Grip Strength Survey Based on Hand Tool Usage

Hand grip strength is broadly used for performing tasks involving equipment in production and processing activities. Most professionals in this field rely on grip strength to perform their tasks. There were three main aims of this study: i) determining various hand grip strength measurements for the group of hand tool users, ii) investigating the effects of height, weight, age, hand dominance, body mass index, previous Cumulative Trauma Disorder (CTD) diagnosis, and hand tool usage experience on hand grip strength, and iii) comparing the obtained results with existing data for other populations. The study groups comprised 71 healthy male facility workers. The values of subjects’ ages was observed between 26 and 74 years. The data were statistically analyzed to assess the normality of data and the percentile values of grip strength. The results of this study demonstrate that there were no significance differences noted between dominant and non-dominant hands. However, there were highly significant differences between the CTD group and the other group. Hand grip strength for the dominant hand was positively correlated to height, weight, and body mass index, and negatively correlated to age and tool usage experience. Hand dominance, height, weight, body mass index, age and tool usage experience should be considered when establishing normal values for grip strength.

___

  • [1] Bassey, E.J., &Harries, U.J. (1991). Normal values for hand grip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors. Clin. Sci. ; 84: 331-337.
  • [2] Bassey, E.J. (1990). Tests of muscle strength. In: Collins KJ, ed. Handbook of Methods for the Measurement of Work Performance, Physical Fitness and Energy Expenditure in Tropical Populations. London: International Union of Biological Sciences, Medical Research, 59-65.
  • [3] Massey-Westrop, N., Rankin, W., Ahern, M., Krishnan, J., &Hearn, T.C. (2004). Measuring grip strength in normal adults: reference ranges and a comparison of electronic and hydraulic instruments. Journal of Hand Surgery 29A, 514–519.
  • [4] Nicolay, C.W., &Walker, A.L. (2005). Grip Strength and Endurance: Influences of anthropometric Variation, Hand Dominance and Gender, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35, 605-618.
  • [5] Rajendran, K., Thamburaj, S., Syed Abudaheer, K., & Thiruvevenkadam, I. A. (2016). Comparison of Hand Grip Strength in Different Positions of Shoulder with Elbow in 90º Flexion and 0º Extension Positions. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research (IJHSR), 6(2), 245-253.
  • [6] Çakıt, E., Durgun, B., & Cetik, O. (2015). A neural network approach for assessing the relationship between grip strength and hand anthropometry. Neural Network World, 25(6), 603.
  • [7] Çakıt, E., Durgun, B., & Cetik, O. (2016). Assessing the Relationship Between Hand Dimensions and Manual Dexterity Performance for Turkish Dental Students. In Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors (pp. 469-479). Springer International Publishing.
  • [8] Dubrowski, A., Carnahan, H. (2004). Grip force when grasping moving cylinders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 34, 69–76.
  • [9] Mital, A., Kilbom, A., (1992). Design, selection and use of hand tools to alleviate trauma of the upper extremities- Part II, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 10, 7-21, Elsevier Science Publication.
  • [10] Koley, S., & Atri, R. (2016). A Study on Handgrip Strength in Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women of North India. International Journal of Biomedical Research, 7(5), 236-239.
  • [11] Hinson, M., & Gench, B. E. (1989). The curvilinear relationship of grip strength to age. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9, 53–60.
  • [12] Crosby, C. A., Wehbé, M. A., & Mawr, B. (1994). Hand strength: Normative values. Journal of Hand Surgery, 19A, 665–670.
  • [13] Robertson, L. D., Mullinax, C. M., Brodowicz, G. R., & Swafford, A. R. (1996). Muscular fatigue patterning in power grip assessment. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation,6, 71–85.
  • [14] Petersen, P., Petrick, M., Connor, H., & Conklin, D. (1989). Grip strength and hand dominance: Challenging the 10% rule. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 444–447.
  • [15] Fernandez, J.E., Uppugondurı, K.G. (1992). Anthropometry of South Indian industrial workmen. Ergonomics, 35(11): 1393-1398.
  • [16] Chau, N., Remy, E., Pétry, D., Huguenin, P., Bourgkard, E., & André, J.M. (1998). Asymmetry correction equations for hand volume, grip and pinch strengths in healthy working people. European Journal of Epidemiology, 14(1), 71-77.
  • [17] Kamarul, T., Ahmad, T. S., & Loh, W. Y. C. (2006). Normal hand grip strength in the adult Malaysian population. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 14(2), 172-71.
  • [18] Mandahawi, N., Imrhan, S., Al-Shobaki, S., & Sarder, B. (2008). Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population. Industrial Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11-12), 966-976.
  • [19] Cakit, E., Durgun, B., Cetik, O. and Yoldas, O. (2014), A Survey of Hand Anthropometry and Biomechanical Measurements of Dentistry Students in Turkey. Hum. Factors Man., 24: 739–753. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20401.
  • [20] ISO 15535, 2006. General Requirements for Establishing Anthropometric Databases.
  • [21] Fess, E.E. (1992). Grip Strength, 2nd edition. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists.
  • [22] Gilbertson, L., & Barber-Lomax, S. (1994). Power and pinch grip strength recorded using the hand-held Jamar dynamometer and B+L hydraulic pinch gauge: British normative data for adults. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 483–488.
  • [23] Butler, M. (1997). Grip strength: A comparative study. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 5–12.
  • [24] Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hébert, R., & Dutil, E. (1995). Normative data for grip strength of elderly men and women. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 637–644.
  • [25] Mathiowetz, V. (1990b). Grip and pinch strength measurements. In L.R. Amundsen(Ed.). Muscle strength testing: Instrumented and non-instrumented systems (pp. 163-177). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
  • [26] Goldman, S., Cahalan, T. D., & An, K. N. (1991). The injured upper extremity and the Jamar five-handle position grip test. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 306–308.
  • [27] Firrell, J. C., & Crain, G. M. (1996). Which setting of the dynamometer provides maximal grip strength? Journal of Hand Surgery, 21A, 397–401.
  • [28] Crosby, C. A., Wehbé, M. A., & Mawr, B. (1994). Hand strength: Normative values. Journal of Hand Surgery, 9A, 665–670.
  • [29] Mathiowetz, V., Weber, K., Volland, G., & Kashman, N. (1984). Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. Journal of Hand Surgery, 9A, 222-226.
  • [30] Amosun, S. L., Moyo, A., & Matara, C. (1995). Trends in hand grip strength in some adult male Zimbabweans. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 345–348.
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7688
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi