Hakemli Yazılar / Refereed Papers

Araştırmada Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü (BBY) öğrencilerinin bilgi arama süreçlerindeki kişisel deneyimlerini anlamak, süreçler ile ilgili kavram yanılgılarının olup olmadığını tespit etmek ve kavram yanılgıları var ise, ne tür kavram yanılgılarına sahip olduklarını ortaya çıkartmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu çerçevede, araştırmada Kuhlthau'nun altı aşamalı "Bilgi Arama Süreci (BAS)" modeli temel alınmıştır. Veriler; amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak, 13 Ankara Üniversitesi BBY öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniği ile elde edilmiştir. Veriler içerik analizi yöntemi ile çözümlenmiştir. Verilerin analizi ile elde edilen bulgular sonucunda, öğrencilerin BAS'ın "konu seçimi", "bilgi toplama", "tamamlama" aşamaları ve "diğer" kategorisinde sınıflandırılan "araştırma yöntemlerini belirleme" ve "araştırma ödevi" ile ilgili kavram yanılgılarına sahip oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Bulgular kavram yanılgılarının öğrencilerin bilgi arama süreçlerini etkili ve verimli bir biçimde gerçekleştirmelerini engelleyebildiğini göstermiştir. Bu araştırmanın sonuçlarının kütüphanecilere, eğitimcilere ve bilgi erişim sistemi tasarımcılarına önemli bir katkı sunması beklenmektedir

Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Bilgi Arama Süreci Deneyimleri: Kavram Yanılgıları

The aim of this work is to understand the personal experiences of Department of Information and Records Management (IRM) students engaged in information search processes, to determine whether there are misconceptions about the processes, and if so to find out which misconceptions exist. The research is based on the model of Kuhlthau's six-staged Information Search Process (BAS). The data were obtained using a semi-structured interview technique with 13 Ankara University IRM students using purposeful sampling. The data were analysed using the content analysis method. It was determined that the students had misconceptions related to the BAS’s stages of “topic selection”, “information collection”, “search closure”, alongside “determination of research methods” and “research paper” which were classified into the “others” category. This evidence indicates that misconceptions can prevent students from performing effectively and efficiently in their information search processes. The results of this research should make an important contribution to library staff, trainers and information retrieval system designers

___

  • Ahmad, U. K, Mansourizadeh, K. ve Ai, G. K. M. (2012). Non-native university students' perception of plagiarism. Advences in Language and Litrarcy Studies, 3(1), 39-48. Erişim adresi: http://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/42/39
  • Barranoik, L. K. (2004). Meaningful research projects: Perspectives from high school students and their teacher (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Alberta Üniversitesi, Kanada.
  • Baysen, E. (2003). Fen eğitiminde yeni gelişmeler ve (1960-1985 Dönemi) Türkiye’deki uygulamaları (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Baysen, E. ve Baysen, F. (2013). Turkish prospective kindergarten teachers’ conceptions concerning some selected atmospheric events. International Journal of Elementary Education, 2(5), 32-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20130205.11
  • Baysen, E., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Çakmak, N. ve Baysen, F. (2017a). Misconceptions of Czech and Turkish university students in providing citations. A. Maturo, Š. Hošková-Mayerová, D.-T.
  • Soitu ve J. Kacprzyk (Dizi Ed.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Series: Vol. 66 Recent trends in social systems: Quantitative theories and quantitative models (s. 183-190) içinde. Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_16.
  • Baysen, E., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Çakmak, N. ve Baysen, F. (2017b). Misconceptions regarding providing citations: To neglect means to take risk for future scientific research. Š. Hošková- Mayerová, F. Maturo ve J. Kacprzyk (Dizi Ed.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Series: Vol. 104 Mathematical-statistical models and qualitative theories for economic and social sciences (s. 177-186) içinde. Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_12
  • Baysen, E. ve Silman, F. (2012). Yapılandırmacı yaklaşım. Z. Kaya (Ed.), Öğrenme ve öğretme: Kuramlar, yaklaşımlar, modeller (s. 197-226) içinde. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Beck, S. E. ve Manuel, K. (2008). Practical research methods for librarians and information professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
  • Belkin, N. J., R. N. Oddy ve H. M. Brooks. (1982a). ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61-71.
  • Belkin, N. J., R. N. Oddy ve H. M. Brooks. (1982b). ASK for information retrieval: Part II. Results of a design study. Journal of Documentation, 38(3), 145-164.
  • Bowler, L. (2010). The Shelf-regulation of curiosity and interest during the information search process of adolescent students. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1332-1344. doi: 10.1002/asi.21334
  • Brault Foisy, L-M., Potvin, P., Riopel, M. ve Masson, S. (2015). Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4, 26– 36. Erişim adresi: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949315000058
  • Brown, D. E. (2014). Students’ conceptions as dynamically emergent structures. Science & Education, 23, 1463-1483. doi: 10.1007/s11191-013-9655-9
  • Burdick, T. A. (1995). Gender in the information search process: An exploratory study of student experience (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). The Florida State Üniversitesi, Tallahassee, Florida. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. (Oxford series in cognitive development). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cheak, A. P. C., Sze, C. C., Ai, Y. J., Min, C. M. ve Ming, S. J. (2013, Eylül). Internet plagiarism: University students' perspective. International Research Conference’ta sunulan bildiri. Erişim adresi: http://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?q=Internet+plagiarism%3A+university+students %27+perspective&btnG=&hl=tr&as_sdt=0%2C5
  • Chen, H. ve Dhar, V. (1988). User misconception of information retrieval systems (Working Paper Series). New York: New York University.
  • Cheng, Y. (2004). Thoughts, feelings, and actions: Quantitative comparisons of interactions and relationships among three factors in college students’ information seeking (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Indiana Üniversitesi, Bloomington.
  • Clifford, N., French, S. ve Valentine, G. (Ed.). (2010). Key methods in geography (2. bs.). Los Angles: SAGE. Erişim adresi: http://www.google.com.tr/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bAXmXbF1pkMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA103&dq=s emi+structured+interview+methogology&ots=L__74gxZYO&sig=wqEvbfhC4YxUXDiyt09zhs Ah4I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=semi%20structured%20interview%20methogology&f=false
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative reserach (3. bs.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4. bs.). Thousand Oaks ve London: Sage Publications.
  • Çakmak, N. (2015). Lisans öğrencilerinin intihal ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 29(2), 212-240.
  • Çakmak, N. (2016). Lisans öğrencilerinin bilgi arama süreçleri ile ilgili kavramları, tutumları ve düşünceleri (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Dalal, H. A., Kimura, A. K ve Hoffmann, M. A. (2015). Searching in the wild: Observing informationseeking behavior in a discovery tool. Proceedings of the ACRL (s. 668-675) içinde. Portland, Oregon American Library Association. Erişim adresi: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Dalal _Kimura_Hofmann.pdf
  • Demir, Y., Uzoğlu, M. ve Büyükkasap, E. (2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının kuvvet ve hareket ile ilgili sahip olduğu kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesinde kullanılan karikatürlerin ve çoktan seçmeli soruların etkililiğinin karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 88-102. Erişim adresi: http://79.123.150.20/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/268/Mustafa%20Uzo%c4%9flu10.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46. doi: 10.1108/13673279810249369
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, New York [etc.]: D.C. Heath and Company.
  • Driver, R., Guesne, E. ve Tibergihen, A. (Ed.). (1998). Childrens’ ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Ellis, D. (1993). Modelling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486. doi: 10.1086/602622 Erman, E. (2016). Factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in learning covalent bonds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Erişim adresi: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21375/epdf
  • Fainburg, L. I. (2009). Information seeking and learning: A comparison of Kuhlthau’s information seeking model and John Dewey’s problem solving model. New Library World, 110(9-10), 457- 466. doi: 10.1108/03074800910997472
  • Francek, M. (2013). A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 31-64. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.736644
  • George, M. W. (2008). The elements of library research: What every student needs to know. New Jersey: Princeton University.
  • Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu, Çev.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Graveline, J. D. (2010). Debunking common misconceptions and myths. College & Undergraduate, 17(1), 100-105. doi: 10.1080/10691310903584650
  • Graves, S. M. (2008). Student cheating habits: A predictor of workplace deviance. Journal of Diversity Management-First Quarter, 3(1), 14-22. Erişim adresi: http://www.cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/JDM/article/view/4977/5069
  • Gullifer, J. ve Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463-481. doi: 10.1080/03075070903096508
  • Henderson, T. (2011). The biggest misconceptions about plagiarism. Erişim adresi: http://www.sooperarticles.com/writing-articles/article-writing articles/biggest-misconceptionsabout-plagiarism-276836.html
  • Holding, M. L., Denton, R. D., Kulesza, A. E. ve Rigdway, J. S. (2014). Confronting scientific misconceptions by fostering a clasroom of scientists in the introductory biology lab. The American Biology Teacher, 76(8), 518-523. doi: 10.1525/abt.2014.76.8.5
  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social science and humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Hunt, E. B. (1966). Concept learning: An information processing problem (2.bs.). New York, London and Sydney: John Wiley &Sons.
  • Hyldegård, J. (2006). Collaborative information behavior exploring Kuhlthau’s information search process model in a group-based educational setting. Information Processing and Management, 42(1), 276-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.06.013
  • Hyldegård, J. (2009). Beyond the research process: Exploring group members’ information behavior in context. Information Processing and Management, 45(1), 142-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.05.007
  • Ingwersen, P. ve Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Netherlands: Springer.
  • Isbell, D. ve Kammerlocher, L. (1998). Implementing Kuhlthau: A new model for library and refrence instruction. Reference Services Review, 26(3-4), 33-44. doi: 10.1108/00907329810307722
  • Kara, Y. ve Yeşilyurt, S. (2008). Comparing the impacts of tutorial and edutainment software programs on students’ achievements, misconceptions, and attitudes towards biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 32-41. doi: 10.1007/s10956-007-9077-z
  • King, C. J. H. (2010). An Analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565-601, doi: 10.1080/09500690902721681
  • Kolçak, D. Y., Moğol, S. ve Ünsal, Y. (2014). A comparison of the effects of laboratory method and computer simulations to avoid misconceptions in physics education. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(175), 154-171. Erişim adresi: http://eb.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2052/820
  • Kracker, J. (2002). Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of reseacrh: an experiment. Part 1. Effect of teaching Kuhlthau’s ISP model. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 282-294. doi: 10.1002/asi.10040
  • Kracker, J. ve Wang, P. (2002). Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of reseacrh: An experiment. Part 2. Content analysis of their writings on two experience. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 295-307. doi: 10.1002/asi.10041
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2. bs.). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1983). The library research process: Case studies and interventions with high school seniors in advanced placement English classes using Kelly’s theory of constructs. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey (New Brunswick).
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1988). Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries. LISR, 10, 257-304.
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1990). Validating a model of the research process: A comprarison of academic, public, and school library users, LISR, 12, 5-31.
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the serach process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Teaching the library research process. (2. bs.). Metuchen, N.Y. ve London: The Scarecrow.
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1996). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. (4. bs.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (2007). Reflections on the development of the model of the Information Searh Process (ISP): Experts from the Lazerow lecture, University of Kentucky, April 2, 2007. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 33(5), 32-36. Erişim adresi: http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Jun-07/Kuhlthau.pdf
  • Kuhltahu, C. C., Trock, B., George, M. W. ve Belvin. R. J. (1990). Validating a model of the search process: A Comparison of academic, public, and school librray users. Library and Information Science Research, 12(1), 5-32.
  • Limberg, L. (1999). Experiencing information seeking and learning: A study of interaction between two phenomena, Information Research, 5(1). Erişim adresi: http://informationr.net/ir/5- 1/paper68.html
  • Löfström, E. (2011). “Does plagiarism mean anything? LOL.”: Students’ conceptions of writing and citing. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(4), 257-275. doi: 10.1007/s10805-011-9145-0
  • Mahmood, S. T., Mahmood, A., Khan, M. N. ve Malik, A. B. (2010). Intellectual property rights: Conceptual awareness of research students about plagiarism. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(6), 193-198.
  • Marchionini, G. (1989). Information seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encylopedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(1), 54-66. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198901)
  • Marchionini, G. (1992). Interfaces for end-user information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(2), 156-163. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199203)
  • Medin, D. L. ve Abn, W. K. (1992). Concepts and categories, learning of. L. R. Squire (Ed.). Encyclopedia of learning and memory içinde (s. 116-119). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
  • Motulsky, H. J. (2014). Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 351(1), 200-205. Erişim adresi: http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/351/1/200.full.pdf+html
  • Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Nahl, D. (1997). Information counseling inventory of affective and cognitive reactions while learning the internet. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 2(2-3), 11-33. doi: 10.1300/j136v02n02_04
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis: Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Educational psychology: Developing learners. (6.bs.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person, Merrili Prentice.
  • Özenç Uçak, N. ve Birinci, H. G. (2008). Bilimsel etik ve intihal. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 22(2), 187- 204. Erişim adresi: http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/410/402 Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2. bs.). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Peterson, J. W. (2008). Networked generation youth’s information seeking process: An examination of cognitive, affective, and physical information seeking behaviors and problem solving techniques. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). North Texas Üniversitesi, Texas.
  • Peterson, R., Treagust, D. ve Garnett, P. (1986). Identification of secondary students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic instrument. Research in Science Education, 16, 40-48. doi: 10.1007/bf02356816
  • Pieterse, V. (2014, 25-26 June). Decoding code plagiarism. Erişim adresi: http://www.cs.up.ac.za/cs/vpieterse/pub/SACLA2014_plagiarism.pdf
  • Sadler, P. M. ve Sonnert, G. (2016). Understanding misconceptions: Teaching and learning in middle school physical science. American Educator, 40(1), 26-32. Erişim adresi: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1094278.pdf
  • Sinnott, E. (1993). Fewer errors resulting from the users’ misconception of the OPAC in 1992 than a decade ago: A comparative study of no direct hits and zero hits in author searches. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 18(1), 75-101. doi: 10.1300/j104v18n01_05
  • Solso, R. L., MacLin, M. K. ve MacLin, O. H. (2011). Bilişsel psikoloji (A. Ayçiçeği-Dinn, Çev.) (4. bs.). İstanbul: Kitabevi.
  • Temiz, B. K. ve Yavuz, A. (2014). Students’ misconceptions about Newton’s second law in outer space. European Journal of Physics, 35(4), 1-16. Erişim adresi: http://iopscience.iop.org/0143- 0807/35/4/045004/pdf/0143-0807_35_4_045004.pdf
  • Tennyson, R. D. (1994). Concept learning. Volume 1. The international encyclopedia of education (2. bs.), (T. Husén ve T. N. Postlethwaite, Ed.) (s. 1016-1020) içinde. England: Pergamon.
  • Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change (2. bs.). New York: Routledge.
  • Wacholder, N. (2011). Interactive query formulation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 157-196. doi: 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450111
  • What about images, videos, and music. (2014). Plagiarism.org. Erişim adresi: http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/
  • What is plagiarism. (2014). Plagiarism.org. Erişim adresi: http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism101/what-is-plagiarism
  • Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Wilson, T. D. (1999a). Exploring models of information behavior: The uncertainty Project.
  • Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 839-849. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4573(99)00029-1 Wilson, T. D. (1999b). Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000007145
  • Wilson, B. ve Tessmer, M. (1990). Adults’ perception of concept learning outcomes: An initial study and discussion (Proceedings of Selected Paper Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology). Erişim adresi: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED323956