___

• 1. Stewart AV. Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) - a potential pasture species. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 1996; 58: 77-86.
• 2. Ramirez-Restrepo CA, Barry TN. Alternative temperate forages containing secondary compounds for improving sustainable productivity in grazing ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2005; 120: 179-201.
• 3. Marchesan M, Paper DH, Hose S, Franz G. Investigation of the anti-inflammatory activity of liquid extracts of Plantago lanceolata L. Phytoth Res 1998; 12: 33-4.
• 4. Samuelsen AB. The traditional uses, chemical constituents and biological activities of Plantago major L. A review. J Ethnopharm 2000; 71: 1-21.
• 5. Velasco-Lezamaa R, Tapia-Aguilara R, RomanRamosa R, Vega-Avilaa E, Perez-Gutierrez S. Effect of Plantago major on cell proliferation in vitro. J Ethnopharm 2006; 103: 36-42.
• 6. Fons F, Rapior S, Gargadennec A, Andary C, Bessiere JM. Volatile components of Plantago lanceolata (Piantaginaceae). Acta Bot Gallica 1998; 145: 265-9.
• 7. Hammock PD, Freeman DE, Baker GJ. Failure of psyllium mucilloid to hasten evaluation of sand from the equine large intestine. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 547-54.
• 8. Washington N, Harris M, Mussellwhite A, Spiller RC. Moderation of lactulose-induced diarrhoea by psyllium: effects on motility and fermentation. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67: 317-21.
• 9. Fischer MH, Yu N, Gray GR, Ralph J, Anderson L, Marlett JA. The gel-forming polysaccharide of psyllium husk (Plantago ovata Forsk). Carbohydr Res 2004; 339: 2009-17.
• 10. Hotwagner K, Iben C. Evaluation of sand from the equine intestine with mineral oil, with and without psyllium. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2008; 92(1): 86-91.
• 11. Cannon SJ. Effects of Psyllium in Milk Replacers for Neonatal Dairy Calves. Master Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009.
• 12. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official methods of analysis (15th ed.). Inc., Arlington, Virginia, USA, 1990; pp 69-90.
• 13. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3583-97.
• 14. Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Becker K. Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and their implication in gas production and true digestibility in vitro techniques. Br J Nutr 1995; 73: 897-913.
• 15. Menke HH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Develop 1988; 28: 7-55.
• 16. Kara K, Aktuğ E, Çağrı A, Güçlü BK, Baytok E. Formik asitin in vitro fermentasyonu ve metan üretimine etkisi. Türk Tar Gıda Bilim Tek Derg 2015; 3: 856-60.
• 17. NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th Revised Edition, Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2001; pp 34-43.
• 18. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor. J Agr Sci 1979; 93: 217-22.
• 19. Blummel M, Steingass H, Becker K. The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and n-15 incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Br J Nutr 1997; 77: 911-21.
• 20. Blummel M, Orskov ER. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughage in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1993; 40: 109-119.
• 21. Makkar HPS. In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemicals. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2005; 123: 291-302.
• 22. Jeranyama P, Garcia AD. Understanding relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). Collage of Agriculture & Biological Sciences. South Dakota State University, South Dakota-USA, 2004; pp 1-3.
• 23. Deaker JM, Young MJ, Fraser TJ, Rowarth JS. Carcass, liver and kidney characteristics of lambs grazing plantain (Plantago lanceolata), chicory (Cichorium intybus), white clover (Trifolium repens) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod 1994; 54: 197-200.
• 24. Jackson FS, McNabb WC, Barry TN, Fooc YL, Jason P. The condensed tannin content of a range of subtropical and temperate forages and the reactivity of condensed tannin with ribulose- 1.5- bis-phosphate carboxylase (rubisco) protein. J Sci Food Agric 1996; 12: 483-92.
• 25. Guil-Guerrero JL. Nutritional composition of Plantago species (P. major L., P. lanceolata L., and P. media L.). Ecol Food Nutr 2001; 40: 481-95.
• 26. Marlett JA, Fischer MH. The active fraction of psyllium seed husk. Proc Nutr Soc 2003; 62: 207-9.
• 27. Swanson KS, Grieshop CM, Clapper GM, Shields RG, Belay T, Merchen NR, Fahey G C. Fruit and vegetable fiber fermentation by gut microflora from canines. J Anim Sci 2001; 79: 919-926.
• 28. Barry TN. Secondary compounds of forages. In, Hacker JB, Ternouth JH (Eds): Nutrition of Herbivores. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia, 1987; pp 91-120.
• 29. Kumar R, Singh M. Tannins: Their adverse role in ruminant nutrition. J Agric Food Chem 1984; 32: 447-53.
• 30. Lopez S, Makkar HPS, Soliva CR. Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In, Vercoe PE, Makkar HPS, Schlink A (Eds): In vitro Screening of Plant Resources for Extra-nutritional Attributes in Ruminants: Nuclear and Related Methodologies. London, New York, 2010; pp191- 231.
• 31. Kara K, Güçlü BK, Baytok E. Comparison of nutrient composition and anti-methanogenic properties in different rosaceae species. J Anim Feed Sci 2015; 24: 308-14.
• 32. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 1995; 73: 2483-92.
• 33. Hook SE, Wright ADG, McBride BW. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea 2010; 1: 1- 11.