Teknoloji Kabul Modelleri ve Teknoloji Hazırlık Odaklı Çalışmalara Yönelik Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz: Turizm Yayınları Örneklemi

Bu araştırma, turizm alanında teknoloji kabul modelleri ile teknoloji hazırlık odaklı çalışmaları incelemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Amaca yönelik olarak bibliyometrik analiz tekniği tercih edilmiş olup ABS Journal Guide – 2022 listesinde “Sector Studies” başlığı altındaki uluslararası süreli yayınların temel alındığı, turizm yönlü 4, 3 ve 2 yıldızlı dergilerin, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Readiness (TR), Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2), Integrated Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) ve Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) anahtar kelimeleri ile taratılmıştır. Tarama sonunda 2000 ve 2023 yılları arasında yayımlanan 66 adet turizm sektörü odaklı çalışma incelemeye konu olmuştur. Yapılan analiz sonucunda çalışmaların daha çok 2015, 2016, 2020 ve 2021 yıllarında ve nicel araştırma yöntemleri kullanılarak gerçekleştirildiği, en fazla yayına ev sahipliği yapan ülkenin ise Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin olduğu ve Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) konulu çalışmaları en fazla yayımlayan derginin Tourism Management olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Focused on Technology Acceptance Models and Technology Readiness: Sample of Tourism Publications

This study was conducted to examine the studies on technology acceptance models and technology readiness in the field of tourism. For this purpose, bibliometric analysis technique was preferred and 4, 3 and 2 star tourism oriented journals based on international periodicals under the title of "Sector Studies" in the ABS Journal Guide - 2022 list were scanned with the keywords Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Readiness (TR), Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2), Integrated Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) and Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3). At the end of the search, 66 tourism sector-oriented studies published between 2000 and 2023 were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the studies were mostly conducted in 2015, 2016, 2020 and 2021 and using quantitative research methods, the country hosting the most publications was the United States of America, and the journal that published the most studies on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was the Tourism Management.

___

  • AlQudah, A. A., Mostafa A., ve Khaled, S. (2021). Technology acceptance in healthcare: A systematic review. Applied Sciences 11(22), 10537. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210537.
  • Türker, A. ve Türker, Ö. G. (2013). Turistik ürün satın alma davranışının teknoloji kabul modeli ile incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15 (2), 281-312. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/deusosbil/issue/4633/63156.
  • Batur, Z. ve Uygun, K. (2012). İki neslin bir kavram algısı: Teknoloji. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5 (1), 74-88 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/usaksosbil/issue/21647/232719.
  • Buhalis, D., ve Licata, M. C. (2002). The future eTourism intermediaries. Tourism Management, 23(3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00085-1.
  • Buhalis, D., ve O'Connor, P. (2005). Information communication technology revolutionizing tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(3), 7-16.https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2005.11081482.
  • Buhalis, D., ve Schertler, W. (Edt.). (1999). Information and communication technologies in tourism 1999: Proceedings of the international conference in Innsbruck, Austria, 1999. Springer Science and Business Media
  • Çıvak, B., ve Sezerel, H. (2018). Araştırma paradigmaları ve turizm yazını. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 5 (1) , 1-14 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/touraj/issue/37924/397349.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.
  • Davis, F. D. Bagozzi. RP ve Warshaw. PR (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/ mnsc.35.8.982.
  • Dong, H., Wang, H., ve Han, J. (2023). Understanding Ecological Agricultural Technology Adoption in China Using an Integrated Technology Acceptance Model Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Front. Green innovation and industrial ecosystem reconstruction in achieving environmental sustainability, 16648714, 348. https: //doi.org/10.33889/fenvs.2022.927668.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., ve Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal Of Business Research, 109, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039.
  • Fishbein, M., ve Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 177-189. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12199-021-01015-2.
  • Granic, A., ve Marangunic, N. (2015). Technology acceptance model : A literature review from 1986 to 2013 Universal access in the information society. 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
  • Hartwick, J., ve Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440.
  • Holden, R. J., ve Karsh, B. T. (2010). The Technology acceptance model: İts past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002.
  • Januszewska, M., Jaremen, D. E. ve Nawrocka, E. (2015). Th e eff ects of the use of ICT by tourism enterprises, Service Management, 2(16), 65- 73. http://doi.org/ ejsm/file/article/view/92.
  • Kaplanidou, K. ve Vogt, C. (2006). A structural analysis of destination travel intentions as a function of web site features. Journal of Travel research, 45(2), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287506291599.
  • Kim, D. Y., Park, J. ve Morrison, A. M. (2008a). A model of traveller acceptance of mobile technology. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10(5), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.669.
  • Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H.ve Law, R. (2008b). An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management, 29(3), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.01
  • Kim, M. J., Lee, C. K., ve Preis, M. W. (2020). The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective well-being, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Telematics and Informatics, 49, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101349.
  • Krauskopf, E. (2018). A bibiliometric analysis of the Journal of Infection and Public Health: 2008–2016. Journal Of Infection And Public Health, 11(2), 224-229.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.12.011
  • Koul, S., ve Eydgahi, A. (2017). A systematic review of technology adoption frameworks and their applications. Journal of Technology Management & Amp; innovation, 12(4), 106-113. http:// doı.org/10.4067/S0718-272420170000400011.
  • Lee, Y. C., Li, M. L., Yen, T. M., ve Huang, T. H. (2010). Analysis of adopting an integrated decision making trial and evaluation laboratory on a technology acceptance model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1745-1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.034.
  • Liljander, V., Gillberg, F., Gummerus, J. ve Van Riel, A. (2006), “Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2005.08.004.
  • Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., Sher, P. J., ve Wang, Y. L. (2005). Consumer adoption of e-service: Integrating technology readiness with the technology acceptance model. In A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries Technology Management (483-488). http://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2005.1509728.
  • Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., ve Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641-657. http://doi.org/10.1002/mar.
  • Lin, J. S.C. ve Chang, H. C. (2011), “The role of technology readiness in self-service technology acceptance”, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 424-444.http://doi.org/ I 10.1108/09604521111146289
  • Martínez-López, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., ve Nicolás, C. (2018). Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
  • Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., ve Roundtree, R. (2003). The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00276-4.
  • Napitupulu, D., Pamungkas, P. D. A., Sudarsono, B. G., Lestari, S. P., ve Bani, A. U. (2020). Proposed TRUTAUT model of technology ddoption for LAPOR!. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 725, No. 1, p. 012120). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/725/1/012120.
  • Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness ındex (trı) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal Of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001.
  • Pradhan, M. K., Oh, J., ve Lee, H. (2018). Understanding travelers’ behavior for sustainable smart tourism: A technology readiness perspective. Sustainability, 10(11), 4259 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114259.
  • Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., ve Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
  • Sun, S., Lee, P., ve Law, R. (2019). International journal of hospitality management impact of cultural values on technology acceptance and technology readiness. 77(March 2018), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.01
  • Ukpabi, D. C., ve Karjaluoto, H. (2017). Consumers’ acceptance of information and communications technology in tourism: A review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 618-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.12.002.
  • Tussyadiah, I. P., Jung, T. H., ve tom Dieck, M. C. (2018). Embodiment of wearable augmented reality technology in tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 57(5), 597-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517709090.
  • Türker, A. ve Türker, Ö. G. (2013). Turistik ürün satın alma davranışının teknoloji kabul modeli ile incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15 (2), 281-312. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/deusosbil/issue/4633/63156
  • Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
  • Venkatesh, V., ve Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., ve Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540.
  • Venkatesh, V., ve Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  • Wei, W. (2012). Research on the application of geographic information system in tourism management. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, 1104-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.394.
  • Wu, M. Y., Chou, H. P., Weng, Y. C., ve Huang, Y. H. (2011). TAM-2 based study of website user behavior-using web 2.0 websites as an example. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 4(8), 133-151.
  • Zhou, Q., Cui, C., ve Liu, Y. (2022). How A/E/C professionals accept BIM technologies in China: A technology acceptance model perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2022-0308.
  • Zupic, I., ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.