ARMENIAN "GENOCIDE": NOT A HISTORICAL FACT, RATHER POLITICAL MYTH
Ermeni Diasporası tarafından bir siyasi kampanya olarak yürütülensözde Ermeni soykırımının tanınması yolundaki gayretler, dünyayı tarihselgerçeklerin ve hukuksal kavramların siyasi "meşrulaştırma" yoluylatanınabileceği hususunda ikna etmek için her yola başvurmuştur. Nitekim,dünyadaki farklı devletlerin kurumları tarafından yapılan tanımalar butür hareketlerin meşruiyeti ve bunların ne gibi sonuçları olabileceğisorularını gündeme getirmiştir. Bu makale, konuyu Perinçek-İsviçredavası üzerinden değerlendirecek ve sözde Ermeni soykırımının tarihselbir gerçeklik değil, ancak siyasi bir masal olarak kabul edilebileceği teziniuluslararası hukuk analizi çerçevesinde savunacaktır.
(ERMENİ "SOYKIRIMI": TARİHSEL BİR GERÇEK DEĞİL, SİYASİ BİR MASAL)
The recognition of so-called Armenian "genocide" as apolitical campaign of Armenian Diaspora have went to great lengths totry and convince the world that there is a possibility to recognize historicalfacts and legal notions through the political "legalization" if one shall tryhard enough. Indeed some of the recognitions made by the stateinstitutions of different countries around the world have raised a questionof the legality and implications of such actions. This article will look atthe issue from the perspective of the case Perincek vs Switzerland andargue that the Armenian "genocide" cannot be considered a historicalfact but a political mythology through the analysis of international law.
___
Case Law of International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Paragraph: ii. Intent to destroy in whole or in part.Criminal Code of Switzerland, Art.261
Criminal conviction for denial that the atrocities perpetrated against the Armenian people in 1915 and years after constituted genocide was unjustified. (2013, 17 December). EHCR Registrar, Press Release.
"French Council Finds Bill Penalizing Denial Unconstitutional." (2012). Armenian Weekly.
Makili-Aliyev, Kamal, (2007) Enforcement of International Law in Nagorno- Karabakh Conflict. Tbilisi: Universal.
Mehdiyev, Elchin. (2014) "Special tribunal should be created for prosecution of Khojaly genocide perpetrators". Trend
Mehtiyev, Elkhan (2006). Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict: Prague Process and Current Status of Negotiations.
"Perinçek: Switzerland requests referral to Grand Chamber" (2014). Press Release, Federal Office of Justice.
Smith, Ray "European Ruling Ignites Freedom Debate", (2014, February 15). IPS, Switzerland.
"Turkish anger as Swiss appeal Perinçek decision", (2014, 14 March), swissinfo.ch
"We welcome Swiss government decision of Perinçek case - Armenian President", (2014, March 14). News.am
Weed, Matthew C. (2011, 10 March). International Criminal Court and the Rome Statute: 2010 Review Conference, CRS Report for Congress.
- ISSN: 1303-5304
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 2002
- Yayıncı: Terazi Yayıncılık Basım Dağıtım Danışmanlık Eğitim Organizasyon Matbaacılık Kırtasiye Tic. Ltd. Şti.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
AVRUPA İNSAN HAKLARI MAHKEMESİ’NİN PERİNÇEK v. İSVİÇRE KARARI
ARMENIAN "GENOCIDE": NOT A HISTORICAL FACT, RATHER POLITICAL MYTH
(PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND DAVASI (AİHM, 17 ARALIK 2013)
ERMENİ TEHCİRİ: ‘ASKERİ MECBURİYET’ GEREKÇESİ
A VERDICT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
THE ARMENIAN 'RELOCATION': THE CASE FOR 'MILITARY NECESSITY'