The Lessons to be taken from the European Union's Great Depression: "The Welfare State Policies and the Clustering of the RDI Related Economic Sectors" are indispensable for the long-term economic success

Bu makalede Avrupa Birliği'nin (AB) iktisadi geleceği analiz edilmekte, ve son dönemde AB'nin iktisadi sorunlarının ve yavaşlamasının, üye devletleri bağlayan 'ortak olarak tanımlanmış makro düzey ekonomik yönetişim parametreleri' eksikliğine bağlı olduğu, savunulmaktadır. Uzun yıllardır AB siyasa yapıcıları, AB'yi, sosyal devlet politikaları ile piyasaların dengelendiği bir model haline dönüştürme yerine, büyük ölçüde koordinasyonsuz bir tek pazarın bütünleşme için yeterli görüldüğü bir sağ liberal modele doğru dönüştürdüler. Ayrıca, iktisadi politikalar açısından da, endüstriyel-sektörel kümelenmenin önemi, özellikle Ar-Ge/İnovasyon kapasitesinin arttırılması bağlamında, oldukça hafife alındı. Sonuç olarak da, reel sektörün nispeten örgütsüzplansız durumu (gerek mal ve gerek hizmet üretiminde) AB'nin küresel rekabet gücünü oldukça azaltmıştır. Bu bağlamda, bu makale, AB bünyesindeki başarılı bir ekonomik yönetişim modelinin gelişimi için 'siyaset' kurumunun öneminin altını çizmekte, ve güçlü 'sosyal devlet politikaları' ile desteklenmiş, 'merkezi planlama ve kümelenme tabanlı' bir uluslar-üstü ekonomik modeli, önermektedir.

Avrupa Birliği'nin Büyük Buhranı'ndan alınacak dersler: "Sosyal Devlet Politikaları ve AR-GE/İnovasyon Bağlantılı İktisadi Sektörlerin Kümelenmesi" uzun vadeli iktisadi başarı için kaçınılmazdır

This paper focuses on the economic future of the European Union (EU) and argues that the EU's economic problems and its recent economic slowdown are consequences of the highly deficient 'commonly defined macro level economic governance parameters' that bind all the member-states today. Instead of balancing the markets with the welfare state policies, the EU policy makers have gradually transformed the EU to a purely right-wing project, where the greatly uncoordinated single market is considered as a sufficient base for integration. Also, with regards to economic policymaking, the importance of industrialsectoral clusters; particularly for improving RDI (Research & Development & Innovation) capacities; has been highly underestimated. As a result, the relatively unorganized status of the real sectors (both in the production of goods and services) has further decreased the EU's global competitiveness. In this context, following the underlining of 'politics' for successful economic governance, this paper offers a 'central planning-clustering based' supranational economic model for the EU, which still necessitates backing by strong 'welfare state policies'.

___

  • AGHION, P. and HOWITT, P. (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press Cambridge.
  • ALT, D., LASSEN, D. D. and WEHNER, J. (2014), "It Isn't Just about Greece: Domestic Politics, Transparency and Fiscal Gimmickry in Europe", British Journal of Political Science, Oct., Volume 44, Issue 4, 707-716.
  • ARROW, K. (1962), "The economic implications of learning by doing", The Review of Economic Studies-Oxford Journals, Volume 29, Issue 3, 155-173.
  • BAUMAN, Z. (1999), In Search of Politics, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • BERGSTEN, C. F. (2012), "Why the Euro Will Survive?", Foreign Affairs, Sep/Oct, Vol. 91, Issue 5, 16-22.
  • BROOKS, C. and MANZA J. (2006), "Why Do Welfare States Persist?", Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 4, 816-827.
  • DAHL, R. A. (1992), "Why Free Markets Are Not Enough?", Journal of Democracy, Vol. 3, No. 3, July, 82-89.
  • DEDMAN, M. J. (1996), The Origins and the Development of the European Union 1945-1995: A History of European Integration, Routledge, London.
  • DELORS, J. (2012), "Economic Governance in the European Union: Past, Present and Future", Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 51, No. 2, 169-178. DERIN, P. (2003), Endogenous Growth Testing in the European Union and Developing Countries: Taxation, Public Expenditure and Growth, Unpublished MSc Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University.
  • DINAN, D. (2004), Europe Recast: A History of European Union, Lynne Rienner Publishers, London.
  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, London.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION REPORT (2003), Final Report of the Expert Group on Enterprise Clusters and Networks, Brussels.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION REPORT (2008), The role of the Maritime Clusters in Enhancing the Strength and Development Level of the European Maritime Sectors, Brussels.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION REPORT (2011), Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION REPORT (2014), R&D Expenditure of the EU member states. (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/R_%26_D_expenditure)
  • GEHRING, T. (1996), "Integrating Integration Theory", Global Society, Vol. 10., No. 3, 225-253.
  • GIDDENS, A. G. (1994), Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • GIDDENS, A. G. (2000), The Third Way and Its Critics, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • GRABBE, H. (2002), "European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire", International Political Science Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 249-268.
  • GRAZIANO, P. (2003), "Europeanisation or Globalisation?", Global Social Policy, Vol. 3, No. 2, 173-194.
  • HABERMAS, J., (2000) "Beyond the Nation-State?" in Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation?, Eds. Eriksen, E. O. and Fossum, J. E., Routledge, London, pp. 29-42.
  • KAMINADA, C. K., GOUDSWAARD, K. and OLAF, V. V. (2010), "Patterns of Welfare State Indicators in the EU: Is there Convergence", Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 48, Issue 3, 529-556.
  • KORPI, W. (2003), "Welfare State Regress in Western Europe: Politics, Institutions, Globalisation and Europeanisation", Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 29, 589-609.
  • KVIST, J. (2004), "Does EU Enlargement Start a Race to the Bottom? Strategic Interaction among EU Member States in Social Policy", Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 301-318.
  • LANE, P. R. (2012), "The European Sovereign Debt Crisis", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 26, No. 3, 49-68.
  • LEVI-FAUR, D. (2004), "On the 'Net Impact' of Europeanisation: The EU's Telecoms and Electricity Regimes Between the Global and the National", Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 3-29.
  • LUCAS, R. E. (1988), "On the Mechanics of Economic Development", Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, 3-42.
  • MAJONE, G. (1999), "The Regulatory State and Its Legitimacy Problems", West European Politics, Vol. 22, Issue 1, 1-24.
  • MCCARTHY, W. E. J (1972), Trade Unions, McCarthy, Penguin Books, London.
  • MITRANY, D. (1966), A Working Peace System, Chicago, Quadrangle Books.
  • NICOLAIDIS, K. (2013), "European Demoicracy and Its Crisis", Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 51, No 2, 351-369.
  • PARENTE, S. (2001), "Failure of Endogenous Growth", Knowledge, Technology & Policy, Vol. 13, No 4, 49-58.
  • PLÜMPER, T. and SCHNEIDER, C. J. (2007), "Discriminatory European Union Membership and the Redistribution of Enlargement Gains", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 51, No. 4, 568-587.
  • POLANYI, K. (2001), The Great Transformation, Beacon Press, New York.
  • PORTER, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York.
  • PORTER, M. E. (1998), "Clusters and the New Economics of Competition", Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec98, Vol. 76, Issue 6, 77-90.
  • POWELL, M. and HEWITT (2002), Welfare State and Welfare Change, Open University Press, Buckingham.
  • PRZEWORSKI, A. (1991), Capitalism and Social Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • REBELO, S. (1991), "Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth", The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 3, 500-521.
  • ROMER, P. M. (1986), "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth", The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, Issue 5, 1002-1037.
  • ROMER, P. M. (1990), "Endogenous Technological Change", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, 71-102.
  • ROSAMOND, B. (2000), Theories of European Integration, Palgrave, New York.
  • SCHARPF, F. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • SEIRFERLING, M. (2013), Stock-Flow Adjustments, Government's Integrated Balance Sheet and Fiscal Transparency, International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/13/63.
  • SOLOW, R. M. (1970), Growth Theory: An Exposition, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • THOMSON REUTERS REPORT (2013), Top 100 Innovators of the World, (http://top100innovators.com)
  • TSAROUHAS, D. and LADI, S. (2013), "Globalisation and/or Europeanisation? The Case of Flexicurity", New Political Economy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 480-502.
  • UZAWA, H. (1965), "Optimum Technical Change in An Aggregative Model of Economic Growth", International Economic Review, Vol. 6, No. 1., 18-31.
  • VON HAGEN, J and WOLFF, G. B. (2006), "What do Deficits tell us about Debt? Empirical Evidence on Creative Accounting with Fiscal Rules in the EU", Journal of Banking and Finance, Dec., Vol. 30, No. 12, 3257-3279.
  • WALLACE, H. (2000), "Europeanisation and Globalisation: Complementary or Contradictory Trends?", New Political Economy, Vol. 5, No. 3, 369-382.
  • WORLD BANK REPORT (2013), Science and Technology, (http://data.worldbank.org/topic/science-and-technology)
ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1010-9935
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: ODTÜ İİBF