Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğrenimi Bağlamında Başarılı Kelime Öğrenicilerinin Deneyimleri

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin İngilizce kelime dağarcığını ölçmekte ve bildiği kelime sayısı fazla olan öğrencilerin gelişim sürecini, yansıtıcı açıklamalar yoluyla ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmada, veri toplamak ve analiz etmek için, karma desen yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Nicel veriler, İngiliz Dili Eğitimi alanında öğrenim gören 93 üniversite öğrencisinden, kelime dağarcığı testi uygulanarak; nitel veriler ise kelime dağarcığı testinden en yüksek puanları almış olan 11 öğrenci ile yapılan yüz yüze görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, katılımcıların kelime dağarcığının orta-sıklık (6000) ile düşük-sıklık (4000) kelime ailesi arasında olduğunu ve katılımcıların kelime dağarcığının, öğrenim gördükleri yılların artışına paralel olarak doğrusal bir artış göstermediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bilinen kelime sayısında, okulda alınan eğitimden ziyade, bireylerin çocukluklarından üniversiteye kadar olan süreçte okul dışı İngilizceye maruz kalışlarının önemli rol oynadığı gözükmektedir. İngilizce bilgisayar oyunu oynamak, internet sitelerini ziyaret etmek, dizi ve film izlemek biçimindeki teknoloji kullanımı, öğrencilerin, kelime edinme ve akılda tutma sürecini kolaylaştırmaktadır.

Vocabulary Size: Experiences of Successful Vocabulary Learners in EFL Context

This study assesses vocabulary size of university students in an EFL context and unfolds the vocabulary development processes of successful learners through learners’ reflective accounts. The study used a mixed methodology to collect and analyze the data. The quantitative data were collected from 93 university students who major in English Language Teaching (ELT) through vocabulary size test and the qualitative data through interviews with 11 participants who received the highest point from the vocabulary size test. The result of the study indicated that the vocabulary size of university students ranges from mid-frequency (6,000) to low-frequency (14,000) word families and the increase in vocabulary size is not linear from first to last year. It appears that individual learner’s extramural English exposure from childhood to university plays a crucial role in the increase in vocabulary size rather than formal schooling. Technology use in the form of playing computer games, using online sites, and watching TV series and movies facilitate the acquisition and retention of new vocabulary for these successful learners.

___

  • Albaladejo, S. A., Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Songs, stories and vocabulary acquisition in preschool learners of English as a foreign language. System, 76, 116- 128.
  • Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.
  • Anthony, L. (2015). AntWordProfiler (Version 1.4.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda Univeristy. Available at http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
  • Beglar, D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test. Language Testing, 27(1), 101-118.
  • Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research into practice (pp. 223- 242). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498-520.
  • Chen, C. M., Liu, H., & Huang, H. B. (2019). Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning app on learners’ perceptions and learning performance: A case study of Taiwanese EFL learners. RECALL, 31(2), 170-188.
  • Coxhead, A., Nation, I. S. P., & Sim, D. (2014). Creating and trialling six forms of the vocabulary size test. TESOLANZ Journal, 22, 13-26.
  • Coxhead, A., Nation, I. S. P., & Sim, D. (2015). Measuring the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 121-135.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. Boston: Pearson.
  • Genç, G., & Köksal, D. (2021). Foreign language learning effort and use of digital media among digital natives: A case study from an urban secondary school. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 15(1), 17-37.
  • Horst, M., Cobb, T. & Nicolae, H. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on-line database. Language Learning and Technology, 9, 90-110.
  • Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 2632-2640). Chichester: WileyBlackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0530
  • Hulstjin, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539-558.
  • Jensen, S. H. (2016). Gaming as an English language learning resource among young children in Denmark. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 1-19.
  • Keating, G. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language. The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12, 365-386.
  • Khezrelou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 63, 104-116.
  • Kim, Y. J. (2008). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 38, 285-325.
  • Klimova, B. (2018). Mobie phones and/or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1091-1099.
  • Knights, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effect on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 285-299.
  • Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
  • Kuppens, A. H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(1), 65-85.
  • Laufer, B. (2017). The three “I”s of second language vocabulary learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 343-354). New York: Routledge.
  • Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning 54(3), 399-436.
  • Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, R. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 687-711.
  • Lehtonen, T. (2017). “You will certainly learn English much faster at work than from a textbook”- Law students learning English beyond the language classroom. System, 68, 50-59.
  • Luppescu, S., & Day, R. R. (1993). Reading dictionaries and vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 263-279.
  • Mahdi, H. S. (2018). Effectiveness of mobile devices on vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 134-154.
  • Mathews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23-36.
  • Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1988). Vocabulary size as a placement indicator. In P. Grunwell (Ed.) Applied linguistics in society (pp. 80-87). London: CILT
  • Miralpeix, I., & Munoz, C. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. IRAL, 56(1), 1-24.
  • Mondria, J., & Wiersma, B. (2004). Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.). Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 79-100). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
  • Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013). Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System 41(3), 720-739.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 581-595). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2011). Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44(4), 529-539.
  • Nation, P., & Anthony, L. (2017). Measuring vocabulary size. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 355-368). New York: Routledge.
  • Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.
  • Peters, E., Heynen, E., & Puimege, E. (2016). Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134-148.
  • Peters, E., Hulstjin, J. H., Sercu, I., & Lutjeharms, M. (2009). Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning, 59(1), 113-151.
  • Qian, D. D. (1996). ESL vocabulary acquisition. Contextualization and decontextualization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 120-142.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
  • Schmitt, N. (2019). Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 52, 261-274.
  • Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484-503.
  • Socket, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: a dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities, RECALL, 24(2), 138- 151.
  • Sundqvist, P. (2019). Commercial-off-the-shelf games in the digital wild and L2 learner vocabulary. Language Learning and Technology, 23(1), 87-113.
  • Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015). Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65-76.
  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley: Newbury House.
  • Sylven, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. RECALL, 24(3), 302-321.
  • Tegge, F. (2017). The lexical coverage of popular songs in English language teaching. System, 67, 87-98.
  • Uzun, L. (2009). An evaluative checklist for computer games used for foreign language vocabulary learning and practice: VocaWord sample. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 3(1), 45-59.
  • Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335-366.
  • Yu, Z. (2018). Differences in serious game-aided and traditional English vocabulary acquisition. Computers and Education, 127, 214-232.