INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL CULTURAL CHALLENGES

Bir kısım araştırmacılar tarafından uluslararası insan kaynakları yönetimindeki rolü ve önemi araştırılan ulusalkültürün; uluslararası alanda örgütsel hedeflere ulaşılmasında farkında olunması gereken önemli bir sorunolarak adlandırılmıştır. Uluslararası insan kaynakları yönetimi dünyanın farklı ülkelerindeki uygulamalarındafarklı etnik kökenlerden gelen kişilerin birlikte çalışması ile oluşan kültürel zorluğun farkına varmalıdır. Buçalışmada, Hofstede'nin geliştirdiği kültürel boyutlar kavramının yanısıra; motivasyon teorisi, eşitlik teorisi,beklenti teorisi, iş tasarımı, iş merkeziliği, ve ödüller kavramlarının uluslararası insan kaynakları yönetimiüzerindeki etkisi incelemiştir.

ULUSLARARASI İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİ VE ULUSAL KÜLTÜREL ZORLUKLAR

A number of researchers have investigated the role of and importance of national culture on internationalhuman resource management and it is named as the major challenge that human resource managementshould be aware of when going global to achieve its organizational goals. Getting individuals from differentethnic backgrounds working together may be difficult in some parts of the world and internationalhuman resource management professionals should be aware of this cultural difficulty. This paper studiesthe influence of national cultural challenges on international human resource management which isinvestigated commonly by Hofstede s cultural dimensions, achievement motivation theory, equity theory,expectancy theory, job design, work centrality, and rewards.

___

  • Adams, J.S. (1976). Inj ustice in Social Exchange. In L. Berowits, & E. Walster, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
  • Ahmad, S. & Schroeder, R.G. (2003). “The Impact of Resource Management Practices on Operational Performance: Recognizing Country and Industry Differences”, Journal of Operations Management, 21, 19-43.
  • Aycan, Z. (2005). “The Inter Play Between Cultures And Institutional/Structural Contingencies in Human Resource Management Practices”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (7), 1083-1119.
  • Barney. J. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management. 17(1): 99-120.
  • Beck, Brenda E.F. & Larry F.M. (1985). Linking the host Culture to Organizational Variables. In P.J. Frost et al., Organizational Culture, 335-54. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
  • Boyacigiller, N. (1990) “The Role of Expatriates in the Management of Interdependence, Complexity and Risk in Multinational Corporations”, The Journal International Business, Third Quarter, p.373.
  • Boyacigiller, N., Adler, N.J. (1991). “The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context”, Academy of Management Review, 16, 262-290.
  • Burns, T. & George M.S. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock. Chatman, J. A. & Karen A. J. (1994). “Assessing the Relationship Between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different Can You Be?”, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 522-53.
  • Child, J. (1981). “Culture, Contingency and Capitalism in the Cross-National Study of Organizations”, In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw, Research In Organizational Behavior, 3: 303-56. New York: JAI.
  • Chilton, K. (1993). “Lincoln Electric’s Incentive System: Can It Be Transferred Overseas?”, Compensation and Benefits Review, 25(6), 21-30.
  • Chow, I.H., Huang, J.C., & Liu, S. (2008). “Strategic HRM in China: Configurations and Competitive Advantage”, Human Resource Management, 47(4), 687-706.
  • Claus, L. (2003). “Similarities and Differences in Human Resource Management in the European Union”, Thunderbird International Business Review. Hoboken: 45 (6), 729-755.
  • Corey, A.V. (1991). “Ensuring Strength in Each Country: A Challenge for Corporate Headquarters Global Human Resource Executives”, Human Resource Planning, March, pp. 1-8
  • Crozier, M. (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dorfman, Peter W & Jon P.H. (1988). “Dimensions of National Culture and Effective Leadership Patterns: Hofstede Revisited”, In R.N. Farmer & E.G. McGoun, Advances in İnternational Comparative Management, 3: 127-50. New York: JAI.
  • Denison, D.R. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: John Wiley.
  • Earley, P.C. (1994). “Self or Group? Cultural Effects of Training on Self-Efficacy and Performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 89-117.
  • Fey, C.F. (2005). “Opening the Black Box of Motivation: A Cross- Cultural Comparison of Sweden and Russia”, International Business Review,14 (3): 345-367.
  • Golesorkhi, B. (1991). “Why Not a Woman in Overseas Assignments”, HRNews, March, p. C-4.
  • Herbig, P.A., & Miller, J.C. (1992). “Culture and Technology: Does the Traffic Move in Both Directions?”, Journal of Global Marketing, 6, 75-104.
  • Hodgetts M.R. & Luthans F. (2003). International Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hodgetts M.R. & Luthans F. (1989). “Japanese HR Management Practices”, Personnel, April 1989, pp. 42-45.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980a). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980b). “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?”, Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42-63.
  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and Organizations, Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill International.
  • Hofstede, G. (1993). “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories”, Academy of Management Executive, 71(1), 81-93.
  • Jaeger, A. M. (1986). “Organization Development and National Culture: Where’s the Fit?”, Academy of Management Review, 11: 178-90.
  • Kats, M.M.S., Van Emmerik, IJ.H., Blenkinsopp, J., & Khapova, S.N. (2010). “Exploring the Associations of Culture with Careers and the Mediating Role of HR Practices: A Conceptual Model”, Career Development International, 15(4), 401-418.
  • Katz, J.P., & Elsea, S.W. (1997). “A Framework for Assessing International Labour Relations: What Every HR Manager Needs to Know”, HR Planning, 20, 4, 16-25.
  • Kluckholn, F.R. & Frederick L.S. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.
  • Laurent, A. (1983). “The Cultural Diversity of Western Conceptions of Management”, International Studies of Management and Organizations, 13: 75-96.
  • Lavelle, L. (2001). “Executive Pay”, Business Week, April 16, pp.76-80
  • Lawler, Edward E, III. (1990). Strategic Pay. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lengnick-Hall. C.A. & Lengnick-Hall, M.L. (1988). “Strategic Human Resotirce Management: A Review of the Literature and a Proposed Typology”, Academy of Management Review, 1988, Vol. 13, No. 3, 454-470.
  • Lilian H.C. & Jeanette S. (1995). Martin Intercultural Business Communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 46-47
  • Linehan, M. & Hanappi-Egger, E. (2006). “Diversity and Diversity Management: A Comparative Advantage?”, In: Larsen, H.H. and Mayrhofer, W. (Eds.), Managing Human Resources in Europe. A thematic Approach. Routledge, 217-233.
  • Luthans, F., Dianne B.W. & Stuart A.R. (1993). “What do Russian Managers Really do? An Observational Study with Comparisons to U.S. Managers”, Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 741-61.
  • Mayrhofer, W. & Larsen, H. H. (2006). “European HRM: A Distinct Field of Research and Practice”, In: Larsen, H.H. and Mayrhofer, W. (Eds.), Managing Human Resources in Europe. Routledge, 1-17.
  • Moffat, S. (1990). “Should You Work for the Japanese?”, Fortune.
  • Morris, T. & Cynthia M.P. (1992). “Management Style and Productivity in two Cultures”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 169-79.
  • Muller, S.L., & Clarke, L.D. (1998). “Political-Economic Context and Sensitivity to Equity: Differences Between the United States and the Transition Economics of Central and Eastern Europe”, Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 319-329.
  • Peterson, F.M. (1995). “Role Conflict Ambiguity, and Overload: A 21-Nation Study”, Academy of Management Journal, June, pp.429-452.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1998). The Human Equation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Powell, T. C. (1992). “Organizational Alignment as Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 119-34.
  • Prescott, J. E. (1986). “Environments as Moderators of the Relationship Between Strategy and Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 29: 329-46.
  • Rabi S. Bhagat et al., (1990). Cross-Cultural Issues in Organizational Psychology: Emergent Trends and Directions for Research in the 1990s in International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. Robertson. New York:Wiley, 1990.
  • Schuler, R.S. & Jackson, S.E. (1987) “Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices”, The Academy of Management Executive. 1(3): 207- 19.
  • Schneider, S. C. & Arnoud, D. (1991). “Interpreting and Responding to Strategic Issues: The Impact of National Culture”, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 307-20.
  • Scullion, H. & Starkey, K. (2000). “In Search of the Changing Role of the Corporate Human Resource Function in the International Firm”, International Journal of HRM, 11, 6, 1061-1081.
  • Shen, J. (2005). “Towards a Generic International Human Resource Management (IHRM) Model”, Journal of Organizational Transformation and Social Change, 2, 2, 83-102.
  • Singh, R., & Mohanty, R. (2011). “Performance Appraisal Satisfaction and Organisational Commitment: Moderating Role of Employees’ Cultural Values”, International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 4(3), 272-297.
  • Tayep, M.H. (1988). Organizations and National Culture: A Comparative Analysis. London: Sage.
  • Tayeb, M.H. (2005). International Human Resource Management. A Multinational Company Perspective, Oxford University Press.
  • Taylor, S.M. (1991). “American Managers in Japanese Subsidiaries: How Cultural Differences Are Affecting the Work Place”, Human Resource Planning, March, pp. 43-49.
  • Taylor, S., Beechler, S., & Napier, N. (1996). “Toward an Integrative Model of Strategic International Human Resource Management”, The Academy of Management Review. 21(4): 959-985.
  • Viktor Vroom, (1964). Work and Motivation, New York: Wiley.
  • Wang, S., Yi, X., Lawler, J., & Zhang, M. (2011). “Efficacy of High-Performance Work Practices in Chinese Companies”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2419-2441.
  • Welsh, D.S.B., Luthans, F., & Sommer, S. (1993). “Managing Russian Factory Workers: The Impact US-Based Behavioral and Participative Technique”, Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 58-79.
  • Wright, J.C. & W.M. (1987). “A Conditional Approach to Dispositional Constructs: the Local Predictability of Social Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 1159-77.