Two-year clinical evaluation of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline ceramic and titanium abutments and single crowns

Amaç: Bu çalmann amac titanyum implantlar üzerinde kullanlan Yttriyum ile desteklenmi tetragonal zirkonyum oksit polikristalin (Y-TZP) seramik ve titanyum abutmentlar 2 yl boyunca deerlendirmektir. Gereç ve yöntemler: 21 hastada toplam 48 implant destekli kron çalma kapsamna alnmtr. Tüm implantlarda standart iki aamal cerrahi prosedür uygulanmtr. Hazrlanan kronlar Y-TZP (ZC) ve metal alt yapl porselen (PFM) kronlar olmak üzere iki gruptur. Yükleme yapldnda ve yükleme yapldktan 6, 12 ve 24 ay sonra gerçekletirilen takip seanslarnda implant yaplar incelenmitir. Her randevuda, implant üstü restorasyonlar kron ve abutmentlarda krlma ve abutment vidasnn kayb yönünden deerlendirilmitir. Bunun dnda implant mobilitesine (evet/hayr) ve implant-kron birleimindeki plak birikimine de baklmtr. Bulgular: Titanyum abutment üzerindeki iki adet metal alt yapl porselen kronda ve Y-TZP abutment üzerindeki bir adet zirkonyum alt yapl kronda olmak üzere toplam 3 adet abutment vidasnn kayb gözlenmitir. Abutment vidasnn kayb açsndan gruplar arasnda istatiksel olarak anlaml bir fark bulunmamtr (p>0.05). Tüm gruplarda herhangi bir abutment ve kron kr gözlenmemitir. Zirkonyum ve metal alt yapl porselen kronlarn hiçbirinin üst yap seramiinde bir krlma ya da atma olmamtr. 6. ve 12. aydaki kontrol randevularnda, plak birikimi için 1 ve 2 eklinde skor deerleri verilmitir. Plak birikimi açsndan gruplar arasnda istatiksel olarak anlaml bir fark bulunmamtr (p>0.05). Sonuç: 2 yllk süreçte, Y-TZP abutmentlar, titanyum abutmentlarla ayn baar orann göstermilerdir. Anahtar kelimeler: Y-TZP

Two-year clinical evaluation of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline ceramic and titanium abutments and single crowns

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline ceramics (Y-TZP) and titanium abutments on titanium implants up to 2 years. Methods: Twenty-one patients who were treated with 48 implant supported crowns were analysed. For all implants, a standardized twostage surgical procedure was used. Y-TZP (ZC) and porcelain-fusedto-metal (PFM) crowns were fabricated. The follow-up examinations comprised clinical assesment of the implant reconstructions and were performed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months of loading. Fracture of abutments, crowns and abutment screew loosening were evaluated for each clinical appointment. Mobility of the implant (yes or no), amount of plaque at abutment-crown combinations were also evaluated. Results: Abutment screw loosening occurred at two PFM crowns on titanium abutments and at 1 ZC crown on Y-TZP abutment. There were no statistically significant differences among groups in respect to abutment screw loosening (p>0.05). Fracture of an abutment and crown was not observed in all groups. No chipping of the veneering ceramic occurred at ZC and PFM crowns. At 6 and 12 month recall appointments, score 1 and 2 for plaque accumulation were observed. There was no statistically significant difference among groups in respect to plaque accumulation (p>0.05). Conclusions: Y-TZP abutments exhibited the same success rate as titanium abutments during a 2-year period.

___

  • 1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral. Surg. 1981; 10:387-416.
  • 2. Marinello CP, Meyenberg KH, Zitzmann N, Lüthy H, Soom U, et al. Single-tooth replacement: some clinical aspects. J. Esthet. Dent. 1997; 9:169-78.
  • 3. Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. J. Prosthet. Dent, 1986; 55:243-7.
  • 4. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, et al. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004; 17:285-90.
  • 5. Canullo L. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2007; 20:489-93.
  • 6. Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, et al. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Periodontics. Restorative. Dent. 2008; 28:357-65.
  • 7. Kollar A, Huber S, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Zirconia for teeth and implants: a case series. Int. J. Periodontics. Restorative. Dent. 2008; 28:479-87.
  • 8. Kohal RJ, Att W, Bächle M, Butz F. Ceramic abutments and ceramic oral implants. An update. Periodontol. 2000 2008; 47:224-43.
  • 9. Qualtrough AJ, Piddock V. Dental ceramics: what’s new? Dent. Update. 2002; 29:25-33.
  • 10. Narcisi EM. Three-unit bridge construction in anterior single-pontic areas using a metal-free restorative. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 1999; 20:109-112, 114, 116-9.
  • 11. Tan PL, Dunne JT. Jr. An esthetic comparison of a metal ceramic crown and cast metal abutment with an all-ceramic crown and zirconia abutment: A clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2004; 91:215-8.
  • 12. Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H. Ceramic abutments-a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry. Int. J. Periodontics. Restorative. Dent. 2000; 20:81-91.
  • 13. Canullo L, Morgia P, Marinotti F. Preliminary laboratory evaluation of bicomponent customized zirconia abutments. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2007; 20:486-8.
  • 14. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent. Mater. 2008; 24:299-307.
  • 15. Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. J. Dent. 2009; 37:731-6.
  • 16. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2008; 19:119-30.
  • 17. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J. Periodontol. 2004; 75:292-6.
  • 18. Uo M, Sjögren G, Sundh A, Watari F, Bergman M, et al. Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics. Dent. Mater. 2003; 19:487-92.
  • 19. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, et al. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2002; 29:448- 55.
  • 20. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta. Odontol. Scand. 1964; 22:121-35.
  • 21. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2008; 19:119-30.
  • 22. Binon PP. Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implants, standard abutments, and laboratory analogs. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1995; 8:162-78.
  • 23. Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1996; 9:149-60.
  • 24. Henriksson K, Jemt T. Evaluation of custom-made procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2003; 16:626-30.
  • 25. Luthardt RG, Holzhüter MS, Rudolph H, Herold V, Walter MH. CAD/CAM-machining effects on Y-TZP zirconia. Dent. Mater. 2004; 20:655-62.
  • 26. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent. Mater. 1999; 15:426-33.
  • 27. Luthy H. Strength and toughness of dental ceramics. In: CAD/CAM in Aesthetic Dentistry. Cerec 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Ed. Mörmann WH. Quintessence. Chicago, p:229-240, 1996.
  • 28. Rieger W. Medical applications of ceramics. In: High-Tech Ceramics: Viewpoints and Perspectives. Ed. Kostorz G. Academic Press. London, p:191-228, 1989.
  • 29. Rocha R, Pinheiro AL, Villaverde AB. Flexural strength of pure Ti, Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys submitted to Nd:YAG laser or TIG welding. Braz. Dent. J. 2006; 17:20-23
  • 30. Firidinolu K, Toksavul S, Toman M, Sarikanat M, Nergiz I. Fracture Resistance and Analysis of Stress Distribution of Implant-Supported Single Zirconium Ceramic Coping Combination with Abutments Made by Different Materials. J. Appl. Biomech 2012;25:135-7.
  • 31. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implantsupported single tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004; 17:285-90.
  • 32. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant protheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003; 90:121-32.
  • 33. Johansson LA, Ekfeldt A. Implant-supported fixed partial protheses: a retrospective study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2003; 16:172-6.
  • 34. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 1995; 10:326-34.
  • 35. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J. Periodontol. 2004; 75:292-6.
  • 36. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 2002; 17:793-8.