Comparison of three different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine in urological surgery
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı transüretral endoskopik cerrahide intratekal izobarik ve hiperbarik levobupivakainin etkinliğini kıyaslamaktır. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, spinal anestezi altında elektif ürolojik cerrahi planlanan olgular alındı. Olgular rastgele 20 hastadan oluşan üç gruba ayrıldı. İntratekal yolla toplamda 3'er ml, Grup 1 olgulara (n=20) 13.5 mg hiperbarik levobupivakain, Grup 2 olgulara (n=20) 12.5 mg izobarik levobupivakain ve Grup 3 olgulara (n=20) 15 mg izobarik levobupivakain uygulandı. Tüm olgularda duyusal ve motor blok, hemodinamik parametreler, ağrı skorları, yan etkiler ve analjezik gereksinimler kaydedildi. Bulgular: Ortalama T10 duyusal blok ve Bromage 0'a ulaşma süreleri açısından gruplar arası farklılık saptandı (p
Ürolojik cerrahide üç farklı intratekal levobupivakain dozunun karşılaştırılması
Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of hyperbaric and isobaric solutions of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery. Patients and Methods: The study included urological patients who were scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia. The cases were randomly divided into three groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 received 13.5 mg hyperbaric levobupivacaine, group 2 received 12.5 mg isobaric levobupivacaine and group 3 received 15 mg isobaric levobupivacaine in a total volume of 3 ml intrathecally. Sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, pain scores, adverse effects and analgesic requirements of the patients were recorded. Results: The time to reach T10 sensory block and the onset time to Bromage 0 were statistically different among the three groups (p<0.05). The mean time to reach T10 was significantly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2 (p<0.001). Regarding the mean onset time to Bromage 0, group 1 had a lower mean value than that of group 3 (p<0.001). The mean duration for analgesic requirement was longer in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). Conclusion: We concluded that the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine was superior to the isobaric forms in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery.
___
- 1) Gristwood RW. Cardiac and CNS toxicity of levobupivacaine: strengths of evidence for advantage over bupivacaine. Drug Saf 2002;25:153-63.
- 2) Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998;46:245-9.
- 3) Kopacz DJ, Allen HW. Accidental intravenous levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1027-9.
- 4) Cox CR, Checketts MR, Mackenzie N, Scott NB, Bannister J. Comparison of S(-)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:594-8.
- 5) Cox CR, Faccenda KA, Gilhooly C, Bannister J, Scott NB, Morrison LM. Extradural S(-)-bupivacaine: comparison with racemic RS-bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:289-93.
- 6) Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003;31:637-41.
- 7) Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G, Heinz MT, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S, et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2002;94:194-8.
- 8) Alley EA, Kopacz DJ, McDonald SB, Liu SS. Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: a comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg 2002;94:188-93.
- 9) Vercauteren MP, Hans G, De Decker K, Adriaensen HA. Levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil and epinephrine for intrathecal labor analgesia: a comparison with racemic bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 2001;93:996-1000.
- 10) Vanna O, Chumsang L, Thongmee S. Levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89:1133-9.
- 11) Turan A, Kaya G, Öztürk N, Pamukçu Z. Spinal anestezi uygulanan bir olguda antidepresan kullanımına bağlı konvulsiyon. Trakya Univ Tıp Fak Derg 2003;20:43-6.
- 12) Çolak A, İnal MT, Arar C, Oğuzhan N, Pamukçu Z. Yüksek kardiyak riskli hastada sürekli spinal anestezi uygulaması. Trakya Univ Tıp Fak Derg 2007;24:150-2.
- 13) Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK, Cheung AS. Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005;22:899-903.