Para Politikası ve Ücret Pazarlıkçıları Arasındaki Stratejik Etkileşimin Makroekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi

Para Politikası ve Ücret Pazarlıkçıları Arasındaki Stratejik Etkileşimin Makroekonomik Performans Üzerindeki EtkisiMerkez bankası ve diğer ekonomik aktörler arasındaki sinyalleşme mekanizmasında ücret pazarlığının kurumsal yapısı önemli rol oynamaktadır. Ücret pazarlığının koordinasyon derecesi merkez bankası tarafından gönderilen sinyalleri daha etkin hale getirir ve bağımsız bir merkez bankasının ekonomiye herhangi bir reel maliyet (işsizlik vb) yüklemeden enfl asyonu düşürmesine yardım eder. Daha açık ifade edilecek olursa, ücret pazarlığı koordinasyon seviyesi yüksek olduğunda, enfl asyon ile mücadele etmek zorunda olan bağımsız bir merkez bankası istihdam seviyesini düşürmek zorunda kalmadan enfl asyon hedeŞ ni gerçekleştirebilmektedir. Buna karşın, düşük koordinasyon derecelerinde enfl asyon ile mücadelede işsizlik gibi reel bir maliyeti beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, merkez bankası bağımsızlığının ve ücret pazarlığı koordinasyon derecesinin ve bu iki kurumsal değişkenin (merkez bankası bağımsızlığı ve ücret pazarlığı koordinasyon derecesi) etkileşiminin işsizlik üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmada sistem GMM yöntemiyle ulaşılan sonuçlar, bağımsız bir merkez bankası ve koordineli pazarlıkçıları arasındaki etkileşimin işsizlik üzerinde azaltıcı bir etki meydana getirdiğine işaret etmektedir. Diğer taraftan, birincil amacı Ş yat istikrarı olan bağımsız bir merkez bankası genel olarak işsizliği artıcı bir etki meydana getirmesine rağmen, işsizlik oranı üzerinde meydana gelecek net etki, ücret pazarlığı koordinasyon derecesine bağlı olmaktadır.

The Impact of the Strategic Interaction among Monetary Policy and Wage Bargainers on Macroeconomic Performance

The instutional structure of wage bargaining plays an important role in the signalling mechanism amongst central bank and other economic actors. Wage bargaining coordination degree makes the signals sent by central banks more effective and helps an independent central bank to reduce infl ation without charging a real cost (unemployment etc.) on the economy. More clearly, when wage bargaining coordination degree is high, an independent central bank having to combat with infl ation could reach its infl ation target without having to reduce the level of employment . None the less, when coordination degree is low, combating with infl ation brings about an real cost such as unemployment. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of central bank independence, wage bargaining coordination and the interaction of these two institutional variables on unemployment. According to system GMM test results, the study reveals that the interaction between central bank independence and wage bargainer generates an reducing effect on unemployment. In addition, although an independent central bank whose primary objective is price stability generally causes increase in unemployment, the net effect depends on wage bargaining coordination level.

___

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Fourth Edition. John Wiley-Sons Ltd. UK.
  • Brumm, H. J. (2000). Infl ation and Central Bank Independence: Conventional Wisdom Redux. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. Vol.32. No.4. Part 1. (Nov.). pp.807- 819.
  • Calmfors, L ve Driffi ll, J. (1987). Centralisation of Wage Bargaining and Macroeconomic Performance, Institute of International Economic Studies, University of Stocholm, Seminar Paper, No.402, December.
  • Calmfors, L. (2001). Wages and Wage-Bargaining Institutions in the EMU: A Survey of the Issues. Empirica.Vol.28. pp.325-351.
  • Calmfors, L. (1993). Centralisation of Wage Bargaining and Macroeconomic Performance, A Survey. OECD Economic Studies. Nr.21. Winter. pp.161-187.
  • Cukierman, A. (1992). Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence, Cambridge. MA, Mit Pres.
  • Cukierman, A., Web, S. B. ve Neyapti, B. (1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(3), 353- 398.
  • Coricelli, F., Cukierman, A., Dalmazzo, A. (2006). A. Monetary Institutions, Monopolistic Competition, Unionized Labor Markets and Economic Performance. Scand. J. of Economics. Vol.108(1). pp.39-63.
  • Crowe, C., Meade, E. E. (2007). Evolution of Central Bank Governance Around the World. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21:4. pp. 69-90.
  • Daunfeldt, S.O, Luna, X. (2008). Central bank independence and price stability: evidence from OECD countries. Oxford Economic Papers. 60 (2008), 410-422.
  • Dullien, S. (2005). The Interaction of Monetary Policy and Wage Bargaining in the European Monetary Union: Lessons from the Endogenous Money Approach. Palgrave Macmillan USA.
  • Eijffi nger, S. ve De Haan, J. (1996). The political Economy of Central-Bank Independence. Special Papers in International Economics. Nr.19, May.
  • Franzese, R. J. (2004). Strategic Interactions of The ECB, Wage Bargainers, and Governments, a Review of Theory, Evidence, and Recent Experience. In Institutional Confl icts and Complementarities Monetary Policy and Wage Bargaining Institutions in EMU. P. Mooslechner, M. Schuerz, R. Franzese, eds., Kluwer, pp.5-42.
  • Franzese, R. J. (2001a). Institutional and Sectoral Interactions in Monetary Policy and Wage-Price-Bargaining. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. P. Hall and D. Soskice, eds. Oxford UP. pp.104-44.
  • Franzese, R. J. (2001b). Strategic Interactions of Monetary Policymakers and Wage/Price Bargainers: A Review with Implications for The European Common-Currency Area. Emprica: Journal of Applied Economic Policy. 28(4):457-86.
  • Franzese, R. J. (1999). Credibly Conservative Monetary Policy and Labor-/Good-Market Organization: A Review with Implications for ECB-Led Monetary Policy in Europe". Institute for Social Research.5 May. pp.97-124.
  • Franzese R. J. ve Hall, P. A. (1999). Institutional Dimensions of Coordinating Wage-Bargaining and Monetary Policy. Cambridge University Pres. pp.173-204.
  • Güler, A. ve Özyurt, H. (2012), Para Politikası ve Ücret Pazarlıkçıları Arasındaki Stratejik Etkileşim, Tisk Akademi, Cilt:7, Sayı:13, 130- 163.
  • Hall, P. A. ve Franzese, R. J (1998). Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining, and European Monetary Union. International Organization. Vol.52, Nr.3. Summer. pp.505-535.
  • Hancke, B. ve Soskice, D. (2003). Wage Setting and Infl ation Targets in EMU. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol.19. Nr.1. pp.149- 160.
  • Heston A., Summers R. , Aten B. (2009). Penn World Table Version 6.3. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. August 2009.
  • Iversen, T. (1998). Wage Bargaining, Central Bank Independence, and the Real Effects of Money. International Organization. Vol.52. Nr.3. Summer, pp.469-504.
  • Lohmann, S. (1992). Optimal Commitment in Monetary Policy: Credibility versus Flexibility. The American Economic Review. Vol.82. No.1. (Mar.). pp.273-286.
  • Lucia, C. (2003). Wage Setters, Central Bank Conservatism and Economic Performance. ISAE Istitutodi Studie Analisi Economica. Rome. April, pp.1-45.
  • Mares, I. (2004). Wage Bargaining in the Presence of Social Services and Transfers. World Politics. Vol.57 (October). pp.99-142.
  • Meland, F. (2006). A Union-bashing Model of Infl ation Targeting. Scand. J. of Economics. 108(3). 419-432.
  • Mooslechner, P. ve Schürz, M. (2001). The Interaction of Wage Bargaining Institutions and an Independent Central Bank-A Methodological Refl ection on Current Theories. Empirica. 28. pp. 487-506.
  • Posen A. (1995). Central Bank Independence and Disinfl ationary Credibility: A missing Link?. International Macroeconomics Function Research and Market Analysis Group Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Nr.1.
  • Posen A. ve Gould, D. P. (2006). Has EMU Had Any Impact on the Degree of Wage Restraint?. Working Paper. Institute for International Economics. Vol. 6.
  • Roodman, D.(2008). How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development. Working Paper. July.
  • Rogoff, K. (1985). The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.100. Nr.4. (Nov.). pp.1169-1189.
  • Soskice, D. ve Iversen, T. (2000). The Nonneutrality of Monetary Policy with Large Price or Wage Setters. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.115. No.1. (Feb.). pp.265-284.
  • Soskice, D. ve Iversen, T. (1998). Multiple Wage-Bargaining Systems in the Single European Currency Area. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol.14. Nr.3. pp.110-124.
  • Söderström, H. T. (1985). Union Militancy, External Shocks and Accommodation Dilemma. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. Vol.87. No.2. (Jun). pp.335-351.
  • Tüsiad (2004). Türkiye'de İşgücü Piyasasının Kurumsal Yapısı ve İşsizlik, Yayın no. TüsiadT/2004-11/381. Aralık.
  • Velasco, A. ve Guzzo, V. (1998). The Case for a Populist Central Banker. Economic Research Reports. August.