Kronik engelli çocuğu olan ailelerde başka çocuk yapma isteği ve anne-baba birlikteliğine etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kronik engelli çocuğu olan ebeveynlerin başka çocuk yapma isteklerinin incelenmesi ve engelli çocuğa sahip olmanın anne-baba birlikteliğine etkisini araştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, kronik engelli 145 çocuğun ailesi dahil edildi. Çocuk ve aileye ait sosyo-demografik bilgiler alındıktan sonra, hazırlanan soru formu ile anne-babanın birlikte yaşayıp yaşamadıkları, ailedeki çocuk sayısı, engelli çocuktan sonra başka çocuğa sahip olmak isteyip-istemedikleri, engelli çocuğun ev halkı ile ilişkisi sorgulandı. Araştırmanın yapılabilmesi için Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Girişimsel Olmayan Etik Kurulu'nda 18.10.2012 tarih ve 2012/34-13 karar numarası ile onay alındı. Çalışmadan elde edilen veriler sayı ve yüzde olarak ifade edildi. Bulgular: Ebeveynlerin %91,7'si birlikteliklerini sürdürüyorken, %2,8'i boşanmış, %1,4'ü eşi tarafından terk edilmişti. Engelli çocuktan sonra başka çocuk istemeyen ebeveynlerin (ya da yapmayanların) oranı %65,2 olarak bulundu. Başka çocuk istememelerinin en büyük nedeni hasta çocuklarına yeterli zaman ayıramayacaklarını düşünmeleri olarak belirlendi. Ebevenynlerin %35,1'i engelli çocuktan sonra birbirlerine daha çok kenetlendiklerini belirtirken, %35,2'si gelecekle ilgili kaygılarının daha çok arttığını ifade etti. Ebeveynlerin %58'i sosyal ilişki ve toplumsal katılımlarının etkilenmediğini belirtirken, diğerleri farklı şekillerde etkilendiğini belirtti.Çıkarımlar: Kronik engelli çocuğu olan ailelerde, anne-baba birlikteliği çok fazla etkilenmemiş olmakla birlikte, ebeveynlerin yoğun gelecek kaygısı yaşadığı saptandı. Bu durumun, kronik engelli çocuğu olan ebeveynlerin engelli doğacak kaygısıyla başka çocuk yapma arzularını da etkileyebildiği belirlendi

Desire to have other children in families with a chronically disabled child and its effect on the relationship of the parents

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the desire of the parents who had a chronically disabled child to have other children and to investigate the effect of having a disabled child on the relationship of the parents. Material and Methods: The families of 145 chronically disabled children were included in the study. After the sociodemographic information belonging to the child and family were obtained, the prepared questionnaire form was used to interrogate if the parents lived together, the number of children in the family, if they wished to have other children and the relation of the disabled child with the household. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Dokuz Eylül University . The data obtained in the study were expressed as figures and percentages.Results: While 91.7% of the parents continued their relationship, 2.8% were divorced and 1.4% were left by their spouses. The rate of the parents who did not wish to have (or did not have) other children after a disabled child was found to be 65.2%. The major reason for the families not to wish to have other children was found to be the fact that they thought they could not spare enough time for their disabled child. While 35.1% of the parents stated that clemped together more tightly, 35.2% stated that their concerns about the future increased further. Fifty eight percent of the parents stated that social relations and community involvements were not affected, whereas others stated that they were affected in different ways. Conclusions: Although the relationship between the parents was not affected to a great extent in families who had chronically disabled children, it was found that parents intensively experienced concern for the future. It was found that this also affected the desire of the parents who had a chronically disabled child to have other children with the concern that the child will be disabled

___

  • Uğuz Ş, Toros F, İnanç BY, Çolakkadıoğlu O. Zihinsel ve/ veya bedensel engelli çocukların annelerinin anksiyete, depresyon ve stres düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Klin Psiki- yatri 2004; 7: 42-7.
  • Dhar RL. Living with a developmentally disabled child: attitude of family members in India. Soc Sci J 2009; 46: 738-55. [CrossRef ]
  • Sivberg B. Family system and coping behaviors: a com- parison between parents of children with autistic spect- rum disorders and parents with non-autistic children. Autism J 2002; 6: 397-409. [CrossRef ]
  • Stancin T, Wade S, Walz NC, Yeates KO, Taylor HG. Trau- matic brain injuries in early childhood: initial impact on the family. J Dev Bhav Pediatr 2008; 29: 253-61. [CrossRef ]
  • Toros F. Zihinsel ve/veya bedensel engelli çocukların annelerinin anksiyete, depresyon, evlilik uyumunun ve çocuğu algılama şeklinin değerlendirilmesi. T Clin J Psychiatry 2002; 3: 45-52.
  • Florian V, Findler L. Mental health and marital adaptati- on among mothers of children with cerebral palsy. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2001; 71: 358-67. [CrossRef ]
  • Parish SL, Cloud JM, Huh J, Henning AN. Child care, di- sability, and family structure: Use and quality in a popu- lation-based sample of low-income preschool children. Child Youth Serv Rev 2005; 27: 905-19. [CrossRef ]
  • Murray JS. Attachment theory and adjustment difficulti- es in siblings of children with cancer. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2000; 2: 149-69. [CrossRef ]
  • Javadian R. A comperative study of adaptability and co- hesion in families with and without a disabled child. Procedia-Soc Behavior Sci 2011; 30: 2625-30. [CrossRef ]
  • Fisman S, Wolf L, Ellison D, Freeman T. A longitudinal study of children with chronic disabilities. Can J Psychi- atry 2000; 45: 369-75.
  • Barbarin OA, Sargent JR, Sahler OZ, Carpenter PJ, Cope- land DR, Dolgin MJ. Sibling adaptation to childhood can- cer collaborative study: Parental views of pre and post- diagnosis adjustment of siblings of children with cancer. J Psychosoc Oncology 1995; 13: 1-20. [CrossRef ]
  • Baumann SL, Dyches TT, Braddick M. Being a sibling. Nurs Sci 2005; 18: 51-8. [CrossRef ]
  • Brobst JB, Clopton JR, Hendrick SS. Parenting children with autism spectrum disorders: The couple's relationship. Foc Autism Other Dev Disabil 2009; 24: 38-49. [CrossRef ]
  • Parker JA, Mandleco B, Roper SO, Freeborn D. Dyches TT. Religiosity, Spirituality, and Marital Relationships of Pa- rents Raising a Typically Developing Child or a Child With a Disability. J Family Nurs 2011; 17: 82-104. [CrossRef ]
  • Stoneman Z, Gavidia-Payne S. Marital adjustment in fa- milies of young children with disabilities: Associations with daily hassles and problem-focused coping. Am J Ment Retard 2006; 111: 1-14. [CrossRef ]
  • Bristol MM, Gallagher JJ, Schopler E. Mothers and fat- hers of young developmentally disabled and nondisab- led boys: Adaptation and spousal support. Dev Psychol 2001; 24: 441-51. [CrossRef ]
  • Seltzer MM, Greenberg JS, Floyd FJ, Pettee Y, Hong, J. Life course impacts of parenting a child with a disability. Am J Ment Retard 2001; 106: 265-86. [CrossRef ]
  • Shearn, J, Todd S. Maternal employment and family res- ponsibilities: The perspectives of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2000; 13: 109-31. [CrossRef ]
  • Sloper P, Knussen C, Turner S, Cunningham C. Factors related to stress and satisfaction with life in families of children with Down's syndrome. J Child Psychol Psychi- atry 1991; 2: 655-76. [CrossRef ]
  • Spangenberg J, Theron J. Stress and coping in parents of children with Down syndrome. Stud Psychol 2000; 43: 41-8.
  • Riper MV. Families of children with Down Syndrome: responding to "a change in plans" with resilience. J Pedi- atr Nurs 2007; 22: 116-28. [CrossRef ]
  • Thyen U, Kuhlthau K, Perrin JM. Employment, child care, and mental health of mothers caring for children assis- ted by technology. Pediatr 1999; 103: 1235-42. [CrossRef ]
  • Yatchmenoff DK, Koren PE, Friesen BJ, Gordon LJ, Kin- ney RF. Enrichment and stress in families caring for a child with a serious emotional disorder. J Child Fam Stud 1998; 7: 129-45. [CrossRef ]
  • Cahill BM, Glidden LM. Influence of child diagnosis on family and parental functioning: Down syndrome versus other disabilities. Am J Ment Retard 1996; 101: 149-60.
  • Stoneman Z. Examining the Down syndrome advantage: Mothers and fathers of young children with disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2007; 51: 1006-17. [CrossRef ]
  • Gardner J, Harmon T. Exploring resilience from a parent's perspective: A qualitative study of six resilient mothers of children with an intellectual disability. Aust Soc Work 2002; 55: 60-8. [CrossRef ]
  • Patterson JM. Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. J Marriage Fam 2002; 64: 349-60. [CrossRef ]
  • Marsh JC. Arguments for family strengths research. Soc Work 2003; 48: 147-9. [CrossRef ]
  • Kearney P, Griffin T. Between joy and sorrow: Being a pa- rent of a child with developmental disability. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34: 582-92. [CrossRef ]
  • Top F. Zihinsel engelli çocuğu olan ailelerin yaşadığı so- runların incelenmesi. Öz-Veri Derg 2008; 5: 1279-92.
  • Karpat D, Girli A. Yaygın gelişimsel bozukluk tanılı çocuk- ların anne-babalarının yas tepkilerinin, evlilik uyumları- nın ve sosyal destek algılarının incelenmesi. Ankara Üni- versitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi 2012; 13: 69-85.
  • Özekes M, Girli A, Sarısoy M, Yurdakul A. Evlilik İlişki- lerinde Engelli Çocuğa Sahip Olmanın Rolü. 10. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi, Sözlü Bildiri, Ankara-1998.
  • Javadian R. A comparative study of adaptability and cohe- sion in families with and without a disabled child. Proce- dia- Soc Behav Sci 2011; 30: 2625-30. [CrossRef ]
  • Fisman S, Wolf L, Ellison D, Gillis B, Freeman T, Szatmari P. Risk and protective factors affecting the adjustment of siblings of children with chronic disabilities. J Am Acad Child Adoles Psychiatr 1996; 35: 1532-41. [CrossRef ]
  • Valizadeh L, Zamanzadeh V, Mohammadi E, Arzani A. Continuous and multiple waves of emotional responses: Mother's experience with a premature infant. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014; 19: 340-8.
  • Schor EL; American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatr 2003; 111: 1541-71.