Sistatin C: Böbrek işlevleri azalmakta olan çocuklarda glomerüler filtrasyon hızı ölçümünde daha yararlı bir değişken olabilir mi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada böbrek işlevleri azalmakta olan çocuklarda glomerül filtrasyon hızı tayininde serum sistatin C’nin kreatinine göre daha iyi bir değişken olup olmadığı araştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Göztepe Eğitim-Araştırma Hastanesi ve Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Çocuk Nefroloji Poliklinikleri’nde izlenen 100 çocuk (53 kız/47 erkek) çalışmaya alındı. Çalışmada altın standart olarak dietilen triamin penta asetat (DTPA) klirensi alındı. Dietilen triamin penta asetat klirensi 80mL/dak/1,73m2’nin üstünde olan olgular birinci gruba (n=64), altındakiler ikinci gruba (n=36) alındı. Olguların serum sistatin C ve kreatinin düzeyleri ölçüldü, glomerül filtrasyon hızı Schwartz formülüyle (GFH schw) hesaplandı. Değişkenlerin tanısal değerleri ROC analizi ile değerlendirildi. Tüm çocukların ailelerinden imzalanmış aydınlatılmış onay formu alındı. Bulgular: Olguların 53’ü kız, 47’si erkek olup yaşları ortalama 8,4±5,1 (0,17-20,5) yıl idi. Birinci gruba 64 olgu, ikinci gruba 36 olgu alındı. Olguların serum sistatin C ve kreatinin düzeyleri ile GFHSchw arasında her iki grupta anlamlı bir ilişki saptandı (p

Cystatin C: can it be more reliable marker for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children with reduced renal function?

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether serum cystatin C is superior as a marker of glomerular filtration rate calculation in children with reduced renal functions. Material and Method: Serum cystatin C, creatinine and 99Tc-diethylenetriamene penta acetate (DTPA) clearance (GFRDTPA) were measured in 100 children (53 girls, 47 boys; mean age 8.4±5.1). Glomerular filtration rate was calculated by the Schwartz formula. Patients with DTPA clearance, accepted as the a gold standart, above 80 mL/dk/1.73m2 were included in group 1(n=64) and below 80 mL/dk/1.73m2 in group 2 (n=36). Receiver-operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess their diagnostic accuracy. Signed informed consents of the parents were obtained in all cases. Results: Serum cystatin C and creatinine were correlated with glomerular filtration rate in group 1 and 2. Diethylen etriamene penta acetate (DTPA) clearance was correlated with glomerular filtration rate in both groups, and with cystatin C in group 2. Receiver-operating characteristics analysis showed that the accuracy of cystatin C and glomerular filtration rate was similar. The area under curves were statistically significant but not different for cystatin C and glomerular filtration rate. Conclusions: Serum cystatin C may be useful but not superior to glomerular filtration rate calculated by Schwartz formula which is a simple and reliable method to estimate glomerular filtration rate in children with normal and decreased renal functions.

___

  • 1. Rahn KH, Heidenreich S, Bruckner D. How to assess glomerular function and damage in humans. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 309-17. [Özet]
  • 2. Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function: new insights into old concepts. Clin Chem 1992; 38: 1933-53. [Özet]
  • 3. Shemesh O, Golbetz H, Kriss JP, Myers BD. Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. Kidney Int 1985; 28: 830-8. [Özet]
  • 4. Blaufox MD, Aurell M, Bubeck B, et al. Report of the radionuclides in Nephrology committee on renal clearance. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 1883-90. [Özet]
  • 5. Peters AM, Allison H, Ussov W. Measurement of the ratio of glomerular filtration rate to plasma volume from the technetium-99m diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid renogram: comparison with glomerular filtration rate in relation to extracellular fluid volume. Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21: 322-7. [Özet]
  • 6. Bökenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J. Cystatin C-a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 875-81. [Özet]
  • 7. Grubb A. Diagnostic value of analysis of cystatin C and protein HC in biological fluids. Clin Nephrol 1992; 38: 20-7. [Özet]
  • 8. Jung K, Jung M. Cystatin C. A promising marker of glomerular filtration rate to replace creatinine. Nephron 1995; 70: 370-1. [Özet]
  • 9. Reed CH. Diagnostic applications of cystatin C. Br J Biomed Sci 2000; 57: 323-9. [Özet]
  • 10. Ylinen EA, Ala-Houhala M, Harmoinen APT, Knip M. Cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in pediatric patients. Pediatr Nephrol 1999; 13: 506-9. [Özet]
  • 11. Stickle D, Cole B, Hock K, Hruska KA, Scott MG. Correlation of plasma concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine to inuline clearance in a pediatric population. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 1334-8. [Özet]
  • 12. Filler G, Priem F, Lepage N, et al. Beta-trace protein, cystatin C, beta(2)-microglobulin, and creatinine compared for detecting impaired glomerular filtration rates in children. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 729-36. [Özet]
  • 13. Schwartz GJ, Brion LP, Spitzer A. The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 1987; 34: 571-90. [Özet]
  • 14. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelman CM Jr, Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 1976; 58: 259-63. [Özet]
  • 15. Ham HR, Piepsz A. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in infants and children using a single-plasma sample method. J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 1294-7. [Özet]
  • 16. Seikaly MG, Browne R, Bajaj G, Arant BS Jr. Limitations to body lenght/serum creatinine ratio as an estimate of glomerular filtration in children. Pediatr Nephrol 1996; 10: 709-11. [Özet]
  • 17. Filler G, Bökenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martinez Bru C, Grubb A. Cystatin C as a marker of GFR-history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem 2005; 38: 1-8. [Özet]
  • 18. Bökenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J. Reference values for cystatin C serum concentrations in children. Pediatr Nephrol 1998; 12: 125-9. [Özet]
  • 19. Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Edwards RG, et al. Serum cystatin C measured by automated immunoassay: a more sensitive marker of changes in GFR than serum creatinine. Kidney Int 1995; 47: 312-8. [Özet]
  • 20. Finney H, Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Fell JM, Price CP. Reference ranges for plasma cystatin C and creatinine measurements in premature infants, neonates, and older children. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82: 71-5. [Özet]
  • 21. Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjork J, et al. A simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children. Clin Chem 2005; 51: 1420-31. [Özet]
  • 22. Zappitelli M, Parvex P, Joseph L, et al. Derivation and validation of cystatin C-based prediction equations for GFR in children. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: 221-30. [Özet]
  • 23. Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklave L. Serum cystatin C-based formulas for prediction of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 114: 118-26. [Özet]
  • 24. Filler G, Lepage N. Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18: 981-5. [Özet]
  • 25. Filler G, Priem F, Vollmer I, Gellermann J, Jung K. Diagnostic sensitivity of serum cystatin for impaired glomerular filtration rate. Pediatr Nephrol 1999; 13: 501-5. [Özet]
  • 26. Eriksen BO, Mathisen UD, Melsom T, et al. Cystatin C is not a better estimator of GFR than plasma creatinine in the general population. Kidney Int 2010; 78: 1305-11. [Özet]
  • 27. Andersen TB, Jensen AE, Frokiaer J, Brochner-Mortensen J. Measuring glomerular filtration rate in children; can cystatin C replace established methods? A review. Pediatr nephrol 2009; 24: 929-41. [Özet]
  • 28. Bouvet Y, Bouissou F, Coulais Y, et al. GFR is better estimated by considering both serum cystatin C and creatinine levels. Pediatr Nephrol 2006; 21: 1299-306. [Özet]
  • 29. Mussap M, Ruzzante N, Varagnolo M, Plebani M. Quantitative automated particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay for the routinary measurement of human cystatin C. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36: 859-65. [Özet]
  • 30. Kyhse-Andersen J, Schmidt C, Nordin G, et al. Serum Cystatin C, determined by a rapid, automated particle-enhanced turbidimetric method, is a better marker than serum creatinine for glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem 1994; 40: 1921-6. [Özet]
  • 31. Bökenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J. Cystatin C- a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 875-81. [Özet]
  • 32. Çabukoğlu S, Alpay H, Bıyıklı NK, Noşari OA, Topçu G. Spina bifidalı çocuklarda dietilen triamin pentaasetik asit klirensi temel alınarak serum sistatin C ve kreatinin değerlerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz Transplantasyon Dergisi 2002; 11: 241-5. [Özet]
  • 33. Herget-Rosenthal S, Marggraf G, Hüsing J, et al. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum cystatin C. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 1115-22. [Özet]
  • 34. Nejat M, Pickering JW, Walker RJ, Endre ZH. Rapid detection of acute kidney injury by plasma cystatin C in the intensive care unit. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 3283-9. [Özet]
  • 35. Risch L, Herklotz R, Blumberg A, Huber AR. Effects of glucocorticoid immunosupression on serum cystatin C concentrations in renal transplant patients. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 2055-9. [Özet]
  • 36. Okura T, Jotoku M , Irita J, et al. Association between cystatin C and inflammation in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Exp Nephrol 2010; 14: 584-8. [Özet]
  • 37. den Hollander JG, Wulkan RW, Mantel MJ, Berghout A. Is cystatin C a marker of glomerular filtration rate in thyroid dysfunction? Clin Chem 2003; 49: 1558-9. [Özet]
  • 38. Sahakyan K, Klein BEK, Lee KE, Tsai MY, Klein R. Serum Cystatin C and the incidence of hypertension in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am J Hypertens 2010; 24: 59-63. [Özet]
  • 39. Shlipak MG, Katz R, Cushman M, et al. Cystatin-C and inflammatory markers in the ambulatory elderly. Am J Med 2005; 118: 1416.[Özet]
Türk Pediatri Arşivi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1306-0015
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Alpay Azap
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Tıbbi uygulama hatası iddiası ile Adli Tıp Kurumu’na gönderilen 0-18 yaş grubu olguların değerlendirilmesi

Muhammet CAN, Rıza YILMAZ, İmdat ELMAS, Nesrin ÖZKAYA, Halit ÖZKAYA, Ali YILDIRIM, Işıl PAKİŞ

Sistatin C: Böbrek işlevleri azalmakta olan çocuklarda glomerüler filtrasyon hızı ölçümünde daha yararlı bir değişken olabilir mi

Lale SEVER, Nurdan YILDIZ, Levent KABASAKAL, Salim ÇALIŞKAN, Nil ARISOY

Cinsel saldırıya uğramış çocuğun muayenesi

Osman CELBİŞ, Bora ÖZDEMİR, Atihan KAYA

Koruyucu demir dozunun hayatın ilk yılında günlük ve günaşırı kullanımı

Tiraje ÇELİKAN

Üniversite hastanemiz acil servisine travma nedeniyle başvuran çocuk olguların değerlendirilmesi

Abuzer COŞKUN, İlhan KORKMAZ, Levent CANKORKMAZ, Fatma Mutlu GÜVEN KUKUL, Zeki DOĞAN

Samsun ilinde ilköğretim çağı erkek çocuklarda testis ve penis boyutları ve dış genital organ anomali oranları

Yarkın Kamil YAKUPOĞLU, Yakup BOSTANCI, Serkan VAROL, Ender ÖZDEN, Cihan YALMAN, Şaban SARIKAYA

Lafora hastalığı: ilerleyici bir miyoklonik epilepsi

Serap UYSAL, Cüyan DEMİRKESEN, Olcay ÜNVER

Bir devlet hastanesinde çok düşük doğum ağırlıklı yenidoğanlarda hastalık ve ölüm oranları

Bayram Ali DORUM, Sevil DORUM, Hilal KURNAZ, İbrahim ŞİLFELER, Yekta CANBAK

Boyunda şişliği olan beş yaşında kız hasta

Ümit Erkan VURDEM, Ahmet SAVRANLAR, Yasemin TORUN ALTINER, Ufuk ERTURAL, Ahmet MENKÜ

Çalışmanın çocuk bedeni üzerine etkisi: İzmit’te yapılan iki araştırma sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

Cavit Işık YAVUZ, Çiğdem ÇAĞLAYAN, Şükrü HATUN, Nilay ETİLER, Onur HAMZAOĞLU