Vaka Çalışması: Okuma Güçlüğü Çeken Okurların Interaktif Dijital Kitap ile OkumaYazma Tecrübeleri

Okuma testlerinde, standart beklentilerin bir veya daha fazla seviye altında puan alan öğrenciler okuma güçlüğü çeken öğrenciler olarak tanımlanır. Okuma güçlüğü çeken öğrenciler, okuma-yazma faaliyetlerini destekleyen etkili uygulamalar kullanıldığında okuma testlerinde başarılı olmaya meyilliler. Son zamanlarda, teknoloji kullanımı okuma güçlüğü çeken öğrencilere modern okuma eğitimi olarak verilen en popüler uygulamalardan biridir. Bu çalışmada, altı 3. sınıf okuma güçlüğü çeken öğrencinin interaktif dijital kitaplar ile deneyimleri incelenmiştir. Veri kaynakları olarak yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler, dökümanlar ve alan notları kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma, her okuma güçlüğü çeken öğrencinin ihtiyacına yönelik özel bir okuma-yazma müfredatına ihtiyaç duyulduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucuna göre, interaktif dijital kitaplar, yetişkin yönlendirmesinin ve kullanılan kitabın kalitesine bağlı olarak, öğrenciler için teşvik edici veya cesaret kırıcı olabilmektedir.

A Case Study: Literacy Experiences of Struggling Readers with Interactive Digital Books

Students who score one or more grade levels below thestandard expectations in reading tests are defined as strugglingreaders. Struggling readers tend to succeed in reading assessmentswhen effective interventions are integrated to support their literacypractices. Recently, technology use has been one of the most popularinterventions in contemporary reading instruction for strugglingreaders. In this study, experiences of six 3rd grade struggling readerswithin tutoring sessions to explore their experiences with interactivedigital boks are examined. Data collection sources included semi–structured interviews, document collection, and field notes. This studyrevealed that every struggling reader needs a special literacycurriculum with strategies that are unique to their needs. The findingsalso suggested that interactive digital books might be eitherencouraging or discouraging for students depending on the quality ofdigital books and adult guidance.

PDF

___

Allington, R. L. (2007). Intervention all day long: New hope for struggling readers. Voices from the Middle, 14(4), 7-14.
Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (2007). Supported e-texts: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 153-160.
Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (2007). The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 134-153.
Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277- 2999.
Chiong, C., Ree, J., Takeuchi, L., & Erickson, I. (2012). Print books vs. e-books. Retrieved from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/07/jgcc_ebooks_quickreport.pdf
Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dalton, B. (2014). DIY e-books: Designing enhanced texts. The Reading Teacher, 67(7), 543-546.
Demiroz, E., & Demiroz, E. (2018). Enactive nature of scholarship and e2TPR. In Wang, V. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Positive Scholarship for Global K-20 Education (pp. 201-216). IGI Global.
Falth, L., Gustafson, S., Tjus, T., Heimann, M., & Svensson, I. (2013). Computer‐assisted interventions targeting reading skills of children with reading disabilities: A longitudinal study. Dyslexia, 19(1), 37-53.
Gibson Jr, L., Cartledge, G., & Keyes, S. E. (2011). A preliminary investigation of supplemental computer-assisted reading instruction on the oral reading fluency and comprehension of firstgrade African American urban students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(4), 260-282.
Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59-85.
Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (1994). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Education.
Kena, G., Aud, S., Johnson, F., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., & Kristapovich, P. (2014). The condition of education 2014 (NCES 2014-083). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved September 21, 2015 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
Laverick, D. (2014). Supporting striving readers through technology-based instruction. Reading Improvement, 51(1), 11-19.
McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). A breakthrough for Josh: How to use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends, 56(3), 20-28.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2014). District and school information. Retrieved from http://mcds.dese.mo.gov/Pages/District-and- School-Information.aspx
Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. College composition and communication, 50(3), 411-436.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6, 1, 1-26.
Udo, G. J. (2001). Privacy and security concerns as major barriers for e-commerce: A survey study. Information Management & Computer Security, 9(4), 165-174.
Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 178- 200.
Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic bookson prekindergarten-to-grade 5 students' literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 47-87.