Evaluation of SP anomalies caused by two dimensional sheet like structures with different inversion techniques

Usage of the least squares and inversion methods are commonly applied to the geophysical data analysis. Solution of the theoretical anomalies of inclined sheet like bodies for the self-potential method were compared by writing a Fortran based computer program which is using simple iterative methods with damped least squares (Marquardt-Levenberg) algorithm. As a result of theoretical model studies, model parameters have been reached with very little number of iterations at the small error limits. Applied Marquardt-Levenberg method damping factor has been carried out automatically in the program depending on converging and non-converging conditions. Depth, horizontal length and starting point (?0) parameters of the inclined sheet model were obtained within low error limits compared with the iteration methods for model and real field data.

___

  • [1] Corwin RF. “The self-potential method and its engineering applications; an overview”. 54th Annual International Meeting of Society of Exploration Geophysicists Expanded Abstracts, Session SP.1, Tulsa, USA, 6-7 December 1984.
  • [2] Markiewicz RD, Davenport GC, Randall JA. “The use of self-potential surveys in geotechnical investigations”. 54th Annual International Meeting of Society of Exploration Geophysicists Expanded Abstracts, Session SP. 6, Tulsa, USA, 6-7 December 1984.
  • [3] Yungul S. “Interpretation of spontaneous polarization anomalies caused by spherical ore bodies”. Geophysics, 15, 237-246, 1950.
  • [4] Meiser P. “A method of quantitative interpretation of self-potential measurements”. Geophysical Prospecting, 10, 203-218, 1962.
  • [5] Corwin RF, Hoover DB. “The self-potential method in geothermal exploration”. Geophysics, 44, 226-245, 1979.
  • [6] Fitterman DV, Corwin RF. “Inversion of self-potential data from the Cerro-Prieto geothermal field, Mexico”. Geophysics, 47, 938-948, 1982.
  • [7] Anderson LA. “Self-potential investigations in the Puhimau thermal area, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii”. 54th Annual International Meeting of Society of Exploration Geophysicists Expanded Abstracts, Session EM.3.5, Tulsa, USA, 6-7 December 1984.
  • [8] Yasukawa K, Ishido T, Suzuki I. “Geothermal reservoir monitoring by continuous self-potential measurements, Mori geothermal field, Japan”. Geothermics, 34(5), 551-567, 2005.
  • [9] Nordiana, MM, Olugbenga AT, Snabila MAS, Ismail NEH. “The application of 2-D resistivity and self-potential (SP) methods in determining the water flow”. Journal of Physics: IOP Conference Series, 995, 1-9, 2018.
  • [10] Bakhshipour Z, Bujang BKH, Shaharin I, Afshin Asadi A, Kura NU. “Application of geophysical techniques for 3d geohazard mapping to delineate cavities and potential sinkholes in the northern part of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia”. The Scientific World Journal, 1-11, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/629476
  • [11] Jardani A, Revil A, Akoa F, Schmutz M, Florsch N, Dupont J P. “Least squares inversion of self-potential (SP) data and application to the shallow flow of ground water in sinkholes”. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L19306, doi:10.1029/2006GL027458, 2006.
  • [12] Jardani A, Revil A, Dupont, JP. “Self‐potential tomography applied to the determination of cavities”. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L13401, doi: 10.1029/2006GL026028, 2006.
  • [13] Schiavone D, Quarto R. “Detection of cavities by the self-potential method”. First Break, 14(11), 419-430, 1996.
  • [14] Satyanarayana Murty BV, Haricharen P. “Nomogram for the complete interpretation of spontaneous potential profiles over sheet-like and cylindrical two-dimensional sources”. Geophysics, 50, 1127-1135, 1985.
  • [15] Bhattacharya BB, Roy N. “A note on the use of a nomogram for self-potential anomalies”. Geophysical Prospecting, 29, 102-107, 1981.
  • [16] DeWitte L. “A new method of interpretation of self-potential data”. Geophysics, 13, 600-608, 1948.
  • [17] Paul MK, Datta S, Banerjee B. “Interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to localized causative bodies”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 61, 95-100, 1965.
  • [18] Atchuta Rao D, Ram Babu HV. “Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to two-dimensional sheet-like bodies”. Geophysics, 48, 1659-1664, 1983.
  • [19] Abdelrahman EM, Sharafeldin MS. “A least-squares approach to depth determination from self-potential anomalies caused by horizontal cylinders and spheres”. Geophysics, 62, 44-48, 1997.
  • [20] Abdelrahman EM, El-Araby TM, Ammar AA, Hassanein, HI. “A least-squares approach to shape determination from residual self-potential anomalies”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 150, 121-128, 1997.
  • [21] Abdelrahman EM, El-Araby HM, Hassaneen AG, Hafez MA. “New methods for shape and depth determination from SP data”. Geophysics, 68, 1202-1210, 2003.
  • [22] Abdelrahman EM, Ammar AA, Sharafeldin SM, Hassanein HI. “Shape and depth solutions from numerical horizontal self-potential gradients”. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 37, 31-43, 1997.
  • [23] Abdelrahman EM, Ammar AA, Hassanein HI, Hafez MA. “Derivative analysis of SP anomalies”. Geophysics, 63, 890-897, 1998.
  • [24] Abdelrahman EM, Hassaneen AGh, Hafez MA. “Interpretation of self-potential anomalies over two-dimensional plates by gradient analysis”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 152, 773-780, 1998.
  • [25] Guptasarma D. “Effect of surface polarization on resistivity modeling”. Geophysics, 48, 98-106, 1983.
  • [26] Furness P. “Modelling spontaneous mineralization potentials with a new integral equation”. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 29, 143-155, 1992.
  • [27] Shi W, Morgan FD. “Non-uniqueness in self-potential inversion”. 66th Annual International Meeting of Society of Exploration Geophysicists Expanded Abstracts, Denver, USA, 10-15 November 1996.
  • [28] Abdelrahman EM, El-Araby TM. “An iterative approach to depth determination from moving average residual self-potential anomalies”. Journal of King Abdulaziz University, Earth Sciences, 9, 7-26, 1997.
  • [29] Candra, AD, Wahyu Srigutomo, Sungkono, Jaya Santosa BJ. “A Complete Quantitative Analysis of Self-Potential Anomaly Using Singular Value Decomposition Algorithm”. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25-27 November 2014.
  • [30] El-Kaliouby HM, Al-Garni MA. “Inversion of self-potential anomalies caused by 2D inclined sheets using neural networks”. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 6, 29-34, 2009.
  • [31] Abdelazeem M, Gobashy, M. “Self-Potential inversion using genetic algorithm”. Journal of King Abdulaziz University, Earth Sciences, 17, 83-101, 2006.
  • [32] Sweilant NH, El-Metwally K, Abdelazeem M. “Self-potential signal inversion to simple polarized bodies using the particle swarm optimization method: a visibility study”. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 6(1), 195-208, 2007.
  • [33] S. Essa, KS. “A particle swarm optimization method for interpreting self-potential anomalies”. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering,16, 463-477, 2019.
  • [34] Abdelazeema M, Gobashy M, Khalil, MH, Abdraboub M. “A complete model parameter optimization from self-potential data using Whale algorithm”. Journal of Applied Geophysics 170, 1-11, 2019.
  • [35] Atchuta Rao D, Ram Babu HV, Silvakumar Sinha GDJ. “A fourier transform method for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to the two-dimensional inclined sheets of finite depth extent”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 120, 365-374, 1982.
  • [36] Roy SVS, Mohan NL. “Spectral interpretation of self-potential anomalies of some simple geometric bodies”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 78, 66-77, 1984.
  • [37] Abdelrahman EM, Hassaneen AGH, Hafez, MA. “A least-squares approach for interpretation of self-potential anomaly over a two dimensional inclined sheet”. Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering, 24, 35-42, 1999.
  • [38] Roy A, Chowdhury DK. “Interpretation of self-potential data for tabular bodies”. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 3, 35-54, 1959.
  • [39] Atchuta Rao D, Ram Babu HV, Silvakumar Sinha GDJ. “A fourier transform method for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to the two-dimensional inclined sheets of finite depth extent”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 120, 365-374, 1982.
  • [40] Demidovich BP, Maron IA. Computational Mathematics. Moscow, Russia, Mir Publication, 1973.
  • [41] Marquardt DW. “An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters”. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11, 431-441, 1963.