Ana babanın psikolojik kontrolü ile gencin yalnızlığı arasındaki ilişkide kişilerarası güven inancı ve bağlanmanın rolü

Araştırmanın amacı, bireyin anne ve babasından algıladığı psikolojik kontrol ile yalnızlık düzeyi arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide kişilerarası güven inancı ile ebeveyn ve akrana bağlanmanın rollerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın ör-neklemini, 378 kız, 307 erkek olmak üzere toplam 685 üniversite öğrencisi (Ori= 19.85, S= 1.42, ranj = 17-25) oluşturmuştur. Araştırma kapsamında Gençler için Kişilerarası Güven İnancı Ölçeği, Ebeveyn ve Akran Bağlılığı Envanteri, Psikolojik Kontrol Ölçeği ve UÇLA Yalnızlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın hipotezleri Yapısal Eşitlik Modeliyle ve her iki cinsiyet için sınanmıştır. Sonuçlar, algılanan psikolojik kontrolün kız ve erkeklerin yalnızlık düzeyini pozitif yönde yordadığını ve bu ilişkinin hem ebeveyne hem de akrana bağlanmayla kısmen açıklanabildiğim göstermiştir. Ebeveyne duyulan güvenin ise psikolojik kontrol ve yalnızlık arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamadığı, sadece kızlarda akrana duyulan güvenin bu ilişkiyi kısmen açıkladığı bulunmuştur. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, gencin ana baba ve arkadaşa bağlılığı ile arkadaşa güveninin, psikolojik kontrol ile bağlantılı yalnızlık hissinin zayıflamasında rol oynadığına dikkat çekmektedir.

The relation between parental psychological control and late adolescents' loneliness: The mediator roles of ınterpersonal trust and attachment

The study intends to examine the relation between perceived parental psychological control and youth loneliness. In addition, it investigates the mediator roles of interpersonal trust belief in and attachment to parents and peers in these relationships. The sample of this study consists of 378 female and 307 male (N= 685) university students = 19.85, SD = 1.42, range = 17-25). The following measures were used in the study: Lâte Adolescent's Interpersonal Trust Belief Scale, Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, Psychological Control Scale, and UCLA Loneliness Scale. Structural Equation Model was used to test the research hypotheses. The results showed that perceived psychological control was positively predicted by university students' loneliness. The models which were conducted separately for females and males revealed that parent and peer attachment partially mediated the relation between perceived psychological control and late adolescents' loneliness. However, trust in mother and father did not account for the relation between perceived control and loneliness in any gender, although it was partially explained by trust in peers only for females. It was concluded that the negative influence of psychological control on late adolescent's loneliness might decrease to a certain extent with secure attachment to parent and peer, and trust in peers.

___

  • Ainsworth, M. D. (1989). Attachment beyond infancy. American Psychologist. 34, 932-937.
  • Allen, J. P., Hauscr, S. T., Bell, K L. ve O'Connor. T. O. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and related-ncss in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 179-194.
  • Armsden, G. ve Greenberg. M. (1987), The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 16, 427-454.
  • Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control; Revisiting a ncglected construct. Child Development. 67, 3296-3319.
  • Barber, B. K. (1999). political violence, family relations, and Palestinian youth functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 206-230.
  • Barber. B. K. ve I larmoıı, 11. L. (2002). Violating the sell: Parental psychological control of early adolescents and adolescents. B. K. Barber. (Ed.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents içinde (15-52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
  • Barber, B. K„ Xia, M., Olsen, J. A., Mcneely, C. A. ve Bose, K. (2012). Feeling disrespected by parents: Refining the measurement and understanding of psychological control. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 273-287.
  • Bayraktar, F„ Özdikmenli-Demir, G. ve Sayıl, M. (2008). Ebeveyne duyulan güvenin psikolojik kontrol ve zorbalık/ zorbalığa maruz kalma arasındaki aracı rolünün incelenmesi. 11. Psikoloji Lisansüstü Öğrencileri Kongresinde sunulan sözel bildiri, Ankara Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara.
  • Bayraktar. F.. Sayıl. M. ve Kumru. A. (2009). Liseli ergenler ve üniversiteli gençlerde benlik saygısı: Ebeveyn ve akrana bağlanma, empati ve psikolojik uyum değişkenlerinin rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 48-63.
  • Bernath, M. S. ve Feshbach, N. D. (1995) Children's trust: Theory, assessment, development and research directions. Applied and Preventative Psychology. 4, 1-19.
  • Black, E. A. ve Deci, L. D. (2000) The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous molivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84,740-756.
  • Blain, M., Thompson, J. ve Whiffen, V. (1993). Attachment and perceived social support in late adolescence: The interaction between working models of self and others. Journal of Adolescent Research. 8, 226—241.
  • Brack. G.. Gay. M. ve Mathcny, K. (1993). Relationships between attachment and coping resources among late adolescents. Journal of College Student Development. 34. 212-215.
  • Bradford, E. ve Lyddon, W. J. (1993). Current parental attachment: Its relation to perceived psychological distress and relationship satisfaction in college students. Journal of College Student Development. 34. 256-272.
  • Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affection-al bonds. London: Tavistock.
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss, separation and depression (Cilt 3). New York: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (I988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
  • Buhrmester, D. vc Furman. W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development, 58, 1101-1113.
  • Cacioppo, J. T. vc Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the needfor social connection. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Cavcll, T., Jones, D.. Runyan, R. D.. Constantin-Page, E. ve Velasquez, J. (1993). Perceptions of attachment and adjustment of adolescents with alcoholic lathers. Journal of Family Psychology. 7,204-212,
  • Clifton, R. A.. Perry, R. P., Adams-Stubbs, C. ve Roberts. L. W. (2004). Faculty environments, psychosocial dispositions, and the academic achievement of college students. Research in Higher Education, 45, 801-828.
  • Dcmir, A. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Tiirk Psikoloji Dergisi. 7. 14-18.
  • Doyle. A. B. vc Markiewicz, D. (2005). Parenting, marital conflict, and adjustment, from early to mid-adolescence: Mediated by adolescent attachment style? Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 34.97-110.
  • Durak-Batıgün, A. (2005). İntihar olasılığı: Yaşamı sürdürme nedenleri, umutsuzluk ve yalnızlık açısından bir inceleme. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. I6( I ),'29-39.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2. baskı) New York: Norton.
  • Imber, S. C. (1973). Relationship of trust to acadcmıc performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 145-150.
  • Güngör. D. (2008). The meaning of parental control in migrant, sending, and host communities: Adaptation or persistence? Applied Psychology: An Ihfernational Review, 57, 397-416.
  • Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal oj Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 65, 599-610.
  • Holmbeck. G. N. vc Wandrei, M. L. (1993). Individual and relational predictors of adjustment in first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 73-78.
  • Hu. L. ve Bentler. P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariancc structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. ve Sörbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.54 for Windows JComputer Software], Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Family and human development across cultures A view from the other side. NJ: Lawrencc Erl-baum Associates, Inc.
  • Karavasilis, L., Doyle, A. B. vc Markiewicz, D. (2003). Associations between parenting style and attachment to mother in middle childhood and adolcscencc. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 27, 153-164.
  • Kenny, M. E. (1987). The extent and function of parental attachment among first-year college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 17-27.
  • Kenny, M. E. (1990). College seniors' perceptions of parental attachments: The value and stability of family ties. Journal of College Student Development. 31, 39-46.
  • Kındap. Y. (2011). Kendini Belirleme Kuramı temelinde ergenlikte destekleyici ebeveynlik, akademik ve sosyal uyum vc kendini belirleme düzeyi arasındaki ilişkilerin boylamsal olarak incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Haccttcpc Üniversitesi, Ankara
  • Kındap, Y„ Sayıl, M. ve Kumru. A. (2008). Anneden algılanan kontrolün niteliği ile ergenin psikososyal uyumu ve arkadaşlıkları arasındaki ilişkiler: Benlik değerinin aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergin. 23(61), 95-110.
  • Kumru, A., Carlo. G. ve Pope-Edwards, C. (2004). Olumlu sosyal davranışlarının ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyıışsal bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 19,109-125.
  • Laible, D. J., Carlo, G. ve Raffaelli, M. (2000). The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolcscent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 29, 45-59.
  • Lapslcy, D„ Rice, K. ve Fit/Gerald, D. (1990). Adolescent attachment, identity, and adjustment to college: Implications for the continuity of adaptation hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Development. 68, 561-565.
  • Larose, S. ve Boivin. M. (1998). Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 8, I -27.
  • Marsh, H. W. vc Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimcthod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73, 107-117.
  • Ö/demir, M. (2010). Trust in people and institutions as predictors of youth well-being. 13* biennial meeting of Society for Research on Adolescence, Mart Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Özdikmenli-Demir, G. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kimlik gelişiminde sosyal ve kimlik sermayelerinin rolü. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Haccttcpc Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Özdikmeü-Dcmir, (i.. Sayıl, M. ve Kumru, A. (2006). The relations of interpersonal trust beliefs to prosocial behaviors in Turkish early adolescent. Uf EARA Conference, Mayıs. Antalya, Turkey.
  • "Pettit. G. S., Laird. R. D., Dodge, K. A.. Bales, J. E. ve Criss, M. M. (2001). Antecedents and behavior problem outcomes of parental monitoring and psychological control in early adolescence. Child Development. 72, 583-598.
  • Randall, B. (2007). Survey notebook from late adolescents' competence study. Fargo, N. D: North Dakota State University.
  • Rice, K. G. (I9l>0). Attachment in adolcscencc: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 19, 511-538.
  • Rice, K, G.. FitzGerald, D. P., Whalcy, T. J. ve Gibbs, C. L. (1995). Cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of attachment, separation individuation, and college student adjustment. Journal of Counseling and Development. 73, 463-474.
  • Rotenberg, K. J. (1994). Loneliness and interpersonal trust. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 152-173.
  • Rotenberg, K. J. (1995). The socialisation of trust: Parents' and children's interpersonal trust. Internatioanl Journal of Behavioural Development, 18, 713-726.
  • Rotenberg, K. J. (2001). Trust across the life-span. N. J. Smclscr ve P. B. Baltes, (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences içinde (7866-7868). New York: Permagon.
  • Rotenberg, K. J. (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rotenberg, K. J., Addis, N., Betts, L. R-. Corrigan, A., Fox, C., Hobson, Z. vc ark., (2010). The relation between trust beliefs and loneliness during early childhood, middle childhood, and adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. J6(8), 1086-1100.
  • Rotenbeıg, K. J., Boulton, M. J. vc Fox, C. L. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among children's trust beliefs, psychological maladjustment and social relationships: Arc very high as well as very low trusting children at risk? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 33, 595-610.
  • Rotenbeıg, K. J. ve Cerda, C. (1995). Racially based trust expectancies of Native American and Caucasian children. Journal of Social Psychology. 134, 621 -631.
  • Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., Green, S.. Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K. ve ark. (2005). Construction and validation of a children's interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 23, 271-292.
  • Rotenberg, K. J. ve Hymel, S. (Eds.). (1999). Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rotenbeıg, K. J., Mac Donald. K. J. ve King, E. V. (2002). The relation between loneliness and interpersonal trust during middle childhood. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 165, 233-249.
  • Rotenberg, ¥L J., McDougall, P., Boulton, M. J.. Vail-lancourt, T., Fox, C. ve Hymel, S. (2004). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among peer-reported trustworthiness, social relationships, and psychological adjustment in children and early adolescents from the United Kingdom and Canada. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 88, 46-67.
  • Rothbaum. F. ve Trommsdorff, G. (2007). Do roots and wings complement or oppose one another? The socialization of relatedness and autonomy in cultural context. J. E. Gmsec ve P. D. Hastings, (Ed.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research içinde (461-489). New York: Guilford.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality. 35, 651-665.
  • Rotter. J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443-452.
  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A. ve Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminate validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39,472-480.
  • Satorra, A. ve Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. A. Von Eye ve C. C. Clogg, (Ed.), Latent variable analysis: Applications in developmental research içinde (339-418). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Sayıl, M. vc Kındap, Y. (2010). Ergenin anne babadan algıladığı psikolojik kontrol: Psikolojik Kontrol Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 13(25), 62-71.
  • Sayıl, M., Kumru, A., Bayraktar, F., Kındap, Y. ve Özdik-menli-Dcmir. G. (2008). Çocukluktan yetişkinliğe geçiş sürecinde sosyal ilişkilerin niteliği w karakter oluşumuyla ilişkisi (Proje No: 105K029). TÜBİTAK - SOBAG.
  • Schultheiss, D. vc Blustein, D. (1994). Role of adolescent-parent relationships in college student development and adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41,248-255.
  • Shck, D. T. L. (2005). Perceived parental control and parent-child relational qualities in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Sex Roles. 53(9), 635-646.
  • Shek, D. T. L. (2007). Perceived parental behavioral control and psychological control in Chinese adolescents in I long Kong: A replication. Adolescence. 42( 167), 6.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations model. S. Lemhart. (Ed.), So ciological methodology 1982 içinde (290-312). San Francisco: Josscy-Bass.
  • Soenens, B. ve Beyers, W. (2012). The cross-cultural significance of control and autonomy in parent-adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescence. 35, 243-248.
  • Soenens, B. ve Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insight on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Re>iew, 30, 74-99.
  • Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Duricz, B. ve Goossens, L. (2006). In search of the sources of psychologically controlling parenting: The role of parental separation anxiety and parental maladaptive perfectionism. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 16, 539-559.
  • Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Duriez, B. ve Niemiec, C. P. (2008). The intervening role of relational aggression between psychological control and friendship quality. Social Development. 17, 661 -681.
  • Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten, P., Duricz, B. ve Goossens, L. (2005). Maladaptive perfcctionistic self-representations: The mediational link between psychological control and adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences. 38, 487-498.
  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşiüikmodelleri:Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3, 49-74.
  • Tuzgöl-Dost, M. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam doyumunun bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(22), 132-143.
  • Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. Z. Rubin, (Ed.), Doing unto others içinde (17-26). Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development. 62, 1066-1078.