Betül TUĞCU, Çiğdem ÇOŞKUN, Ulviye YİĞİT, Şule KESKİN

Sensoryal Heterotropyalı Hastaların Klinik Özellikleri

Amaç: Sensoryal heterotropyalı hastaların klinik özelliklerini değerlendirmekYöntem ve Gereçler: Sensoryal heterotropya tanısı alan hastaların kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Kaymanıntipi, etyolojisi, organik patoloji varlığı ve görme kaybının geliştiği yaş kaydedildi. Sonuçlar: Toplam 164 olgunun 120 (%73.2) sinde ezotropya, 44 (%26.8) ünde ekzotropya saptandı. 102 (%62.2)hastada konjenital görme kaybı var idi; 73 (%71.6) ünde ezotropya, 29 (%28.4 )unda ekzotropya gelişti. 62 (%37.8)hastada edinsel görme kaybı var idi; 7 (%11.3)sinde ezotropya, 55 (%88.7) inde ekzotropya gelişti. Kayma başlan- gıç yaş ortalaması ezotropyalarda 4,8 iken ekzotropyalarda 9,1 idi. Başlangıç yaşı ve kaymanın tipi arasında istatis- tiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p

Clinical Characteristics In Patients With Sensory Heterotropia

Aim: Assess the clinical characteristics of patients with sensory heterotropia. Material And Method: The records of the patients diagnosed with sensory heterotropia were assessed as retrospecti- vely. Type of strabismus, etiology, organic pathology and the age of onset at visual loss were recorded. Results: Of the 164 patients, 120 (73.2%) developed esotropia, 44 (26.8%) developed exotropia. 102 (62.2%) pati- ents had congenital vision loss; 73 (71.5%) developed esotropia, 29 (28.4%) developed exotropia. 62 (37.8%) pati- ents had acquired vision loss; 7 (11.3%) developed esotropia, 55 (88.7%) developed exotropia. The average age atonset of deviation was 4,8 in esotropia and 9,1 in exotropia. A significant difference was noted between age at onsetand type of horizontal strabismus (p

PDF

___

1. von Noorden GK. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus, cd 4. St Louis, CV Mosby, 1996.
2. Sidirako Y, von Noorden GK. Observations in sensory heterotro- pia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1982;19:12-19.
3. Bielschowsky A: Über die relative Ruhelage der Augen. Ber Vers Deutsch Ophthal Ges 1913;34:67.
4. Chavasse FB: in Worths Squint. London, Bailliere, Tindall&Cox, 1939, pp 172-176.
5. Hamburger FA: Stellungsanomalien, in Velhagen K: Der Augenar- zt. Stuttgart, G Thieme, 1960, vol 3, p 88.
6. Duke Elder S, Wybar K. Ocular Motility and Strabismus, System of Ophthalmology. St Louis, CV Mosby, 1973;6:238.
7. Yoon KC, You IC, Park YG. Clinical Analysis of Sensory Strabis- mus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2002; 43 No.12:2483-2488.
8. Kim KS, Park SC. The Clinical Consideration of Sensory Strabis- mus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005 Feb;46(2):316-322.
9. Havertape SA, Cruz OA, Chu FC. Sensory Strabismus- Eso or Exo?. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2001;38:327-330.
10. Ing MR, Pang SW. The racial distribution of strabismus. Proceed- ings of the 3rd meetingof the International Strabismological As- sociation;1978; p:107-10.
11. Bielschowsky A. Lectures on motor anomalies II. The theory of heterotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 1938;21:1129-1936.
12. Jampolsky A. Ocular divergence mechanisms. Trans Am Ophthal- mol Soc 1970;68:730-822.
13. Kim IG, Park JM, Lee SJ. Factors associated with the direction of ocular deviation in sensory horizontal strabismus and unilateral or- ganic ocular problems. Korean J Ophthalmol 2012;26(3):199-202.