Nijerya Toplumu, Ticari Araç Sürücülerinde, Emniyet Kemeri Kullanımı Uyumu

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada şehirler arası ticari araç sürücüleri arasında emniyet kemeri kullanımı uyumunu saptamak amaçlanmıştır. YÖNTEM: Bu tanımlayıcı çalışma Güney Batı Nijerya, Owo bölgesinde, şehirler arası araç sürücüleri arasında Haziran-Eylül 2009 tarihleri arasında yapılmıştır. Etik izinler Owo, Ondo Eyaleti, Nijerya, Ulusal Tıp Merkezi Etik Değerlendirme Komite'sinden araştırmadan once alınmıştır. Ayrıca Karayolu Ulaşım Çalışanları Sendikasının izni alınmıştır. Tahmini 160 şehirler arası ticari araç sürücüsünden 90 tanesi araştırmaya katılmıştır. Tüm katılımcılardan aydınlatılmış onamlar alınmıştır. Veriler SPSS 15.0.1 istatistik programı ile işlenmiş ve analiz edilmiştir. BULGULAR: Araştırmaya doksan kişi katılmıştır. Katılımcıların çoğunun sürücülük deneyimi uzundu: 53 sürücü (%58.9) 20 yıldan fazla sürüş deneyimine sahipti. Sürücülerin çoğu 78 (%86.7) emniyet kemeri takıyordu. Emniyet kemeri takmamaktaki temel engel kısa yolduluklardı, 28 (%50.9). Çoğu katılımcı, 67 (%74.4) hatalı sürücülerin cezalandırılmasını destekliyordu. Farkındalığın temel kaynağı ise Ulusal Yol Güvenliği Birliği idi; 59 (%65.6). SONUÇ: Çoğu katılımcı emniyet kemeri kullanımına uyuyordu. Emniyet kemeri uyumuna yönelik en önemli bariyer, şehir içi kısa yolculuklar idi. Ulusal Yol Güvenliği Birliği özellikle şehir içinde emniyet kemeri kullanımını, teşvik etmelidir.

Compliance with Use of Seat Belt among Commercial Drivers in a Nigerian Community

AIM: This study aimed at determining compliance with use of seat belt among commercial intercity drivers. METHOD: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Owo, South West Nigeria among commercial intercity drivers between June and September, 2009. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of Federal Medical Centre, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria prior to commencement of this study. The permission of the leadership of Road Transport Workers' Union was also sought and obtained. Ninety intercity commercial drivers out of the estimated one hundred and sixty intercity commercial drivers in the community were enrolled in this study. Informed consent was obtained from each of the respondents. The data obtained was collated and analyzed with SPSS 15.0.1 statistical soft ware version. RESULTS: Ninety respondents were enrolled in this study. The driving experience of the respondents revealed that most respondents: 53 (58.9%) had more than 20 years driving experience. Most respondents;78 (86.7%) complied with use of seat belt .The main barrier to compliance with seat belt was short trip;28 (50.9%).Most respondents; 67 (74.4%)were in support of penalization of defaulters. The major source of awareness about seat belt was Federal Road Safety Corps;59 (65.6%). CONCLUSION: Most respondents complied with use of seat belt. The major barrier to compliance with seat belt was short trip within the community. The Federal Road Safety Corps should enforce compliance with the use of seat belt most especially within communities.

___

  • 1. Bener A, Ahmad MF, El-Tawil MS, Al-Bakr S. Visual impairment and motor vehicle accidents. The Middle East Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004; 4: 1-9.
  • 2. Owsley C, McGwin Jr. Vision impairment and driving. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999; 43(6): 535-550.
  • 3. Lagarde E. Road traffic injury is an escalating proportionate research efforts. Plos Med. 2007; 4(6): 170.
  • 4. World report on road traffic injury prevention: summary WHO;2004 available at:http:www.paho.org/English/DD/PUB/Summary _World_report_Road_Safety.PDF [Access Date: 12.10.2010).
  • 5. World health statistics. www.who.int/who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS0 8_Full. PDF [Access Date: 12.10.2010]
  • 6. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy lessons from the Global Burden of Disease study. Science. 1996; 27: 740-743.
  • 7. Krug E,ed. Injury: a leading cause of global burden of disease. Geneva WHO;1999. www.who.int /violence_ injury_ prevention/index.html [Access Date: 12.10.2010].
  • 8. Nantulya VM, Reich RM. The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries. BMJ. 2002; 324: 1139-1141.
  • 9. Nantulya VM, Reich MR. Equity dimensions of road traffic injuries in low and middle income countries. Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 2003; 10: 13-20.
  • 10. Forjuoh SN. Traffic-related injury prevention for low -income countries. Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 2003; 10: 109-118.
  • 11. Forjuoh SN, Li G. A review of successful transport and home injury interventions to guide developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 43: 1551-1560.
  • 12. Elvik R,Vaa T. Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Elseivier. Amsterdam. 2004.
  • 13. Evans L. Traffic Safety. Bloomfield, Michigan: Science Serving Society, 2004.
  • 14. King AI, Yang K. Research in biomechanics of occupant protection. The Journal of Trauma - Injury Infection and Critical Care. 1995; 38: 570- 576.
  • 15. Cummings P,Rivara FP. Car occupant death according to the restraint use of other occupants. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004; 291: 343-349.
  • 16. MacLennan PA, Mc Gwin JG, Metzger J, Moran SG, Rue LW. Risk of injury for occupants of motor vehicle collisions from unbelted occupants. Injury Prevention. 2004; 10: 363-367.
  • 17. Freeman EE, Munoz B, Turano KA, et al. Measures of visual function and their association with driving modification in older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(2): 514-520.
  • 18. Holland C. Older drivers: a literature review(No.25) http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/road safety/research/rsrr/theme 3/older drivers a literature review 4770 [Access Date: 26.10.2009].
  • 19. Johnson MA, Choy D. On the definition of agerelated norms for visual functioning testing Appl Opt. 1987: 26(8): 1449-1454.
  • 20. Kotecha A, Spratt A, Viswanathan A. Visual function and fitness to drive. British Medical Bulletin. 2008; 1-12.
  • 21. Ismaila SO, Akanbi OG. Study on the use of seat belt by Nigerian drivers. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2010; 4(3): 494- 497.
  • 22. Sangowawa AO, Ekanem SEU, Alagh BT, et al. Use of seat belts by vehicle occupants in University College Hospital,(U.C.H) Ibadan, Nigeria. AIPM. 2005; 3(2): 57-62.
  • 23. Iribhogbe PE, Osime CO. Compliance with seat belt use in Benin city, Nigeria. Prehospital Disast Med. 2008; 23(1): 16-19.
  • 24. Olukoga IA, Noah M. The use of seat belt by motor vehicle occupants in South Africa. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2005; 6(4): 398-400.
  • 25. Campbell H, Macdonald S, Richardson P. High levels of incorrect use of car seat belts and child restraints in Fife. An important and underrecognised road safety issue. Inj Prev. 1997; 13: 17-22.
  • 26. Fockler SKF, Cooper PJ. Situational characteristics of safety belt use. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1990; 22: 109-118.
  • 27. Williams AF, Lund AK. Seat belt use laws and occupant protection in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1986; 76: 1438-1442.
  • 28. Williams AF, Wells JK. The role of enforcement programs in increasing seat belt use. J Saf Research. 2004; 35; 175
  • 29. Harris GT, Olukoga IA. Cost benefit analysis of an enhanced seat belt enforcement program in South Africa. Inj Prev. 2005; 11: 102-105.
TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-734X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 8 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2002
  • Yayıncı: Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi Halk Sağlığı AD.