FUNDA ÖZDEMİR, Serkan BODUR, EVŞEN NAZİK, Hakan NAZİK, Ayla KANBUR

Hiperemezis gravidarum tanısı alan gebelerin sosyal destek düzeyinin belirlenmesi

AMAÇ: Sosyal destek kişinin fiziksel ve psikolojik sağlığının sürdürülmesinde önemlidir. Bu nedenle, bu araştırma hiperemezis gravidarum tanısı alan gebelerde sosyal destek düzeyini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. YÖNTEM: Araştırmanın evrenini, bir devlet ve bir üniversite hastanesinde kadın doğum kliniğinde yatan, hiperemezis gravidarum tanısı alan gebeler, örneklem grubunu ise rastgele örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 119 gebe oluşturdu. Veriler; Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği kullanılarak toplandı. Elde edilen veriler SPSS programında analiz edildi. BULGULAR: Çalışmada gebelerin %71,4’ünün 20-29 yaş grubunda olduğu, %65,6’sının ilköğretim mezunu olduğu bulunmuştur. Gebelerin çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek puan ortalamasının 60,87±13,04 olduğu bulunmuştur. Gebelerin çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin özel insan alt boyutu toplam puan ortalaması, aile ve arkadaş alt boyutları toplam puan ortalamasından yüksek bulunmuştur. SONUÇ: Çalışmaya alınan gebelerin sosyal destek düzeyinin iyi olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Investigation the perceived social support levels of pregnants with hyperemesis gravidarum

AIM: Social support is important that person’s physical and psychological health in maintaining. Therefore, this research was performed to determine the level of social support in pregnant women diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum. METHOD: The study consisted of pregnant women with diagnosis of hyperemezis gravidarum in Obstetric Department of one state hospital and one university hospital. The sample group consisted of a random sample of 119 pregnant women. Data were collected with a questionnaire to determine the pregnants’ descriptive and obstetrics characteristics and The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The data were analyzed with SPSS. RESULTS: 71.4% of the pregnant women were in the 20-29 age group, 65.6% of them was graduated of primary school. The avarege of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale of the pregnant women was 60.87±13.04. Multidimensional scale of perceived social support of pregnant, total average score of special human subdimension were higher than the average of family and friend subscale scores. CONCLUSION: The pregnant women who were taken for this study, social support level was found well.

PDF

___

1. Lacasse A, Rey E, Ferreira E, Morin C, Bérard A. Epidemiology of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: prevalence, severity, determinants, and the importance of race/ethnicity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 2(9): 26.
2. Lacroix R, Eason E, Melzack R. Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: a prospective study of its frequency, intensity, and patterns of change. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(4): 931–7.
3. Köken G, Coşar E, Şahin F, Dağıstan T, Yeşildağer E, Yılmazer M. Erken gebelikte bulantı ve kusmaya etki eden faktörler. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi. 2009; 6(2): 92-96
4. Kugahara T, Ohashi K. Characteristics of nausea and vomiting in pregnant Japanese women. Nurs Health Sci. 2006; 8(3): 179-84.
5. Chandra K, Magee L, Koren G. Discordance between physical symptoms versus perception of severity by women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2002; 2(1): 5.
6. Bailit JL. Hyperemesis gravidarium: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(3): 811–814.
7. Furneaux EC, Langley-Evans AJ, Langley-Evans SC. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: endocrine basis and contribution to pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001; 56(12): 775-82.
8. Fell DB, Dodds L, Joseph KS, Allen VM, Butler B. Risk factors for hyperemesis gravidarum requiring hospital admission during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107(2): 277–284.
9. Carroll C. Hyperemesis gravidarum. Eds.: Rivlin ME, Martin RW: Manuel of Clinical Problems in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 5th edition. Philadelphia. Lippincott, 2000, p. 130-4.
10. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD. Williams Obstetrics. 21st edition. New York. McGraw Hill, 2001, p. 1275-6.
11. Bovone S, Pernoll M. Normal Pregnancy and Prenatal Care. Eds.: DeCherney AH, Nathan L: Current Obstetric and Gynecologic Diagnosis and Treatment 9th ed. New York. McGraw Hill, 2003, p. 195
12. Munch S, Korst LM, Hernandez GD, Romero R, Goodwin TM. Health-related quality of life in women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: the importance of psychosocial context. J Perinatol.2010 Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print].
13. Büyükkurt S, Demir SC, Özgünen FT, Cüneyt İ, Kadayıfçı O, Güzel AB. Gebelikte bulantı-kusma yakınması olan hastanın değerlendirilmesi ve tedavi seçenekleri. Türkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst. 2008; 18: 106-116
14. Swallow BL, Lindow SW, Masson EA, Hay DM. Psychological health in early pregnancy: relationship with nausea and vomiting. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 24(1): 28–32.
15. Chou FH, Chen CH, Kuo SH, Tzeng YL. Experience of taiwanese women living with nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006, 51(5): 370-5.
16. Jesse DE, Walcott-McQuigg J, Mariella A, Swanson MS. Risk and protective factors associated with symptoms of depression in lowincome African American and Caucasian women during pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005; 50(5): 405–10.
17. Chou FH, Avant KC, Kuo SH, Fetzer SJ. Relationships between nausea and vomiting, perceived stress, social support, pregnancy planning and psychosocial adaptation in a sample of mothers: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008; 45(8): 1185-91.
18. Chou FH. The adaptation to pregnancy in Taiwanese women who experience different severities of nausea and vomiting. Texas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
19. Mckee MD, Cunningham M, Jankowski KR, Zayas L. Health-related functional status in pregnancy: relationship to depression and social support in a multi-ethnic population. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97(6): 988-93.
20. Smith C, Crowther C, Beilby J, Dandeaux J. The impact of nausea and vomiting on women: a burden of early pregnancy. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 40(4): 397-401.
21. Attard CL, Kohli MA, Coleman S, Bradley C, Hux M, Atanackovic G, et al. The burden of illness of severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(5 suppl): 220–7.
22. Meighan M, Wood AF. The impact of hyperemesis gravidarum on maternal role assumption. JOGNN. 2005; 34(2): 172–9.
23. Kuo SH, Wang RH, Tseng HC, Jian YS, Chou FH. A comparison of different severities of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy relative to stress, social support, and maternal adaptation. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007; 52(1): e1–e7.
24. Eker D, Akar H. Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 1995; 10(34): 45-55.
25. Collins NL, Schetter D, Lobel M, Susan CM. Social support in pregnancy: Psychosocial correlates of birth outcome and postpartum depression. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1993; 65: 1243-1258.
26. Brown MA. Social support, stress, and health: A comparison of expectant mothers and fathers. Nurs Res. 1986; 35: 72–6.
27. Chou FH, Kuo SH, Wang RH. A longitudinal study of nausea and vomiting, fatigue and perceived stress in, and social support for pregnant women through the three trimesters. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008; 24(6): 306-14.
28. Okanlı A, Tortumluoğlu G, Kırpınar İ. Gebe kadınların ailelerinden algıladıkları sosyal destek ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2003; 4: 98-105.
29. Elsenbruch S, Benson S, Rücke M, Rose M, Dudenhausen J, Pincus-Knackstedt MK, et al. Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22(3): 869-77.
30. Charlan D, Kroelinger MA, Kathryn S. Partner support and pregnancy wantedness. Birth. 2000; 27(2): 112-119.