Öğrencilerin Sorgulama Becerilerine Yönelik Bir Karşılaştırma Araştırması: Takım-OyunTurnuva ve Birleştirme Teknikleri

Hormonlar konusu fen eğitiminde önemli bir yere sahiptir.Eğitimin her kademesinde yer alan bu konu soyut kavramlardanoluşması sebebiyle öğrencileri ezbere yönlendirmekte veöğrenme sürecinde becerilerini kullanmalarını kısıtlamaktadır.Bu sebeple hormonlar konusunun öğreniminde öğrencilerinbecerilerini kullanmalarına ve geliştirmelerine imkân sağlayanetkinlikler önem arz etmektedir. Sunulan çalışmada hormonlarkonusunda işbirlikli öğrenme yaklaşımın iki farklı tekniği olanTakım-Oyun-Turnuva ve Birleştirme tekniklerine dayalıgerçekleştirilen etkinliklerin üniversite öğrencilerinin sorgulamabecerilerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçlaöğrenciler Grup-1 (N=23) ve Grup-2 (N=29) olmak üzere ikigruba ayrılmıştır. Grup-1’de Takım-Oyun-Turnuva, Grup-2’deise Birleştirme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Uygulamalar 9 hafta sürmüşve veri toplama amacıyla uygulamalardan önce ve sonra olmaküzere Sorgulama Becerileri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre,grupların ön test ve son test puanları arasında anlamlı gelişmebulunurken, son test puanları arasında anlamlı farklılık tespitedilmemiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre her iki tekniğin deöğrencilerin sorgulama becerilerini geliştirdiği fakat aralarındaanlamlı bir farklılığın olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

A Comparative Research for Students’ Inquiry Skills: Team-Game-Tournament and Jigsaw

Hormones have an important place in science education. This issue is memorized by the students and it also makes a challenge to use their skills because it consists of abstract concepts. For this reason, activities that provide students to use and improve their skills have great importance. In the present research, a comparison of the impact of two different techniques of cooperative learning approach, which were team-game-tournament and jigsaw, on undergraduates’ inquiry skills in the context of hormones issue was conducted. For this purpose, participants were assigned to Group-1 (N=23) and Group-2 (N=29). Team-game-tournament was used in Group-1 and jigsaw was conducted in Group-2. Treatment was accomplished during nine weeks and the Inquiry Skills Scale was used before and after the instructions for data collection. According to the results, there was significant improvement between students’ pre- and post-tests. However, the post-test scores of groups were not significantly different. It was concluded that both techniques improved students' inquiry skills but there was no difference between them.

___

  • Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(4), 387–398.
  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2014). Aktif öğrenme. İzmir: Biliş Özel Eğitim, Danışmanlık, Araştırma Hizmetleri ve Yayın.
  • Aldan-Karademir, Ç., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2013). The development of inquiry skills scale: Reliability and validity study. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 56-65.
  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J. & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage
  • Arslan, A., & Zengin, R. (2016). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin bilimsel ve sosyal beceriler üzerindeki etkisi. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 23-45.
  • Bayrakçeken, S., Doymuş, K., & Doğan, A. (2013). İşbirlikli öğrenme modeli ve uygulanması. Pegem Akademi.
  • Bilgin, İ., & Gelici, Ö. (2011). İşbirlikli öğrenme tekniklerinin tanıtımı ve öğrenci görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 40-70.
  • Cooper, J. L., & Mueck, R. (1990). Student involvement in learning cooperative learning and college instruction. Journal on Excellence College Teaching, 1, 68–76.
  • Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.
  • De Vries, D. L., & Edwards, K. J. (1974). Student teams and learning games: Their effects on cross-race and cross-sex interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 741-749.
  • De Vries, D. L., Edwards, K. J. & Wells, E. H. (1974). Teams-games-tournament in the social studies classroom: effects on academic achievement, student attitudes, cognitive beliefs, and classroom climate. Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University, Report Number 173.
  • De Vries, D. L., & Slavin, R. E. (1978). Teams-games-tournaments (TGT): Review of ten classroom experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 28-38.
  • Doymus, K. (2008a). Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 249-260.
  • Doymus, K. (2008b). Teaching chemical bonding through jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 47-57.
  • Doymus, K., Karacop, A., & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’ understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 671-691.
  • González, A., Jennings, D., & Manriquez, L. (2014). Multi-faceted impact of a team game tournament on the ability of the learners to engage and develop their own critical skill set. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(5), 1213-1224.
  • Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325–332.
  • Holliday, D. C. (1995). Jigsaw IV: Using student/ teacher concerns to improve Jigsaw III. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED495687, 08.04.2019 tarihinde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED465687.pdf adresinden den alınmıştır.
  • Johnson D. W. & Johnson R. T. (1994). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston: Allynand Bacon.
  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. ERIC Document Number: ED 241 516, 8.04.2019 tarihinde http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED241516.pdf adresinden alınmıştır
  • Kaplan Parsa, M. (2016). İşbirlikli sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme ortamının yaratıcı düşünmeye, sorgulayıcı öğrenme becerilerine, fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutuma etkisi(Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Karaçöp, A., & Diken, E. H. (2017). The effects of jigsaw technique based on cooperative learning on prospective science teachers' science process skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 86-97.
  • Karaçöp, A., & Doymuş, K. (2013). Effects of jigsaw cooperative learning and animation techniques on students’ understanding of chemical bonding and their conceptions of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 186-203.
  • Koç, Y., Doymuş, K., Karaçöp, A., & Şimşek, Ü. (2010). The effects of two cooperative learning strategies on the teaching and learning of the topics of chemical kinetics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2) 52-65.
  • Kumar, C. V., Kalasuramath, S., Patil, S., Kumar, K. R., Taj, K. S., Jayasimha, V. L., Basavarajappa, K.G.,
  • Shashikala, P., Kukkamalla, A., & Chacko, T. (2017). Effect of jigsaw co-operative learning method in improving cognitive skills among medical students. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(3), 164-173.
  • Lazarowitz R. & Penso, S. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215-224.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2004). Tebliğler Dergisi. 2563.
  • Mutlu, A. (2018). Comparison of two different techniques of cooperative learning approach: Undergraduates' conceptual understanding in the context of hormone biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(2), 114-120.
  • Newmann, F. M., & Thompson, J. A. (1987). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement in secondary schools: a summary of research. ERIC Document number: ED 288 853, 08.04.2019 tarihinde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED288853.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Oludipe, D., & Awokoy, O. J. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry. Türk Fen Eğitim Dergisi, 7(1), 1-36.
  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival manual, a step by step a guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. England: McGraw-HillEducation.
  • Phillips, J., & Fusco J. (2015). Using the jigsaw technique to teach clinical controversy in a clinical skills course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 79(6), 1-7.
  • Sharan S. & Hertz-Lazarowitz R. (1980). A group-investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom. In S. Sharan, P. Hare, C. Webb and R. Hertz Lazarowitz (eds.) Cooperation in Education. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Education Research, 50, 315–342.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning. Baltimore, MD.: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
  • Solihatin, E., & Öztürk, A. (2014). Increasing civics learning achievement by applying cooperative learning: team game tournament method. Sociology, 4(11), 949-954.
  • Souvignier, E., & Kronenberger, J. (2007). Cooperative learning in third graders' jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without questioning training. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 755- 771.
  • Stahl, R. J. (1994). Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Addison-Wesley.
  • Tarhan, L., & Acar Şeşen, B. (2012). Jigsaw cooperative learning: acid–base theories. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 307-313.
  • Tarhan, L., Ayyıldız, Y., Ogunc, A., & Acar-Sesen, B. (2013). A jigsaw cooperative learning application in elementary science and technology lessons: physical and chemical changes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 184-203.
  • Tekkaya, C., Özkan, Ö., & Sungur, S. (2001). Biology concepts perceived as difficult by Turkish high school students. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 145-150.
  • Van Wyk, M. M. (2011). The effects of Teams-Games-Tournaments on achievement, retention, and attitudes of economics education students. Journal of Social Sciences, 26(3), 183-193.
  • Veloo, A., & Chairhany, S. (2013). Fostering students’ attitudes and achievement in probability using teamsgames-tournaments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 59-64.
  • Yılar, M. B., & Şimşek, U. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde farklı işbirlikli öğrenme uygulamalarının sosyal beceriler üzerindeki etkileri. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(3), 835-854.
Trakya Eğitim Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2630-6301
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi