In vitro activity of tigecycline against Brucella spp.

Amaç: Brucelloz tedavisinde tigesiklinin in vitro etkinliği ile ilgili bilgi çok fazla bulunmamaktadır. Çalışmamızda Brucella cinsi mikroorganizmalara karşı trimetoprim-sülfametaksazol, rifampisin, tetrasiklin, streptomisin ve siprofloksasin ile tigesiklinin in vitro aktivitesinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma Planı: Brucella cinsi 96 izolata karşı tigesiklin, trimetoprim-sülfametaksazol, rifampisin, tetrasiklin, streptomisin ve siprofloksasinin in vitro aktivitesi belirlenmiştir. Minimal inhibitör konsantrasyon (MİK) değerleri E-test yöntemiyle saptanmıştır. Bulgular: Tüm Brucella izolatlarına karşı en düşük MİK50 ve MİK90 değerleri tigesiklinde belirlenmiştir. Tigesiklinin en yüksek MİK değeri 0.19 µg/mL olarak saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Tetrasikline dirençli olan izolatlar da dahil olmak üzere Brucella izolatlarına karşı en düşük MİK değeri tigesiklin ile belirlenmiştir. Tigesiklinin tedavide kullanımı klinik çalışmalar ile onaylanmalıdır.

Tigesiklinin Brucella spp' ye karşı in vitro aktivitesi

Objectives: There are no published data regarding efficacy of tigecycline in brucellosis and in vitro data are scarce. We compared the in vitro activity of tigecycline to that of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, tetracycline, streptomycin and ciprofloxacin against Brucella spp. Study Design: In vitro activities of tigecycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, tetracycline, streptomycin and ciprofloxacin were evaluated against 96 strains of Brucella spp. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by the E-test method. Results: Tigecycline had low MIC50 and MIC90 values against all Brucella isolates; the highest MIC observed was 0.19 µg/mL. Conclusion: Tigecycline had low MICs against Brucella spp. including tetracycline-resistant isolates and its use in therapy should be confirmed by clinical studies.

___

  • 1) Akova M, Gür D, Livermore DM, Kocagöz T, Akalin HE. In vitro activities of antibiotics alone and in combination against Brucella melitensis at neutral and acidic pHs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:1298-300.
  • 2) Elfaki MG, Uz-Zaman T, Al-Hokail AA, Nakeeb SM. Detection of Brucella DNA in sera from patients with brucellosis by polymerase chain reaction. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;53:1-7.
  • 3) Gür D, Kocagöz S, Akova M, Unal S. Comparison of E test to microdilution for determining in vitro activities of antibiotics against Brucella melitensis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:2337.
  • 4) Rubinstein E, Lang R, Shasha B, Hagar B, Diamanstein L, Joseph G, et al. In vitro susceptibility of Brucella melitensis to antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:1925-7.
  • 5) Dizbay M, Kilic S, Hizel K, Arman D. Tigecycline: its potential for treatment of brucellosis. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:432-4.
  • 6) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2007. M100-S17. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 16th informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 7) Akova M, Uzun O, Akalin HE, Hayran M, Unal S, Gür D. Quinolones in treatment of human brucellosis: comparative trial of ofloxacin-rifampin versus doxycycline-rifampin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:1831-4.
  • 8) García-Rodríguez JA, Muñoz Bellido JL, Fresnadillo MJ, Trujillano I. In vitro activities of new macrolides and rifapentine against Brucella spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:911-3.
  • 9) García-Rodríguez JA, García Sánchez JE, Trujillano I, García Sánchez E, García García MI, Fresnadillo MJ. Susceptibilities of Brucella melitensis isolates to clinafloxacin and four other new fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:1194-5.
  • 10) Bodur H, Balaban N, Aksaray S, Yetener V, Akinci E, Colpan A, et al. Biotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates. Scand J Infect Dis 2003;35:337-8.
  • 11) Turan H, Arslan H, Azap OK, Serefhanoğlu K, Uncu H. In vitro antibacterial activity of tigecycline in comparison with doxycycline, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin against Brucella spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007;30:186-7.
Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-3149
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: -
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A comparison of the urinary system in the first printed modern Turkish anatomy book and contemporary anatomy books

ENİS ULUÇAM, Nilüfer GÖKÇE, SELMAN ÇIKMAZ, ALİ YILMAZ

Epizyotomi onarımı zamanının postpartum kan belirteçlerine etkisi

Özgür DÜNDAR, Tolga ÇİFTPINAR, Pınar YÖRÜK, Levent TÜTÜMCÜ, Ercüment MÜNGEN, Yusuf Ziya YERGÖK

In vitro activity of tigecycline against Brucella spp.

BELGİN ALTUN, AYŞE GÜLŞEN HASÇELİK, Deniz GÜR

Evaluation of oxidant injury induced by irradiation in brain tissues of rats of different ages

Burçin Ayşe UYUMLU, Haldun Şükrü ERKAL, KADİR BATÇIOĞLU, Meltem SERİN, NESLİHAN YÜCEL

Features of tetanus in eight adult patients in İstanbul metropolis

Gönül ŞENGÖZ, Filiz YILDIRIM, Kart Kadriye YAŞAR, Mehmet BAKAR, Özcan NAZLICAN, KADİR İDİN, Ejder ÖZENÇ

The importance of metallic residues on teeth to determine the entrance hole of shotgun wounds

ÇETİN LÜTFİ BAYDAR

Comparison of three different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine in urological surgery

Hüseyin ŞEN, MERT AKBAŞ, Ali SIZLAN, FERHAT ATEŞ, Kamer DERE, İlker GÜNDÜ, Sezai ÖZKAN, GÜNER DAĞLI

Serum homocysteine and lipoprotein(a) levels in preeclamptic pregnants

Murat Yaşar IŞILDAK, Türkmen Sembol YILDIRMAK, Serkan DOĞAN, Mustafa ÇAKMAK, Ekrem ÖZAKIN

The investigation of the association between the frequency of Trichomonas vaginalis and using intrauterine contraceptive device

Nizami DURAN, GÜLNAZ ÇULHA, Ali Ulvi HAKVERDİ, ARİF GÜNGÖREN

Effect of carvedilol on P-wave duration and P-wave dispersion in patients with systolic heart failure

Ersan TATLI, Meryem AKTÖZ, Ahmet BARUTÇU, Turhan KÜRÜM, ARMAĞAN ALTUN