Simülasyona Dayalı Hemşirelik Eğitiminde Kuramlar

Simülasyon güvenli ve yapılandırılmış bir ortamda hastaya zarar verme riski olmadan hemşirelik öğrencilerinin öğrenmelerini, uygulama yapmalarını ve deneyim kazanmalarını sağlamaktadır. Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyonu tasarlamak, uygulamak ve değerlendirmek için yaygın olarak kullanılan eğitim teorileri bulunmaktadır. Sosyal, bilişsel, deneyimsel ve yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramları yetişkin öğrenmede önem taşımaktadır. Bunun yanında beceri kazanma modeli, klinik karar verme modeli ve Jeffries simülasyon modeli simülasyona dayalı eğitimde yaygın olarak rehber alınan kuramlardandır. Simülasyona dayalı eğitimin kuramlar rehberliğinde tasarlanması, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi ile simülasyon eğitiminde kuramsal alt yapının ortaya koyulması ve güçlendirilmesi böylece hemşirelik eğitiminin niteliğinin arttırılmasına katkı sağlanması beklenmektedir. Bu derleme makalede, simülasyona dayalı hemşirelik eğitiminde kuramların tanımlanması ve anlaşılması için kapsamlı bir çerçeve sunulması amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Hemşirelik, simülasyon

Theories in Simulation-Based Nursing Education

Simulation allows nursing students to learn, practice, and gain experience in a safe and structured environment without risk to patients. Studies suggest that simulation should be based on a theoretical frame work or conceptual model to guide the simulation practice. It is required based on a theoretical frame work or conceptual model for perform more effectively of simulation. There are widely used educational theories for designing, implementing and evaluating simulations in nursing education. Social, cognitive, experiential and constructivist learning theories are crucial to adult learning. In addition novice to expert model, model of clinical judgment and Jeffries simulation theory were the widely-guided theories in simulation-based training. The design, implementation and evaluation of simulation-based learning under theories guidance reveals and reinforces the theoretical background in simulation education. In this context, it is expected contributing to increasing the quality of nursing education. This review article was aimed: provides a comprehensive frame work for understanding and identification of theories in simulation-based nursing education.

Keywords:

Nursing, simulation,

PDF

___

1. Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives 2005;26(2):96-103.
2. Jeffries PR, Rogers KJ. Theoretical framework for simulation design. Ed: Jeffries PR Simulation in nursing education: from conceptualization to evaluation. National League for Nursing. 2007. USA. 21-31.
3. Jeffries PR, Rodgers B, Adamson K. NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory: Brief Narrative Description. Nursing Education Perspective 2015;36(5):292-293.
4. Aebersold M, Tschannen D. Simulation in nursing practice: the ımpact on patient care OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 2013;18(2):6.
5. Kaakinen J.Arwood E. Systematic review of nursing simulation literature for use of learning theory. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 2009;6(1):1-20.
6. V. Ünver, T Basak. Simülasyona dayalı eğitimde senaryo yazma süreci. Türkiye Klinikleri Cerrahi Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Hemşirelikte Bilişim Özel Sayısı 2016;2(1):70-78.
7. The International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL). INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation_ Simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2016;12(Suplement): 1-50.
8. Bandura A. (Ed.). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 1995.
9. Bandura A. Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions (2006: original 1971).
10. Bahn D. Social Learning Theory: its application in the context of nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 2001;21(2):110-117.
11. Christian A. Krumwiede N. Simulation enhances self-efficacy in the management of preeclampsia and eclampsia in obstetrical staff nurses. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2013;9(9):369-377.
12. Driscoll MP. Psychology of learning for instruction 3th ed. London: Pearson; 2005. pp. 14–16.
13. DeYoung S. Teaching Strategies for Nurse Educators. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hal 2007.
14. Aliakbari F, Parvin N, Heidari M, Haghani F. Learning theories application in nursing education Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2015;4(2):1-11.
15. Phillips DC. The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher 1995;4(7):5–12.
16. Phillips DC. How, why, what, when, and where: Perspectives on constructivism in psychology and education. Issues in Education 1997;3(2):151–195.
17. Baturay MH, Bay OF. The effects of problem-based learning on the class-room community perceptions and achievement of web-based education students. Computers and Education 2010;55(1):43–52.
18. Lishchinsky OS. Simulation-based constructivist approach for education leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 2015;43(6):972–988.
19. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, 1984. NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Poore JA, Cullen DL, Schaar GL. Simulation based interprofessional education guided by kolb’s experiential learning theory. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2014;10(5):241-247.
21. Fawke J. Cusack J. Neonatal simulation – training a workforce for the future. Infant, 2011;7(1):9-11.
22. LeFlore J.L. Anderson M. Effectiveness of 2 methods to teach and evaluate new content to neonatal transport personnel using high-fidelity simulation. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 2008;22(4):319-328.
23. Lindamood K.E. Weinstock P. Application of high-fidelity simulation training to the neonatal resuscitation and pediatric advanced life support programs. Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews, 2011;11(1):24-27.
24. Kaymakcı S. Yeşiltaş NK. Education Understading of John Dewey and Some Sample Applications on the Education of Social Sciences Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences 2009;4:227-242.
25. Lasater K. Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 2007;46(11):496-503.
26. Reilly A. Spratt C. The perceptions of undergraduate student nurses of high-fidelity simulation-based learning: A case report from the University of Tasmania. Nurse Education Today 2007;27(6):542-550.
27. Lathrop A, Sinningham B, Vande Vusse L. Simulation-based learning for midwives: Background and pilot implementation. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 2007;52(5):492-498.
28. Knowles M. S. The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. 1980, Chicago, IL: Follett.
29. Knowles M. S. The adult learner: A neglected species. (4th ed.), 1990, Houston, TX: Gulf.
30. Feingold CE, Calaluce M, Kallen MA. Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education 2004;43(4):156-163.
31. Yaeger KA1, Halamek LP, Coyle M, Murphy A, Anderson J, Boyle K, Braccia K, McAuley J, Sandre GD, Smith B. High-fidelity simulation-based training in neonatal nursing. Advances in Neonatal Care 2004;4(6):326-331.
32. Rutherford-Hemming T. Simulation methodology in nursing education and adult learning theory. Adult Learning 2012; 23(3).129-137.
33. Benner P From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: 1984. Addison-Wesley.
34. Thomas CM, Kellgren M. Benner's Novice to Expert Model: An application for simulation facilitators. Nursing Science Quarterly 2017;30(3):227-234. 35. Tanner C. A. Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education 2006;45(6):204-211.
36. Letcher DC. Roth SJ. Varenhorst LJ. Simulation-based learning: ımproving knowledge and clinical judgment within the NICU Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2017;13:284-290.
37. Sharof L. Simulation: Pre-briefing preparation, clinical judgment and reflection. What is the connection. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 2015;5(2):88-101.