___

• Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resources and output trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review, 46(2), pp. 5-23.
• Adams, J. D. (1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy, %(4), pp. 673—703.
• Adams, J. D. and Clemmons, J. R (2008). The origins of industrial scientific discoveries. NBER Working Paper No. 13823.
• Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., and Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities, 1981—1999. Research Policy, _33, pp. 259—285.
• Adams J .D., Chiang, E. P. & Jensen J .L. (2000). The inşuence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. NBER Working Paper, No. 7612.
• Aghion, P. and Howitt, P (1992). A‘model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, @(2), pp. 323-351.
• Arrow, K. J. and Kurz, M (1970). Public investment, the rate of return, and optimal fiscal policy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
• Arundel, A. and Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firm. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Q6), pp. 559-580. '
• Aschauer, D. A. (1989a). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 2&2), pp. 177-200.
• Aschauer, D. A. (1989b). Public investment and productivity growth in group of seven. Economic perspectives: a review from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, gö), pp. 17—25.
• Aschauer, D. A. and Greenwood, J. (1985). The "new monetary economics", “ fiscal issues and unemployment. In Karl Brunner and A. H. Meltezer, (Eds). The Mew Monetary Economics. Amsterdam: N orth-Holland
• Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i—Martin (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw—Hill.
• Benhabib, J. and Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development: evidence from aggregate cross—country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, Şg), pp. 143-173.
• Bernard, A. B. and Jensen, B. J. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, g(ı), pp. 1— 25.
• Bemdt, E. R. and Hansson, B. (1999). Measuring the contribution of public infrastructure capital in Sweden. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, %(S), pp. 8151—8168.
• Bernstein, J. I. (1988). Costs of production, intra- and interindustry R&D spillovers: Canadian evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, ua), pp. 324-347.
• Bernstein, J. I. and Nadiri, M. I. (1991). Product demand, cost of production,
• spillovers, and the social rate of return to R&D. NBER Working Paper, no. 3625.
• Bowie, N. E. (1994). University—business partnership: an assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Coe, D. T. and Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, $6), pp. 859—887.
• Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., and Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. G. Noll (Ed.). Challenges to Research University (pp. 171—199). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
• David, P. A., Mowery, D. and Steinmueller W. E. (1992). Analyzing the economic payoffs from basic research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2(1), pp. 73—90.
• Delgado, M. A., Farinas, J .C. and Ruano, S. (2002). Firm productivity and export market/: a non-parametric approach. Journal of International Economics, 5_7(2), pp. 397—422.
• Dietz, J. S. and Bozeman, 13-, (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, pp 349—367. 570
• Dowrick, S., and Rogers, M. (2002). Classical and technological convergence: beyond the Solow-Swan growth model. Oxford Economic Papers, $8), pp. 369-385.
• Dunning, J. H (1994). Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, gü), pp. 67-88.
• Etzkowitz, H. and Stevens, A. J. (1998). Inching toward industrial policy: the university’s role in government initiatives to assist small, innovative companies in the United States. In H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster and P.
• Healey, (Eds). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of industry
• and Academia (pp.215—238). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (1998). Introduction. In H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster and P. Healey, (Eds). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of industry and Academia (pp.1-17). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Evans, P. and Karras, G. (1994). Are government activities productive? Evidence from a panel of US states. The Review of Economics and Statistics, EU), pp. 1—1.
• Frantzen, D. (2000). R&D, human capital and international technology spillovers: a cross—country analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, mga), pp. 57—75
• Fosfuri, A., Motta, M. and Ronde, T. (2001). Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers’ mobility. Journal of international economics, :30), pp. 205—222.
• Gramlich, E. M. (1994). Infrastructure investment: a review essay. Journal of Economic Literature, £(3), pp. 1176-1196
• Greenaway, D., and Kneller R. (2007). Exporting, productivity and agglomeration. European Economic Review, doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.07.001
• Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal Economics, mü), pp. 92—116.
• Griliches, Z. and Lichtenberg, F. (1984). R&D and productivity growth at the industry level: is there still a relationship? In Z. Griliches (Ed). R&D, Patents, and Productivity (pp. 465—501). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press: Cambridge.
• Hall, B. H., and Mairesse J. (1995). Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 6_5(1), pp. 263—293.
• Holtz—Eakin, D. (1994). Public—sector capital and the productivity puzzle. T_he Review of Economics and Statistics, Z§(1), pp. 12—21.
• Hulten, C. R. and Wykoff, F. C. (1981). The measurement of economic depreciation. In C. R. Hulten (Ed.). Depreciation, Inşation and the Taxation of Income from Capital (pp. 81-125). Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute Press. —
• Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firm’s patents, profits, and market value. The American Economic Review, EÜ), pp. 984—1001.
• Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 36), pp. 957-970.
• Jensen, R. and Thursby, M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. The American Economic Review, al), pp. 240-259.
• Keller, W. (1998). Are international R&D spillovers trade—related? Analysing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners. American Economic Review, £(8), pp. 1469-1481
• Keller, W. and Yeaple, S. R. (2003). Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: firm level evidence from the United States. NBER Working Paper, No. 9504.
• Lichtenberg, F. R. and Siegel, D. (1991). The impact of R&D investment on productivity — new evidence using linked R&D—LRD data. Economic Inquiry, 22(2), pp. 203-228.
• Luintel, K. B. and Khan, M. (2004). Are international R&D spillovers costly for the United States? The Review of Economics and Statistics, §§(4), pp. 896-910.
• Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1), pp. 1-12.
• Markusen, J. (2002). Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Munnell, A. H. (1990). Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review, (January), Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
• Nadiri, M. I. (1993). Innovations and technological spillovers. NBER Working Paper, no. 4423.
• Nadiri, M. I., and Mamuneas, T. P. (1994). Infrastructure and public R&D investments, and the growth of factor productivity in US manufacturing industries. NBER Working Paper Series, no. 4845.
• National Council on Public Works Improvements (1988). Fragile foundations: a report on America’s public works. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2008). Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2007. Detailed Statistical Tables NSF 09-303. Arlington, VA. Available at http:/lwww.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf09303/.
• Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S. and Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, gö), pp. 317-330.
• Nelson, R. R. (1982). The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 9_7_(3), pp. 453—470.
• Nickell, S. and Van Reenen, J. (2001). Technological Innovation and Performance in the United Kingdom. CEP Discussion Paper, no. 0488. Center for Economic Performances, LSE.
• OECD (1993). The measurement of scientific and technological activities: standard practice for surveys of experimental development — Frascati Manual 1993. Paris: OECD Press.
• OECD (2002). Benchmarking science—industry relationships. Paris: OECD
• Park, W. G. (1995). International R&D spillovers and OECD economic growth. Economic Inquiry, 33(4), pp. 571—591.
• Pisano, G. P. (2002). Pharmaceutical biotechnology. In B. Steil, D. G. Victor and R. R. Nelson (Eds). Technological. Innovation and Economic Performance (pp. 347—366). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Poole, E. and Bernard, J. (1992). Defence innovation stock and total factor productivity. Canadian Journal of Economics, 25(2), pp. 438—452.
• Press, 1E. and Washbum, J. (2000). The kept university. The Atlantic Monthly, ggot pp. 39—54
• Robson, M. T. (1993). Federal funding and the level of private expenditure on basic research. Southern Economic Journal, @(1), pp. 63-71.
• Rodriguez—Clare, A. (1996). Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. The American Economic Review, _8_6_(4), pp. 852-873. 573
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 9_8, pp. S71—S102.
• Rosenberg, N. and Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), pp. 323-348.
• Sampat, B. N. (2006). Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: the world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy, Çağ, pp. 772— 789.
• Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies. and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, EU), pp. 65—94.
• Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function.
• ' Review of Economics and Statistics, 2(3), pp. 312-320.
• Tatom, J. A. (1991). Public capital and private sector performance. IE Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 13(3), pp. 3-15.
• Teece, D. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know—how. The Economic Journal, &(346), pp. 242—261.
• Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. and Lichtenberg, F. (2001). Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? The Reviews of Economics and Statistics, 8_3(3), pp. 490—497.
• Wagner, J. (2002). The casual effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: first evidence from a matching approach. Economic Letters, HO), pp. 443-472.
• Xu, B. (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics, QQ), pp. 477-493.
• Xu, B. and Wang, J. (1999). Capital goods trade and R&D spillovers in the OECD. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 2(5), pp. 1258-1274.