A.Pnar SUMER, Hatice DURAN, Canan UZUN, Mahmut SUMER, Soner ÇANKAYA

Panoramik radyograflarda gömülü maksiller kanin lokalizasyonunun değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalmann amac, panoramik radyograflarda gömülü maksiller kaninlerin lokalizasyonunun deerlendirilmesidir. Metod: Çalmada 60 gömülü maksiller kanini olan 60 hastann panoramik radyograf deerlendirildi. Gömülü kaninlerin uzun eksenlerinin horizontal planla oluturduu aç ölçüldü. Öl- çümler kaninlerin lokalizasyonlarnn tahmin edilmesinde(bukkal veya palatinal) kullanld ve cerrahi srasnda belirlenen konumlar ile kar- latrld. Bulgular: 60 diin 45i palatinal, 15i ise bukkal pozisyondadr. Bukkal pozisyondaki gömülü kaninlerde açlanma 64.85°±18,97(18.93°- 86.31° aras) ve palatinal pozisyondakilerde ise 40.64°±13.13°(12.96°-69.19° aras)dr. ki grup arasnda istatistiksel olarak fark vardr. Sonuç: 60°den büyük açlar, maksiller kaninlerin palatinalden ziyade bukkalde gömülü olma eilimini arttrr. Anahtar

Assessment of the localization of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic radiographs

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the localization of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic radiographs. Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 60 subjects with 60 impacted maxillary canines were analyzed. The angulation of the long axis of the impacted canine to the horizontal plane was measured. The measurements were used to predict the localization of the canines (buccal or palatal) and were compared with the specified position during surgery. Results: Of the 60 teeth, 45 were at the palatal position and 15 were at the buccal position. The angulation of the impacted canines in the buccal group was 64.85º±18.97º ( range, 18.93º-86.31º ) and in the palatal group was 40.64º±13.13º ( range, 12.96º-69.19º ). There was statistically significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: The angulations greater than 60º were more likely reflected buccally impacted maxillary canines compared with palatally impacted maxillary canines.

___

1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Abnormalities of Teeth. In: Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. Saunders Elsevier, p:74, 2009.
2. Yazc S, Kökden A, Tank A. Gömülü diler üzerine retrospektif bir çalma. C.Ü. Dihek Fak Derg 2002;5:103-5.
3. Celikoglu M, Miloglu Ö, Kamak H, Kazanc F, Oztek Ö, Ceylan . Erzurum ve çevresinde yaayan ve yalar 12- 25 arasnda deien bireylerde gömülü di sklnn retrospektif olarak incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2009;19:72-5.
4. Katsnelson A, Flick WG, Susarla S, Tartakovsky JV, Miloro M. Use of panoramic x-ray to determine position of impacted maxillary canines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:996-1000.
5. Fournier A, Turcotte JY, Bernard C. Orthodontic considerations in the treatment of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod 1982;81: 236-39.
6. Nagpal A, Pai KM, Setty S, Sharma G. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using panoramic radiography. J Oral Sci 2009;51:37-45.
7. Sajnani AK, King NM. The sequential hypothesis of impaction of maxillary canine- A hypothesis based on clinical and radiographic findings. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:e375-85.
8. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:93-102.
9. Kim Y, Hyun HK, Jang KT. Interrelationship between the position of impacted maxillary canines and the morphology of the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141:556-62.
10. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, Huang JC. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:590-97.
11. Mason C, Papadakou P, Roberts GJ. The radiographic localization of impacted maxillary canines: a comparison of methods. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:25-34.
12. Sudhakar S, Patil K, Mahima VG. Localization of impacted permanent maxillary canine using single panoramic radiograph. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:340-5. Yazma