Durable and nondurable consumption, health and education expenditures over the life-cycle in Turkey

Bu çalışmanın amacı 2003 Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketini kullanarak Türkiye’de hanehalklarının tüketimlerinin ve tüketimin bileşenlerinin yaşam döngüsü profillerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmanın temel bulguları şunlardır: Yaşam döngüsü modelinin savunduğunun aksine Türkiye’de tüketim gelirle beraber hareket etmektedir, ancak eşdeğer hane büyüklüğüne göre çizilen tüketim profilleri çok daha yataydır. Her ne kadar bu sonuç yaşam döngüsü modelini destekler nitelikteyse de halen bazı yaşam döngüsü dinamikleri gözlenmektedir. Diğer önemli sonuçlar ise şunlardır: i) Gelişmiş ülkelerdeki bulunan sonuçların aksine Türkiye’deki hanehalklarının dayanıklı mallara ilişkin tüketim profilleri çok daha geç yaşlarda en yüksek noktasına ulaşmaktadır. ii) Cepten sağlık harcamaları, büyük ihtimalle Türkiye’deki kapsamlı sosyal güvenlik sistemi sayesinde, yaşam döngüsü boyunca sabit bir seyir izlemektedir. iii) Hanehalkı reisinin eğitim seviyesine göre türetilen eğitim harcamaları profillerine bakıldığında eğitim grupları arasında büyük farklılıklar gözlenmektedir. Bu da az eğitimli ailelerin çocuklarının düşük beşeri sermaye tuzağında kalmalarına yol açabilmektedir.

Türkiye’de dayanıklı, dayanıksız malların tüketiminin ve sağlık ve eğitim harcamalarının yaşam döngüsü analizleri

In this paper, we investigate the life-cycle profiles of household consumption and its components in Turkey using the 2003 Turkish Household Budget Survey. We find that consumption tracks income quite closely over the life-cycle, which contradicts the implication of the life-cycle model. However, the adult-equivalent consumption profile is much flatter. Although this could be interpreted in favor of the life-cycle model, some life-cycle dynamics are still apparent in the adult-equivalent consumption profile. Other major findings are: i) The durable consumption profile of Turkish households peaks at a much later age than those of their counterparts in developed countries. ii) Out-of-pocket health expenditures are quite constant over the life-cycle, which is likely to stem from the Turkish Social Security System. iii) There is substantial difference in education expenditures according to the household head’s education, which suggests that children with less-educated parents might be mired in a low human-capital trap.

___

  • AKÇIN, O. and ALPER, E. (1999), “Aggregate Consumption and Permanent Income: An Empirical Investigation for Turkey”, METU Studies in Development, 26 (1-2), 1-23.
  • AKTAS, A., GUNER, D., GURSEL, S. and UYSAL, G. (2012), “Structural Determinants of Household Savings in Turkey: 2003-2008”, Working Papers 007, Bahcesehir University, Betam.
  • ATTANASIO, O. P. (1994), “Personal saving in the United States". In James M. Poterba (Ed.), International Comparisons of Household Saving (pp57-123). The University of Chicago Press.
  • ATTANASIO, O. P. and BROWNING, M. (1995), “Consumption over the Life Cycle and over the Business Cycle”, American Economic Review, 85(4), 1118-1137.
  • ATTANASIO, O. P. and WEBER, G. (1995), Is consumption growth consistent with intertemporal optimization? Evidence from the consumer expenditure survey. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6), 1121-1157.
  • ATTANASIO, O. P. and SZÉKELY, M. (2000), “Household saving in developing countries – inequality, demographics and all that: How different are Latin America and South East Asia?” .Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department, Working Paper No:427.
  • BANKS, J. and BLUNDELL, R. (1994), “Household saving behavior in the United Kingdom.” In James M. Poterba (Ed.), International Comparisons of Household Saving (pp. 169-206). The University of Chicago Press.
  • BURBIDGE, J.B. and DAVIES, J.B., (1994), “Household data on saving behavior in Canada.” In James M. Poterba (Ed.), International Comparisons of Household Saving (pp. 11-56). The University of Chicago Press.
  • CARROLL, C. D. and. SUMMERS, L. H. (1991), “Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence”. In B. D.Bernheim and J. B. Shoven (Ed.), National Saving and Economic Perf ormance, (pp. 305-43). Chicago University Press for NBER.
  • CERITOĞLU, E. (2013a), “Household Expectations and Household Consumption Expenditures: The Case of Turkey”, Working Papers 1310, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • CERITOĞLU, E. (2013b), “The impact of labour income risk on household saving decisions in Turkey”, Review of Economics of the Household, 11(1), 109-129.
  • CİLASUN, S. M and KIRDAR, M. G. (2013), “Household Structure, and Household Income and Its Components over the Life-Cycle in Turkey”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 28(318), 89-116.
  • CORBO, V. and SCHMIDT-HEBBEL, K. (1991), “Public policies and saving in developing countries”, Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, 36(1), 89-115.
  • DUYGAN, B. (2005), “Aggregate Shocks, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Durable Goods Purchases: Evidence from Turkey’s 1994 Financial Crisis”, EUI Finance and Consumption Program Working Paper.
  • DUYGAN, B. (2006), “Welfare Cost of Financial Crises when Risk-Sharing is Imperfect: Evidence from Turkey” in EUI Finance and Consumption Program Working Paper.
  • DUYGAN, B. and GÜNER, N. (2007), “Income and Consumption Inequality in Turkey: What Role does Education Play?”. In S. Altuğ and A. Filiztekin (Ed.), The Turkish Economy: The Real Economy, Corporate Governance and Ref orm and Stabilization Policy (pp. 63-91). Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Studies.
  • FRIEDMAN, M. (1957), A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • HALL, R. E. (1978), “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, 86(6), 971-987.
  • HALVORSEN, E. (2003), “A Cohort Analysis of Household Saving in Norway”, Statistics Norway, Research Department, Discussion Paper, No; 354.
  • HAQUE, N. and MONTIEL, P. (1989), “Consumption in Developing Countries”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 408-15.
  • LOAYZA, N., SCHMIDT-HEBBEL, K. and SERVEN, L. (2000), “Saving in Developing Countries: An overview”, The World Bank Economic Review, 14(3), 393-414.
  • MARKU, M. (2004), “A cohort analysis of consumption and earnings in Iran: 1984-2002”. Paper presented at NEUDC Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  • MODIGLIANI, F. and BRUMBERG, R. (1954), “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data”. In Kenneth K. Kurihara (Ed.), Post-Keynesian Economics (pp. 388-436). New Brunswick, N. J. Rutgers University Press.
  • ÖZMEN, E. and YAVAN, Z. A. (1999), “Aggregate Consumption in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation,” METU ERC Working Paper No: 99/22.
  • POTERBA (1994), International Comparisons of Household Saving. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  • VAN RIJCKEGHEM, C., and ÜÇER, M. (2008), “The evolution and determinants of the Turkish private saving rate: What lessons for policy?” Paper presented at ERF Conference, İstanbul, Turkey.
  • VILLAVERDE, J. and KRUEGER, D. (2004), “Consumption over the Life Cycle: Facts from Consumer Expenditure Survey Data”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 552-565.
  • YÜKSELER, Z. and TÜRKAN, E. (2008), “Türkiye’de hanehalkı: İşgücü, gelir, harcama ve yoksulluk açısından analizi.” TÜSİAD-T/2008-03/455.