Christopher R. EDGINTON, Ming-kai CHIN, Gıyasettin DEMİRHAN

Beden Eğitimi ve Sağlık:yeni bir küresel görüş birliği

Dünya çapında, beden eğitimi programlarının yeniden değerlendirilmesi gerekir. Değişen bir dünyada yaşadığımızdan, yeni pedagoji formlarının incelenmesi, teknoloji kullanımı ve beden eğitimi öğretmenlerini hazırlamak için yeni yöntemlerin incelenmesi gerekir. Beden Eğitimi Pedagojisi 2010 Küresel Toplantısı (GoFPEP 2010), davet esasına göre, 30 ülkeden 64 üniversite, enstitü ve okulu temsil eden 70'den fazla ünlü eğitimciyi, profesyonelleri, yöneticileri, iş adamlarını ve politikacıları bir araya getirdi. GoFPEP 2010'un birincil amacı 21. yy da Sağlık ve Beden Eğitimi Pedagojisi başlıklı küresel bir uzlaşma beyanına işçilik etmekti. Asıl tavsiyeler, sağlıklı bir yaşam tarzına odaklanmayı, öğrenci merkezli öğrenmeye teşvik etmeyi, bilgiyi ilerletmeyi, 21. yy beden okuryazarlığı ile öğrenenler tarafından gerek duyulan yetenekleri ve eğilimleri, sosyal adalet gibi programların teşvik edilmesini; teknoloji kullanarak değerlendirme stratejilerinin yeniden kavramsallaştırılmasını ve paydaşların çeşitliliğini birbirine bağlamayı içeriyordu. Görüş birliği raporu, sağlık ve beden eğitiminin entegrasyonuna, en iyi uygulamaların teşvik edilmesine, ortaklıkların kurulmasına, farklı şartlara duyarlılık geliştirmeye, güvenirliliği teşvik etmek için kazanma stratejilerine ve pratik ile teoriği birbirine bağlamaya çağrıda bulunuyor.

Worldwide, physical education programs need to be rethought. As we live in an ever-changing world, the examination of new forms of pedagogy, use of technology and new methods for preparing physical education teachers need to be examined. Global Forum for Physical Education Pedagogy 2010 (GoFPEP 2010) drew together, on an invitation basis, more than 70 renowned educators, professionals, administrators, business leaders and policy makers from 30 countries, representing 64 universities, institutions and schools. The primary purpose of GoFPEP 2010 was the crafting of a global consensus statement entitled Health and Physical Education Pedagogy in the 21st Century. Major recommendations include focusing on healthy active lifestyles, promoting student centered learning, advancing knowledge, skills and dispositions required by 21st Century learners with physical literacy, promoting programs as models of social justice; re-conceptualizing assessment strategies using technology and engaging a multiplicity of stakeholders. The consensus statement calls for integrating health and physical education, promoting best practice, building partnerships, developing sensitivity to diverse conditions, gaining strategies to promote accountability and linking practice to theory.

PDF

___

1. Bailey R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397-401.
2. Bocarro J, Kanters MA, Casper J, Forrester S. (2008). School physical education, extracurricular sports and lifelong active living. Journal of Teaching of Physical Education, 27,155-166.
3. Edginton CR, Kirkpatrick B, Schupach R, Philips C, Chin MK, Chen P. (2011). A dynamic pedagogy of physical education teacher preparation: Linking practice with theory. Asian Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 16(2), 7-23.
4. Freedman DS, Mei Z, Srinivasan, SR, Berenson GS, Dieta WH. (2007). Cardiovascular risk factors and excess adiposity among overweight children and adolescents: The Bogalusa heart study. Journal of Pediatrics, 150,12-17.
5. Hardman K, Marshall J. (2009). Second world-wide survey of school physical education: Final report. Berlin: ICSSPE/CIEPSS.
6. International Council of Sports Science and Physical Education. (1999). The Berlin agenda for action for government ministers: 1st world summit of physical education, Retrieved February 13, 2011, from http://www.icsspe.org/index.php?m=13&n=78&o=41
7. International Council of Sports Science and Physical Education. (2005). Magglingen commitment for physical education: 2nd world summit of physical education. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http:// www.icsspe.org/download/documente/deklaration/ Magglingen %20Commitment%20for% 20 Physical%20Education.pdf
8. International Obesity Task Force. (2009). Obesity: Understanding and challenging the global epidemic. 2009-2010 report. Retrieved February 13, 2011, from http://www.iaso.org/site_media/uploads/IASO_ Summary_Report_2009.pdf
9. Jago R, McMurray RG, Bassin S, Pyle L, Bruceker S, Jakicic JM, Moe E, Murray T, Volpe SL. (2009). Modifying middle school physical education: Piloting strategies to increase physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 21(2), 171-185.
10. Koca C, Attencio M, Demirhan G. (2009). The place and meaning of the field of PE in Turkish young people lives: A study using Bourdieus conceptual tools. Sport, Education & Society, 14(1), 55-75.
12. Lund JL, Kirk MF. (2010). Performance-based assessment for middle and high school physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
13. McKenzie T, Kahan D. (2008). Physical activity, public health, and elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 108(3), 171-179.
14. MEB (2007). Beden Eğitimi Dersi (1-8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuzu. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
15. MEB-TTK (2010). http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program. aspx?islem=1&kno=50. Giriş tarihi: 20.04.2011.
16. Puhse U, Gerber M. (2005). International comparison of physical education: Concepts, problems, prospects. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK) Ltd.
17. Türkiye Ulusal Hastalık Yükü ve Maliyet-Etkililik Raporu. (2004). RSHBM Hıfzısıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
18. UNESCO. (1978). International chapter of physical education and sport. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.phpURL_ ID=13150&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC &URL_SECTI0N=201. html
19. World Health Organization. (2010). Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: Childhood overweight and obesity. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from http:// www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/