Arazi Kullanım Kararlarının Dere Sistemleri Üzerinde Fiziki Etkisinin Analizi ve Kentsel Yaşama Yansıması: İstanbul’da Su Baskını, Sel ve Taşkın Risk Değerlendirmesi

Dünya sel ve kuraklıkla ilgili küresel alarmdadır. Dünya Araştırma Enstitüsü, 2030 yılında dünya nüfusunun yarısının su sıkıntısı yaşayacağını; sellerin etkisinin 3 kat artacağını, 54 milyon insanın etkileneceğini vurgulamaktadır. Fiziki çevreyi kontrolde tutan en önemli faktör dere sistemleri ve havzalarıdır. Bu sürece dere havza sistemleri hazır mı? Dere (drenaj) havzasının dere sistemi, kollarıyla yüzey üstü/altı kaynaklarını, yağış sularını toplar ve kara sistemine suyu dağıtarak boşaltırlar. Doğal havzasında dengede olan hidrolik sistemler, hatalı arazi kararlarıyla doğal morfolojisini, havza akış yönlerini kaybetmesi, artan yapısal yüzeyler vb. etkenlerle drenaj yoğunluğunu değiştirmesi, taşkınları sıklaştırmaktadır; değişen iklim faktörü ile de şiddetini artırmaktadır. Son yıllarda sıklaşan taşkınlar, nehir/dere ekosistemlerinin fiziki yapısını ve üzerinde bulunduğu arazi kullanım kararları ile ilişkisinin araştırılmasını, bulguların çevresel risk açısından değerlendirilmesini şehir, ulusal ve uluslararası ölçeklerde gündeme taşımaktadır. Ülkede bütüncül su hukukunun bulunmaması, idari problemler, su ekosistemini içme suyu havza alanı olan ve olmayan şeklinde parçalayan yaklaşımlar, koruma aleyhinde yasalar, vb. ile dere sistemleri (su kaynakları) korunmamakta, sürdürülebilirliği devam ettirilmemektir. Bu araştırmada, İstanbul’da içme suyu havza alanı dışında bırakılan yaklaşık 2740 km² yüzölçümlü alanda, açık havza konumunda olan (Karadeniz, Marmara Denizi, Boğaziçi, Haliç ve Göllerine dökülen) 168 akar dere havzasına ve havzada bulunan yaklaşık 3344 km uzunluğunda dere sistemlerine odaklanılmıştır. Bulgular, boy kesitine göre değerlendirildiğinde, derelerin ~%73’ü doğal yapısını koruduğu, ~%27’’si doğasına aykırı fiziki değişime uğrayarak yeni formlara dönüştüğünü göstermektedir. Dere sistemlerinin ~%79’u kırsal alandan geçtiği ve doğal yapısını koruduğu; ~%21’i ise kentsel alanda bulunduğu, çeşitli müdahaleler ile fiziksel yapısının değiştiği fakat kaybolmadığı, üzerindeki arazi kararlarından etkilendiği ve dere koruma bantlarının işgal edildiği anlaşılmıştır. Dere sistemleri havza ölçeğinde değerlendirildiğinde, araştırma sahasının ~%64’ü (108 dere havzası) fiziksel değişimden az/çok etkilenerek havzasında sel, taşkın, kuraklık ve diğer çevresel riskleri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma, problemlerin kentin geneline (%51’ine) yayıldığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, derelerin birbirlerinden bağımsız birimler olmadığını ve önerilecek yasal düzenlemelerin dereleri havza sistemleri ölçeğinde değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini; araştırılan derelerin açık havza sistemi olması nedeniyle uluslararası öneme sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Doğal dere sistemlerini korumak, sürdürülebilirliğini sağlamak, riskleri yönetmek, faydaya çevirmek için, yasal, kurumsal, teknik problemleri ortadan kaldıracak devlet kontrolünde ivedilikle bütüncül su hukuku, havza ölçeğinde bütünleşik havza planlaması ve havza yönetimi, sürdürülebilir dere restorasyon programına ihtiyaç vardır.

The Analyses of the Physical Effect of Land Use Decisions on Stream Systems and its Reflection on Urban Life: The Risk Evaluation of Flood and Overflow in İstanbul

The World Resources Institute reported that nearly half of the world population will experience water shortage in 2030; the effects of floods will be tripled globally. Drought and floods threaten several cities all around the country, including Istanbul. The most important factors that control the physical environment are stream systems and their basins. Are the stream basin systems ready for this process? Hydraulic system balanced in its natural basin has lost its natural morphology and direction of overland flowing because of land decisions given wrongly by the authorities. This situation shows that it is essential to analyze the physical structure of stream/river ecosystems and land use decisions on the urban, national, and international scales. The lack of integrated water law, management problems, and the laws against the protection of stream systems have caused the problem. The present study focuses on the 3344 km long stream systems that are in the basins of 168 running streams and in nearly 2740 km2 outside drinking water basin in Istanbul. The findings show that 73% of the stream systems have protected their natural structure, 27% have transformed its natural structure, and 79% have protected their natural structure in rural areas according to longitude. Of the stream systems, 21% have transformed its natural structure in urban areas because of various interventions, but they have not disappeared, they have been affected by land use decisions, and stream protective zones have been deforced. Based on the stream basin scale, 64% of the region have been affected because of the transformation, and some environmental risk, such as floods and drought, have been spread to the whole city. The findings show that streams are not independent from each other; laws must evaluate streams on the basin system scale, and streams are important internationally as they are open basin systems. Integrated basin planning and management, sustainable stream restoration program, and holistic water law controlled by the government are essential to find solutions to legal, technical, and corporate problems; protect natural stream systems; maintain their sustainability; and overcome the risks.

___

  • Allan, J. D. (2012). Landscapes and Riverscapes: The influence of land use on Stream Ecosystems. Annual review of ecology, evolution and systematics. Vol. 35(2004), 257-284, Michigan Üniversitesi.
  • Allan, J. D., Erickson, D. L., and Fay, J. (1997). The Influence of Catchment Land Use on Stream Integrity Across Multiple Spatial Scales. Freshwater Biology, vol 37, 149-162.
  • Anderson, D. G. (1970). Effects of urban development on floods in Northern Virginia. Water in The Urban Environment: Geological Survey WaterSupply Papper. Washington, USA.
  • Booth, D. B. (1991). Urbanization and the natural drainage system-impact, solutions and prognoses. The Northwest Journal. Vol.7, No 1, (s.93-117), Wahington Univrsity, USA.
  • Booth, D. B., Karr, J. R., Schauman, S., Christopher, P. K., vd. (2004). Reviving urban streams: Land use, Hydrology, Biology and human behavior. Journal of American Water Resources Association. (s.1351- 1364), USA.
  • Bosch, J. M. and Hewlett, J. D. (1982). A review of catchment experiments to the determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology. Vol.55, 3-23, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Bölen, F. v.d. (2009). İstanbul’da yapılaşma yoğunluğu yaşanabilir alan ilişkisi. İTÜ Dergisi: Mimarlık, planlama ve tasarım. Cilt 8, Sayı:1, (s:127-137), Mart 2009, İstanbul.
  • Brown, K. B. (2000). Urban stream restoration practices: An initial assessment. The center for watershed protection. Elliot City, MD.
  • Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., Limb, M. (1998). People, parks and the urban green: a study of popular meanings and value for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies. Vol:26, 5, 6, (s.455-473).
  • Campbell, C. J. (1971). Pressure bomb measurements indıcate water availability in a Southwestwen Riparian Community. Rocky Maountain forest and regime experiment station. The Pennsylvania State Universty Libraries.
  • Carlston, C. W. (1963). Drainage density and streamflow, physiographic and hydraulic of rivers. Geological survey professional paper. Washington, USA.
  • Corbett, E. S., and Lynch, J. A. (1985). Management of streamside zones on municipal watersheds. Ripirian ecosystems and The management: Reconciling conflicting uses, 1.North American Riparian Kenferansı. (s.187- 190). Tucson, Arizona.
  • Correl, M. R., Lillydal, J. H. ve Singell, L. D. (1978). The effects of greenbelts on residental property values. Some Findings on the political economy of Open Space. Vol.54, (s.207-217).
  • Cushing, C. E., Cummins, K. W. and Minshall, G. W. Vd. (2006). River and stream ecosystems of the world. University of California Press.
  • Dağdelen, İ. (2006). Alman Mavileri 1913-1914 I. Dünya Savaşı Öncesi İstanbul Haritaları Cilt 1, 2, 3. TC. İBB Kütüphane ve Müzeler Müdürlüğü, ISBN 975-6582-78-2, 975-6582-79-0.
  • Dale, V. H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R. A., Hobbs, N.T., vd. (2000). Ecological principles and gidelines for managing the use land. Ecological Society of America(ESA) Report. Vol. 10 (3), 639-670.
  • Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978).Water in environmental planning. San Francisco: W. H.| Freeman.
  • Dülger Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., Baran, P. K., Marans, R. W. (2008). İstanbul’da yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi. İTÜ Dergisi/a.Cilt 7 Sayı 2, İstanbul
  • Erman, D. C., Erman, N. A., Costick, L., and Beckwitt, S. (1996). Management and landuse buffers. Riparian areas and wetlands: Appendix 3, Kaliforniya Üniversitesi. http://www.sierraforestlegacy.org/Resources/ Conservation/FireForestEcology/ThreatenedHabitats/MontaneMeadows/Montane-Kattelmenn96.pdf.
  • Ernst, and Young (2003). Transfer pricing surveys, Global Survey: Practices, percetions and trends in 22 countries, plus tax authority approaches in 44 countries, EYGM ltd. Erişim adresi, www.ey.com.
  • Fausch, K. D., Torgesen, C. E., Baxter, C.V., and Li, H. W. (2002). Landscapes to riverscapes; briding the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience. 52, (s.483-489).
  • Fisher, S. G., and Likens, G. E. (1973). Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem matabolism. Ecol. Monogr., 43, (s.421-439).
  • Gao, X. ve Asami, Y. (2005). Economic value of urban landscapes. Institute of Geografical Sciences and Natural Resources Reserch, Chinese, center for spatial information Science University of Tokyo, Japan http://www. csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/dp/67.pdf.
  • Gatewood, J. S., Robinson, T. W., Colby, B. R., Hem, J. D., vd. (1950). Use of water by bottom-land vegetation in lower Safford Valley Arizona. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper. U.S. Dept. Of Interior, 1103, (s.96), Vol 364.
  • Gordon M. F., John C. G., Daniel A. G. (1966). Water and Waste water Engineering. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
  • Groffman, P. M., Bain, D. J., Band, L. E., Belt, K. T. vd. (2003). Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. The ecological Society of America, (s.315-321).
  • Hardesty, P., Kuhns, C. (1998). The Buffer Handbook: A guide to creating vegetated buffers for lakefront properties. Environmental protection agency, Boston Regional Office, Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
  • Hermoso,V., Pantus, F., Olley, J., Linke, S, Mugodo, j., Lea, P. (2011). Systematic planning for river rehabilitation: Integrating multiple ecological and economic objectives in complex decision-making scenarios Freshwater Biology. Vol. 58, 1-12.
  • Hollis, G. E. (1975). The effects of urbanization on floods of different recurrence intervals. Water Resources Research. Vol. 11, 431-435.
  • Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin of the geological society of America(2011), Vol. 56, 275-370.
  • Hynes, H. B. N. (1970). The ecology of running waters. Toronto Üniversitesi yayını, Toronto.
  • Iturbe, I. R., and Escobar (1982). The dependence of drainage density on climate and geomorphology. Vol 27 (2), 129-137. Hydrological Secience Journal.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2007). 1/100.000 Ölçekli İstanbul Hali Hazır Haritaları-2007 onaylı, Eişim tarihi: Kasım 11 2013. İBB, Harita Müdürlüğü, İstanbul. (CD-ROM).
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2009). 1/100.000 Ölçekli İstanbul İl Çevre Düzeni Planı Raporu. Plan uygulama araçları, İBB, İmar ve Şehircilik Daire Başkanlığı Şehircilik Daire Başkanlığı, Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü, İstanbul.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2009). İstanbul’un Asya, Avrupa Yakası Dereleri Raporu. İBB, Alt Yapı Mühendislik. İstanbul.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2010). Park Bahçeler Müdürlüğü. Erişim tarihi Mart 5, 2014, erişim adresi; http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/BilgiHizmetleri/Istatistikler/Documents/bldhizmetleri/2010/parkvebahceler_mud_2004-%202010.pdf.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2011). İstanbul Metropolitan Alanı Kentsel Ulaşım Ana Plan Raporu. İBB, Ulaşım Daire Başkalığı Ulaşım Daire Başkanlığı. Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü, İstanbul.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2013). Dere Islah Çalışmaları Notları Ek. Erişim tarihi, Aralık 2, 2013, erişim adresi: www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/Documents/basinbulteni/../dereislahi_notlar_ek.doc.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2013). 1/25.000 ölçekli İstanbul’un dereleri, akarsu havza dışı derleri. İstanbul Su ve Kanalizasyon İdaresi (İSKİ). İstanbul, Erişim tarihi: Nisan 24, 2013. (CD-ROM).
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2013). Dere Proses: Akarsu dere, akarsu havza içi, akarsu havza dışı dereler. İBB Alt Yapı Birimi. (CD-ROM). Erişim: Nisan 24, 2013.
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2013). Avrupa-Asya yakaları havza Itrf, 12.03. 2007, 02.08.2006. İstanbul Su ve Kanalizasyon İdaresi (İSKİ). (CD-ROM).
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2013). İçme Suyu Havzaları Yönetmeliği, 2 sayılı karar, yayın tarihi 24 Ocak 2013.
  • Jhan, L. R., and Trefethen, J. B. (1972). Placing channel modificiations in perspective. In Watersheds in transition, proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Water Resources Association and Colarado State University. (s.15-21), Fort Collins, Colorada: Colorada State Universty.
  • Jhonson, R. R., Carothers, S. W. (1982). Riparian habitats and recreation: Interralationship and impact in Southwest and Rochy Mountain Region.
  • Senior research scientist, National Park Service, School of renewable natural resources and depertment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Arizona Üniversitesi. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/AWAE/labs/ awae_flagstaff/Hot_Topics/ripthreatbib/johnson_carothers_riphabrec. pdf.
  • Jhonson, R. R., and Lowe C. H. (1985). On the development of ripirian ecology. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_rm/rm_gtr120/rm_ gtr120_112_116.pdf.
  • Kahya, E. Erkek, C., Ağıralioğlu, N. (2006). Su Kaynakları Mühendisliği “Su Kaynaklarının Geliştirilmesi, Ders Notları. İnşaat Mühendisliği, İTÜ Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Kauark, Leitte, L. A., Nascimento, N. O, Baptista, M. B. (1999). Stormwater masterplanning in developing tropical countries, impact of urban growth on surface water and graoundwater quality (Proceeding of IUGG). 99 Symposium HSS, Birmingham, IAHS. Yayın no: 259.
  • King, D., vd. (2012). Community-based agroforestry initiatives in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Forest Wildlife Management. Minnesota Universitesi.
  • Kobold, M., and Seselj, K. (2005). Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. No. 9 (4), 322-332.
  • Koçu, R, E. (1963). Boğaziçi’nde İskele, Kayık ve Sandalları. İstanbul Ansiklopedisi. 6.Cilt, Koçu yayınları, İstanbul Ansiklopedisi ve Neşriyat Kollektif Şirketi, İstanbul.
  • Kriken, J. L., Enquist, R., Rapaport, R. (2010). City Building-Nine Planning Principles for The Twenty-First Century. Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
  • Kuban, D. (2004). İstanbul Bir Kent Tarihidir. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul. ISBN:9753331304.
  • Lindsey, G. I., Man, J., Payton., Discon K. (2003). Amenity and recreation values of urban greenways. The Association of European Schools of Planning Congress. Leuven, Belgium.
  • Luttik, J. (2000). The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house price in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 48, 161-167.
  • May, C. W., Horner, R. R., Karr, J. R., Mar, B. W., Welch, E. B. (2014). The Cumulative Effects of Urbanization on Small Streams in the Puget. Sound Lowland Ecoregion. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/240437080_Effects_of_urbanization_on_small_streams_in_the_Puget_Sound_Lowland_Ecoregion.
  • Mayer, G. E., Franti, T. G. and Mortensen D. A. (1997). Seek and destroymachine vision identifies weeds for spot spraying. Resource Magazine, Engineering and Technology for a Sustainable World. Vol.4(12),13-14, http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/AnnualReports/1998/NE98.pdf.
  • Mayer, P. M., Reynolds S. K., Canfield, T. J. (2005). Ripirian buffer width, vegetative cover and nitrogen removal effectiveness: A Review of current science and regulations. National Risk Management Research Laboratory office of research and development US. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA. Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Melton, M. A. (1957). An analysis of the realtions among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology. Departman of Geology, Columbia University.
  • Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K. W., Petersen, R. C., Cushing, C. E., Bruns, D. A., Sedell, J. R., Vannote, R, L. (1985). Developments in Stream Ecosystem Theory. Canada, J.Fish. Aquat. Sci 42, 1045-1055.
  • Mitchell, B., and Gardner, J. S. (1983). Introduction. Pages 1-4 in River basin management: Canadian experiences. University of Waterloo Department of Geography. Pub No. 20, Waterloo, Ontario
  • Mitchell, B. (2005). Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements and land-use planning. Environment and Planning. A 2005, Vol.37, (s.1335-1352). Erişim tarihi Nisan 16, 2015, http://web.env. auckland.ac.nz/courses/geog320/resources/pdf/water/Mitchell_2005. pdf.
  • Moglen, G.E., Eltahir, E. A. B., and Bras, R. L (1998). On the sensitivity of drainage density to climate change. Water resources research. Vol.34 (4), (s.855-862).
  • Moring, J. R., Garman, G. C., Mullen, D. M. (1985). The value of ripirian ones for protecting aquatic systems: General concern and recent studies in Maine. (s.315-319), Tucson, Arizona.
  • Mutkowski, R. A. (1929). The ecology of trout streams in Yellowstone National Park. Roosevelt Wild Life Annuals 2. (s.151-240).
  • Nabhan, G. P. (1985). Riparian vegetation and indigenous Southwestern Agriculture: Control of erosion, pests and microclimate. (s.232-236), 1.North American Riparian Konferansı. Tucson, Arizona.
  • Naiman, R. J. Bilby, R. E., Bisson, P. A. (2000). Riparian ecology and management in the Pacific Coastal Rain Forest, Bioscience. Vol 50 (11), 996- 1011.
  • Needham. P. R. (1934). Quatiative studies of stream bottom foods. Trans. American Fishery A Soc., 64, 238-247.
  • Needham, P. R. (1938). Trout streams. Comstock Publ. Co. Ithaca, N.Y., s. 233.
  • Odum, H. T. (1974). Environment, Power and Society. Minnesotans for sustainability. Erişim tarihi 0cak 13, 2015, erişim adresi: http://www.mnforsustain.org/energy_ecology_economics_odum_ht_1973.htm.
  • Pallard, B., Castellarin, A., and Montanari, A. (2009). A look at the links between drainage density and flood statistics. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. No. 13, (s.1019-1029).
  • Palmer, M. A., Bernhardt, E. S., Allan, J. D., Lake, P. S., Alexander, G., Brooks, S. Carr, J., Clayton, S., vd. (2005). Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, USA.
  • Pervititich, J. (2000). İstanbul in the Insurance Maps of Jacques Pervititich. AXA Oyak, ISBN 975-7306-73-8, (s.46-51).
  • Platt, R. H. (2006). Urban Watershed Management Sustainability, On Stream at a Time. Vol.48, (4), Heldref Yayıncılık, http://heldref.org/env.php.
  • Richard, M. T., and Wood D. B. (1985). The economic value of sportfishing at Lees Ferry, Arizona. 1.North American Riparian Konferansı. (s.219- 222), Tucson, Arizona.
  • Rodriguez, Iturbe, I., and Escobar, L. A. (1982). The Dependence of drainage density on climate and geomorphology. Hydrolog, System Sciences. No. 27, (s.129–137).
  • Rowe, P. B. (1963). Streamflow increases after removing woodland–riparian vegetation from a southern California watershed. Journal of Forestry. Vol. 61, 365–370.
  • Sauer, V.B., Thomas, J., Stricker, V. A. ve Wilson, K. V. (1983). Flood characteristics of urban watersheds in the United States. Geological Survey Water-Supply. Papper 2207.
  • Scarr, A. (2014). Restore-Rivers Engaging Supporting and Transferring Knowledge for Restorasyon in Europe. Erişim tarihi Nisan 05, 2014, erişim adresi, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/ index.cfm?fuseaction=search.dspPage&n_proj_id=3780
  • Scott, R. L., Shuttleworth, W. J., Goodrich, D. C., Maddock, T. (2000). The water use of two dominant vegetation communities in a semiarid riparian ecosystem. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol.105 Issues 1-3, (s.241-256). Tucson, Arizona.
  • Shelford, V. E. and Eddy, S. (1929). Methods fort the study of stream communities. Ecology: 10: 382-292.
  • Skinner, Q. D., Smith, M.A., Dodd, J. L., and Rodgers, J. D. (1985). Reclamation of Riparian Zones and Water Law: First in time-First in Right. Riparing ecosystems and their management, reconcilin conflicting uses. (s.374-378). 1st North American Riparian Cenference. Tucson, Arizona.
  • Stabler, D. F. (1985). Increasing summer flow in small streams through management of riparian areas and adjacent vegetation. A Synthesis 1st the North American Riparian Conference. Tucson, Arizona.
  • Steiner, F.R. (2001). Planning and Urban Design Standards. “Water” (s.59- 73). USA.
  • Stromberg, J. C, Tellman, B. (2009). Ecology and Conservation on San Pedro River. Arizona Universitesi.
  • Teclaff, L. A., Teclaff, E. (1994). Restoring River and Lake Basin Ecosystems. Natural Resources Journal. Vol: 34, 905-932.
  • Teclaff, L. A. (1996). Evolution of the River Basin Concept in National and International Water Law. Natural Resources Journal. Vol. 36, No:2, University of New Mexico School of Law.
  • Teclaff, L. A, Teclaff E. (1996). Restoring River and Lake Basin Ecosystems. Natural Resources Journal. Vol. 34, (s.905-932). Erişim adresi http:// lawschool.unm.edu/nrj/volumes/34/4/06_teclaff_restoring.pdf, erişim tarihi Ocak 23, 2015.
  • The Trust for public land. ( 2013). 2012 Annual Report, Erişim tarihi, Mart 20, 2013, adresi : https://www.tpl.org/.
  • Tucker, G. E., and Bras, R. L. (2010). Hillslope processes drainage densty and landscape morphology. Water resources research. Vol. 34, No.10, 2751- 2764.
  • Turner, S. F., and Skibitzke, H. E. (1952). Use of water by phreatophytes in a 2000: foot channel between Granite Reef and Gillespie Dams, Maricopa County, Arizona. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 33, (s.66–72).
  • Türkiye Ulusal Rapor ve Eylem Planı (1996). Birleşmiş Milletler İnsan Yerleşimler Konferansı Habitat II. İstanbul.
  • Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., Korça, B. P., Terzi, F. ( 2011). Measuring quality of Life in Istanbul. Investigating Quality of Urban Life. R. Marans, R.J.Stimson (Eds.), London, (s.209-232).
  • United Nations. (1996). Land Administration Guidelines. Economic Comission for Europe, New York and Geneva. UN-Habitat. (2013).Un-habitat annual report. 2012, ISBN. 978-92-1- 132555-3, erişim tarihi Mayıs 2013, 2013, http://unhabitat.org/unhabitat-annual-report-2012/, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Url-1 , erişim tarihi 01.11.2012.
  • Url-2 , erişim tarihi 01.11.2012.
  • Url-3 , alındığı tarih: 2012-2014
  • Url-4 , erişim tarihi 2012-2014.
  • Url-5, erişim tarihi 03.02.2015.
  • Url-6 , erişim tarihi 01.11.2012.
  • Url-7 , erişim tarihi 05.07.2014.
  • Url-8 , erişim tarihi 05.07.2014.
  • Url-9 , erişim tarihi 10.08.2014.
  • Url-10 < http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2015/03/150305_seller_ artacak >, erişim tarihi 01.09.2017.
  • Url-11 < http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2016/05/160516_sel_uyari >, erişim tarihi 18.05.2016.
  • Url-12
  • Url-13 , erişim tarihi 21.02.2018.
  • Verniers, G., Peeters A., Hallot, H. ( 2013). Hydromorphological quality and river restoration the WALPHY project’ in October 2013. Erişim tarihi Nisan 5, 2014, Belçikahttp://www.reformrivers.eu/news/161
  • Vörösmarty, C. J., Mcintyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., ….. Davies, P.M. (2010). Global threats to human security and river biodiversity. (s.555-561), Nature 467.
  • Weeler, S. (2008). State and Municipal Climate Change Plans. (s.481-496), vol.74, American Planning Associasion. Chicago.
  • Wenger, S. J., and Fowler, L. (2000). Protecting Stream and River Corridors: Creating Effective Local Riparian Buffer Ordinances. (s.21-27), Carl Vinson Institute of Goverment The University of Georgia.
  • Wood, P. J., Armitage, P. D. (1997). Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Vol. 21 (2), 203-217, Springer, Verlag New York Inc.
  • Wooding, R. A. (1966). A hydraulic model fort he catchment-stream problem III. Comparison with runoff observation. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 4, 21-37.
  • Woods, L.G. (1966). Multiple use management of mountain riparian vegetation. In Vegetation Management on Flood Plans and Riparian lands. Phreatophyte Symp., Pac, Soutwest Inter-Agency Comm.66-3 Meet, Albuquergue. N.Mex.(s.37-43).
  • Woodyer, K. D., and Brookfield, M. (1966). The land system and its stream net: A Morphometric study of two land systems in semi-arid central Australia, CSIRO. Division of Land Research, 66/5, Australia.
  • Xia,T., Zhu, W., Xin, P., Li, L. (2010). Assesment of urban stream morphology: an integrated index and modelling system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Vol. 167, Issue 1-4, (s.447-460).
  • Yazır, R.S. (1984). Görsel Türkiye Ansiklopedisi. 2.Cilt, 4.Cilt. (İstanbulKütahya), Görsel Yayınları, 1984.
  • Yeang, K. (2006). Ecodesign, a manual for ecological design. Eco Design, Wiley Acedemy.
  • Yetişkin Kubilay, A. (2010). Maps of İstanbul Haritaları, 1422-1922. Denizler Kitapevi, ISBN 978-9944-264-19-8, İstanbul.
  • Zhang, H. L., Wang, Y. J., Wang, Y. Q., Li, D. X., and Wang, W. K. (2013). The effect of watershed scale on HEC-HMS calibrated parameters: a case study in the Clear Creek watershed in Iowa, U.S. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. No. 17, 2735-2745.