Örgüt kimliğinin gücü, algılanan örgütsel prestij ve kişi-örgüt uyumu ile bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkiler: Örgütsel bağlılığın aracı rolü

Bu araştırma kişi-örgüt uyumu, örgüt kimliğinin gücü ve algılanan örgütsel prestij ile bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkilerde örgütsel bağlılığın alt boyutları olan duygusal bağlılık, devamlılık bağlılığı ve normatif bağlılığın aracı rolünü bir üniversite ömekleminde incelemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya Karabük Üniversitesinde çalışan 190 akademik personel katılmıştır. Araştırmanın yordayıcı değişkenleri ile yordanan değişkeni arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel bağlılığın alt boyutlarının aracı rolünü incelemek amacıyla üç ayrı hiyerarşik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar duygusal bağlılık ve normatif bağlılığın kişi-örgüt uyumu, örgüt kimliğinin gücü ve algılanan örgütsel prestij ile bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkide aracı rol oynadığını ancak devamlılık bağlılığının ise böyle bir aracı rolünün olmadığını göstermiştir.

The relationships of contextual performance with person-organization fit, perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength: The mediating role of organizational commitment

The present study was carried out to examine the mediating role of organizational commitment (affective, normative and continuance) on the relationship between person-organization fit. perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength and organizational commitment of the employees. The results of regression analyses using data collected from 190 academic staff in Karabük University showed that affective and normative commitment has an intermediary role in the relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identity strength, perceived organizational prestige and contextual performance while the same results also showed that there is no intermediary role of continuance commitment in this relationship.

___

  • Abrams, D., Ando, K. ve Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers' turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 24( 10), 1027-1040.
  • Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, P. (1990), The measurement ve antecedents of affective, continuance vc normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  • Albert. S. ve Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  • Amos, E. A. ve Weathington, B. L. (2008). An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142, 615-632.
  • Arthur, W. Jr., Bell, S. T., Doverspike, D. ve Villado, A. J. (2006). The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 786-801.
  • Ashfort. B. E. ve Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and organization. Academy and Management Review. 14( 1), 20-39.
  • Ashfort. B. E., ve Mael, F. A. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 19-64.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology. 66, 32-42.
  • Bergman, M. E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 645-663.
  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Bowling, N. A. (2010). Effects of job satisfaction and conscientiousness on extra-role behaviors. Journal of Bussiness Psychology, 25, 119-130.
  • Brief, A. F. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
  • Borman, W. C. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. N. Schmit ve W. C. Borman, (Ed.), Personal selection in organizations içinde. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cable, D. vc Judge, T. A. (1996). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546-561.
  • Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organization Studies. 26(3), 443-464.
  • Carmeli, A., Gilat, G. ve Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies. 44(6), 972-992.
  • Carmeli, A., Gershon, G. ve Weisberg, J. (2006). Perceived external prestige, organizational identification and affective commitment: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Reputation Review. 9(2), 92-104.
  • Cichy, R. F., Cha, J. ve Kim, S. (2009). The relatioaship between organizational commitment and contextualperfor-mance among private club leaders. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 28( 1), 53-62.
  • Cole, M. S. ve Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 585-605.
  • Crede, M., Chernyshenko, O. S., Bagraim, J. ve Sully, M.
  • (2009). Contextual performance and the job satisfaction-dissatisfaction distinction: Examining artifacts and utility. Human Performance, 22, 246-272.
  • De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R., Hermans, S., Du Bois, C., Caers, R. ve Jegers, M. (2009). Person-organi-zation fit: Testing socialization and attraction-selection-attrition hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 74, 102-107. 4
  • de Lara, P. Z. M. (2008). Should faith and hope be included in the employees' agenda?: Linking p-o fit and citizenship behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23, 73-88.
  • Devonish, D. ve Greenidge, D. (2010). The effect of organizational justice on contextual performance, counterproductive work behaviors, and task performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability-based emotional intelligence. International Jourml of Selection and Assessment, 18(I), 75-86.
  • Dutton, J. E. ve Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517-554.
  • Dutton, J. E.. Dukerich, J. M. ve Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images ve member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
  • Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J. ve Rohdick, S. ( 2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology, 30. 1-13.
  • Ersoy, C. N„ Bom, M. Ph., Dcrousa, E. ve Vander Molen, H. T.
  • (2010). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior among blue- and white-collar workers in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 743, 1-12.
  • Fincgan, J. E. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 149-169.
  • Fuller, J. B., Hester, K.. Bamett, T., Frey, L. ve Relyea, C. (2006). Perceived organizational support and perceived external prestige: predicting organizational attachment for üniversity faculty, staff, and administrators. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1460), 327-347.
  • George, J. M. ve Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329. *
  • Gioia, D. A. ve Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in acadcmia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403.
  • Goodman. S. ve Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254-275.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
  • Güleryüz, E. (2010). Öncülleri ve sonuçalrı bağlamında örgütsel özdenimin örgütsel bağlılığın duygusal bağlılık boyutuyla ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2006). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ile duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 3(1), 48-75.
  • HolTman, B. J. ve Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person-organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68. 389-399.
  • Jahangir, N., Akbar, M. ve Haq. M. M. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. BRAC University Journal. 1(2), 75-85.
  • Kamdar, D. ve Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joints effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286-1298.
  • Karakurum, M. (2005). The effects of person-organization fit employee job satisfaction, performance vc organizational commitment in a Turkish public organization. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi. Ankara.
  • Kreiner, G. E. vc Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 25, 1-27.
  • Kristof-Brown. A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement and implications. Personnel Psychology. 49(1), 1-49.
  • Kristof-Brown. A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. vc Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individulas' fit at work: A meta analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervizor fit. Personnel Psychology. 58, 281-342.
  • LePine J. A.. Erez, A. vc Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology', 87, 52-65.
  • Lin, C. P., Hung, W. T. ve Chiu, C. K. (2008). Being good citizens: Understanding a mediating mechanism of organizational commitment and social network ties in OCBs. Journal of Business Ethics. 81, 561-578.
  • Liu, Y. (2008). Perceived organizational support and expatriate organizational citizenship behavior. The mediating role of affective commitment towards the parent company. Personnel Review. 38, 307-319.
  • Mael. F. ve Ashforth. B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
  • Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Bio-data, organizational idendification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48,309-333.
  • Marsh, R. M. ve Mannan. H. (1977). Organizational commitment and turnover: A predictive study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 57-75.
  • Mayer. R. C. ve Schoorman, D. F. (1998). Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment: A test of March and Simon's model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19( 1), 15-28.
  • Mclnnis, K. J., Meyer, J. P. ve Feldman, S. (2009). Psychological contracts and their implications for commitment: A feature-based approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 165-180.
  • Meyer, J. P. ve Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review. 1(1), 61-89.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J.. Hcrscovitch, L. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 61,20-52.
  • Milliken, F. J. (1990). Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: an examination of college administrators' interpretation of changing demographics. Academy of Management Journal. 33,42-63.
  • Motowidlo, J. S. ve Van Scotter. J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(4), 475-480.
  • Organ, D. ve Ryan. K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of atti-tudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology. 48, 775-800.
  • Ostroff, C., Shin, Y. Y. ve Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Multiple perspectives of congruence: relationship between value congruence and employee attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 26,591-623.
  • Porter, L. W„ Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. ve Boulian, P. B. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology. 59(5). 603-609.
  • Podsakoff, P. M.. Ahearne. M. ve MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applıeıl Psychology. 82(2), 262-270.
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting. S. W„ Podsakoff, P. M. ve Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behavior A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94( 1), 122-141.
  • Rikctta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 23,257-266.
  • Scheneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology. 40,437-453.
  • Shore, L. M. ve Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78, 774-780.
  • Silverthorne, C. (2004). The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on oıganizationa) commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 25, 592-599.
  • Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. H., ve Van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication ve perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal. 49(5 1051-1062.
  • Smith, A. C., ve Organ, D. W. ve Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
  • Sobcl, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology. 13, 290-312.
  • Somcrs, M. J. (2009). The combined influence of affective, con-tinuancc and normative commitment on employee withdrawal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 75-81.
  • Spector, P. E. ve Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review. 12(2), 269-292.
  • Tom, V. R. (1971). The role of personality and organizational images in the recruiting process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 6(5), 573-592.
  • Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human Resource Management Review. 10(1), 79-95.
  • Wasti. S. A. (1999). Organizational commitment and collectivism: The case of Turkey. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  • Wasti, S. A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover intentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 303-321.
  • Weiner, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Acadcmy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.
  • Westerman, J. W. ve Cyr, L. A. (2004). An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 12(3), 252-261.
  • Witt, L. A. ve Ferris, G. R. (2003). Social skill as moderator of the conscientiousness-performance relationship: Convergent results across four studies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5), 809-820.