Amerika birleşik devletlerinde Arapça öğretimi

Bu makale genel olarak ABDde Arapça öğretiminden bahsetmektedir. Yazar, giriş kısmında, son yıllarda ABDde Arapçaya olan ilgilinin sebebi üzerinde durmuş, Amerikalıların bu dile yaklaşımlarını ortaya koymuş ve artan Arapça öğrenim talebi karşısında üretilen çözümlere yer vermiştir. Daha sonra ABDde Arapça öğretim tarihi hakkında kısaca bilgi verdikten sonra ikidillilik, yani fasih ve ammice dil üzerinde durmuştur. Ardından kulak-dil alışkanlığı ile iletişimsel metodun Arapça öğretiminde kullanımına yer vermiştir. Burada, akademi ve edebiyat dilinden çok aşina olunan günlük konuşma dilinin öncelenmesi gerektiğini ifade etmiş ve dil öğretiminde başarılı modellerden bahsetmiştir. Öğrenciyi dilin içine adeta daldıran Middlebury Modeli, karma ve uzun süreli yoğunluğu esas alan FSI Modeli ile yurtdışı merkezlerde Arapça öğrenimini uygulayan CASA gibi başarılı modeller hakkında bilgi vermiştir. Başarılı modellerin ortak özelliklerinden hareketle yeni bir yol haritası çizen yazar öğretmen eğitimi, Arapça konuşma analizi ve yabancı bir dil olarak Arapça öğrenimi ile ilgili araştırmaların yapılması gerektiği üzerinde durmuştur. Ayrıca Arapçayı veraset yoluyla öğrenen insanların durumu hakkında bilgiler vermiş ve yeni akademik seçenekler üzerinde durmuştur.

Teaching Arabic in the united states

This article, in general, discusses the issue of teaching Arabic language in the United States. The author, Karin C. Ryding, at the beginning of her article, talks about causes and motivations for Americansinterest in Arabic Language in recent years, and solutions to the Arabic teaching profession for handling the increased number of students. Ryding sketches briefly the history of teaching Arabic in the United States, and Diglossia, which refers to a situation in which two or more varieties of the same language exist side by side ( fusha and ammiyah). At this point, she mentions audiolingual and communicative approaches and their usage in Arabic language teaching. She further focuses on assigning more importance to the primary discourses of familiarity than the secondary discourses of literature and the academy. She provides information about some successful programs including the following: The Middlebury Model that immerses learners in Arabic Language, FSI Model which mixes Formal Spoken Arabic with colloquial speech in long-term intensive program and CASA, The Center for Arabic Study Abroad. Based on these successful programs Ryding draws a new roadmap and talks about teacher education, Arabic discourse analysis, research in the acquisition of Arabic as a foreign language and heritage speakers. At the end of the article she offers some new academic options.

___

  • Abboud, Peter, Ernest Abdel-Massih, Salih Altoma, Wallace Erwin, Ernest McCarus and Raji Rammuny. (1971). Modern Standard Arabic Intermediate Level, Three parts. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Near Eastern Studies.
  • Abboud, P. F. & McCarus, E., (Eds.). (1968, 1983). Elementary Modern Standard Arabic. Two volumes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Allen, R. (1992). Teaching Arabic in the United States. In A. Rouchdy (Ed.), The Arabic Language in America (pp. 222-250). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  • Badawi, E. M. (1985). Educated spoken Arabic: A problem in teaching Arabic as a foreign language. In K. R. Jankowsky (Ed.), Scientific and Humanistic Dimensions of Language (pp. 15- 22). Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
  • Bernhardt, E. B. (1998). Sociohistorical perspectives on language teaching in the modern United States. In Byrnes, H. (Ed.), Learning Foreign and Second Languages: Perspectives in Research and Scholarship. (pp. 39-57). New York: Modern Language Association.
  • Brustad, K., Al-Batal, M.,& Al-Tonsi, A. (1995). Alif-Baa: Introduction to Arabic Letters and Sounds. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Brustad, K, (1996). Al-Kitaab fii ta’allum al-‘arabiyya. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Byrnes, Heidi. (2002). Toward academic-level foreign language abilities: Reconsidering foundational assumptions, expanding pedagogical options. In Leaver, B. and Shekhtman, B. (Eds.), Developing Professional-Level Language Proficiency (pp. 34- 58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Coleman, Algernon and Robert Herndon Fife. 1949. An Analytical Bibliography of Modern Language Teaching, 1937-1942. New York: King's Crown. (Editörün Notu: Bernhardt, “Coleman Raporu”na yaptığı referanslar için sadece Coleman ve Fife’yi zikreder.)
  • Cowell, Mark W. 1964, reprint 2005. A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Erwin, Wallace. 1969, reprint 2004. A Basic Course in Iraqi Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Gee, James P. 1998. "What is Literacy?" In Negotiating Academic Literacies: Teaching and Learning across Languages and Cultures, Vivian Zamel and Ruth Spack (Eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 51-59.
  • Harrell, Richard S. 1962, reprint 2004. A Short Reference Grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Hary, B. (1989). Middle Arabic: Proposals for new terminology. Al- Arabiyya 22,19-36.
  • Hary, B. (1996). The importance of the language continuum in Arabic multiglossia. In Elgibali, A. (Ed.), Understanding Arabic: Essays in Contemporary Linguistics in Honor of El-Said Badawi (pp. 69-90). Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.
  • Language Continuum. (2004). George P. Schultz National Foreign Affairs Center, School of Language Studies, Foreign Service Institute, U.S. Department of State. .
  • McCarus, E. (1992). History of Arabic study in the United States. In Rouchdy, A. (Ed.), The Arabic Language in America (pp. 207- 221). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  • Pratt, M. L. (2003). Building a new public idea about language. Profession 2003. New York: Modern Language Association.
  • Ryding, K. (1991). Proficiency despite diglossia: A new approach for Arabic. Modern Language Journal 75: 2, 212-218.
  • Ryding, Karin C. 2005. "A response to Mary Louise Pratt's 'Building a new public idea about language. ' "ADFL Bulletin 36:2:14-16.
  • Ryding, Karin C.(1995). Discourse competence in TAFL: Skill levels and choice of language variety in the Arabic classroom. In Al Batal, M. (Ed.), The Teaching of Arabic as a Foreign Language. (pp. 223-231). Provo, UT: American Association of Teachers of Arabic.
  • Welles, E. B. (2004). "Foreign language enrollments in United States institutions of higher education, fall, 2002" in ADFL Bulletin 35, 2-3: 7-26.