Değişik yöntemlerle ıslah edilen meralarda bazı toprak kalite özelliklerinin değişimi

Bu çalışma; farklı yöntemler uygulanarak ıslah edilen mera alanında ıslah uygulamalarının bazı toprak kalite özelliklerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla, 2008 ve 2009 yılları Mayıs ayının ikinci haftasında 5 farklı ıslah yöntemi uygulanan mera alanından ve herbir ıslah uygulama alanının sekiz farklı yerinden 0–15 ve 15–30 cm derinliklerinden toprak örnekleri alınmıştır. Alınan toprak örneklerinde; toprak reaksiyonu, toprak tuzluluğu, kireç içeriği, toplam karbon, toplam azot, agregat stabilitesi, kuru hacim ağırlığı, tane yoğunluğu, katalaz enzim aktivitesi, üreaz enzim aktivitesi ve mezofil aerobik mikroorganizma sayıları tekrarlanan ölçümlerle incelenmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin istatistik analizlerine göre ıslah uygulamalarının; toprak reaksiyonu, toprak tuzluluğu, kireç yüzdesi, toplam azot, agregat stabilitesi, katalaz enzim aktivitesi ve mezofil mikroorganizma sayıları özelliklerine etkisinin önemli düzeyde (P

Change of some soil quality characteristics under different rasture reclamation methods of rangelands

The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of different pasture reclamation methods on soil characteristics. For this purpose, soil samples were taken from 0–15 and 15–30 cm depths of the pasture lands subjected to 5 different reclamation processes from 8 different locations of each process during the second week of May of 2008 and 2009. Soil reaction, soil salinity, lime content, total carbon, total nitrogen, aggregate stability, bulk density, particle density, catalase and urease enzyme activities and mesophyllic aerobic microorganism count tests were carried out on soil samples for two years. Effects of reclamation processes on soil reaction, soil salinity, lime content, total nitrogen, aggregate stability, catalase enzyme activity and mesophyllic microorganism counts found to be significant at P

___

  • Allison L E & Moodie C D (1965). Carbonate. In: C A Black (Eds), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1379–1396
  • Beck T H (1971). Die Messung Katalasen Aktivitaet Boden Z. Pflanzenernaehai Sodek 130: 68–81
  • Blake G R & Hartge K H (1986). Bulk density. In: A Klute (Eds), Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. 2nd edition, Agron. Monogr. 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison WI, USA, pp. 363–376
  • Bouyoucos G J (1951). A recalibration of hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal 43 (9): 435–438
  • Çetiner M (2009). Yapay bir merada otlatmanın bitki örtüsü ve toprak özelliklerine etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Çanakkale
  • ÇOB (2007). http://www.bcs.gov.tr/documents/ UBSEP–2007.pdf, Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Stratejik Eylem Planı, T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı (Erişim Tarihi 27.07.2013)
  • Dick R P (1994). Soil Enzyme Activity as an Indicator of Soil Quality. In: J W Doran et al (Eds), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, Madison WI, USA, pp. 107–125
  • Dizdar M Y (2003). Türkiye’nin Toprak Kaynakları. TMMOB Mühendisleri Odası, Teknik Yayınlar Dizisi No:2, Ankara.
  • Eldor A P (2007). Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, USA Fırıncıoğlu H K, Seefeldt S S & Sahin B (2007). The effects of long-term grazing exclosures on range plants in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey. Environmental Management 39 (3): 326–337
  • Fidan C (2002). Doğu Anadolu (Elaziz) mera topraklarının ıslahı üzerine araştırmalar. Doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniverstesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), İstanbul.
  • Gökkuş A, Alatürk F & Özaslan Parlak A (2011). Çanakkale’de otlatma alanlarının hayvancılıktaki önemi. Çanakkale Tarımı Sempozyumu (Dünü, Bugünü ve Geleceği): 10–11 Ocak, Çanakkale, s. 71–79
  • Gökkuş A, Baytekin H, Hakyemez B H & Özer İ (2001). Çanakkale’nin sürülüp terk edilen çalılı meralarında yeniden bitki gelişimi. Türkiye 4. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. Cilt: III, Çayır Mera Yem Bitkileri: 17–21 Eylül, Tekirdağ, s. 13–18
  • Heady H (1973). Structure and function of climax. Arid Shrublands, Proc. of Third Workshop of the United States/Australia Rangelands Panel, March 26–April 5, Tuscon, Arizona, 73–80
  • Hoffmann E & Teicher K (1961). Ein kolorimetrisches Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Ureaseaktivit/at in: B6den. Z Pflanzenernaehr Dtingung Bodenkd 95: 55–63
  • Hofmann E & Hofmann G (1966). Determination of soil biological activity with enzymatic methods. Advanced Enzymology 28: 365–390
  • Holechek J L, Pieper R D & Herbel C H (2004). Range Management: Principles and Practices, 5th edition. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
  • Jackson M L (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice- Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs New Jersey, USA
  • Kadıoğlu B (2007). Bazı toprak kalite indeks parametrelerinin işlemeli tarım ve mera alanlarında farklı topoğrafik pozisyonlara bağlı olarak değişimi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Erzurum
  • Kavdır Y, Ekinci H, Yüksel O & Mermut A (2005). 13C CP/MAS–NMR spectra of soil organic matter and stability of soil aggregates affected by forest wildfires in Canakkale, Turkey. Geoderma 129: 219–229
  • Kavdır Y, Özcan H, Ekinci H, Yigini Y & Yüksel O (2004). The influence of clay content, organic carbon and land use types on soil aggregate stability and tensile strength. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28 (3): 155–162
  • Kemper W D & Rosenau R C (1986). Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution. In: A Klute (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison WI, USA, pp: 425–442
  • Kirsten W J (1983). Organic Elemental Analysis. Academic Press, New York, USA
  • Kökten K (2005). Çukurova bölgesinde maki tipi vejetasyonun değişik mera ıslahı yöntemleriyle geliştirilme olanakları. Doktora tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Adana
  • Lal R (2011). Sequestering carbon in soils of agro- ecosystems. Food Policy 36: 33–39
  • Langdale G W, West L T, Bruce R R, Miller W P & Thomas A W (1992). Restoration of eroded soil with conservation tillage. Soil Technology 5: 81–90
  • Lavorel S, Rochette C & Lebreton J D (1999). Functional groups for response to disturbance in Mediterranean old fields. Oikos 84: 480–498
  • Liu Y, Horisawa S & Mukohata Y (2010). Effect of seed coating on plant growth and soil conditions: A preliminary study for restoration of degraded rangeland in the inghai–Tibetan Plateau. Grassland Science 56: 145–152
  • Lund H G (2007). Accounting for the World’s Rangelands. Rangelands 29 (1): 3–10
  • MGM (2013). Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. http:// www.mgm.gov.tr/ veridegerlendirme/ (Erişim Tarihi 26.07.2013)
  • Mikhailova E A, Bryant R B, Cherney D J R, Post C J & Vassenev I I (2000). Botanical composition, soil and forage quality under different management regimes in Russian grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 80: 213–226
  • Montalvo J, Casado M A, Levassor C & Pineda F D (1993). Species–diversity patterns in mediterranean grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 213–222
  • Mülayim M (1980). Tabii merada herbisitlerle hazırlanan tohum yatağında suni mera kurma olanakları üzerinde araştırmalar. Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Ankara
  • Nael M, Khademi H & Hajabbasi M A (2004) Response of soil quality indicators and their spatial variability to land degradation in central Iran. Applied Soil Ecology 27: 221–232
  • Nannipieri P (1994). The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: C E Pankhurst, B M Double, V V S R Gupta & P R Grace (Eds), Soil Biota Management in Sustainable Farming Systems, CSIRO East Melbourne, pp. 238– 244
  • Nortcliff S (2002). Standardisation of soil quality attributes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 88 (2): 161–168
  • Oğuz İ (2012). The Effect Of Planting, Protection And Fertilization Applications On Vegetation, Soil Properties, Soil Loss And Soil Water Content in Central Anatolia Degraded Rangeland. Carpathian Journal Of Earth And Environmental Sciences 7 (3): 167–173
  • Ojima D S, Dirks B O M, Glenn E P, Owensby C E & Scurlock J O (1993). Assessment of C budget for grasslands and drylands of the world. Water Air Soil Pollution 70: 95–109
  • Olsen S, Cole C, Watanabe F & Dean L (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular Nr: 939, US
  • Gov. Print. Office, Washington DC,USA Özaslan Parlak A (2011). Çanakkale yöresinde çalılı meraların önemi. Çanakkale Tarımı Sempozyumu (Dünü, Bugünü ve Geleceği): 10–12 Ocak, Çanakkale, s. 489–496
  • Özaslan Parlak A, Gökkuş A & Hakyemez B H (2011a). Değişik yöntemlerle ıslah edilen meranın bitki örtüsündeki değişim (yayınlanmamış). ÇOMÜ, 2007/89 no’lu proje raporu
  • Özaslan Parlak A, Gökkuş A, Hakyemez B H & Baytekin H (2011b). Forage yield and quality of kermes oak and herbaceous species throughout a year in Mediterranean zone of western Turkey. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 21 (3): 513–518
  • Öztaş T, Koc A & Comaklı B (2003). Changes in vegetation and soil properties along a slope on overgrazed and eroded rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments 55: 93–100
  • RG (1998). http://www.kentli.org/yasa/4342.htm, 4342 Sayılı Mera Kanunu, Resmi Gazete 28.02.1998– 23272 (Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2013)
  • Richards L A (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook 60, Washington DC, USA
  • SAS (2000). SAS. STAT User’s guide. 9th version, SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC
  • Sebastian U, Sabine T, Hofmann B & Christen O (2010). Biological soil properties in a long–term tillage trial in Germany. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 173 (4): 483–489
  • Seligman N G (1996). Management of Mediterranean grasslands. In: J Hodgson & A W Illius (Eds), The Ecology and Management Og Grazing Systems, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 359–392
  • Sternberg M, Gutman M, Perevolotsky A, Ungar E D & Kigel J (2000). Vegetation response to grazing management in a Mediterranean herbaceous community: A functional group approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 224–237
  • Stoddart L A, Smith A D & Box T W (1975). Range Management (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, USA
  • Şekercioğlu C H, Anderson S, Akçay E, Bilgin R, Can O E, Semiz G, Tavşanoğlu C, Yokeş M B, Soyumert A, İpekdal K, Sağlam İ K, Yücel M & Dalfes H N (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biologıcal Conservation 144 (12): 2752–2769
  • Turgut B & Öztaş T (2012). Toprak penetrasyon direncine etki eden toprak özelliklerinin yersel değişim paternlerinin jeoistatistiksel yöntemlerle belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agriculture Sciences 18 (2): 115–125
  • Winogradsky S N (1952). Soil Microbiology. Problems and Methods. USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow (in Russian).
  • Wollum A G (1982). Cultural Methods for Soil Microorganisms. In: A L Page et al (Eds), Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edition, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, SSSA Book Series (9), Madison WI, USA, pp. 781–802
  • Zavala L M, Granged A J P, Jordán A & Bárcenas-Moreno G (2011). Post-fire evolution of soil properties and vegetation cover in a Mediterranean heathland after experimental burning: A 3-year study. Geoderma 164: 85–94