Accessibility of Physical Activity Facilities in Local Surroundings According to Elderly with Disabilities

The aim of the study was to identify the main factors thatinfluence the accessibility of physical activity facilities inthe opinion of elderly residents with disabilities in Lithuania. The questionnaire was developed according torecommendations of Lithuanian Governmental PhysicalEducation and Sport Department and European Physical Activity Guidelines (2008) and consisted of 17 questions about the demand for participation and the type ofparticipation in physical activity, reasons for inactivityand environmental conditions. 150 respondents (age 71.2± 3.6) from different places of Lithuania filled in questionnaire anonymously. The data analysis showed that86% of respondents were irregularly engaged in unin- structed physical activity. 94% of respondents had no information about possibilities to engage in structure ex- ercise training of older people in their community. Somerespondents pointed out the lack of basic knowledgeabout physical activities that prevent them from practicing independently. The main reasons of inactivity were:health condition, not appropriate sport facilities in locality, overpriced physical activity facilities. Women admitted to have lack of will power. Only 32% of respondentsnoticed that organized physical activity facilities areaccessible. Conclusion: Physical activity of older peoplecould be increased by improving accessibility of physical activity facilities in local communities and providingmore information about the different possibilities to benot only physically but also socially active and involvedin organized activities.

PDF

___

1. Armstrong N., Welsman J. (1997). Young People and Physical Activity. GB, 369.
2. Frenckmann, U. (1999). Alkoholis ir depresija, Vilnius. 64.
3. Griniene, E., Dudoniene, V. (2003). Vyresniu klasiu mok- sleiviu fizini aktyvuma skatinantys veiksniai, Respublikine konferencija, Sporto mokslas realij os ir perspektyvos, Kaunas
4. James H., Barth R, Edward W, Amy R, Janine J, (2004). Physical Activity Participation Among Persons with Disabilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 5, 419-425.
5. Jankauskiene R. (2008). Lietuvos gyventoj u fizinio ak- tyvumo skatinimo strategija: kuno kultura ar kuno kultas. Kaunas: Medicina, 44(5)
6. Kardelis, K, Kavaliauskas, S., Balzeris S, V. (2001). Mokykline kuno kultura: realij os ir perspektyvos. Kaunas: LKKA.
7. Kindurys, V. (2002). Paslaugu marketingas. Monografija. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
8. Loukaitou-Sideris A. (2004). Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity. Safety and Security Considerations. TRB Special Report 282; Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. Retrieved 04 29 2012 from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ archive/downloads/sr282papers/sr282Sideris.pdf
9. Michael L. B, Neville O, Adrian B, Ornella C, Eva L. (2000). SocialCognitive and Perceived Environment In- fluences Associated with Physical Activity in Older Aus- tralians. Preventive Medicine 31, 1522.
10. Petkevicius R. (2010).Urbanizacija kaip visuomenes sveikatos problema ir iukis, Nacionalines sveikatos tarybos metinis praneimas. Urbanizacija nauji iukiai žmoniu sveikatai. Vilnius. 63-65.
11. Lithuanian Physical Education and Sports Department (2011). Lietuvos 7-80 metu amžiaus gyventoju požiuris i kuno kulturos pratybas, sporta ir sportavimo iprociu tyrimo ataskaita.
12. Welk, G. (1999). The Youth Physical Activity Promotion Model: a conceptual bridge between theory and practice. Quest, 51, 5-23.