Gençlik merkezlerinde algılanan hizmet kalitesi ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması

Bu çalışmanın amacı Aycan (2005) tarafındangençlik merkezlerine yönelik olarak geliştirilen Gençlik Merkezlerinde Algılanan Hizmet KalitesiÖlçeği nin yeniden düzenlenmesidir. İki aşamadanoluşan çalışmada farklı örneklemler üzerinden toplanan verilerin birinci örneklemi Bolu, Sakarya, Düzceve Kocaeli illerindeki gençlik merkezlerindeki üyelerden (N=311); ikinci örneklem ise Ankarada faaliyetgösteren gençlik merkezlerindeki üyelerden (N=213)oluşmuştur. Çalışmanın birinci aşamasında 40 maddeden oluşan ölçeğe, Açıklayıcı Faktör Analizi yapılmış ve 23 maddenin öz değeri 1den büyük 3 faktöraltında toplandığı saptanmıştır. Bu faktörler; FizikselÇevre Kalitesi$alpha$=0.81, Etkileşim Kalitesi$alpha$=0.89 veÇıktı Kalitesi $alpha$=0.68 alt boyutları olarak adlandırılmıştır. Toplam ölçeğin alfa değeri ise $alpha$=0.89 bulunmuştur. Araştırmanın ikinci aşamasında elde edilen 23maddelik ölçek Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi için tekrardağıtılmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre kikarenin serbestlik derecesine oranı ( H2 /sd) 2.07 olarakbulunmuştur. Diğer uyum iyiliği ölçütleri incelendiğinde; RMSEA = 0.071, NFI = 0.94, NNFI = 0.96, CFI = 0.97ve GFI = 0.84 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Alfa katsayılarıincelendiğinde ise; fiziksel çevre kalitesi için Ơ=0.82,etkileşim kalitesi için $alpha$=0.83, çıktı kalitesi için $alpha$=0.64olarak tespit edilirken; toplam ölçek ise $alpha$=0.90 olarakbulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak Gençlik Merkezlerinde Algılanan Hizmet Kalitesi Ölçeği nin yapılan analizleredayanarak, geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu kabul edilmiştir.

The Perceived service quality scale for youth centers" validity and reliability study

T he purpose of this study was to rearrange the perceived service quality scale for youth centers developed by Aycan (2005). This study has two stagesand was implemented to two different samples. Thedata for the first sample was gathered from members of youth centers at Bolu, Sakarya, Düzce, andKocaeli (N=311) and the data for second sample wasgathered from members of youth centers under thegreater municipality of Ankara (N=213). In the firststage of the study, the 40-item scale was analyzedby the exploratory factor analysis, and there were 23items which had eigenvalues above 1 and these itemswere loaded under three factors. These factors weresubscaled as physical environment quality $alpha$=0.81, interaction quality $alpha$=0.89, and output quality $alpha$=0.68.The alpha value for the total scale was found to be$alpha$=0.89. In the second stage of the study, this obtained23-item scale was administered to the second sampleto apply confirmatory factor analysis. Chi-square/degrees of freedom ratio was found as (H2 /df) 2.07. Theother parameters were determined as RMSEA=0.071,NFI=0.94, NNFI=0.96, CFI=0.97 ve GFI=0.84. TotalCronbach alpha for the final version of scale was foundto be $alpha$=0.90, for the subscales as followed; physical environment quality $alpha$=0.82, interaction quality$alpha$=0.83, and output quality$alpha$=0.64. In conclusion, ThePerceived Service Quality Scale For Youth Centerswas found to be a valid and reliable instrument.

___

  • Akgül A, Çevik O. (2005). İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri; SPSS’te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları. Ankara: Emek Ofset.
  • Aycan A. (2005). Gençlik Merkezlerinde Örgütsel Etkililik ve Hizmet Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi. Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Bayram N. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Bitner MJ. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customer and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57-71.
  • Brady MK, Cronin JJ. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 34-49.
  • Brady MK, Cronin JJ, Brand RR. (2002). Performanceonly measurement of service quality: A replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 55, 17-31.
  • Chang K, Chelladurai P. (2003). System-based quality dimensions in fitness services: Development of the scale of quality. The Service Industries Journal 23(5), 65-83.
  • Chelladurai P, Chang K. (2000). Targets and standarts of quality in sport services. Sport Management Review, 3, 1-22,
  • Cronin JJ, Taylor S. (1992). Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 55-68.
  • Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pagem Akademi.
  • Dale BG. (1994). Managing quality. (BR Lewis, Ed.) Managing Service Quality. (2. Ed.) 137-236, Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International Ltd.
  • George D, Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 11.0 Update. (4. Ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Glynn WJ, Barnes JG. (1995). Understanding services management. (A Parasuraman, Ed.) Measuring and Monitoring Service Quality. 145-148, Chichester: John Willey & Sons Ltd.
  • Greenwell TC, Fink JS, Pastore DL. (2002). Perceptions of the service experience: Using demographic variablesto identify customer segments. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 11(4), 233-241.
  • Gronross C. (1984). A service quality model and it’s market implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18 (4), 36-44.
  • Hightower R, Brady MK, Baker TL. (2002). Investigating the role of the physical environment in hedonic service consumption: An exploratory study of sporting events. Journal of Business Research, 55 (9), 697-707.
  • Howat G, Absher J, Crilley G, Milne I. (1996). Measuring customer service quality in sports and leisure centers. Managing Leisure, 1, 77-89.
  • Hoyle RH, (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. (2001). Lisrel 8: Users Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Kelly SW, Turley LW. (2001). Consumer perceptions on service quality attributes at sporting event, Journal of Business Research, 54, 161-166.
  • Kim D, Kim SY. (1995). QUESC: An instrument for assessing the service quality of sport center in Korea. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 208-220
  • Kotler P. (1997). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.
  • Ko YJ, Pastore DL. (2005). A hierarchical model of service quality for the recreational sport industry. Sport Marketing Quartely, 14, 84–97.
  • Lam ETC, Zhang JJ, Jensen BE. (2005). Service quality assessment scale (SQAS): An instrument for evaluating service quality of health-fitness clubs. Measurement in Physical and Exercise Science 9(2), 79–111.
  • McDonald MA, Sutton WA, Milne GR. (1995). TEAMQUAL TM. Measuring service quality in professional team sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 4(2), 9-15.
  • Olsen MD, Tse EC, West JJ. (1998). Strategic Management in The Hospital Industry, Newyork: John Willey & Sons Inc.,
  • Papadimitriou DA, Karteroliotis K. (2000). The service quality expectations in private sport and fitness centers: A reexamination of the factor structure. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 9(3) 157-164.
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithalm VA, Berry LL. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithalm VA, Berry LL. (1998). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
  • Rust RT, Oliver RL. (1994). New directions in theory and practice. (RT Rust, RL Oliver Ed.) Service Quality, California: SAGE Publications Inc.
  • Schermelleh EK, Moosbrugger H, Müler H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. (2004). Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equaiton Modeling. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shilbury D. (1994) Delivering quality service in professional sport. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 3(1), 29- 35.
  • Şencan H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Tavşancıl E. (2006). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. 3. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Uyguç N. (1998). Hizmet Sektöründe Kalite Yönetimi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Yayıncılık.
  • Wakefield KL, Blodgett JG. (1994). The importance of servicescapes in leisure setting. Journal of Services Marketing, 8(3), 66-76.
  • Winer RS. (2000). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
  • Yılmaz V, Çelik HE. (2009). LISREL ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi – I. Ankara: Pagem Akademi.
  • Zeithalm VA, Bitner MJ. (2000). Service Marketing. 2.Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.