419422

Co-existence of Democracy and Capitalism: A Reflection of Reciprocity or Ideology?

There are two types of premises discussing the relationship between democracy and capitalism. First, capitalism and democracy are interrelated since both ideologies protect the liberal concept of private property and the freedom of individuals. However, another bloc believes that these two ideologies are contradictory. Capitalism generates economic inequalities within society that create political disparity. Through a critical survey of some foundational texts and contemporary literature on liberal democracy and capitalism, this article examines their relationship and explains why and how capitalism and democracy support each other. It argues that capitalism and democracy fit structurally and mutually make a politico-economic order in which capitalism ensures its autonomies against the state, and democracy commands public policies in which economic structure does not ban the freedom of political choice. The article concludes that capitalism and democracy were reciprocally causal historically and serve as survival-shield of each other although they are not ideologically tied; democracy is the best institutional safeguard of market freedom and profit maximization, while capitalism creates the practical ground of political competition. Both are functionally well-suited as they ensure high centralization of power and capital in a few hands. This relationship is far more interest-oriented and power-centric than ideological.

Keywords:

Democracy, capitalism, socialism, freedom power-reciprocity,

PDF

___

Acemoglu, D. (2008). Oligarchic versus democratic societies. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(1), 1-44. google scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers. google scholar
Acemoglu, D., & James A. Robinson. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. New York: Penguin Books. google scholar
Almond, G. (1991). Capitalism and democracy. Political Science, 24, 467-74. google scholar
Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Translated by G. M. Goshgarian). London: Verso. google scholar
Amadae, S. M. (2003). Rationalizing capitalist democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press. google scholar
Andrain, C. F. (1984). Capitalism and democracy reappraised: A review essay. The Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 652-664. google scholar
Asad, T. (1992). Conscripts of western civilization. In C. W. Gailey (Ed.), Dialectical anthropology: Essays on honor of Stanley Diamond, Vol. 1: Civilization in crisis: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 333-51). Florida: University Press of Florida. google scholar
Avrich, P. (1984). The Haymarket tragedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
Ball, T., Dagger, R., & O’Neil, D. (2014). Political ideologies and the democratic ideal. Boston: Pearson. google scholar
Baradat, L. P., & Phillips, J. A. (2017). Political ideologies: Their origins and impact (12th edition). New York: Routledge. google scholar
Beetham, D. (1993). Four theorems about the market and democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 23(2), 187-201. google scholar
Berman, S. (2007). How democracies emerge: Lessons from Europe. Journal of Democracy, 18 (1), 28-41. google scholar
Bernholz, P. (2001). Democracy and capitalism: Are they compatible in the long-run? In D. Mueller & U. google scholar
Cantner (Eds.), Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century (pp. 9-22). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag Berlin. google scholar
Bhattacharya, H. (2008). Interpretive research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 463-467). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. google scholar
Boggs C. (2011). Phantom democracy: Corporate interests and political power in America. Palgrave Macmillan, google scholar
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1986). Democracy and capitalism: Property, community, and the contradictions of modern social thought. New York: Routledge. google scholar
Clague, C., Keefer, P., Knack, S., & Olson, M. (1996). Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 243-276. google scholar
Coyne, C. (2007, August 27). Capitalism and democracy: Friends or foes? The Economist. https://www. economist.com/free-exchange/2007/08/27/capitalism-and-democracy-friends-or-foes google scholar
Creswell, J. (2007). Philosophical, paradigm, and interpretive frameworks. In J. W. Creswell (Ed.), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among fve approaches (pp. 15-33). New York: Sage. google scholar
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. google scholar
Dahl, R. (1982). Dilemmas ofpluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. New Haven: Yale University Press. google scholar
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press. google scholar
Dahl, R. (1993). Why all democratic countries have mixed economies. In J. W Chapman & I. Shapiro (Eds.), Democratic Community (pp. 259-282). New York: New York University Press. google scholar
Dahl, R. (1998). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press. google scholar
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. google scholar
Diamond, L. (2003). Defining and developing democracy. In R. Dahl, I. Shapiro & J. Cheibub, (Eds.), Democracy source book (pp.29-39). London: The MIT Press. google scholar
Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy. New York: Times Books. google scholar
Diamond, L. (2010). Why are there no Arab democracies? Journal ofDemocracy, 21(1), 93-104. google scholar
Diamond, L. (2017). Prospects for democracy and democratization in Chinese societies. Keynote address to 59th annual conference of the American Association for Chinese Studies Walker Institute. https://diamond-democracy.stanford.edu/speaking/speeches/prospects-democracy-and-democratization-chinese-societies google scholar
Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656-673. google scholar
Foley, B. (2019). Marxist literary criticism today. London: Pluto Press google scholar
Freeden, M., l Sargent, L. T., & Stears, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook ofpolitical ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Freedom House Report (2023). Countries and territories. https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/ scores google scholar
Friedman, M. (1981 [1962]). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Gallagher, M., Laver, M., & Mair, P. (2004). Representative government in modern Europe. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
Geddes, B. (2009). What causes democratization? In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp.593-615). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Gedeon, p. (2018). Market and democracy: Friends or foes? Theories reconsidered. Society and Economy, 40 (2), 185-210. doi: 10.1556/204.2018.40.2.2 google scholar
Ghosh, A. (1993). Socialism, modern capitalism and democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 28 (14), 551554. google scholar
Hayek, F. A. (2001[1944]). The road to serfdom. New York: Routledge. google scholar
Heywood, A. (2017). Political ideologies: An introduction (6th edition). Palgrave. google scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press. google scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1991a). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. google scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1991b) Democracy’s third wave. Journal ofDemocracy, 2(2), 12-34. google scholar
Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, democracy, and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Iversen, T. (2006). Capitalism and democracy. In D. A. Wittman & B. R. Weingast, (Eds), Oxford handbook of political economy (pp.601-623). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Jalal, A. (1994). The sole spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League, and the demand for Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Kuo, D. (2018). Clientelism, capitalism, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Kurki, M. (2014). Politico-economic models of democracy in democracy promotion. International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), 121-141. google scholar
Latham, M. E. (2011). The right kind of revolution: Modernization, development, and U. S. foreign policy from the cold war to the present. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. google scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1961 [1902]). What is to be done? Burning Questions of our Movement (WITBD). www.marxists. org/archive/lenin/works/1901/witbd/ google scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (2001). The market system: What It Is, how It works, and what to make of it. New Haven: Yale University Press. google scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53 (1), 69-105. google scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases ofpolitics. New York: Doubleday and Company. google scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1993). Reflections on capitalism, socialism and democracy. Journal ofDemocracy, 4 (2), 44-54. google scholar
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2005[1848]). Manifesto ofthe communist party. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/ works/down-load/manifest.pdf. google scholar
Matin, K. (2012). Democracy without capitalism: Re-theorizing Iran’s constitutional revolution. Middle East Critique, 21 (1), 37-56. google scholar
McMenamin, I. (2004). Varieties of capitalist democracy: What difference does East-Central Europe make? Journal ofPublic Policy, 24 (3), 259-274. google scholar
Michels, R. (1962). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern parties. New York: Collier Books. google scholar
Moore, B. (1966). The social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press. google scholar
North, D. C, Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
OECD (2014) Does income inequality hurt economic growth? http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014.pdf. google scholar
OECD.Stat (Social Expenditure - Aggregated data) (2023). https://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml. aspx?datasetcode=SOCX_AGG&lang=en google scholar
Offe, C. (1990). Contradictions of the welfare State. New York: The MIT Press. google scholar
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567-576. google scholar
Patnaik, P. (2008). Capitalism, freedom and democracy. Social Scientist, 36 (8), 16-28. google scholar
Pearson, M., Rithmire, M., & Tsai K. S. (2021). Party-state capitalism in China. Current History, 120 (827), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2021.120.827.207 google scholar
Piketty, T (2014). Capital in the twenty first century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. google scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. google scholar
Popper, K. (1962). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. google scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Przeworski, A. (2004). Democracy and economic development. In E. D. Mansfield & R. Sisson (Eds.), Political science and the public interest (pp.1-27). Columbus: Ohio State University Press. google scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., & Cheibub, J. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-Being in the world,1950—1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Rowen, H. S. (2007). When will the Chinese people be free? Journal of Democracy, 18 (3), 38-52. google scholar
Sargent, L. T. (2009). Contemporary political ideologies: A comparative analysis (14th Edition). New York: Wadsworth Publishing. google scholar
Sattari, S. (2020). The Fetishism of state capitalism in Iran (1944-2020). Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 6 (3), 9-31. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2021.79491 google scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1976 [1943]). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Routledge. google scholar
Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. google scholar
Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design. New York: Routledge. google scholar
Strath, B (2013). Ideology and conceptual history. In M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent & M. Stears (Eds.), (2013). The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Streeck, W. (2014a). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London: Verso Books. google scholar
Streeck, W. (2014b). How will capitalism end? New Left Review, 87, 35-64. google scholar
Vanberg, V. J. (2005). Market and state: The perspective of constitutional political economy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 23-49. google scholar
Wagner, P (2011). The democratic crisis of capitalism: Reflections on political and economic modernity in Europe, LEQS Paper No. 44/2011. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53209/1/LEQSPaper44.pdf. google scholar
Westad, O. A. (2012). The cold war and the international history of the twentieth century. In Leffler M. P., & Westad O. A. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of cold war (pp.1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
Wetherly, P. (2017). Introduction to ideology: Contesting the nature of the ‘good society’. In P. Wetherly (Ed.), Political ideologies (pp. 1-32). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Wolf, M. (2023). The crisis of democratic capitalism. New York: Penguin Press. google scholar
World Bank estimates (2013). Gini Index. http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/bangladesh/gini-index. google scholar
Yanow, D. (2014). Interpretive analysis and comparative research. In I. Engeli & C. R. Allison (Eds.), Comparative policy studies conceptual and methodological challenges (pp. 131-160). London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76 (6), 22-43. google scholar
Zakaria, F. (2007). The future of freedom, illiberal democracy at home and abroad (revised edition). New York: Norton & Company. google scholar