Gazi Üniversitesi Radyasyon Onkolojisi Anabilim Dalı’nda tedavi gören küçük hücreli akciğer kanseri tanılı hastaların retrospektif analizi

Sınırlı evre küçük hücreli akciğer kanseri (KHAK)'nin temel tedavisi kemoterapi (KT) ue radyoterapi (RT) olmasına rağmen, bu kombinasyon içinde RT'nin zamanlaması, dozu, fraksiyon şeması ue profilaktik kranial ışınlamanın yapılıp yapılmaması gibi tartışmalar devam etmektedir. Retrospektif incelememizde tartışmalı konuları hastalarımız üzerinde incelemeye çalıştık. 1995-2002 yılları arasında Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyasyon Onkolojisi Anabilim Dalı'nda tedaviye alınan sınırlı evre KHAK'lı, dosya verileri yeterli olan 70 hasta üzerinde araştırma yapıldı. KT yanıtı, toplam RT dozu ue RT'nin başlama zamanı ile ilgili verilere göre hastalar gruplandırıldı ve genel sağkalım üzerine bu değişkenlerin etkileri analiz edildi. Değerlendirilen 70 hastada kadın/erkek oranı: 5/1 ve ortalama yaş 55 (31-80) yıl idi. Ortalama izlem süresi 10 ay, ortalama sağkalım süresi 16 ay idi. RT öncesi uygulanan KT'ye 47 (%67) hastanın objektif yanıt (tam + kısmi) verdiği gözlendi. KT yanıtı olanlarda sağkalımın daha iyi olduğu bulundu (median 11 aya karşın altı ay, p= 0.002). 50 Gy'den yüksek doz uygulamanın sağkalım üzerine etkisinin olmadığı bulundu. RT'nin dördüncü kür KT'den önce başlatılmasının sağkalımı artırdığı gözlendi (median 14 aya karşın sekiz ay, p= 0.01). Profılaktik kranial ışınlamanın sağkalım üzerine etkisi sağkalım analizlerinde gözlenmemesine rağmen Cox-regresyon analizinde sağkalımı etkileyen bir parametre olduğu bulundu. RT esnasında en sık gözlenen komplikasyon özefajit olmasına rağmen, grade III özefajıt 1 (%3) hastada izlenmekteydi. KT'ye yanıt gözlenmesi sağkalım için bir gösterge olarak kabul edilebilir. RT'ye KT'nin erken döneminde başlanması, 50 Gy'den yüksek RT dozlarının kullanılmaması ve profılaktik kranial RT'nin yanıt gözlenen tüm olgulara uygulanması gerektiği retrospektif çalışmadan çıkardığımız sonuçlardır.

Retrospective analysis of patients with small cell lung cancer treated at Gazi University Department of Radiation Oncology

The combination of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) is the main treatment modality of limited-stage small c lung cancer (SCLC). The application of radiation timing, doses, fraction schedules in this modality and the indication prophylactic cranial irradiation is recently controversial. In this retrospective study, these subjects were evaluated by o sidering our patients results. Seventy patients having adequate data for examination, with limited-stage SCLC were referred to our clinic in the period between December 1995 and December 2002. The patients were classified according to their response to CT, the dose and timing of RT applications. The effects of obtained variables on overall survival were analyzed, male/female ratio was 5/1; and the mean age was 55 years (range 31-80 years). The mean follow-up of all patients was months and the mean survival time was 16 months. An objective (complete and partial) response to CT administered fore RT was seen in 47 (67%) patients. The survival time was better in the CT responding patients (median 11 months versus 6 months, p= 0.002). The application of more than 50 Gy radiation dose was found to be ineffective on survival, improvement in survival was observed in RT application beginning before fourth cycle CT (median 14 months versus months p= 0.01). In despite of the ineffectiveness of prophylactic cranial irradiation on survival is observed in survival analysis, it was found to be a parameter affecting survival in Cox-regression analysis. However the most frequently compilication during RT was oesophagitis. Grade III was seen in 1 (3%) patient. The response to CT can be accepted as an indicator for survival. We concluded that the administering of RT in the beginning of CT, not administering radiation dose: more than 50 Gy and the necessity of applying prophylactic cranial irradiation to all patients showing complete response, are points to be considered according to our retrospective analysis.

___

  • 1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54: 8-29.
  • 2. Takada M, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, et al. Phase III study versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with cisplatin and etoposid for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan clinical oncology group study 9104. J Clin Oncol 2002; 4: 3054-60.
  • 3. Ihde DC, Pass HI, Gladstein EJ. Small cell lung cancer. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, et al (eds). Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:911-49.
  • 4. Turrisi AT, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposid. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:265-71.
  • 5. Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic radiation therapy improve survival and local control in limited stage small cell lung carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 890-5.
  • 6. Pignon JP, Arriagada R, Ihde DC, et al. A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1618-24.
  • 7. Murray N, Coy P, Pater JL, et al. The importance of timing for thoracic irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 336-44.
  • 8. Fried DB, Morris DE, Poole C, et al. Systematic review evaluating the timing of thoracic radiation therapy in combined modality therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4837-45.
  • 9. Choi NC, Herndon II JE, Rosenmann J, et al. Phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of radiation in standard daily and hyperfractionated-accelerated twice-daily radiation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3528-36.
  • 10. Bogart JA, Herndon II JE, Lyss AP, et al. 70 Gy thoracic radiotherapy is feasible concurrent with chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: analysis of cancer and leukemia group B study 39808. İnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 460-8.
  • 11. Auperin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 476-84.
  • 12. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53:457-81.
  • 13. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology-v.1.2005.http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/ sclc.pdf.
  • 14. Begg AC. Chemotherapy from the standpoint of radiotherapy. In: Steel GG (ed). Basic Clinical Radiobiology. London: Edward Arnold, 1993: 142-50.
  • 15. Perry MC, Eaton WL, Propert KJ, et al. Chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy in limited stage small cell carcinoma of the lung. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:912-8.
  • 16. Perry MC, Herndon JE 3rd, Eaton WL, Gren MR. Thoracic radiation therapy added to chemotherapy for samll cell lung cancer: an update of cancer and leukemia group B study 8038. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2446-7.
  • 17. Schield SE, Bonner JA, Shanahan JG, et al. Long-term results of a phase HI trial comparing once-daily radiotherapy with twice-daily radiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, İnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Pyhs 2004; 59: 943-51.
  • 18. Armstrong JG. Tumors of the lung and mediastinum. In: Liebal SA, Philips TL (eds). Textbook of Radiation Oncology.Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1998:567-600.
  • 19. Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Borle F, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small cell lung cancer in complete remission. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87:183-90.
  • 20. Ihde D, Souhami B, Comis R, et al. Consensus report.Small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 1997; 17: 19-21.
  • 21. Liengswangwong V, Bonner JA, Shaww EG, et al.Prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1995; 75: 1302-9.
  • 22. Kristjansen PEG, Kristensen CA. The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the management of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev .1993; 19:3-16.
  • 23. Gregor A, Cull A, Stephens RJ, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is indicated following complete response to induction in small- cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research (CJKCCCR) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 1752-8.
Tüberküloz ve Toraks-Cover
  • ISSN: 0494-1373
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1951
  • Yayıncı: Tuba Yıldırım
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Gazi Üniversitesi Radyasyon Onkolojisi Anabilim Dalı’nda tedavi gören küçük hücreli akciğer kanseri tanılı hastaların retrospektif analizi

Müge AKMANSU, Ö. Petek ERPOLAT, Fatih GÖKSEL, Haluk AŞIKOĞLU, Hüseyin BORA, İbrahim EGEHAN, Diclehan ÜNSAL, Can ÖZTÜRK

Smoking and lung cancer

Tevfik ÖZLÜ, Yılmaz BÜLBÜL

A rare association: Castleman’s disease and pemphigus vulgaris

İlkin ZİNDANCI, Aydanur MİHMANLI, Ahmet SELVİ, Müyesser ERTUĞRUL, Bahadır ÜSKÜL, Hatice TÜRKER

İdiyopatik kronik eozinofilik pnömonili bir olgu sunumu

Zafer ARSLAN, Uğur ÖZÇELİK, Çiğdem ÜNER, Cumhur AYDEMİR, İ. Ethem PİŞKİN, Başak ADAKLI, Gönül TANIR, Serap ÖZMEN

Difüz interstisyel akciğer hastalıklarında tedavi

Oya KAYACAN

Lung cancer histopathology in the Thrace region of Turkey and comparison with national data

Çakır Ebru EDİS, Celal KARLIKAYA

Akciğerin adenoskuamöz karsinomu (13 olgu nedeniyle)

Murat YALÇINSOY, Canan TAHAOĞLU, Ebru DAMADOĞLU, Aysun AYBATLI, Ali ATASALİH, Esen AKKAYA, Adnan YILMAZ

Akciğer hidatidozunun tanısında IHA, ELISA ve Western Blot testlerinin değerlendirilmesi

Ümit AKSOY, Bayram Songül DELİBAŞ, Soykan ÖZKOÇ, Sadık YALDIZ, Can BİÇMEN, Gökhan YUNCU, Serpil SEVİNÇ, Çiler AKISU

The evaluation of soluble Fas and soluble Fas ligand levels of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in lung cancer patients

Ferah BUDAK, Barbaros ORAL, Dane EDİGER, Ercüment EGE, Güher GÖRAL, Esra UZASLAN, Oktay GÖZÜ, Beril ERDOĞAN, Mehmet KARADAĞ

Pseudohypoxemia: interpretation of discrepancies between SaO2 and SpO2

Gökhan M. MUTLU, Jacob I. SZNAJDER