Kent Hakkı ve Katılımcılık Bağlamında Kendin Yap Kentleşme: Roma Bostanı Örneği

Bu makale, “Kendin Yap Kentleşme” bağlamı içerisinden İstanbul’da halen sürdürülmekte olan bostanlardan olan Cihangir Roma Bostanı’na odaklanmaktadır. İstanbul’da kent içi tarım alanları olan bostanların geçmişi yüzyıllar öncesine dayanmakla birlikte son bir kaç yıl Türkiye’nin İstanbul başta olmak üzere birçok kentinde “kendin yap” bostanların kurulmasına sahne olmuştur. Bu bostanlar, öz-örgütlenme yoluyla bir araya gelmiş olan katılımcıların kendilerine ait olmayan araziler üzerinde, “izinsiz” olarak hayata geçirdikleri ve kendi imkanlarıyla kolektif olarak sürdürdükleri, kullanım değerinin öne çıktığı ve gıda üretiminin sembolik kaldığı mekânlardır. Bu makale dayanışma, ortaklaşma ve karşılıklı öğrenme mekânı olan Cihangir Roma Bostanı’nı bir doğrudan katılımcı bir kamusal mekân talebi olarak Türkiye’nin ve özelde İstanbul’un kamusal ve yeşil mekânlarının artarak yok edildiği neoliberal kent politikalarına karşı “kent hakkı” çerçevesinden tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır

Do-It-Yourself Urbanism within the Context of Right to the City and Participatory Urbanism: The Roma Garden

The present study focuses on one of the last remaining urban gardens, the Roma Garden in Istanbul, Turkey, in the context of “DIY urbanism.” Urban agriculture has a very long history in Istanbul where traditional urban market gardens called “bostans” provided the city with food for centuries. While the last remaining historical gardens are now under threat due to municipal policies favoring urban development, Istanbul has witnessed the formation of “DIY” urban gardens in 2013. These gardens, initiated on public land and maintained by a small group of gardeners, are open to the public without any legal relation to the local state. In contrast to the last remaining historical “bostans,” these gardens, organized around the use value, are managed solely by gardeners, and the harvest is not meant to be nourishment, rather it has a symbolic value. The empirical research that the present study is based on shows that the destruction of urban public space in general and public green space in particular over the last decade in Istanbul paved the way to DIY public gardens as spaces of solidarity, collectivity, and shared knowledge, as well as spaces where ecological concerns can be raised and made visible. The present study also explores the ways in which these urban gardens contribute to envisage a new kind of urban opposition centered around the demand for public space against the neoliberal urban policies.

___

  • Adams, D. & Hardman, M. (2014). Observing Guerillas in the Wild: Reinterpreting Practices of Urban Guerilla Gardening. Urban Studies, 5(6),1103-1119. doi: 10.1177/0042098013497410
  • Aksoy, A. (2014). İstanbul’un Neoliberalizmle İmtihanı. A. B. Candan ve C. Özbay (Ed.), Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları: Sınırlar, Mücadeleler, Açılımlar içinde (s. 27-46). İstanbul: Metis.
  • Ateş, B. (2015). A Spatial Impromptu: Green Resistance By Guerilla Gardening. (Mastır Tezi). Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Attoh, A.K. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669–685. doi: 10.1177/0309132510394706
  • Baker, E. L. (2004). Tending Cultural Landscapes and Food Citizenship in Toronto’s Community Gardens. The Geographical Review, 94(3), 305- 352.
  • Bendt, P., Barthel, S. & Colding, J. (2013). Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin, Landscape and Urban Planning 109,18-30.
  • Bergdoll, B. (2015). Preface. P. Gadanho (Ed.), Uneven Growth Tactical Urbanisms for Expanding Megacities içinde (s. 10-13). New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Bishop, P. & Williams, L. (2012). The Temporary City. London: Routledge.
  • Brenner, N. & Elden, S. (2009). Introduction. State, Space, World: Lefebvre and the Survival of Capitalism. N. Brenner ve S. Elden (Ed.) State, Space, World Selected Essays içinde (s.1-48). Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press .
  • Brenner, N. (2015). Is “Tactical Urbanism” an Alternative to Neoliberal Urbanism? Post Notes on Modern and Contemporary Art Around the Globe. http://post.at.moma.org/content_items/587-is-tactical-urbanis Erişim tarihi: 06.05.2018
  • Certomà, C. (2011). Critical urban gardening as a post-environmentalist practice. Local Environment, 16(10), 977-987.
  • Crossan, J., Cumbers, A., McMaster, R. & Shaw, D. (2016). Contesting Neoliberal Urbanism in Glasgow’s Community Gardens: The Practice of DIY Citizenship. Antipode, 1-19. doi: 10.1111/anti.12220
  • Douglas, C.C.G. (2014). Do-It-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal “Improvement” Through Unauthorized Alteration. City & Community, 13(1), 5-25. doi: 10.1111/cico.12029
  • Durusoy, E., & Cihanger, D. (2016). Historic Landscape vs. Urban Commodity?: The Case of Yedikule Urban Gardens. İstanbul. Megaron, 11(1), 125-136. doi: 10.5505/MEGARON.2016.48343
  • Fabian, L. & Samson, K. (2016). Claiming Participation – A Comparative Analysis of DIY Urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166-184. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2015.1056207
  • Ferris, J., Norman, C. & Sempik, J. (2001). People, Land and Sustainability: Community Gardens and the Social Dimension of Sustainable Development. Social Policy and Administration, 35(5): 559–568. http://illinoisonline.org/krassa/hdes598/Readings/People,%20land,%20and%20 sustainability.pdf
  • Fırat, Ö. B. & Kuryel, A. (2015). Yaratıcılık İş Başında: Karşı – Gösteriler ve Duygulanımsal Kolektiviteler. A. Kuryel ve B.Ö. Fırat (Ed.) Küresel Ayaklanmalar Çağında Direniş ve Estetik içinde (s. 243-267). İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Finn, D. (2014). DIY Urbanism: Implications for Cities. Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7(4), 381-398. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2014.891149
  • Finn, D. (2014a). Introduction to the Special Issue on DIY urbanism. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), 331-332. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2014.959154
  • Gadanho, P. (2015). Mirroring Uneven Growth A Speculation on Tomorrow’s Cities Today. Pedro Gadanho (Ed.), Uneven Growth Tactical Urbanisms for Expanding Megacities içinde (s. 14-25). New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Hardman, M. (2011). Understanding Guerrilla Gardening: An Exploration of Illegal Cultivation in the UK. Working Paper No. 1, Centre for Environment and Society Research, Birmingham.
  • Harvey, D. (2003). Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941. doi: 10.1111/j.0309- 1317.2003.00492.x
  • Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53. Holland, L. (2007). Diversity and Connection in Community Gardens: A Contribution to Local Sustainability. Local Environments, 9(3), 285-305. doi: 10.1080/1354983042000219388
  • Hou, J. (2010). (Not) your everyday public space. J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent Public Space Guerilla Urbanism and the Making of Contemporary Cities içinde (s. 1-17). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941-956. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12053
  • Kaldjian, J. P. (2004). Istanbul’s Bostans: A Millenium of Market Gardens. The Geographical Review 94(3), 284-304.
  • Kaya, İ. A. & Görgün, E. K. (2017). Kentsel mekân Üretiminde ‘Kendin Yap’ Hareketi. Planlama, 27(1), 57-74. doi: 10.14744/planlama.2017.74946
  • Lefebvre, H. (1969). The Explosion: Marxism and the French Upheavel. New York: Modern Reader Paperbacks.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1996) Writings On Cities. E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Lydon, M. & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical Urbanism Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Marcuse, P. (2009). From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City. City, 13(2-3), 185-197.doi: 10.1080/13604810902982177
  • Marcuse, P. (2012). Whose Right(s) to What City?. N. Brenner, P. Marcuse & M. Mayer (Ed.), Cities For People Not For Profit Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City içinde (s.24-41). London: Routledge.
  • Marcuse, P. (2014). Reading the Right to the City. City, 18(1), 4-9. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2014.878110
  • Marche, G. (2015). What Can Urban Gardening Really Do About Gentrification? A Case-Study of Three San Francisco Community Gardens. European Journal of American Studies 10(3), 1-8. http://ejas.revues. org/11316
  • Mares, T. M. & Peña, D. G. (2010). Urban agriculture in the making of insurgent spaces in Los Angeles and Seattle. J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent Public Space Guerilla Urbanism and the Making of Contemporary Cities içinde (s. 241-254). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Mayer, M. (2009). The ‘Right to the City’ in the Context of Shifting Mottos of Urban Social Movements. City, 13(2-3), 362-375. doi: 10.1080/13604810902982755
  • Merrifield, A. (2006). Henri Lefevbre: A Critical Introduction. New York, London: Routledge.
  • Mikadze, V. (2015). Ephemeral Urban Landscapes of Guerrilla Gardeners: A Phenomenological Approach. Landscape Research, 40(5), 519-529. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2014.93961724
  • Mitchell, D. & Heynen, N. (2009). The Geography of Sur- vival and the Right to the City: Speculations on Surveil- lance, Legal Innovation, and the Criminalization of Intervention. Urban Geography, 30: 611–630. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.30.6.611
  • Peck, J. & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing Space. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (eds.), Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
  • Pudup, M. B. (2008). It Takes A Garden: Cultivating Citizen- subjects in Organized Garden Projects. Geoforum, 39(3), 1228-1240. doi: 10.1016/j. geoforum.2007.06.012
  • Pugalis,L. & Giddings, B. (2011). A Renewed Right to Urban Life: A Twenty- First Century Engagement with Lefebvre’s Initial “Cry”. Architectural Theory Review, 16(3), 278-295. doi: 10.1080/13264826.2011.623785
  • Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 98-158. https://faculty.washington.edu/mpurcell/geojournal.pdf
  • Purcell, M. (2008). Recapturing Democracy Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures. Routledge, London and New York.
  • Reynolds, R. (2008). On Guerilla Gardening: A Handbook For Gardening Without Boundaries. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Rosol, M. (2010). Public Participation in Post-Fordist Urban Green Space Governance: The Case of Community Gardens in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 548-63. doi:10.1111/ j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x
  • Rosol, M. (2012). Community Volunteering as Neoliberal Strategy? Green Space Production in Berlin. Antipode, 44(1), 239-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00861.x
  • Saldivar-Tanaka, L. & Krasny, E. M. (2004). Culturing Community Development, Neighborhood Open Space, and Civic Agriculture: The Case of Latino Community Gardens in New York City. Agriculture and Human Values, 21, 399-412.
  • Sassen, S. (2015). Complex and Incomplete Spaces for Tactical Urbanism. P. Gadanho (Ed.), Uneven Growth Tactical Urbanisms for Expanding Megacities içinde (s. 40-47). New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Schmelzkopf, K. (2002). Incommensurability, Land Use, and The Right to Space: Community Gardens in New York City. Urban Geography, 23(4), 323-343. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.23.4.323
  • Schmid, C. (2012). Henri Lefebvre, The Right to the City, and the New Metropolitan Mainstream. N. Brenner, P. Marcuse & M. Mayer (Ed.), Cities For People Not For Profit Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City içinde (s. 42-62). London: Routledge.
  • Spataro, D. (2016). Against a de-politicized DIY urbanism: Food Not Bombs and the struggle over public space. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 185-201. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2015.1056208
  • Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy. In N. Brenner and N. Theodore (eds.), Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
  • Talen, E. (2015). Do-it-Yourself Urbanism: A History. Journal of Planning History, 14(2), 135-148. doi: 10.1177/1538513214549325
  • Thompson, M. (2015). Between Boundaries: From Commoning and Guerrilla Gardening to Community Land Trust Development in Liverpool. Antipode, 47(4), 1021–1042. doi: 10.1111/anti.12154
  • Zardini, M. (2008). A new urban takeover. G. Borasi & M. Zardini (Ed.), Actions: What you can do with the City içinde (s. 12-17). Montreal: SUN Architecture ve CCA.
  • Zeiger, M. (2011). The Interventionist’s Toolkit, Part 1. The Design Observer. http://places.designobserver.com/entryprint.html?entry=25408 Erişim tarihi: 14 Mart 2011.