabancı göçmen ve mülteci deneyimi. Journal of World of Turks, 6(3), 65–89.
• Verkuyten, M. (2009). Support for multiculturalism and minority rights: The role of national identification and out-group threat. Social Justice Research, 22, 31–52.
• Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Identity motives. S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx ve V. Vignoles (Ed.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research içinde (403–432). Springer: London.
• Vignoles, V. L, Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J. ve Scabini, E. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 308–333.
• Yzerbyt, E., Castano, V. Leyens, M. P. ve Paladino, S. (2000). The Primacy of the in-group: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 257–295.
• Wright, M. (2011). Diversity and the imagined community: Immigrant diversity and conceptions of national identity. Political Psychology, 32(5), 9221–2011.
• Zarate, M. A., Garcia, B., Garza, A. A. ve Hitlan, R. T. (2004). Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 99–105.