Kayıtdışı çalışma ile yaşam ve iş memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Birlikte değişim analizinin bulguları

Bu çalışma, ücretli çalışanlar arasında kayıtdışı çalışma ile yaşam ve iş memnuniyeti arasındaki bağıntıyı araştırdı. Birlikte değişim analizi kapsamında, 2004-2012 dönemini içeren Türkiye Yaşam Memnuniyet Araştırmasının verileri kullanılarak, Sıralı Probit ve Sıradan En Küçük Kareler yöntemleriyle kayıtdışı çalışmanın çeşitli memnuniyet ölçümlerine etkileri tahmin edildi. Bulgular, kayıtdışı çalışma ile yaşam ve iş memnuniyet ölçümlerinin birlikte negatif yönde değiştiğini işaret etti. Ayrıca, kayıtdışı çalışma ile memnuniyet ölçümleri arasındaki negatif bağıntının cinsiyet, yaş ve eğitim gruplarına göre nasıl değiştiği incelendi. Alt grupların tümünde, bu negatif ilişkinin bulunduğu belirlendi. Ancak bazı memnuniyet ölçümlerinin incelenmesinde, kadınlar, üniversite mezunları ve yaşlılar arasında, kayıtdışı çalışmanın olumsuz etkisinin zayıfladığı yönünde bulgulara ulaşıldı.

Informal employment and life and job satisfaction: A statistical association analysis

This study examines the statistical association between salaried employees informal status and their life and job satisfaction. In the framework of the association analysis, using data from the Turkey Life Satisfaction Survey for the 2004-2012 time period, Ordered Probit and Ordinary Least Squares Methods were implemented to estimate the impact of informal employment on various measures of satisfaction. Estimation results suggest that informal employment is negatively related to the life- and job-satisfaction measures. This negative association remains robust across different specifications and estimation procedures. Furthermore, the study also evaluates the extent to which the negative associations between informal employment and satisfaction measures differ across gender, age, and education groups. The analysis highlights that the adverse consequences of informal employment are prevalent in all sub-groups. For some measures of satisfaction, however, there is some evidence that these negative consequences are weaker among women, university graduates, and older individuals.

___

AMARAL, P. ve QUINTIN, E. (2006), A competitive model of the informal sector, Journal of Monetary Economics, 53 (7), 1541-1553.
ASKENAZY, P. ve CAROLI, E. (2006), Innovative work practices, information, technologies, and working conditions: Evidence for France, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2321.
BAŞKAYA, Y. S. ve HÜLAGÜ, T. (2011), Informal-formal worker wage gap in Turkey: Evidence from a semi-parametric approach, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Working Paper No: 11/15.
CHEN, A.M. (2012), The informal economy: definitions, theories and policies, WIEGO Working Paper No: 1.
DOLAN, P., PEASGOOD, T. ve WHITE, M. (2008), Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subj ective well-being, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29 (1), 94-122.
DOLAN, P. ve FUJIWARA, D. (2012), Valuing adult learning: Comparing wellbeing valuation to contingent valuation, Department for Business Innovation & Skills, BIS Research Paper Number No.85.
FIELDS, G. (2004), Dualism in the labor market: A perspective on the Lewis model after half a century, The Manchester School, 72 (6), 724-735.
FIELDS, G. (2009), Segmented labor markets in developing countries, Erişim tarihi: 28.06.2015, http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/162/
FLANAGAN, J. R. (2006), Globalization, labor conditions: Working conditions and worker rights in a global economy, New York, Oxford University Press.
FUJIWARA, D. ve CAMPBELL, R. (2011), Valuation techniques for social cost-benefit analysis: Stated preference, revealed preference, and subj ective well-being approaches, a discussion of the current issues. Department for Work and Pensions.
HECKMAN, J. J. (1976), The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables, Annals of Economic Social Measurement, 5 (4), 475-492.
GÜNTHER, I. ve LAUNOV, A. (2012), Informal employment in developing countries: Opportunity or last resort?, Journal of Development Economics, 97 (1), 88-98.
HOSSEINI, H. (2012), Arthus Lewiss dualism, the literature of development economics, and the less developed economies, Review of European Studies, 4 (4), 132-140. ILO (International Labor Organization). (2013), Global employment trends for youth 2013: A generation at risk, Geneva.
KÜMBETOĞLU, B., USER, İ. ve AKPINAR, A. (2012). Kayıp işçi kadınlar: Kayıtdışı çalışmaya dair bir alan araştırması. İstanbul, Bağlam Yayıncılık.
LEWIS, A. (1954), Economic development with unlimited surplus of labor, The Manchester School, 22 (2), 139-191.
MALONEY, F. W. (2004), Informality revisited, World Development, 32 (7), 1159-1178.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2009), Promoting pro-poor growth employment. Paris, OECD Publishing.
PAGES, C., ve MADRIGAL, L. (2008), Is informality a good measure of job quality? Evidence from Job Satisfaction Data, Working Paper No. 654, Inter-American Development Bank.
PERRY, E. G., MALONEY, F. W., ARIAS, S. O., FAJNZYLBER, P., MASON D. A., ve SAAVEDRA-CHANDUVI, J. (2007), Informality: Exit and exclusion. Washington D.C., World Bank.
POWDTHAVEE, N. (2008), Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37 (4), 1459-1480.
PORTES, A., ve SASSEN-KOOB, S. (1987), Making it underground: comparative material on the informal sector in western market economies American Journal of Sociology, 93 (1), 30-61.
PRATAP, S. ve QUINTIN, E. (2006), Are labor markets segmented in developing countries? A semiparametric approach, European Economic Review, 50 (7), 1817-1841.
SADULLAH, Ö. (2013), İnsan kaynakları bölümüne giriş: İnsan kaynakları yönetiminin tanımı, önemi ve çevresel faktörler, İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi içinde, Ed. İ.Ü İşletme Fakültesi, İstanbul, Beta Yayıncılık.
TANSEL, A. (1997), Informal sector earning determination in Turkey, ERF, Regional Trade, Finance and Labor Markets in Transition, Conference Proceedings, September, 7-9, 1997, Beirut, Lebanon: 153-161.
――――(1999), Formal versus informal sector choice of wage earners and their wages in Turkey, Economic Research Forum, Working Paper No. 9927.
――――(2000), Türkiyede ücretlilerin formel ve enformel kesim seçimleri ve ücretleri Enformel Kesim I içinde, Ed. Tuncer Bulutay, Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, 2000, Ankara.
――――(2001), Wage earners, self employed and gender in the informal sector in Turkey, Economic Research Forum. Working Paper No. 2001.
TANSEL, A., ve KAN, O. E. (2012a), The formal/informal employment earnings gap: Evidence from Turkey, IZA Discussion Paper No.6556.
――――(2012b), Labor mobility across the formal/informal divide in Turkey: Evidence from individual level data, IZA Discussion Paper No. 6271.
TANSEL, A., ve GAZİOĞLU, Ş. (2014), Management-employee relations, firm size and job satisfaction, International Journal of Manpower, 35 (8), 1260-1275.
TODARA, P. M., ve SMITH, C. S. (2012), Economic development, 11th edition. Boston, Addision Wesley.
TUNALI, İ., ERCAN, H., BAŞLEVENT, C., ÖZTÜRK, D. O., AKCİĞİT, U. (2003), Backgorund study on labor market and employment in Turkey. Italy, Europe Training Foundation.
YERELİ, B. A. ve KARADENİZ, O. (2004), Kayıtdışı istihdam. Ankara, Odak Yayınevi.
WORLD BANK (2010). Informality: Causes, consequences, policies. Turkey country economic memorandum, Report No. 48523-TR, Washington D.C.