AN APPROACH TO ACUTE APPENDICITIS CASES DURING PREGNANCY: A PUBLIC HOSPITAL PRACTICE

Objective Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric surgery performed during pregnancy. Physiological and anatomical changes specific to pregnancy complicate the diagnosis and treatment processes. It has been seen in the literature that the studies on this subject mostly reflect the experiences of tertiary centers. The present study aimed to present the perioperative experience of acute appendicitis cases in pregnancy in a secondary care hospital. Materials and Methods The present study was carried out retrospectively between January 2015 and November 2020 in a secondary state hospital. Patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis during pregnancy and whose postoperative follow-ups and labors were carried out in our hospital were included in the study. Results The median age of the patients was 24 years (18- 35), the median gestational week was 17 weeks (8- 32). The median leukocyte count was 11.6 x103 uL, neutrophil count was 8.6 x103 uL, lymphocyte count was 2 x103 uL, thrombocyte count was 271 x x103 uL, C-reaktif protein was 4.5, neutrophil/ leukocyte ratio was 4.3, thrombocyte/lymphocyte was ratio 120.8, and the leukocyte /C-reaktif protein ratio was 0.7. Spinal anesthesia was the most preferred method and it was observed that open surgery was performed in all patients. The median week of delivery was 38 (36- 40) and preterm labor was seen in only one patient. It was observed that no additional maternal or fetal complications developed. Conclusion Pregnant acute appendicitis patients can also be successfully treated in secondary service hospitals on the condition of a multidisciplinary approach.

GEBELİKTE AKUT APANDİSİT OLGULARINA YAKLAŞIM; BİR DEVLET HASTANESİ PRATİĞİ

Amaç Akut apandisit, gebelikte en sık yapılan non-obstetrik cerrahidir. Gebeliğin kendine özgü fizyolojik, anatomik değişiklikleri tanı ve tedavi sürecini güçleştirir. Literatürde bu konuyla ilgili çalışmaların çoğunlukla tersiyer merkezlerin deneyimlerini yansıttığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı gebelikte akut apandisit vakalarına ilişkin ikinci basamak bir hizmet hastanesindeki perioperatif deneyiminin sunulmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem Çalışma Ocak 2015- Kasım 2020 tarihleri arasında ikinci basamak bir devlet hastanesinde retrospektif olarak yapıldı. Gebelik döneminde akut apandisit tanısı alan, postoperatif takipleri ve doğumları hastanemizde gerçekleştirilen hastalar çalışmaya alındı. Bulgular Hastaların yaş aralığı 24 yaş (18-35), ortanca gestasyonel hafta 17 hafta (8-32) idi. Ortanca lökosit sayısı 11,6 x103 uL, nötrofil sayısı 8,6 x103 uL, lenfosit sayısı 2 x103 uL, trombosit sayısı 271 x103 uL, C-reaktif protein 4,5, nötrofil/lökosit oranı 4,3, trombosit/ lenfosit oranı 120,8, lökosit/ C-reaktif protein oranı 0,7 olarak saptandı. Spinal anestezi en çok tercih edilen yöntemdi ve hastaların tamamında açık cerrahinin uygulanmış olduğu görüldü. Ortanca doğum haftası 38 idi (36-40), sadece bir hastada preterm doğumun geliştiği saptandı. Ek maternal veya fetal komplikasyon gelişmediği görüldü. Sonuç Multidisipliner yaklaşım koşuluyla ikinci basamak hizmet hastanelerinde de gebe akut apandisit’li hastalar başarıyla tedavi edilebilir.

___

1. Zingone F, Sultan AA, Humes DJ, West J. Risk of acute appendicitis in and around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study from England. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):332-7.

2. Franca Neto AHd, Amorim MMRd, Nóbrega BMSV. Apendicite aguda na gestação: revisão de literatura. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61(2):170-7.

3. Sanci M, Töz E, Ince O, Özcan A, Polater K, Inan AH, et al. Reference values for maternal total and differential leukocyte counts in different trimesters of pregnancy and the initial postpartum period in western Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(5):571-5.

4. Moreno CC, Mittal PK, Miller FH. Nonfetal Imaging During Pregnancy: Acute Abdomen/Pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58(2):363-80.

5. Masselli G, Derme M, Laghi F, Framarino-dei-Malatesta M, Gualdi G. Evaluating the acute abdomen in the pregnant patient. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53(6):1309-25.

6. Liu J, Ahmad M, Wu J, Tong XJ, Zeng HZ, Chan FSY, et al. Antibiotic is a safe and feasible option for uncomplicated appendicitis in pregnancy‐A retrospective cohort study. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020.

7. Lee SH, Lee JY, Choi YY, Lee JG. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC surg. 2019;19(1):41.

8. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(4):534- 40.

9. Vujic J, Marsoner K, Lipp-Pump A, Klaritsch P, Mischinger H, Kornprat P. Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy–an eleven-year retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):382.

10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205.

11. Akbas A, Aydin Kasap Z, Hacim NA, Tokocin M, Altinel Y, Yigitbas H, et al. The value of inflammatory markers in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnant patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020;26(5):769-76.

12. Çınar H, Aygün A, Derebey M, Tarım İA, Akalın Ç, Büyükakıncak S, et al. Significance of hemogram on diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018;24(5):423-8.

13. Mei Z, Li H, Serdula MK, Flores‐Ayala RC, Wang L, Liu JM, et al. C‐reactive protein increases with gestational age during pregnancy among Chinese women. Am J Hum Biol. 2016;28(4):574-9.

14. Patel D, Fingard J, Winters S, Low G. Clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42(7):1857-63.

15. Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, Daye ZJ, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Keim SM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(3):508-17.

16. Yoon I, Slesinger TL. Radiation Exposure In Pregnancy. 2019.

17. Practice CoO. Committee opinion No. 723: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e210.

18. Mantoglu B, Altintoprak F, Firat N, Gonullu E, Dikicier E, Akdeniz Y, et al. Reasons for Undesirable Pregnancy Outcomes among Women with Appendicitis: The Experience of a Tertiary Center. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:6039862

19. Şenocak R, Çelik Su, Kaymak Ş. Diagnosis, Management And Clinicopathological Features Of Acute Appendicitis In Pregnant Women And Its Impact On Fetal Outcomes. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.135-40.

20. Ibiebele I, Schnitzler M, Nippita T, Ford JB. Appendicectomy during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a population data linkage study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(1):45- 53.

21. Frountzas M, Nikolaou C, Stergios K, Kontzoglou K, Toutouzas K, Pergialiotis V. Is the laparoscopic approach a safe choice for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnant women? A meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101(4):235-48.

22. Yumi H. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):849-61.

23. Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, et al. Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(12):1259-65.

24. Kuczkowski KM. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: what are the risks of anesthesia? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59(1):52-6.

25. Olutoye OA, Baker BW, Belfort MA. FDA Warning on Anesthesia and Brain Development: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):98-102.
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7416
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1994
  • Yayıncı: SDÜ Basımevi / Isparta
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

EVALUATION OF PELVIC VENOUS DILATATION WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH CELIAC DISEASE

İlyas Dündar, Cemil GÖYA, Ensar TÜRKO, Sercan ÖZKAÇMAZ, Mesut ÖZGÖKÇE, Fatma DURMAZ, Veysel Atilla AYYILDIZ

ÖN ÇAPRAZ BAĞ REKONSTRÜKSİYONU UYGULANMIŞ NORMAL VE OBEZ BİREYLERİN FONKSİYONEL SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Hüseyin Sina COŞKUN, Lokman KEHRİBAR

PENTOSAN POLİSÜLFAT SODYUM TEDAVİSİ ALAN PRİMER MESANE AĞRISI SENDROMU HASTALARINDA PİGMENTER MAKULOPATİ İLİŞKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Murat AKGÜL, Tansu GÖNEN, Cenk Murat YAZICI, Ayşe SARIFAKIOĞLU, Arzu MALAK, Çağrı DOĞAN, Hulusi DAYISOYLU, Ece KARASU GÜNDER

GEBELİKTE AKUT APANDİSİT OLGULARINA YAKLAŞIM; BİR DEVLET HASTANESİ PRATİĞİ

Serdar KIRMIZI

COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION IN OBESE PATIENTS WITH NORMAL INDIVIDUALS

Lokman KEHRİBAR, Sina COŞKUN

RETINAL MICROVASCULAR DIFFERENCES IN TYPE 2 DIABETES WITHOUT CLINICALLY APPARENT RETINOPATHY: AN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY STUDY

Müjdat KARABULUT, Aylin KARALEZLİ, Sinem KARABULUT, Sabahattin SÜL

C-REAKTİF PROTEİN/ALBUMİN ORANININ İLEUS TİPİNİ VE PROGNOZU BELİRLEMEDEKİ YERİ

Bora ÇEKMEN, GİRAY KOLCU

ROTATOR MANŞET YIRTIKLARINDA BİSEPS TENDON PATOLOJİLERİNİN SAPTANMASINDA PREOPERATİF MR’IN ETKİNLİĞİ: MR VE İNTRAOPERATİF BULGULARIN KORELASYONU

Ahmet Çağdaş BİÇEN, Mustafa Hulusi ÖZKAN, Ahmet EKİN, Meriç ÜNAL

EFFICACY OF PREOPERATIVE MRI IN DETECTING BICEPS TENDON PATHOLOGIES IN ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: CORRELATION OF MRI AND INTRAOPERATIVE FINDINGS

Çağdaş BİÇEN, ABDULLAH MERİÇ ÜNAL, Ahmet EKİN, Mustafa ÖZKAN

YAYGIN BAZI NÖROLOJİK HASTALIKLARDA KOMORBİD PSİKİYATRİK BOZUKLUKLAR

Giray KOLCU, Behçet COŞAR, Nermin GÜRHAN, Ülkü POLAT, Ümit GÖRGÜLÜ, Kevser ALTAY, Şükrü ÖZEN, Yasemin YALÇIN AKMAN