Çocukluk çağında nötropenik hastaya yaklaşım

Nötrofiller konak savunmasında ve akut enflamasyonda önemli role sahiptir. Nötrofil sayısı azaldığında enfeksiyonlara eğilimin arttığı iyi bilinmektedir. Nötropeniler nötrofil sayısına göre hafif, orta ve ağır; nötropeni süresine göre akut ve kronik; oluşum mekanizmasına göre de kazanılmış ve doğuştan olarak sınıflanmaktadır. Nötropenik hastaların kliniği birbirinden farklıdır, altta yatan nedene bağlı olarak yaşamı tehdit eden enfeksiyonlar görülebilir ya da enfeksiyon hiç geçirmeyebilirler. Kazanılmış nötropeninin en sık nedeni viral enfeksiyonlar olup, bunu ilaçlar ve otoimmun nötropeniler izlemektedir. Doğuştan nötropenilere genellikle akut ve yaşamı tehdit edici invaziv bakteriyel ve fungal enfeksiyonların görülmesi ile tanı koyulur. Doğuştan nötropenide immün sistem bozuklukları ve diğer sistem bulguları eşlik edebilir veya etmeyebilir. Son yıllarda, genetik tanı tekniklerinin gelişmesiyle doğuştan nötropeniye neden olan birçok yeni tek gen defekti tanımlanmıştır. Moleküler tanı; risk sınıflaması, tedavi seçimi ve hastalığın seyrini belirlemede yararlıdır. Bu derleme, çocuk hekimleri için nötropenik hastaya yaklaşım, nötropenide hangi testler yapılmalı ve ne zaman kan hastalıkları uzmanına yönlendirilmeli konularında bir rehber niteliğinde hazırlanmıştır

Approach to the patient with neutropenia in childhood

Neutrophils have an important role in host defense and acute inflammation. It is well known that susceptibility to infection increases when the neutrophil count is low. Neutropenia were classified as mild, moderate and severe according to the neutrophil counts, or acute and chronic depending on the duration of neutropenia, or congenital and acquired according to the mechanism. The patients with neutropenia are clinically different due to underlying mechanism, they have life- threatening infections or no infection may be observed. The most common cause of acquired neutropenia is viral infection, followed by drugs and autoimmune neutropenia. Congenital neutropenia are usually diagnosed by acute and life- threatening invasive bacterial and fungal infections. Immune system disorders and other systemic abnormalities may be accompanied or not. Recent years, novel single gen defects causing congenital neutropenia were defined through advanced genetic techniques. Molecular diagnosis is useful for risk stratification, choice of therapy and prognosis on followup. This review was prepared for pediatricians as a guide focused on approach neutropenia, which tests should be performed and when should be referred to a specialist

___

  • Boxer L, Dale DC. Neutropenia: causes and consequen- ces. Semin Hematol 2002; 39: 75-81. [CrossRef ]
  • Kruger P, Saffarzadeh M, Weber AN, et al. Neutrophils: between host defence, immune modulation, and tissue injury. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11: e1004651. [CrossRef ]
  • Lanzkowsky P. Manual of pediatric hematology and oncology. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc, 2011. p. 275-95.
  • Walkovich K, Boxer LA. How to approach neutropenia in childhood. Pediatr Rev 2013; 34: 173-84. [CrossRef ]
  • Welte K, Zeidler C. Severe congenital neutropenia. He- matol Oncol Clin North Am 2009; 23: 307-20. [CrossRef ]
  • Dale DC, Welte K. Cyclic and chronic neutropenia. Can- cer Treat Res 2011; 157: 97-8. [CrossRef ]
  • Boxer LA. How to approach neutropenia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012; 2012: 174-82.
  • Berliner N, Horwitz M, Loughran TP Jr. Acquired neut- ropenia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2004; 63-79. [CrossRef ]
  • Fioredda F, Calvillo M, Bonanomi S, et al. Congenital and acquired neutropenia consensus guidelines on diagnosis from the Neutropenia Committee of the Marrow Failu- re Syndrome Group of the AIEOP (Associazione Italia- na Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 57: 10-7. [CrossRef ]
  • Starkebaum G. Chronic neutropenia associated with autoim- mune disease. Semin Hematol 2002; 39: 121-7. [CrossRef]
  • Farruggia P, Dufour C. Diagnosis and management of pri- mary autoimmune neutropenia in children: insights for clinicians. Ther Adv Hematol 2015; 6: 15-24. [CrossRef ]
  • Hauck F, Klein C. Pathogenic mechanisms and clinical implications of congenital neutropenia syndromes. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 13: 596-606. [CrossRef ]
  • Özbek N. Konjenital nötropenilere genetik bakış. TJH 2009; 26: 1-8.
  • Zeidler C, Germeshausen M, Klein C, Welte K. Clini- cal implications of ELA2-, HAX1-, and G-CSF-receptor (CSF3R) mutations in severe congenital neutropenia. Br J Haematol 2009; 144: 459-67. [CrossRef ]
  • Roques G, Munzer M, Barthez MA, et al. Neurological findings and genetic alterations in patients with Kost- mann syndrome and HAX1 mutations. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61: 1041-8. [CrossRef ]
  • Freedman MH, Alter BP. Risk of myelodysplastic syndro- me and acute myeloid leukemia in congenital neutrope- nias. Semin Hematol 2002; 39: 128-33. [CrossRef ]
  • Rosenberg PS, Zeidler C, Bolyard AA, et al. Stable long- term risk of leukaemia in patients with severe congenital neutropenia maintained on G-CSF therapy. Br J Haema- tol 2010; 150: 196-9. [CrossRef ]
  • Klein C. Congenital neutropenia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009; 1: 344-50. [CrossRef ]
  • Dror Y. Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005; 45: 892-901. [CrossRef ]
  • Boztug K, Järvinen PM, Salzer E, et al. JAGN1 deficiency causes aberrant myeloid cell homeostasis and congenital neutropenia. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 1021-7. [CrossRef ]
  • Skokowa J, Steinemann D, Katsman-Kuipers JE, et al. Co- operativity of RUNX1 and CSF3R mutations in severe congenital neutropenia: a unique pathway in myeloid leukemogenesis. Blood 2014; 123: 2229-37. [CrossRef ]
  • Collin M, Dickinson R, Bigley V. Haematopoietic and immune defects associated with GATA2 mutation. Br J Haematol 2015; 169: 173-87. [CrossRef ]
  • Khanna-Gupta A, Berliner N. Vitamin B3 boosts neutrop- hil counts. Nat Med 2009; 15: 139-41. [CrossRef ]
  • Aydin SE, Kilic SS, Aytekin C, et al. DOCK8 deficiency: clinical and immunological phenotype and treatment options - a review of 136 patients. J Clin Immunol 2015; 35: 189-98. [CrossRef ]